journal article·2009-10Open access

The effect of nanometre-scale structure on interfacial energy

Jeffrey J. Kuna, Kislon Voïtchovsky, Chetana Singh, Hao Jiang, Steve Mwenifumbo, Pradip K. Ghorai, Molly M. Stevens, Sharon C. Glotzer, Francesco Stellacci

Nature Materials· Volume 8· Issue 10

Abstract

Natural surfaces are often structured with nanometre-scale domains, yet a framework providing a quantitative understanding of how nanostructure affects interfacial energy, gamma(SL), is lacking. Conventional continuum thermodynamics treats gamma(SL) solely as a function of average composition, ignoring structure. Here we show that, when a surface has domains commensurate in size with solvent molecules, gamma(SL) is determined not only by its average composition but also by a structural component that causes gamma(SL) to deviate from the continuum prediction by a substantial amount, as much as 20% in our system. By contrasting surfaces coated with either molecular- (<2 nm) or larger-scale domains (>5 nm), we find that whereas the latter surfaces have the expected linear dependence of gamma(SL) on surface composition, the former show a markedly different non-monotonic trend. Molecular dynamics simulations show how the organization of the solvent molecules at the interface is controlled by the nanostructured surface, which in turn appreciably modifies gamma(SL).
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Bizzarri, A. R. & Cannistraro, S. Molecular dynamics of water at the protein-solvent interface. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 6617–6633 (2002).10.1021/jp020100m ↗
2. Hoffmann, M. R., Martin, S. T., Choi, W. Y. & Bahnemann, D. W. Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 95, 69–96 (1995).10.1021/cr00033a004 ↗
3. Zhdanov, V. P. & Kasemo, B. Kinetics of electrochemical reactions: From single crystals to nm-sized supported particles. Surf. Sci. 521, L655–L661 (2002).10.1016/S0039-6028(02)02330-0 ↗
4. Stevens, M. M. & George, J. H. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 310, 1135–1138 (2005).10.1126/science.1106587 ↗
5. Rogers, K. R. Principles of affinity-based biosensors. Mol. Biotech. 14, 109–129 (2000).10.1385/MB:14:2:109 ↗
6. Willard, A. P. & Chandler, D. The role of solvent fluctuations in hydrophobic assembly. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 6187–6192 (2008).10.1021/jp077186+ ↗
7. Oregan, B. & Gratzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar-cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353, 737–740 (1991).10.1038/353737a0 ↗
8. Frauenfelder, H., Fenimore, P. W., Chen, G. & McMahon, B. H. Protein folding is slaved to solvent motions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15469–15472 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0607168103 ↗
9. Ulman, A. Formation and structure of self-assembled monolayers. Chem. Rev. 96, 1533–1554 (1996).10.1021/cr9502357 ↗
10. Love, J. C., Estroff, L. A., Kriebel, J. K., Nuzzo, R. G. & Whitesides, G. M. Self-assembled monolayers of thiolates on metals as a form of nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 105, 1103–1169 (2005).10.1021/cr0300789 ↗
11. Mrksich, M. & Whitesides, G. M. Using self-assembled monolayers to understand the interactions of man-made surfaces with proteins and cells. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 25, 55–78 (1996).10.1146/annurev.bb.25.060196.000415 ↗
12. Stranick, S. J. et al. Nanometer-scale phase separation in mixed composition self-assembled monolayers. Nanotechnology 7, 438–442 (1996).10.1088/0957-4484/7/4/025 ↗
13. Pace, C. N., Treviño, S., Prabhakaran, E. & Scholtz, J. M. Protein structure, stability and solubility in water and other solvents. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 359, 1225–1235 (2004).10.1098/rstb.2004.1500 ↗
14. Stranick, S. J., Parikh, A. N., Tao, Y. T., Allara, D. L. & Weiss, P. S. Phase-separation of mixed-composition self-assembled monolayers into nanometer-scale molecular domains. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 7636–7646 (1994).10.1021/j100082a040 ↗
15. Centrone, A. et al. The role of nanostructure in the wetting behaviour of mixed-monolayer-protected metal nanoparticles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9886–9891 (2008).10.1073/pnas.0803929105 ↗
16. Jackson, A. M., Myerson, J. W. & Stellacci, F. Spontaneous assembly of subnanometre-ordered domains in the ligand shell of monolayer-protected nanoparticles. Nature Mater. 3, 330–336 (2004).10.1038/nmat1116 ↗
