journal article·2017-06Open access

Antifogging abilities of model nanotextures

Timothée Mouterde, Gaëlle Lehoucq, Stéphane Xavier, Antonio Checco, Charles T. Black, Atikur Rahman, Thierry Midavaine, Christophe Clanet, David Quéré

Nature Materials· Volume 16· Issue 6

Abstract

Nanometre-scale features with special shapes impart a broad spectrum of unique properties to the surface of insects. These properties are essential for the animal's survival, and include the low light reflectance of moth eyes, the oil repellency of springtail carapaces and the ultra-adhesive nature of palmtree bugs. Antireflective mosquito eyes and cicada wings are also known to exhibit some antifogging and self-cleaning properties. In all cases, the combination of small feature size and optimal shape provides exceptional surface properties. In this work, we investigate the underlying antifogging mechanism in model materials designed to mimic natural systems, and explain the importance of the texture's feature size and shape. While exposure to fog strongly compromises the water-repellency of hydrophobic structures, this failure can be minimized by scaling the texture down to nanosize. This undesired effect even becomes non-measurable if the hydrophobic surface consists of nanocones, which generate antifogging efficiency close to unity and water departure of droplets smaller than 2 μm.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Blossey, R. Self-cleaning surfaces—virtual realities. Nat. Mater. 2, 301–306 (2003).10.1038/nmat856 ↗
2. Papadopoulos, P., Mammen, L., Deng, X., Vollmer, D. & Butt, H. J. How superhydrophobicity breaks down. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3254–3258 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1218673110 ↗
3. Cheng, Y. T. & Rodak, D. E. Is the lotus leaf superhydrophobic? Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 144101 (2005).10.1063/1.1895487 ↗
4. Cheng, Y. T., Rodak, D. E., Angelopoulos, A. & Gacek, T. Microscopic observations of condensation of water on lotus leaves. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 194112 (2005).10.1063/1.2130392 ↗
5. Wier, K. A. & McCarthy, T. J. Condensation on ultrahydrophobic surfaces and its effect on droplet mobility: ultrahydrophobic surfaces are not always water repellent. Langmuir 22, 2433–2436 (2006).10.1021/la0525877 ↗
6. Dorrer, C. & Rühe, J. Condensation and wetting transitions on microstructured ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 23, 3820–3824 (2007).10.1021/la063130f ↗
7. Varanasi, K. K., Hsu, M., Bhate, N., Yang, W. & Deng, T. Spatial control in the heterogeneous nucleation of water. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 094101 (2009).10.1063/1.3200951 ↗
8. Liu, Y., Chen, X. & Xin, J. H. Can superhydrophobic surfaces repel hot water? J. Mater. Chem. 19, 5602–5611 (2009).10.1039/b822168e ↗
9. Narhe, R. D., Gonzalez-Viñas, W. & Beysens, D. Water condensation on zinc surfaces treated by chemical bath deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 256, 4930–4933 (2010).10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.004 ↗
10. Gao, X. F. et al. The dry-style antifogging properties of mosquito compound eyes and artificial analogues prepared by soft lithography. Adv. Mater. 19, 2213–2215 (2007).10.1002/adma.200601946 ↗
11. Wisdom, K. M. et al. Self-cleaning of superhydrophobic surfaces by self-propelled jumping condensate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7992–7997 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1210770110 ↗
12. Checco, A. et al. Collapse and reversibility of the superhydrophobic state on nanotextured surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 216101 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.216101 ↗
13. Park, K. C. et al. Nanotextured silica surfaces with robust superhydrophobicity and omnidirectional broadband supertransmissivity. ACS Nano 6, 3789–3799 (2012).10.1021/nn301112t ↗
14. Miljkovic, N., Enright, R. & Wang, E. N. Modeling and optimization of superhydrophobic condensation. J. Heat Trans. 135, 111004 (2013).10.1115/1.4024597 ↗
