A genetic algorithm for predicting the structures of interfaces in multicomponent systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent years have seen great advances in our ability to predict crystal structures from first principles. However, previous algorithms have focused on the prediction of bulk crystal structures, where the global minimum is the target. Here, we present a general atomistic approach to simulate in multicomponent systems the structures and free energies of grain boundaries and heterophase interfaces with fixed stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric compositions. The approach combines a new genetic algorithm using empirical interatomic potentials to explore the configurational phase space of boundaries, and thereafter refining structures and free energies with first-principles electronic structure methods. We introduce a structural order parameter to bias the genetic algorithm search away from the global minimum (which would be bulk crystal), while not favouring any particular structure types, unless they lower the energy. We demonstrate the power and efficiency of the algorithm by considering non-stoichiometric grain boundaries in a ternary oxide, SrTiO(3).
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Dillon, S. J., Tang, M., Carter, W. C. & Harmer, M. J. Complexion: A new concept for kinetic engineering in materials science. Acta Mater. 55, 6208–6218 (2007).10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.029 ↗
2. Sun, E. Y. et al. Microstructural design of silicon nitride with improved fracture toughness: II, effects of yttria and alumina additives. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 2831–2840 (1998).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02703.x ↗
3. Chiang, Y.-M., Silverman, L. A., French, R. H. & Cannon, R. M. Thin glass film between ultrafine conductor particles in thick-film resistors. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 1143–1152 (1994).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb05386.x ↗
4. Luo, J., Wang, H. F. & Chiang, Y.-M. Origin of solid-state activated sintering in Bi2O3-doped ZnO. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 916–920 (1999).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01853.x ↗
5. von Alfthan, S., Haynes, P. D., Kaski, K. & Sutton, A. P. Are the structures of twist grain boundaries in silicon ordered at 0 K? Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 055505 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.055505 ↗
6. Xiang, H. J., Da Silva, J. L. F., Branz, H. M. & Su-Huai, W. Understanding the clean interface between covalent Si and ionic Al2O3 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 116101 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.116101 ↗
7. Deaven, D. M. & Ho, K. M. Molecular geometry optimization with a genetic algorithm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 288–291 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.288 ↗
8. Oganov, A. R. & Glass, C. W. Crystal structure prediction using ab initio evolutionary techniques: Principles and applications. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 244704 (2006).10.1063/1.2210932 ↗
9. Zhang, J., Wang, C. Z. & Ho, K. M. Finding the low-energy structures of Si[001] symmetric tilted grain boundaries with a genetic algorithm. Phys. Rev. B 80, 174102 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.80.174102 ↗
10. Morris, G. M. et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 19, 1639–1662 (1998).10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1639::AID-JCC10>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
11. Benedek, N. A., Chua, A.-L. S., Elsässer, C., Sutton, A. P. & Finnis, M. W. Interatomic potentials for strontium titanate: An assessment of their transferability and comparison with density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 78, 064110 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevB.78.064110 ↗
12. Zhang, S. B. & Northrup, J. E. Chemical-potential dependence of defect formation energies in GaAs—application to Ga self-diffusion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2339–2342 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2339 ↗
13. Finnis, M. W., Lozovoi, A. Y. & Alavi, A. The oxidation of NiAl: What can we learn from ab initio calculations? Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 35, 167–207 (2005).10.1146/annurev.matsci.35.101503.091652 ↗
14. Brindle, A. Genetic algorithms for function optimization. Tech. Report TR81-2, (Univ. Alberta, Department of Computer Science, 1981).
15. Goldberg, D. E. & Deb, K. in Foundations of Genetic Algorithms I (ed. Rawlins, G. J. E.) (Morgan Kaufmann, 1991).
16. Zhang, Z. L., Sigle, W., Phillipp, F. & Rühle, M. Direct atom-resolved imaging of oxides and their grain boundaries. Science 302, 846–849 (2003).10.1126/science.1089785 ↗
17. Steinhardt, P. J., Nelson, D. R. & Ronchetti, M. Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses. Phys. Rev. B 28, 784–805 (1983).10.1103/PhysRevB.28.784 ↗
18. Batyrev, I. G., Alavi, A. & Finnis, M. W. Equilibrium and adhesion of Nb/sapphire: The effect of oxygen partial pressure. Phys. Rev. B 62, 4698–4706 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevB.62.4698 ↗
19. Johnston, K., Castell, M. R., Paxton, A. T. & Finnis, M. W. SrTiO3(2×1) reconstructions: First-principles calculations of surface energy and atomic structure compared with scanning tunnelling microscopy images. Phys. Rev. B 70, 085415 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevB.70.085415 ↗
20. Clark, S. J. et al. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. Kristallogr. 220, 567–570 (2005).10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075 ↗