journal article·2023-01Open access

Matrix viscoelasticity controls spatiotemporal tissue organization

Alberto Elosegui-Artola, Anupam Gupta, Alexander J. Najibi, Bo Ri Seo, Ryan Garry, Christina M. Tringides, Irene de Lázaro, Max Darnell, Wei Gu, Qiao Zhou, David A. Weitz, L. Mahadevan, David J. Mooney

Nature Materials· Volume 22· Issue 1

Abstract

Biomolecular and physical cues of the extracellular matrix environment regulate collective cell dynamics and tissue patterning. Nonetheless, how the viscoelastic properties of the matrix regulate collective cell spatial and temporal organization is not fully understood. Here we show that the passive viscoelastic properties of the matrix encapsulating a spheroidal tissue of breast epithelial cells guide tissue proliferation in space and in time. Matrix viscoelasticity prompts symmetry breaking of the spheroid, leading to the formation of invading finger-like protrusions, YAP nuclear translocation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition both in vitro and in vivo in a Arp2/3-complex-dependent manner. Computational modelling of these observations allows us to establish a phase diagram relating morphological stability with matrix viscoelasticity, tissue viscosity, cell motility and cell division rate, which is experimentally validated by biochemical assays and in vitro experiments with an intestinal organoid. Altogether, this work highlights the role of stress relaxation mechanisms in tissue growth dynamics, a fundamental process in morphogenesis and oncogenesis.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Cancer Cells and Metastasis · Spaceflight effects on biology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Paszek, M. J. et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 8, 241–254 (2005).10.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.010 ↗
2. Sato, T. et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262–265 (2009).10.1038/nature07935 ↗
3. Moris, N. et al. An in vitro model of early anteroposterior organization during human development. Nature 582, 410–415 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2383-9 ↗
4. Hannezo, E. & Simons, B. D. Multiscale dynamics of branching morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 60, 99–105 (2019).10.1016/j.ceb.2019.04.008 ↗
5. Nelson, C. M. On Buckling morphogenesis. J. Biomech. Eng. 138, 021005 (2016).10.1115/1.4032128 ↗
6. Briggs, J. A. et al. The dynamics of gene expression in vertebrate embryogenesis at single-cell resolution. Science 360, eaar5780 (2018).10.1126/science.aar5780 ↗
7. Hannezo, E. & Heisenberg, C. P. Mechanochemical feedback loops in development and disease. Cell 178, 12–25 (2019).10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.052 ↗
8. Green, J. B. & Sharpe, J. Positional information and reaction–diffusion: two big ideas in developmental biology combine. Development 142, 1203–1211 (2015).10.1242/dev.114991 ↗
9. Chan, C. J. et al. Hydraulic control of mammalian embryo size and cell fate. Nature 571, 112–116 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1309-x ↗
10. Nelson, C. M. et al. Microfluidic chest cavities reveal that transmural pressure controls the rate of lung development. Development 144, 4328–4335 (2017).
11. Shyer, A. E., Huycke, T. R., Lee, C., Mahadevan, L. & Tabin, C. J. Bending gradients: how the intestinal stem cell gets its home. Cell 161, 569–580 (2015).10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.041 ↗
12. Harris, A. R. et al. Characterizing the mechanics of cultured cell monolayers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16449–16454 (2012).10.1073/pnas.1213301109 ↗
13. Barriga, E. H., Franze, K., Charras, G. & Mayor, R. Tissue stiffening coordinates morphogenesis by triggering collective cell migration in vivo. Nature 554, 523–527 (2018).10.1038/nature25742 ↗
14. Thompson, A. J. et al. Rapid changes in tissue mechanics regulate cell behaviour in the developing embryonic brain. Elife 8, e39356 (2019).10.7554/eLife.39356 ↗
15. Chaudhuri, O., Cooper-White, J., Janmey, P. A., Mooney, D. J. & Shenoy, V. B. Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour. Nature 584, 535–546 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2 ↗
16. Elosegui-Artola, A. The extracellular matrix viscoelasticity as a regulator of cell and tissue dynamics. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 72, 10–18 (2021).10.1016/j.ceb.2021.04.002 ↗
17. Heisenberg, C. P. & Bellaiche, Y. Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning. Cell 153, 948–962 (2013).10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.008 ↗
18. Debnath, J., Muthuswamy, S. K. & Brugge, J. S. Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods 30, 256–268 (2003).10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00032-X ↗
19. Lee, K. Y. & Mooney, D. J. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 37, 106–126 (2012).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003 ↗
20. Chaudhuri, O. et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat. Mater. 15, 326–334 (2016).10.1038/nmat4489 ↗
21. Rowley, J. A., Madlambayan, G. & Mooney, D. J. Alginate hydrogels as synthetic extracellular matrix materials. Biomaterials 20, 45–53 (1999).10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00107-0 ↗
22. Elosegui-Artola, A. et al. Mechanical regulation of a molecular clutch defines force transmission and transduction in response to matrix rigidity. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 540–548 (2016).10.1038/ncb3336 ↗
23. Lee, J. Y. et al. YAP-independent mechanotransduction drives breast cancer progression. Nat. Commun. 10, 1848 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-09755-0 ↗
24. Yang, J. et al. Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 341–352 (2020).10.1038/s41580-020-0237-9 ↗
