The effect of nanometre-scale structure on interfacial energy
Source abstract
Abstract
Natural surfaces are often structured with nanometre-scale domains, yet a framework providing a quantitative understanding of how nanostructure affects interfacial energy, gamma(SL), is lacking. Conventional continuum thermodynamics treats gamma(SL) solely as a function of average composition, ignoring structure. Here we show that, when a surface has domains commensurate in size with solvent molecules, gamma(SL) is determined not only by its average composition but also by a structural component that causes gamma(SL) to deviate from the continuum prediction by a substantial amount, as much as 20% in our system. By contrasting surfaces coated with either molecular- (<2 nm) or larger-scale domains (>5 nm), we find that whereas the latter surfaces have the expected linear dependence of gamma(SL) on surface composition, the former show a markedly different non-monotonic trend. Molecular dynamics simulations show how the organization of the solvent molecules at the interface is controlled by the nanostructured surface, which in turn appreciably modifies gamma(SL).
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Bizzarri, A. R. & Cannistraro, S. Molecular dynamics of water at the protein-solvent interface. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 6617–6633 (2002).10.1021/jp020100m ↗
2. Hoffmann, M. R., Martin, S. T., Choi, W. Y. & Bahnemann, D. W. Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 95, 69–96 (1995).10.1021/cr00033a004 ↗
3. Zhdanov, V. P. & Kasemo, B. Kinetics of electrochemical reactions: From single crystals to nm-sized supported particles. Surf. Sci. 521, L655–L661 (2002).10.1016/S0039-6028(02)02330-0 ↗
4. Stevens, M. M. & George, J. H. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 310, 1135–1138 (2005).10.1126/science.1106587 ↗
5. Rogers, K. R. Principles of affinity-based biosensors. Mol. Biotech. 14, 109–129 (2000).10.1385/MB:14:2:109 ↗
6. Willard, A. P. & Chandler, D. The role of solvent fluctuations in hydrophobic assembly. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 6187–6192 (2008).10.1021/jp077186+ ↗
7. Oregan, B. & Gratzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar-cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353, 737–740 (1991).10.1038/353737a0 ↗
8. Frauenfelder, H., Fenimore, P. W., Chen, G. & McMahon, B. H. Protein folding is slaved to solvent motions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15469–15472 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0607168103 ↗
9. Ulman, A. Formation and structure of self-assembled monolayers. Chem. Rev. 96, 1533–1554 (1996).10.1021/cr9502357 ↗
10. Love, J. C., Estroff, L. A., Kriebel, J. K., Nuzzo, R. G. & Whitesides, G. M. Self-assembled monolayers of thiolates on metals as a form of nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 105, 1103–1169 (2005).10.1021/cr0300789 ↗
11. Mrksich, M. & Whitesides, G. M. Using self-assembled monolayers to understand the interactions of man-made surfaces with proteins and cells. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 25, 55–78 (1996).10.1146/annurev.bb.25.060196.000415 ↗
12. Stranick, S. J. et al. Nanometer-scale phase separation in mixed composition self-assembled monolayers. Nanotechnology 7, 438–442 (1996).10.1088/0957-4484/7/4/025 ↗
13. Pace, C. N., Treviño, S., Prabhakaran, E. & Scholtz, J. M. Protein structure, stability and solubility in water and other solvents. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359, 1225–1235 (2004).10.1098/rstb.2004.1500 ↗
14. Stranick, S. J., Parikh, A. N., Tao, Y. T., Allara, D. L. & Weiss, P. S. Phase-separation of mixed-composition self-assembled monolayers into nanometer-scale molecular domains. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 7636–7646 (1994).10.1021/j100082a040 ↗
15. Centrone, A. et al. The role of nanostructure in the wetting behaviour of mixed-monolayer-protected metal nanoparticles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9886–9891 (2008).10.1073/pnas.0803929105 ↗
16. Jackson, A. M., Myerson, J. W. & Stellacci, F. Spontaneous assembly of subnanometre-ordered domains in the ligand shell of monolayer-protected nanoparticles. Nature Mater. 3, 330–336 (2004).10.1038/nmat1116 ↗
17. Singh, C. et al. Entropy-mediated patterning of surfactant-coated nanoparticles and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 226106 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.226106 ↗
18. Carney, R. P. et al. Size limitations for the formation of ordered striped nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 798–799 (2008).10.1021/ja077383m ↗
19. Jackson, A. M., Hu, Y., Silva, P. J. & Stellacci, F. From homoligand- to mixed-ligand-monolayer-protected metal nanoparticles: A scanning tunnelling microscopy investigation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 11135–11149 (2006).10.1021/ja061545h ↗
