Tension-induced fusion of bilayer membranes and vesicles
Source abstract
Abstract
Maintaining the integrity of their protective plasma membrane is a primary requirement of cells. Accordingly, cellular events that breach the membrane are tightly regulated. Artificial vesicles used in drug delivery must also stay intact until they have reached the desired target. In both cases, the intrinsic resistance of the membrane to rupture must be overcome to allow the efflux of the vesicle's contents. Here, we use mesoscopic simulations to study the fusion of 28-nm-diameter vesicles to 50 x 50 nm(2) planar membrane patches over 2 mus. We monitor the time evolution of 93 different fusion attempts. This allows us to construct a global morphology diagram, using the initial tensions of the vesicle and the planar membrane patch as control parameters, and to determine the corresponding fusion statistics. All successful fusion events are observed to occur within 350 ns, which reflects the presence of alternative pathways for the tension relaxation.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Alberts, B. et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell 2nd edn (Garland, New York, 1989).
2. Lasic, D. D. in Vesicles (ed. Rosoff, M.) Ch. 10 (Surfactant Science Series vol. 62, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1995).
3. Shillcock, J. C. & Lipowsky, R. Equilibrium structure and lateral stress distribution of amphiphilic bilayers from dissipative particle dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 117, 5048–5061 (2002).10.1063/1.1498463 ↗
4. Jahn, R. & Grubmüller, H. Membrane fusion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biology 14, 488–495 (2002).10.1016/S0955-0674(02)00356-3 ↗
5. Mayer, A. Membrane fusion in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 18, 289–314 (2002).10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.032202.114809 ↗
6. Lindau, M. & de Toledo, G. A. The fusion pore. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1641, 167–173 (2003).10.1016/S0167-4889(03)00085-5 ↗
7. Ohta-lino, S. et al. Fast lipid disorientation at the onset of membrane fusion revealed by moleculer Dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 81, 217–224 (2001).10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75693-7 ↗
8. Marrink, S. J. & Mark, A. E. The mechanism of vesicle fusion as revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 11144–11145 (2003).10.1021/ja036138+ ↗
9. Stevens, M. J., Hoh, J. H. & Woolf, T. B. Insights into the molecular mechanism of membrane fusion from simulation: evidence for the association of splayed tails. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 188102 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.188102 ↗
10. Chanturiya, A., Scaria, P., Kuksenok, O. & Woodle, M. C. Probing the mechanism of fusion in a two-dimensional computer simulation. Biophys. J. 82, 3072–3080 (2002).10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75648-8 ↗
11. Noguchi, H. & Takasu, M. Fusion pathways of vesicles: a Brownian dynamics simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 115, 9547–9551 (2001).10.1063/1.1414314 ↗
12. Siegel, D. P. The modified stalk mechanism of lamellar/inverted phase transitions and its implications for membrane fusion. Biophys. J. 76, 291–313 (1999).10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77197-3 ↗
13. Markin, V. S. & Albanesi, J. P. Membrane fusion: stalk model revisited. Biophys. J. 82, 693–712 (2002).10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75432-5 ↗
14. Mueller, M., Katsov, K. & Schick, M. A new mechanism of model membrane fusion determined from Monte Carlo simulation. Biophys. J. 85, 1611–1623 (2003).10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74592-5 ↗
15. Hoogerbrugge, P. J. & Koelman, J. M. V. A. Simulating microscopic hydrodynamic phenomena with dissipative particle dynamics. Europhys. Lett. 19, 155–160 (1992).10.1209/0295-5075/19/3/001 ↗
16. Kranenburg, M., Venturoli, M. & Smit, B. Molecular simulations of mesoscopic bilayer phases. Phys. Rev. E. 67, 060901 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevE.67.060901 ↗
17. Yamamoto, S., Maruyama, Y. & Hyodo, S. Dissipative particle dynamics study of spontaneous vesicle formation of amphiphilic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 116, 5842–5849 (2002).10.1063/1.1456031 ↗
18. Groot, R. D. & Warren, P. B. Dissipative particle dynamics: bridging the gap between atomistic and mesoscopic simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 107, 4423–4435 (1997).10.1063/1.474784 ↗
19. Vattulainen, I., Karttunen, M., Besold, G. & Polson, J. M. Integration schemes for dissipative particle dynamics simulations: from softly interacting systems to hybrid models. J. Chem. Phys. 116, 3967–3979 (2002).10.1063/1.1450554 ↗
20. Warren, P. B. Dissipative particle dynamics. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 3, 620–624 (1998).10.1016/S1359-0294(98)80089-7 ↗
21. Nielsen, S. O., Lopez, C. F., Srinivas, G. & Klein, M. L. Coarse grain models and the computer simulation of soft materials. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108, 8153–8160 (2004).10.1021/jp0369239 ↗
22. McNew, J. A. et al. Close is not enough: SNARE-dependent membrane fusion requires an active mechanism that transduces force to membrane anchors. J. Cell Biol. 150, 105–117 (2000).10.1083/jcb.150.1.105 ↗
23. Yersin, A. et al. Interactions between synaptic vesicle fusion proteins explored by atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8736–8741 (2003).10.1073/pnas.1533137100 ↗