A smart and responsive crystalline porous organic cage membrane with switchable pore apertures for graded molecular sieving
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Membranes with high selectivity offer an attractive route to molecular separations, where technologies such as distillation and chromatography are energy intensive. However, it remains challenging to fine tune the structure and porosity in membranes, particularly to separate molecules of similar size. Here, we report a process for producing composite membranes that comprise crystalline porous organic cage films fabricated by interfacial synthesis on a polyacrylonitrile support. These membranes exhibit ultrafast solvent permeance and high rejection of organic dyes with molecular weights over 600 g mol−1. The crystalline cage film is dynamic, and its pore aperture can be switched in methanol to generate larger pores that provide increased methanol permeance and higher molecular weight cut-offs (1,400 g mol−1). By varying the water/methanol ratio, the film can be switched between two phases that have different selectivities, such that a single, ‘smart’ crystalline membrane can perform graded molecular sieving. We exemplify this by separating three organic dyes in a single-stage, single-membrane process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Ionic liquids properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Tozawa, T. et al. Porous organic cages. Nat. Mater. 8, 973–978 (2009).10.1038/nmat2545 ↗
2. Zhang, G. & Mastalerz, M. Organic cage compounds – from shape-persistency to function. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 1934–1947 (2014).10.1039/C3CS60358J ↗
3. Jiang, S. et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of gas selectivity in amorphous porous molecular solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 17818–17830 (2013).10.1021/ja407374k ↗
4. Giri, N. et al. Liquids with permanent porosity. Nature 527, 216–220 (2015).10.1038/nature16072 ↗
5. Sturluson, A., Huynh, M. T., York, A. H. P. & Simon, C. M. Eigencages: learning a latent space of porous cage molecules. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 1663–1676 (2018).10.1021/acscentsci.8b00638 ↗
6. Jelfs, K. E. & Cooper, A. I. Molecular simulations to understand and to design porous organic molecules. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 17, 19–30 (2013).10.1016/j.cossms.2012.12.001 ↗
7. Little, M. A. & Cooper, A. I. The chemistry of porous organic molecular materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1909842 (2020).10.1002/adfm.201909842 ↗
8. Chen, L. et al. Separation of rare gases and chiral molecules by selective binding in porous organic cages. Nat. Mater. 13, 954–960 (2014).10.1038/nmat4035 ↗
9. Nunes, S. P. & Peinemann, K.-V. Membrane Technology: in the Chemical Industry (John Wiley & Sons, 2006).10.1002/3527608788 ↗
10. Kim, D., Salazar, O. R. & Nunes, S. P. Membrane manufacture for peptide separation. Green Chem. 18, 5151–5159 (2016).10.1039/C6GC01259K ↗
11. Marchetti, P., Jimenez Solomon, M. F., Szekely, G. & Livingston, A. G. Molecular separation with organic solvent nanofiltration: a critical review. Chem. Rev. 114, 10735–10806 (2014).10.1021/cr500006j ↗
12. Sholl, D. S. & Lively, R. P. Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature 532, 435–437 (2016).10.1038/532435a ↗
13. Elimelech, M. & Phillip, W. A. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 333, 712–717 (2011).10.1126/science.1200488 ↗
14. Kabay, N., Arda, M., Trochimczuk, A. & Streat, M. Removal of chromate by solvent impregnated resins (SIRs) stabilized by coating and chemical crosslinking. I. Batch-mode sorption studies. React. Funct. Polym. 59, 9–14 (2004).10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2003.10.006 ↗
15. Jiang, Z., Karan, S. & Livingston, A. G. Water transport through ultrathin polyamide nanofilms used for reverse osmosis. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705973 (2018).10.1002/adma.201705973 ↗
16. Cundy, C. S. & Cox, P. A. The hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites: precursors, intermediates and reaction mechanism. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 82, 1–78 (2005).10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.02.016 ↗
