journal article·2021-09Open access

Programmable icosahedral shell system for virus trapping

Christian Sigl, Elena M. Willner, Wouter Engelen, Jessica A. Kretzmann, Ken Sachenbacher, Anna Liedl, Fenna Kolbe, Florian Wilsch, S. Ali Aghvami, Ulrike Protzer, Michael F. Hagan, Seth Fraden, Hendrik Dietz

Nature Materials· Volume 20· Issue 9

Abstract

Broad-spectrum antiviral platforms that can decrease or inhibit viral infection would alleviate many threats to global public health. Nonetheless, effective technologies of this kind are still not available. Here, we describe a programmable icosahedral canvas for the self-assembly of icosahedral shells that have viral trapping and antiviral properties. Programmable triangular building blocks constructed from DNA assemble with high yield into various shell objects with user-defined geometries and apertures. We have created shells with molecular masses ranging from 43 to 925 MDa (8 to 180 subunits) and with internal cavity diameters of up to 280 nm. The shell interior can be functionalized with virus-specific moieties in a modular fashion. We demonstrate this virus-trapping concept by engulfing hepatitis B virus core particles and adeno-associated viruses. We demonstrate the inhibition of hepatitis B virus core interactions with surfaces in vitro and the neutralization of infectious adeno-associated viruses exposed to human cells.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bacteriophages and microbial interactions · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Lauster, D. et al. Phage capsid nanoparticles with defined ligand arrangement block influenza virus entry. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 373–379 (2020).10.1038/s41565-020-0660-2 ↗
2. Kwon, P. S. et al. Designer DNA architecture offers precise and multivalent spatial pattern-recognition for viral sensing and inhibition. Nat. Chem. 12, 26–35 (2020).10.1038/s41557-019-0369-8 ↗
3. Cao, L. et al. De novo design of picomolar SARS-CoV-2 miniprotein inhibitors. Science 370, 426–431 (2020).10.1126/science.abd9909 ↗
4. Cagno, V., Tseligka, E. D., Jones, S. T. & Tapparel, C. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans and viral attachment: true receptors or adaptation bias? Viruses 11, 596 (2019).10.3390/v11070596 ↗
5. Legendre, M. et al. Thirty-thousand-year-old distant relative of giant icosahedral DNA viruses with a pandoravirus morphology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4274–4279 (2014).10.1073/pnas.1320670111 ↗
6. Bale, J. B. et al. Accurate design of megadalton-scale two-component icosahedral protein complexes. Science 353, 389–394 (2016).10.1126/science.aaf8818 ↗
7. King, N. P. et al. Accurate design of co-assembling multi-component protein nanomaterials. Nature 510, 103–108 (2014).10.1038/nature13404 ↗
8. Lai, Y. T. et al. Structure of a designed protein cage that self-assembles into a highly porous cube. Nat. Chem. 6, 1065–1071 (2014).10.1038/nchem.2107 ↗
9. Butterfield, G. L. et al. Evolution of a designed protein assembly encapsulating its own RNA genome. Nature 552, 415–420 (2017).10.1038/nature25157 ↗
10. Rothemund, P. W. K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297–302 (2006).10.1038/nature04586 ↗
11. Douglas, S. M. et al. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459, 414–418 (2009).10.1038/nature08016 ↗
12. Castro, C. E. et al. A primer to scaffolded DNA origami. Nat. Methods 8, 221–229 (2011).10.1038/nmeth.1570 ↗
13. Veneziano, R. et al. Designer nanoscale DNA assemblies programmed from the top down. Science 352, 1534 (2016).10.1126/science.aaf4388 ↗
14. Benson, E. et al. DNA rendering of polyhedral meshes at the nanoscale. Nature 523, 441–444 (2015).10.1038/nature14586 ↗
15. Dunn, K. E. et al. Guiding the folding pathway of DNA origami. Nature 525, 82–86 (2015).10.1038/nature14860 ↗
16. Bai, X. C., Martin, T. G., Scheres, S. H. & Dietz, H. Cryo-EM structure of a 3D DNA-origami object. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20012–20017 (2012).10.1073/pnas.1215713109 ↗
17. Funke, J. J. & Dietz, H. Placing molecules with Bohr radius resolution using DNA origami. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 47–52 (2016).10.1038/nnano.2015.240 ↗
18. Iinuma, R. et al. Polyhedra self-assembled from DNA tripods and characterized with 3D DNA-PAINT. Science 344, 65–69 (2014).10.1126/science.1250944 ↗
