Fictitious phase separation in Li layered oxides driven by electro-autocatalysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Layered oxides widely used as lithium-ion battery electrodes are designed to be cycled under conditions that avoid phase transitions. Although the desired single-phase composition ranges are well established near equilibrium, operando diffraction studies on many-particle porous electrodes have suggested phase separation during delithiation. Notably, the separation is not always observed, and never during lithiation. These anomalies have been attributed to irreversible processes during the first delithiation or reversible concentration-dependent diffusion. However, these explanations are not consistent with all experimental observations such as rate and path dependencies and particle-by-particle lithium concentration changes. Here, we show that the apparent phase separation is a dynamical artefact occurring in a many-particle system driven by autocatalytic electrochemical reactions, that is, an interfacial exchange current that increases with the extent of delithiation. We experimentally validate this population-dynamics model using the single-phase material Lix(Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3)O2 (0.5 < x < 1) and demonstrate generality with other transition-metal compositions. Operando diffraction and nanoscale oxidation-state mapping unambiguously prove that this fictitious phase separation is a repeatable non-equilibrium effect. We quantitatively confirm the theory with multiple-datastream-driven model extraction. More generally, our study experimentally demonstrates the control of ensemble stability by electro-autocatalysis, highlighting the importance of population dynamics in battery electrodes (even non-phase-separating ones).
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Dreyer, W. et al. The thermodynamic origin of hysteresis in insertion batteries. Nat. Mater. 9, 448–453 (2010).10.1038/nmat2730 ↗
2. Zhao, H. & Bazant, M. Z. Population dynamics of driven autocatalytic reactive mixtures. Phys. Rev. E 100, 012144 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevE.100.012144 ↗
3. Lim, J. et al. Origin and hysteresis of lithium compositional spatiodynamics within battery primary particles. Science 353, 566–571 (2016).10.1126/science.aaf4914 ↗
4. Liu, H. et al. Capturing metastable structures during high-rate cycling of LiFePO4 nanoparticle electrodes. Science 344, 1252817 (2014).10.1126/science.1252817 ↗
5. Zhang, X. et al. Rate-induced solubility and suppression of the first-order phase transition in olivine LiFePO4. Nano Lett. 14, 2279–2285 (2014).10.1021/nl404285y ↗
6. Li, Y. et al. Current-induced transition from particle-by-particle to concurrent intercalation in phase-separating battery electrodes. Nat. Mater. 13, 1149–1156 (2014).10.1038/nmat4084 ↗
7. Zhang, W. et al. Kinetic pathways of ionic transport in fast-charging lithium titanate. Science 367, 1030–1034 (2020).10.1126/science.aax3520 ↗
8. Gonzalez-Rosillo, J. C. et al. Lithium-battery anode gains additional functionality for neuromorphic computing through metal–insulator phase separation. Adv. Mater. 32, 1907465 (2020).10.1002/adma.201907465 ↗
9. Yin, S.-C., Rho, Y.-H., Swainson, I. & Nazar, L. F. X-ray/neutron diffraction and electrochemical studies of lithium de/re-intercalation in Li1−xCo1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2 (x = 0 → 1). Chem. Mater. 18, 1901–1910 (2006).10.1021/cm0511769 ↗
10. Choi, J. & Manthiram, A. Role of chemical and structural stabilities on the electrochemical properties of layered LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 cathodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, A1714–A1718 (2005).10.1149/1.1954927 ↗
11. Kondrakov, A. O. et al. Charge-transfer-induced lattice collapse in Ni-rich NCM cathode materials during delithiation. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 24381–24388 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06598 ↗
12. Seidlmayer, S. et al. First-cycle defect evolution of Li1−xNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 lithium ion battery electrodes investigated by positron annihilation spectroscopy. J. Power Sources 336, 224–230 (2016).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.050 ↗
13. Weber, R., Fell, C. R., Dahn, J. R. & Hy, S. Operando X-ray diffraction study of polycrystalline and single-crystal LixNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A2992–A2999 (2017).10.1149/2.0441713jes ↗
14. Bang, H. J., Joachin, H., Yang, H., Amine, K. & Prakash, J. Contribution of the structural changes of LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathodes on the exothermic reactions in Li-ion cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 153, A731–A737 (2006).10.1149/1.2171828 ↗
15. Yoon, W.-S., Chung, K. Y., McBreen, J. & Yang, X.-Q. A comparative study on structural changes of LiCo1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2 and LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 during first charge using in situ XRD. Electrochem. Commun. 8, 1257–1262 (2006).10.1016/j.elecom.2006.06.005 ↗
16. Zhou, Y.-N. et al. High-rate charging induced intermediate phases and structural changes of layer-structured cathode for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600597 (2016).10.1002/aenm.201600597 ↗
17. Robert, R., Bünzli, C., Berg, E. J. & Novák, P. Activation mechanism of LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2: surface and bulk operando electrochemical, differential electrochemical mass spectrometry, and X-ray diffraction analyses. Chem. Mater. 27, 526–536 (2015).10.1021/cm503833b ↗
18. Li, J., Downie, L. E., Ma, L., Qiu, W. & Dahn, J. R. Study of the failure mechanisms of LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 cathode material for lithium ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A1401–A1408 (2015).10.1149/2.1011507jes ↗
19. Grenier, A. et al. Reaction heterogeneity in LiNi0.80Co0.15Al0.05O2 induced by surface layer. Chem. Mater. 29, 7345–7352 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02236 ↗
20. Märker, K., Reeves, P. J., Xu, C., Griffith, K. J. & Grey, C. P. Evolution of structure and lithium dynamics in LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (NMC811) cathodes during electrochemical cycling. Chem. Mater. 31, 2545–2554 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00140 ↗
21. Lee, W. et al. New insight into Ni-rich layered structure for next-generation Li rechargeable batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1701788 (2017).10.1002/aenm.201701788 ↗
22. Grenier, A. et al. Intrinsic kinetic limitations in substituted lithium-layered transition-metal oxide electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 7001–7011 (2020).10.1021/jacs.9b13551 ↗
23. Li, W., Reimers, J. & Dahn, J. In situ X-ray diffraction and electrochemical studies of Li1−xNiO2. Solid State Ion. 67, 123–130 (1993).10.1016/0167-2738(93)90317-V ↗
24. Pillot, C. The rechargeable battery market and main trends 2016–2025. In 34th Annual International Battery Seminar & Exhibit (2017).