17. Thomas, A. Functional materials: from hard to soft porous frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 8328–8344 (2010).10.1002/anie.201000167 ↗
18. Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341, 1230444 (2013).10.1126/science.1230444 ↗
19. Côté, A. P. et al. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science 310, 1166–1170 (2005).10.1126/science.1120411 ↗
20. Lin, R.-B. et al. Multifunctional porous hydrogen-bonded organic framework materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 1362–1389 (2019).10.1039/C8CS00155C ↗
21. Dey, K. et al. Selective molecular separation by interfacially crystallized covalent organic framework thin films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 13083–13091 (2017).10.1021/jacs.7b06640 ↗
22. Matsumoto, M. et al. Lewis-acid-catalyzed interfacial polymerization of covalent organic framework films. Chem 4, 308–317 (2018).10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.011 ↗
23. Corcos, A. R. et al. Reducing the pore size of covalent organic frameworks in thin-film composite membranes enhances solute rejection. ACS Mater. Lett. 1, 440–446 (2019).10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00272 ↗
24. Zhang, C., Wu, B.-H., Ma, M.-Q., Wang, Z. & Xu, Z.-K. Ultrathin metal/covalent–organic framework membranes towards ultimate separation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 3811–3841 (2019).10.1039/C9CS00322C ↗
25. Wang, Z., Zhang, S., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z. & Ma, S. Covalent organic frameworks for separation applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 708–735 (2020).10.1039/C9CS00827F ↗
26. Venna, S. R. & Carreon, M. A. Metal organic framework membranes for carbon dioxide separation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 124, 3–19 (2015).10.1016/j.ces.2014.10.007 ↗
27. Fenton, J. L., Burke, D. W., Qian, D., Olvera de la Cruz, M. & Dichtel, W. R. Polycrystalline covalent organic framework films act as adsorbents, not membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 1466–1473 (2021).10.1021/jacs.0c11159 ↗
28. Jones, J. T. A. et al. On–off porosity switching in a molecular organic solid. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 749–753 (2011).10.1002/anie.201006030 ↗
29. Bera, S. et al. Porosity switching in polymorphic porous organic cages with exceptional chemical stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 4243–4247 (2019).10.1002/anie.201813773 ↗
30. Song, Q. et al. Porous organic cage thin films and molecular-sieving membranes. Adv. Mater. 28, 2629–2637 (2016).10.1002/adma.201505688 ↗
31. Brutschy, M., Schneider, M. W., Mastalerz, M. & Waldvogel, S. R. Porous organic cage compounds as highly potent affinity materials for sensing by quartz crystal microbalances. Adv. Mater. 24, 6049–6052 (2012).10.1002/adma.201202786 ↗
32. Bushell, A. F. et al. Nanoporous organic polymer/cage composite membranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 1253–1256 (2013).10.1002/anie.201206339 ↗
33. Zhu, G., O’Nolan, D. & Lively, R. P. Molecularly mixed composite membranes: challenges and opportunities. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 3464–3473 (2020).10.1002/chem.201903519 ↗
34. Alexandre, P.-E. et al. A robust porous quinoline cage: transformation of a [4+6] salicylimine cage by Povarov cyclization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 19675–19679 (2020).10.1002/anie.202007048 ↗
35. Mastalerz, M., Schneider, M. W., Oppel, I. M. & Presly, O. A salicylbisimine cage compound with high surface area and selective CO2/CH4 adsorption. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 1046–1051 (2011).10.1002/anie.201005301 ↗
36. Avellaneda, A. et al. Kinetically controlled porosity in a robust organic cage material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 3746–3749 (2013).10.1002/anie.201209922 ↗
37. Elbert, S. M. et al. Shape-persistent tetrahedral [4+6] boronic ester cages with different degrees of fluoride substitution. Chem. Eur. J. 24, 11438–11443 (2018).10.1002/chem.201802123 ↗