17. Singh, C. et al. Entropy-mediated patterning of surfactant-coated nanoparticles and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 226106 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.226106 ↗
18. Carney, R. P. et al. Size limitations for the formation of ordered striped nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 798–799 (2008).10.1021/ja077383m ↗
19. Jackson, A. M., Hu, Y., Silva, P. J. & Stellacci, F. From homoligand- to mixed-ligand-monolayer-protected metal nanoparticles: A scanning tunnelling microscopy investigation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 11135–11149 (2006).10.1021/ja061545h ↗
20. Dupré, A. Théorie Mécanique de La Chaleur (Gauthier-Villars, 1869).
21. Young, T. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. (1804).10.1098/rstl.1805.0005 ↗
22. Laibinis, P. E., Fox, M. A., Folkers, J. P. & Whitesides, G. M. Comparisons of self-assembled monolayers on silver and gold—mixed monolayers derived from Hs(Ch2)21x and Hs(Ch2)10y (X,Y=Ch3, Ch2oh) have similar properties. Langmuir 7, 3167–3173 (1991).10.1021/la00060a041 ↗
23. Wenzel, R. N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 28, 988–994 (1936).10.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
24. Barthlott, W. & Neinhuis, C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202, 1–8 (1997).10.1007/s004250050096 ↗
25. Chow, T. S. Wetting of rough surfaces. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10, L445–L451 (1998).10.1088/0953-8984/10/27/001 ↗
26. Gennes, P. G. d. Soft Interfaces (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994).
27. Cassie, A. B. D. & Baxter, S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 40, 546–551 (1944).10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
28. Bohlen, H., Parry, A. O., Diaz-Herrera, E. & Schoen, M. Intrusion of fluids into nanogrooves. Eur. Phys. J. E 25, 103–115 (2008).10.1140/epje/i2007-10268-2 ↗
29. Schoen, M. Fluid bridges confined between chemically nanopatterned solid substrates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 223–256 (2008).10.1039/B706674K ↗
30. Imabayashi, S., Gon, N., Sasaki, T., Hobara, D. & Kakiuchi, T. Effect of nanometre-scale phase separation on wetting of binary self-assembled thiol monolayers on Au(111). Langmuir 14, 2348–2351 (1998).10.1021/la971377u ↗
31. Maibaum, L. & Chandler, D. Segue between favorable and unfavorable solvation. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 9025–9030 (2007).10.1021/jp072266z ↗
32. Shipway, A. N., Katz, E. & Willner, I. Nanoparticle arrays on surfaces for electronic, optical, and sensor applications. Chem. Phys. Chem. 1, 18–52 (2000).10.1002/1439-7641(20000804)1:1<18::AID-CPHC18>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
33. Musick, M. D., Keating, C. D., Keefe, M. H. & Natan, M. J. Stepwise construction of conductive Au colloid multilayers from solution. Chem. Mater. 9, 1499–1501 (1997).10.1021/cm970087w ↗
34. Brust, M., Bethell, D., Kiely, C. J. & Schiffrin, D. J. Self-assembled gold nanoparticle thin films with nonmetallic optical and electronic properties. Langmuir 14, 5425–5429 (1998).10.1021/la980557g ↗
35. Gao, L. C. & McCarthy, T. J. How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong. Langmuir 23, 3762–3765 (2007).10.1021/la062634a ↗
36. O’Shea, S. J., Welland, M. E. & Pethica, J. B. Atomic-force microscopy of local compliance at solid–liquid interfaces. Chem. Phys. Lett. 223, 336–340 (1994).10.1016/0009-2614(94)00458-7 ↗
37. O’Shea, S. J. & Welland, M. E. Atomic force microscopy at solid–liquid interfaces. Langmuir 14, 4186–4197 (1998).10.1021/la9801864 ↗
38. Lantz, M., Liu, Y. Z., Cui, X. D., Tokumoto, H. & Lindsay, S. M. Dynamic force microscopy in fluid. Surf. Interface Anal. 27, 354–360 (1999).10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199905/06)27:5/6<354::AID-SIA541>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
39. Chandler, D. Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437, 640–647 (2005).10.1038/nature04162 ↗
40. Giovambattista, N., Debenedetti, P. G. & Rossky, P. J. Hydration behaviour under confinement by nanoscale surfaces with patterned hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 1323–1332 (2007).10.1021/jp065419b ↗
41. Rajamani, S., Truskett, T. M. & Garde, S. Hydrophobic hydration from small to large lengthscales: Understanding and manipulating the crossover. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9475–9480 (2005).10.1073/pnas.0504089102 ↗