25. Newman, J. & Tiedemann, W. Porous-electrode theory with battery applications. AIChE J. 21, 25–41 (1975).10.1002/aic.690210103 ↗
26. Ferguson, T. R. & Bazant, M. Z. Phase transformation dynamics in porous battery electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 146, 89–97 (2014).10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.083 ↗
27. Smith, R. B. & Bazant, M. Z. Multiphase porous electrode theory. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, E3291–E3310 (2017).10.1149/2.0171711jes ↗
28. Wang, Q. et al. Thermal runaway caused fire and explosion of lithium ion battery. J. Power Sources 208, 210–224 (2012).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.038 ↗
29. Tsai, P.-C. et al. Single-particle measurements of electrochemical kinetics in NMC and NCA cathodes for Li-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 860–871 (2018).10.1039/C8EE00001H ↗
30. Fraggedakis, D. et al. A scaling law to determine phase morphologies during ion intercalation. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 2142–2152 (2020).10.1039/D0EE00653J ↗
31. Wasserman, L. Bayesian model selection and model averaging. J. Math. Psychol. 44, 92–107 (2000).10.1006/jmps.1999.1278 ↗
32. Arai, H. et al. Phase transition kinetics of LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 electrodes studied by in situ X-ray absorption near-edge structure and X-ray diffraction analysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 10442–10449 (2013).10.1039/c3ta11637a ↗
33. Dreyer, W., Guhlke, C. & Huth, R. The behavior of a many-particle electrode in a lithium-ion battery. Physica D 240, 1008–1019 (2011).10.1016/j.physd.2011.02.011 ↗
34. Dreyer, W., Guhlke, C. & Herrmann, M. Hysteresis and phase transition in many-particle storage systems. Continuum Mech. Therm. 23, 211–231 (2011).10.1007/s00161-010-0178-1 ↗
35. Bazant, M. Z. Theory of chemical kinetics and charge transfer based on nonequilibrium thermodynamics. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1144–1160 (2013).10.1021/ar300145c ↗
36. Duhem, P. Traité Élémentaire de Mécanique Chimique Pondée sur la Thermodinamique (Librairie Scientifique A. Hermann, 1897–1899).10.1007/BF02742731 ↗
37. Jouguet, E. Observations sur les principes et les théorémes généraux de la statique chimique. J. Éc. Polytech. 21, 61–180 (1921).
38. Kodepudi, D. & Prigogine, I. in Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures 2nd edn, 310–313 (John Wiley & Sons, 2014).10.1002/9781118698723 ↗
39. Guhlke, C., Gajewski, P., Maurelli, M., Friz, P. K. & Dreyer, W. Stochastic many-particle model for LFP electrodes. Continuum Mech. Therm. 30, 593–628 (2018).10.1007/s00161-018-0629-7 ↗
40. Tang, M., Carter, W. C. & Chiang, Y.-M. Electrochemically driven phase transitions in insertion electrodes for lithium-ion batteries: examples in lithium metal phosphate olivines. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 40, 501–529 (2010).10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104435 ↗
41. Carati, D. & Lefever, R. Chemical freezing of phase separation in immiscible binary mixtures. Phys. Rev. E 56, 3127–3136 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevE.56.3127 ↗
42. Bazant, M. Z. Thermodynamic stability of driven open systems and control of phase separation by electro-autocatalysis. Faraday Discuss. 199, 423–463 (2017).10.1039/C7FD00037E ↗
43. Gent, W. E. et al. Persistent state-of-charge heterogeneity in relaxed, partially charged Li1−xNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 secondary particles. Adv. Mater. 28, 6631–6638 (2016).10.1002/adma.201601273 ↗