15. Miljkovic, N. et al. Jumping-droplet-enhanced condensation on scalable superhydrophobic nanostructured surfaces. Nano Lett. 13, 179–187 (2012).10.1021/nl303835d ↗
16. Boreyko, J. B. & Chen, C.-H. Self-propelled dropwise condensate on superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 184501 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.184501 ↗
17. Chen, X. et al. Nanograssed micropyramidal architectures for continuous dropwise condensation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 4617–4623 (2011).10.1002/adfm.201101302 ↗
18. Tian, J. et al. Efficient self-propelling of small-scale condensed microdrops by closely packed ZnO nanoneedles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2084–2088 (2014).10.1021/jz500798m ↗
19. Lv, C. et al. Condensation and jumping relay of droplets on lotus leaf. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 021601 (2013).10.1063/1.4812976 ↗
20. Dorrer, C. & Rühe, J. Wetting of silicon nanograss: from superhydrophilic to superhydrophobic surfaces. Adv. Mater. 20, 159–163 (2008).10.1002/adma.200701140 ↗
21. Rykaczewski, K. et al. Multimode multidrop serial coalescence effects during condensation on hierarchical superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 29, 881–891 (2013).10.1021/la304264g ↗
22. Lv, C., Hao, P., Yao, Z. & Niu, F. Departure of condensation droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 31, 2414–2420 (2015).10.1021/la504638y ↗
23. Rykaczewski, K. et al. How nanorough is rough enough to make a surface superhydrophobic during water condensation? Soft Matter 8, 8786–8794 (2012).10.1039/c2sm25502b ↗
24. Enright, R., Miljkovic, N., Al-Obeidi, A., Thompson, C. V. & Wang, E. N. Condensation on superhydrophobic surfaces: the role of local energy barriers and structure length scale. Langmuir 28, 14424–14432 (2012).10.1021/la302599n ↗
25. Jiang, Y., Hirvi, J. T., Suvanto, M. & Pakkanen, T. A. Molecular dynamic simulations of anisotropic wetting and embedding of functionalized polypropylene surfaces. Chem. Phys. 429, 44–50 (2014).10.1016/j.chemphys.2013.12.001 ↗
26. Lata Singh, S., Schimmele, L. & Dietrich, S. Structures of simple liquids in contact with nanosculptured surfaces. Phy. Rev. E 91, 032405 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevE.91.032405 ↗
27. Checco, A., Rahman, A. & Black, C. T. Robust superhydrophobicity in large-area nanostructured surfaces defined by block-copolymer self assembly. Adv. Mater. 26, 886–891 (2014).10.1002/adma.201304006 ↗
28. Reyssat, M. & Quéré, D. Contact angle hysteresis generated by strong dilute defects. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 3906–3909 (2009).10.1021/jp8066876 ↗
29. Yu, Z. J. et al. How to repel hot water from a superhydrophobic surface? J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 10639–10646 (2014).10.1039/C4TA00882K ↗
30. Rykaczewski, K. Microdroplet growth mechanism during water condensation on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 28, 7720–7729 (2012).10.1021/la301618h ↗
31. Khandekar, S. & Muralidhar, K. Dropwise Condensation on Inclined Textured Surfaces (Springer, 2014).10.1007/978-1-4614-8447-9 ↗
32. Xu, W., Lan, Z., Peng, B. L., Wen, R. F. & Ma, X. H. Effect of nanostructures on the nucleus wetting modes during water vapor condensation: from individual groove to nano-array surface. RSC Adv. 6, 7923–7932 (2016).10.1039/C5RA23836F ↗
33. Rykaczewski, K. et al. Multimode multidrop serial coalescence effects during condensation on hierarchical superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 29, 881–891 (2013).10.1021/la304264g ↗
34. Liu, F., Ghigliotti, G., Feng, J. J. & Chen, C. H. Numerical simulations of self-propelled jumping upon drop coalescence on non-wetting surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 752, 39–65 (2014).10.1017/jfm.2014.320 ↗
35. Cavalli, A. et al. Electrically induced drop detachment and ejection. Phys. Fluids 28, 022101 (2016).10.1063/1.4940213 ↗