25. Taubenberger, A. V. et al. 3D microenvironment stiffness regulates tumor spheroid growth and mechanics via p21 and ROCK. Adv. Biosyst. 3, 1900128 (2019).10.1002/adbi.201900128 ↗
26. Wang, C., Tong, X. & Yang, F. Bioengineered 3D brain tumor model to elucidate the effects of matrix stiffness on glioblastoma cell behavior using PEG-based hydrogels. Mol. Pharm. 11, 2115–2125 (2014).10.1021/mp5000828 ↗
27. Saffman, P. G. & Taylor, G. I. The penetration of a fluid into a porous medium or Hele–Shaw cell containing a more viscous liquid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 245, 312–329 (1958).10.1098/rspa.1958.0085 ↗
28. Biggins, J. S., Saintyves, B., Wei, Z., Bouchaud, E. & Mahadevan, L. Digital instability of a confined elastic meniscus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12545–12548 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1302269110 ↗
29. Shaebani, M. R., Wysocki, A., Winkler, R. G., Gompper, G. & Rieger, H. Computational models for active matter. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 181–199 (2020).10.1038/s42254-020-0152-1 ↗
30. Berthier, L. & Kurchan, J. Non-equilibrium glass transitions in driven and active matter. Nat. Phys. 9, 310–314 (2013).10.1038/nphys2592 ↗
31. Lee, H.-p et al. The nuclear piston activates mechanosensitive ion channels to generate cell migration paths in confining microenvironments. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd4058 (2021).10.1126/sciadv.abd4058 ↗
32. Nam, S. et al. Cell cycle progression in confining microenvironments is regulated by a growth-responsive TRPV4-PI3K/Akt-p27(Kip1) signaling axis. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw6171 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aaw6171 ↗
33. Ulrich, T. A., de Juan Pardo, E. M. & Kumar, S. The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Res. 69, 4167–4174 (2009).10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4859 ↗
34. Mongera, A. et al. A fluid-to-solid jamming transition underlies vertebrate body axis elongation. Nature 561, 401–405 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0479-2 ↗
35. Chaudhuri, O. et al. Extracellular matrix stiffness and composition jointly regulate the induction of malignant phenotypes in mammary epithelium. Nat. Mater. 13, 970–978 (2014).10.1038/nmat4009 ↗
36. Gjorevski, N. et al. Designer matrices for intestinal stem cell and organoid culture. Nature 539, 560–564 (2016).10.1038/nature20168 ↗
37. Deglincerti, A. et al. Self-organization of the in vitro attached human embryo. Nature 533, 251–254 (2016).10.1038/nature17948 ↗
38. Friedl, P., Locker, J., Sahai, E. & Segall, J. E. Classifying collective cancer cell invasion. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 777–783 (2012).10.1038/ncb2548 ↗
39. Lamalice, L., Le Boeuf, F. & Huot, J. Endothelial cell migration during angiogenesis. Circ. Res. 100, 782–794 (2007).10.1161/01.RES.0000259593.07661.1e ↗
40. Spurlin, J. W. et al. Mesenchymal proteases and tissue fluidity remodel the extracellular matrix during airway epithelial branching in the embryonic avian lung. Development 146, dev175257 (2019).10.1242/dev.175257 ↗
41. Tetley, R. J. et al. Tissue fluidity promotes epithelial wound healing. Nat. Phys. 15, 1195–1203 (2019).10.1038/s41567-019-0618-1 ↗
42. Kuriyama, S. et al. In vivo collective cell migration requires an LPAR2-dependent increase in tissue fluidity. J. Cell Biol 206, 113–127 (2014).10.1083/jcb.201402093 ↗
43. Streitberger, K. J. et al. How tissue fluidity influences brain tumor progression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 128–134 (2020).10.1073/pnas.1913511116 ↗
44. Sinkus, R. et al. Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography. Magn. Reson. Imaging 23, 159–165 (2005).10.1016/j.mri.2004.11.060 ↗
45. Shahryari, M. et al. Tomoelastography distinguishes non-invasively between benign and malignant liver lesions. Cancer Res., canres. 2150, 2019 (2019).
46. Nematbakhsh, Y., Pang, K. T. & Lim, C. T. Correlating the viscoelasticity of breast cancer cells with their malignancy. Converg. Sci. Phys. Oncol. 3, 034003 (2017).10.1088/2057-1739/aa7ffb ↗
47. Palamidessi, A. et al. Unjamming overcomes kinetic and proliferation arrest in terminally differentiated cells and promotes collective motility of carcinoma. Nat. Mater. 18, 1252–1263 (2019).10.1038/s41563-019-0425-1 ↗
48. Han, Y. L. et al. Cell swelling, softening and invasion in a three-dimensional breast cancer model. Nat. Phys. 16, 101–108 (2020).10.1038/s41567-019-0680-8 ↗
49. Staneva, R. et al. Cancer cells in the tumor core exhibit spatially coordinated migration patterns. J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs220277 (2019).10.1242/jcs.220277 ↗
50. Monslow, J., Govindaraju, P. & Puré, E. Hyaluronan—a functional and structural sweet spot in the tissue microenvironment. Front. Immunol. 6, 231 (2015).10.3389/fimmu.2015.00231 ↗
51. Chaudhuri, O. et al. Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading. Nat. Commun. 6, 6364 (2015).10.1038/ncomms7365 ↗
52. Darnell, M. et al. Material microenvironmental properties couple to induce distinct transcriptional programs in mammalian stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E8368–E8377 (2018).10.1073/pnas.1802568115 ↗
53. Huebsch, N. et al. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat. Mater. 9, 518–526 (2010).10.1038/nmat2732 ↗
54. Zhao, X., Huebsch, N., Mooney, D. J. & Suo, Z. Stress-relaxation behavior in gels with ionic and covalent crosslinks. J. Appl. Phys. 107, 63509 (2010).10.1063/1.3343265 ↗
55. Corbin, E. A., Kong, F., Lim, C. T., King, W. P. & Bashir, R. Biophysical properties of human breast cancer cells measured using silicon MEMS resonators and atomic force microscopy. Lab Chip 15, 839–847 (2015).10.1039/C4LC01179A ↗