Unravelling surface and interfacial structures of a metal–organic framework by transmission electron microscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are crystalline porous materials with designable topology, porosity and functionality, having promising applications in gas storage and separation, ion conduction and catalysis. It is challenging to observe MOFs with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) due to the extreme instability of MOFs upon electron beam irradiation. Here, we use a direct-detection electron-counting camera to acquire TEM images of the MOF ZIF-8 with an ultralow dose of 4.1 electrons per square ångström to retain the structural integrity. The obtained image involves structural information transferred up to 2.1 Å, allowing the resolution of individual atomic columns of Zn and organic linkers in the framework. Furthermore, TEM reveals important local structural features of ZIF-8 crystals that cannot be identified by diffraction techniques, including armchair-type surface terminations and coherent interfaces between assembled crystals. These observations allow us to understand how ZIF-8 crystals self-assemble and the subsequent influence of interfacial cavities on mass transport of guest molecules.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Li, H., Eddaoudi, M., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal–organic framework. Nature 402, 276–279 (1999).10.1038/46248 ↗
2. Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. The chemistry and applications of metal–organic frameworks. Science 341, 974–986 (2013).10.1126/science.1230444 ↗
3. Park, K. S. et al. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10186–10191 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0602439103 ↗
4. Lebedev, O. I., Millange, F., Serre, C., Van Tendeloo, G. & Ferey, G. First direct imaging of giant pores of the metal–organic framework MIL-101. Chem. Mater. 17, 6525–6527 (2005).10.1021/cm051870o ↗
5. Zhu, L. K., Zhang, D. L., Xue, M., Li, H. & Qiu, S. L. Direct observations of the MOF (UiO-66) structure by transmission electron microscopy. Crystengcomm 15, 9356–9359 (2013).10.1039/c3ce41122b ↗
6. Wiktor, C., Turner, S., Zacher, D., Fischer, R. A. & Van Tendeloo, G. Imaging of intact MOF-5 nanocrystals by advanced TEM at liquid nitrogen temperature. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 162, 131–135 (2012).10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.06.014 ↗
7. Cravillon, J. et al. Rapid room-temperature synthesis and characterization of nanocrystals of a prototypical zeolitic imidazolate framework. Chem. Mater. 21, 1410–1412 (2009).10.1021/cm900166h ↗
8. Feyand, M. et al. Automated diffraction tomography for the structure elucidation of twinned, sub-micrometer crystals of a highly porous, catalytically active bismuth metal–organic framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 10373–10376 (2012).10.1002/anie.201204963 ↗
9. Yakovenko, A. A., Reibenspies, J. H., Bhuvanesh, N. & Zhou, H. C. Generation and applications of structure envelopes for porous metal–organic frameworks. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 346–353 (2013).10.1107/S0021889812050935 ↗
10. Adams, C. J., Haddow, M. F., Lusi, M. & Orpen, A. G. Crystal engineering of lattice metrics of perhalometallate salts and MOFs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16033–16038 (2010).10.1073/pnas.0910146107 ↗
11. Wu, H. et al. Unusual and highly tunable missing-linker defects in zirconium metal–organic framework UiO-66 and their important effects on gas adsorption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 10525–10532 (2013).10.1021/ja404514r ↗
12. Fang, Z. L., Bueken, B., De Vos, D. E. & Fischer, R. A. Defect-engineered metal–organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 7234–7254 (2015).10.1002/anie.201411540 ↗
13. Makiura, R. et al. Surface nano-architecture of a metal–organic framework. Nat. Mater. 9, 565–571 (2010).10.1038/nmat2769 ↗
14. Song, Q. L. et al. Zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) based polymer nanocomposite membranes for gas separation. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 8359–8369 (2012).10.1039/c2ee21996d ↗
15. Cliffe, M. J. et al. Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal–organic framework. Nat. Commun. 5, 4176–4183 (2014).10.1038/ncomms5176 ↗
16. Zhu, Y. H. et al. Atomic resolution imaging of nanoscale structural ordering in a complex metal oxide catalyst. Chem. Mater. 24, 3269–3278 (2012).10.1021/cm301828n ↗
17. Hashimoto, A., Suenaga, K., Gloter, A., Urita, K. & Iijima, S. Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers. Nature 430, 870–873 (2004).10.1038/nature02817 ↗
18. Zhu, Y. H., Wang, Q. X., Zhao, L. & Han, Y. Direct observation of surface reconstruction and termination on a complex metal oxide catalyst by electron microscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 4176–4180 (2012).10.1002/anie.201108532 ↗
19. Mayoral, A., Sanchez-Sanchez, M., Alfayate, A., Perez-Pariente, J. & Diaz, I. Atomic observations of microporous materials highly unstable under the electron beam: the cases of Ti-doped AlPO4-5 and Zn-MOF-74. Chemcatchem 7, 3719–3724 (2015).10.1002/cctc.201500617 ↗
20. Li, X. M. et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 10, 584–590 (2013).10.1038/nmeth.2472 ↗
21. Bartesaghi, A. et al. 2.2 angstrom resolution cryo-EM structure of beta-galactosidase in complex with a cell-permeant inhibitor. Science 348, 1147–1151 (2015).10.1126/science.aab1576 ↗
22. Zou, X. D., Hovmöller, S. & Oleynikov, P. Electron Crystallography: Electron Microscopy and Electron Diffraction (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580200.001.0001 ↗
23. Yanai, N. & Granick, S. Directional self-assembly of a colloidal metal–organic framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5638–5641 (2012).10.1002/anie.201109132 ↗
24. Yanai, N., Sindoro, M., Yan, J. & Granick, S. Electric field-induced assembly of monodisperse polyhedral metal–organic framework crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 34–37 (2013).10.1021/ja309361d ↗
25. Utama, M. I. B. et al. Recent developments and future directions in the growth of nanostructures by van der Waals epitaxy. Nanoscale 5, 3570–3588 (2013).10.1039/c3nr34011b ↗
26. Hovmoller, S. CRISP: crystallographic image processing on a personal computer. Ultramicroscopy 41, 121–135 (1992).10.1016/0304-3991(92)90102-P ↗
27. Pan, M. & Crozier, P. A. Low-dose high-resolution electron-microscopy of zeolite materials with a slow-scan CCD camera. Ultramicroscopy 48, 332–340 (1993).10.1016/0304-3991(93)90108-A ↗
28. Rez, D., Rez, P. & Grant, I. Dirac–Fock calculations of X-ray scattering factors and contributions to the mean inner potential for electron-scattering. Acta Crystallogr. A 50, 481–497 (1994).10.1107/S0108767393013200 ↗