20. Dupré, A. Théorie Mécanique de La Chaleur (Gauthier-Villars, 1869).
21. Young, T. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. (1804).10.1098/rstl.1805.0005 ↗
22. Laibinis, P. E., Fox, M. A., Folkers, J. P. & Whitesides, G. M. Comparisons of self-assembled monolayers on silver and gold—mixed monolayers derived from Hs(Ch2)21x and Hs(Ch2)10y (X,Y=Ch3, Ch2oh) have similar properties. Langmuir 7, 3167–3173 (1991).10.1021/la00060a041 ↗
23. Wenzel, R. N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 28, 988–994 (1936).10.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
24. Barthlott, W. & Neinhuis, C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202, 1–8 (1997).10.1007/s004250050096 ↗
25. Chow, T. S. Wetting of rough surfaces. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10, L445–L451 (1998).10.1088/0953-8984/10/27/001 ↗
26. Gennes, P. G. d. Soft Interfaces (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994).
27. Cassie, A. B. D. & Baxter, S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 40, 546–551 (1944).10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
28. Bohlen, H., Parry, A. O., Diaz-Herrera, E. & Schoen, M. Intrusion of fluids into nanogrooves. Eur. Phys. J. E 25, 103–115 (2008).10.1140/epje/i2007-10268-2 ↗
29. Schoen, M. Fluid bridges confined between chemically nanopatterned solid substrates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 223–256 (2008).10.1039/B706674K ↗
30. Imabayashi, S., Gon, N., Sasaki, T., Hobara, D. & Kakiuchi, T. Effect of nanometre-scale phase separation on wetting of binary self-assembled thiol monolayers on Au(111). Langmuir 14, 2348–2351 (1998).10.1021/la971377u ↗
31. Maibaum, L. & Chandler, D. Segue between favorable and unfavorable solvation. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 9025–9030 (2007).10.1021/jp072266z ↗
32. Shipway, A. N., Katz, E. & Willner, I. Nanoparticle arrays on surfaces for electronic, optical, and sensor applications. Chem. Phys. Chem. 1, 18–52 (2000).10.1002/1439-7641(20000804)1:1<18::AID-CPHC18>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
33. Musick, M. D., Keating, C. D., Keefe, M. H. & Natan, M. J. Stepwise construction of conductive Au colloid multilayers from solution. Chem. Mater. 9, 1499–1501 (1997).10.1021/cm970087w ↗
34. Brust, M., Bethell, D., Kiely, C. J. & Schiffrin, D. J. Self-assembled gold nanoparticle thin films with nonmetallic optical and electronic properties. Langmuir 14, 5425–5429 (1998).10.1021/la980557g ↗
35. Gao, L. C. & McCarthy, T. J. How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong. Langmuir 23, 3762–3765 (2007).10.1021/la062634a ↗
36. O’Shea, S. J., Welland, M. E. & Pethica, J. B. Atomic-force microscopy of local compliance at solid–liquid interfaces. Chem. Phys. Lett. 223, 336–340 (1994).10.1016/0009-2614(94)00458-7 ↗
37. O’Shea, S. J. & Welland, M. E. Atomic force microscopy at solid–liquid interfaces. Langmuir 14, 4186–4197 (1998).10.1021/la9801864 ↗
38. Lantz, M., Liu, Y. Z., Cui, X. D., Tokumoto, H. & Lindsay, S. M. Dynamic force microscopy in fluid. Surf. Interface Anal. 27, 354–360 (1999).10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199905/06)27:5/6<354::AID-SIA541>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
39. Chandler, D. Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437, 640–647 (2005).10.1038/nature04162 ↗
40. Giovambattista, N., Debenedetti, P. G. & Rossky, P. J. Hydration behaviour under confinement by nanoscale surfaces with patterned hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 1323–1332 (2007).10.1021/jp065419b ↗
41. Rajamani, S., Truskett, T. M. & Garde, S. Hydrophobic hydration from small to large lengthscales: Understanding and manipulating the crossover. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9475–9480 (2005).10.1073/pnas.0504089102 ↗