19. Jungmann, R. et al. DNA origami-based nanoribbons: assembly, length distribution, and twist. Nanotechnology 22, 275301 (2011).10.1088/0957-4484/22/27/275301 ↗
20. Liu, W., Zhong, H., Wang, R. & Seeman, N. C. Crystalline two-dimensional DNA-origami arrays. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 264–267 (2011).10.1002/anie.201005911 ↗
21. Suzuki, Y., Endo, M. & Sugiyama, H. Lipid-bilayer-assisted two-dimensional self-assembly of DNA origami nanostructures. Nat. Commun. 6, 8052 (2015).10.1038/ncomms9052 ↗
22. Ke, Y. et al. DNA brick crystals with prescribed depths. Nat. Chem. 6, 994–1002 (2014).10.1038/nchem.2083 ↗
23. Wagenbauer, K. F., Sigl, C. & Dietz, H. Gigadalton-scale shape-programmable DNA assemblies. Nature 552, 78–83 (2017).10.1038/nature24651 ↗
24. Crick, F. H. & Watson, J. D. Structure of small viruses. Nature 177, 473–475 (1956).10.1038/177473a0 ↗
25. Caspar, D. L. & Klug, A. Physical principles in the construction of regular viruses. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 27, 1–24 (1962).10.1101/SQB.1962.027.001.005 ↗
26. Twarock, R. & Luque, A. Structural puzzles in virology solved with an overarching icosahedral design principle. Nat. Commun. 10, 4414 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-12367-3 ↗
27. Gerling, T., Wagenbauer, K. F., Neuner, A. M. & Dietz, H. Dynamic DNA devices and assemblies formed by shape-complementary, non-base pairing 3D components. Science 347, 1446–1452 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa5372 ↗
28. Douglas, S. M. et al. Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5001–5006 (2009).10.1093/nar/gkp436 ↗
29. Maffeo, C., Yoo, J. & Aksimentiev, A. De novo reconstruction of DNA origami structures through atomistic molecular dynamics simulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 3013–3019 (2016).10.1093/nar/gkw155 ↗
30. Wagenbauer, K. F. et al. How we make DNA origami.ChemBioChem 18, 1873–1885 (2017).10.1002/cbic.201700377 ↗
31. Langecker, M. et al. Synthetic lipid membrane channels formed by designed DNA nanostructures. Science 338, 932–936 (2012).10.1126/science.1225624 ↗
32. Gerling, T., Kube, M., Kick, B. & Dietz, H. Sequence-programmable covalent bonding of designed DNA assemblies. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau1157 (2018).10.1126/sciadv.aau1157 ↗
33. Ponnuswamy, N. et al. Oligolysine-based coating protects DNA nanostructures from low-salt denaturation and nuclease degradation. Nat. Commun. 8, 15654 (2017).10.1038/ncomms15654 ↗
34. Wang, D., Tai, P. W. L. & Gao, G. Adeno-associated virus vector as a platform for gene therapy delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 358–378 (2019).10.1038/s41573-019-0012-9 ↗
35. Guo, P. et al. Rapid AAV-neutralizing antibody determination with a cell-binding assay. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 13, 40–46 (2019).10.1016/j.omtm.2018.11.007 ↗
36. Praetorius, F. et al. Biotechnological mass production of DNA origami. Nature 552, 84–87 (2017).10.1038/nature24650 ↗
37. Ohto, U. et al. Structural basis of CpG and inhibitory DNA recognition by Toll-like receptor 9. Nature 520, 702–705 (2015).10.1038/nature14138 ↗
38. Andreeva, L. et al. cGAS senses long and HMGB/TFAM-bound U-turn DNA by forming protein–DNA ladders. Nature 549, 394–398 (2017).10.1038/nature23890 ↗
39. Engelhardt, F. A. S. et al. Custom-size, functional, and durable DNA origami with design-specific scaffolds. ACS Nano 13, 5015–5027 (2019).10.1021/acsnano.9b01025 ↗
40. Kick, B., Praetorius, F., Dietz, H. & Weuster-Botz, D. Efficient production of single-stranded phage DNA as scaffolds for DNA origami. Nano Lett. 15, 4672–4676 (2015).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01461 ↗
41. Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013 ↗
42. Kimanius, D., Forsberg, B. O., Scheres, S. H. & Lindahl, E. Accelerated cryo-EM structure determination with parallelisation using GPUs in RELION-2. Elife 5, e18722 (2016).10.7554/eLife.18722 ↗
43. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, e42166 (2018).10.7554/eLife.42166 ↗
44. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).10.1038/nmeth.4193 ↗
45. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008 ↗
46. Sominskaya, I. et al. A VLP library of C-terminally truncated hepatitis B core proteins: correlation of RNA encapsidation with a Th1/Th2 switch in the immune responses of mice. PLoS ONE 8, e75938 (2013).10.1371/journal.pone.0075938 ↗