journal article·2005-05-01

Evolutionary approach for determining first-principles hamiltonians

Gus L. W. Hart, Volker Blum, Michael J. Walorski, Alex Zunger

Nature Materials· Volume 4· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Modern condensed-matter theory from first principles is highly successful when applied to materials of given structure-type or restricted unit-cell size. But this approach is limited where large cells or searches over millions of structure types become necessary. To treat these with first-principles accuracy, one 'coarse-grains' the many-particle Schrodinger equation into 'model hamiltonians' whose variables are configurational order parameters (atomic positions, spin and so on), connected by a few 'interaction parameters' obtained from a microscopic theory. But to construct a truly quantitative model hamiltonian, one must know just which types of interaction parameters to use, from possibly 10(6)-10(8) alternative selections. Here we show how genetic algorithms, mimicking biological evolution ('survival of the fittest'), can be used to distil reliable model hamiltonian parameters from a database of first-principles calculations. We demonstrate this for a classic dilemma in solid-state physics, structural inorganic chemistry and metallurgy: how to predict the stable crystal structure of a compound given only its composition. The selection of leading parameters based on a genetic algorithm is general and easily applied to construct any other type of complex model hamiltonian from direct quantum-mechanical results.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Surface Chemistry and Catalysis · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Statistical Physics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1980). Transl. from the Russian by J. B. Sykes & M. J. Kearsley.
2. Rado, G. T. & Suhl, H. (eds) Magnetism Vol. 2B (Academic, New York, 1965).
3. Zunger, A. In Statics and Dynamics of Alloy Phase Transformations (eds Turchi, P. & Gonis, A.) 361–419 (Plenum, New York, 1994).10.1007/978-1-4615-2476-2_23 ↗
4. de Fontaine, D. Cluster approach to order-disorder transformations in alloys. Solid State Phys. 47, 33–176 (1994).10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60639-6 ↗
5. Michalewicz, Z. & Fogel, D. B. How to Solve it: Modern Heuristics (Springer, Berlin, 2000).10.1007/978-3-662-04131-4 ↗
6. Maddox, J. Crystals from first principles. Nature 335, 201 (1988).10.1038/335201a0 ↗
7. Phillips, J. C. Bonds and Bands in Semiconductors (Academic, New York, 1973).
8. Pauling, L. The Nature of the Chemical Bond (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, 1960).
9. Hume-Rothery, W. & Raynor, G. The Structure of Metals and Alloys (Institute of Metals, London, 1954).
10. Connolly, J. & Williams, A. Density-functional theory applied to phase transformations in transition-metal alloys. Phys. Rev. B 27, 5169–5172 (1983).10.1103/PhysRevB.27.5169 ↗
11. Kikuchi, R. In Noble Metal Alloys (eds Massalski, T. B., Pearson, W. B., Bennet, L. H. & Chang, Y. A.) (The Metallurgical Society, Warrendale, PA, 1986).
12. van der Walle, A. & Ceder, G. Automating first-principles phase diagram calculations. J. Phase Equil. 23, 348–359 (2002).10.1361/105497102770331596 ↗
13. Zarkevich, N. A. & Johnson, D. D. Reliable first-principles alloy thermodynamics via truncated cluster expansions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 255702 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.255702 ↗
14. de Gironcoli, S. & Baroni, S. Effects of disorder on the vibrational properties of SiGe alloys: failure of mean-field approximations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1959–1962 (1992).10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1959 ↗
15. Deaven, D. M. & Ho, K. M. Molecular geometry optimization with a genetic algorithm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 288–291 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.288 ↗
16. Ho, K. M. et al. Structures of medium-sized silicon clusters. Nature 392, 582 (1998).10.1038/33369 ↗
17. Stucke, D. P. & Crespi, V. H. Predictions of new crystalline states for assemblies of nanoparticles: perovskite analogues and 3-D arrays of self-assembled nanowires. Nano Lett. 3, 1183–1186 (2003).10.1021/nl034230y ↗
18. Morris, J. R., Deaven, D. M. & Ho, K. M. Genetic algorithm energy minimization for point charges on a sphere. Phys. Rev. B 53, R1740 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.53.R1740 ↗
19. Johannesson, G. H. et al. Combined electronic structure and evolutionary search approach to materials design. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 255506 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.255506 ↗
20. Klimeck, G. & Bowen, R. C. Si tight-binding parameters from genetic algorithm fitting. Superlattices Microstruct. 27, 77–88 (2000).10.1006/spmi.1999.0797 ↗
21. Blum, V. & Zunger, A. Structural complexity in binary bcc ground states: the case of bcc MoTa. Phys. Rev. B 69, 020301 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevB.69.020103 ↗
22. Predel, B. (ed.) Phase Equilibria, Crystallographic and Thermodynamic Data of Binary Alloys. Landolt-Börstein, New Series, Group IV Vol. 5H (Springer, Berlin, 1997).
23. Sigli, C. & Sanchez, J. M. Electronic Structure calculation of ordering and segregation energies of transition metal alloys. Acta Metall. Mater. 36, 367–375 (1988).10.1016/0001-6160(88)90012-0 ↗
24. Turchi, P. E. A., Gonis, A., Drchal, V. & Kurdnovsky, J. First-principles study of stability and local order in substitutional Ta–W alloys. Phys. Rev. B 64, 085112 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.64.085112 ↗
25. Baumann, K. Cross validation as the objective function for variable selection. Trends Anal. Chem. 22, 395–406 (2003).10.1016/S0165-9936(03)00607-1 ↗
26. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