38. Suganuma, S. & Katada, N. Innovation of catalytic technology for upgrading of crude oil in petroleum refinery. Fuel Process. Technol. 208, 106518 (2020).10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106518 ↗
39. Jang, H.-Y. et al. Torlon® hollow fiber membranes for organic solvent reverse osmosis separation of complex aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures. AIChE J. 65, e16757 (2019).10.1002/aic.16757 ↗
40. Lv, E., Ding, S., Lu, J., Yi, W. & Ding, J. Separation and purification of fatty acids by membrane technology: a critical review. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 18, 20190224 (2020).10.1515/ijcre-2019-0224 ↗
41. Gilmer, C. M., Zvokel, C., Vick, A. & Bowden, N. B. Separation of saturated fatty acids and fatty acid methyl esters with epoxy nanofiltration membranes. RSC Adv. 7, 55626–55632 (2017).10.1039/C7RA11223H ↗
42. Ghasemian, S., Sahari, M. A., Barzegar, M. & Gavlighi, H. A. Concentration of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids by polymeric membrane. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 50, 2411–2418 (2015).10.1111/ijfs.12907 ↗
43. Takahashi, D., Inomata, T. & Fukui, T. AJIPHASE®: a highly efficient synthetic method for one-pot peptide elongation in the solution phase by an Fmoc strategy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 129, 7911–7915 (2017).10.1002/ange.201702931 ↗
44. Thompson, K. A. et al. N-aryl–linked spirocyclic polymers for membrane separations of complex hydrocarbon mixtures. Science 369, 310–315 (2020).10.1126/science.aba9806 ↗
45. Sadrzadeh, M. & Bhattacharjee, S. Rational design of phase inversion membranes by tailoring thermodynamics and kinetics of casting solution using polymer additives. J. Memb. Sci. 441, 31–44 (2013).10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.009 ↗
46. Lu, Y., Chen, T., Chen, X., Qiu, M. & Fan, Y. Fabrication of TiO2-doped ZrO2 nanofiltration membranes by using a modified colloidal sol-gel process and its application in simulative radioactive effluent. J. Memb. Sci. 514, 476–486 (2016).10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.074 ↗
47. Siew, W. E., Livingston, A. G., Ates, C. & Merschaert, A. Molecular separation with an organic solvent nanofiltration cascade–augmenting membrane selectivity with process engineering. Chem. Eng. Sci. 90, 299–310 (2013).10.1016/j.ces.2012.10.028 ↗
48. Little, M. A., Chong, S. Y., Schmidtmann, M., Hasell, T. & Cooper, A. I. Guest control of structure in porous organic cages. Chem. Commun. 50, 9465–9468 (2014).10.1039/C4CC04158E ↗
49. Little, M. A. et al. Trapping virtual pores by crystal retro-engineering. Nat. Chem. 7, 153–159 (2015).10.1038/nchem.2156 ↗
50. Jones, J. T. A. et al. Modular and predictable assembly of porous organic molecular crystals. Nature 474, 367–371 (2011).10.1038/nature10125 ↗
51. Karan, S., Jiang, Z. & Livingston, A. G. Sub–10 nm polyamide nanofilms with ultrafast solvent transport for molecular separation. Science 348, 1347–1351 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa5058 ↗
52. Aumann, L. & Morbidelli, M. A continuous multicolumn countercurrent solvent gradient purification (MCSGP) process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 98, 1043–1055 (2007).10.1002/bit.21527 ↗
53. Loftsson, T., Vogensen, S. B., Brewster, M. E. & Konráosdóttir, F. Effects of cyclodextrins on drug delivery through biological membranes. J. Pharm. Sci. 96, 2532–2546 (2007).10.1002/jps.20992 ↗
54. Kohli, P., Wirtz, M. & Martin, C. R. Nanotube membrane based biosensors. Electroanalysis 16, 9–18 (2004).10.1002/elan.200302916 ↗
55. O’Brien, D. J. & Craig, J. C. Ethanol production in a continuous fermentation/membrane pervaporation system. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 44, 699–704 (1996).10.1007/BF00178605 ↗
56. Nicklin, C., Arnold, T., Rawle, J. & Warne, A. Diamond beamline I07: a beamline for surface and interface diffraction. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 23, 1245–1253 (2016).10.1107/S1600577516009875 ↗
57. Basham, M. et al. Data analysis workbench (DAWN). J. Synchrotron Radiat. 22, 853–858 (2015).10.1107/S1600577515002283 ↗
58. Coelho, A. TOPAS Academic v.5 (Coelho Software, 2012).