Cell-wall recovery after irreversible deformation of wood
Source abstract
Abstract
The remarkable mechanical properties of biological materials reside in their complex hierarchical architecture and in specific molecular mechanistic phenomena. The fundamental importance of molecular interactions and bond recovery has been suggested by studies on deformation and fracture of bone and nacre. Like these mineral-based materials, wood also represents a complex nanocomposite with excellent mechanical performance, despite the fact that it is mainly based on polymers. In wood, however, the mechanistic contribution of processes in the cell wall is not fully understood. Here we have combined tensile tests on individual wood cells and on wood foils with simultaneous synchrotron X-ray diffraction analysis in order to separate deformation mechanisms inside the cell wall from those mediated by cell-cell interactions. We show that tensile deformation beyond the yield point does not deteriorate the stiffness of either individual cells or foils. This indicates that there is a dominant recovery mechanism that re-forms the amorphous matrix between the cellulose microfibrils within the cell wall, maintaining its mechanical properties. This stick-slip mechanism, rather like Velcro operating at the nanometre level, provides a 'plastic response' similar to that effected by moving dislocations in metals. We suggest that the molecular recovery mechanism in the cell matrix is a universal phenomenon dominating the tensile deformation of different wood tissue types.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Building materials and conservation · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Weiner, S. & Wagner, H.D. The material bone: structure-mechanical functions relations. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 271–298 (1998).10.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.271 ↗
2. Ashby, M.F., Gibson, L.J., Wegst, U. & Olive, R. The mechanical properties of natural materials. I. Material property charts. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 450, 123–140 (1995).10.1098/rspa.1995.0075 ↗
3. Gordon, J.E. & Jeronimidis, G. Composites with high work of fracture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 294, 545–550 (1980).10.1098/rsta.1980.0063 ↗
4. Smith, L.B. et al. Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites. Nature 399, 761–763 (1999).10.1038/21607 ↗
5. Thompson, J.B. et al. Bone indentation recovery time correlates with bond reforming time. Nature 414, 773–776 (2001).10.1038/414773a ↗
6. Nalla, R.K., Kinney, J.H. & Ritchie, R.O. Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone. Nature Mater. 2, 164–168 (2003).10.1038/nmat832 ↗
7. Niklas, K.J. Plant Biomechanics (Univ.Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992).
8. Meylan, B.A. & Butterfield, B.G. Helical orientation of the microfibrils in tracheids, fibres and vessels. Wood Sci. Technol. 12, 219–222 (1978).10.1007/BF00372867 ↗
9. Cave, I.D. The anisotropic elasticity of the plant cell wall. Wood Sci. Technol. 2, 268–278 (1968).10.1007/BF00350273 ↗
10. Jentzen, C.A. The effect of stress applied during drying on some of the properties of individual pulp fibers. TAPPI J. 47, 412–418 (1964).
11. Navi, P., Rastogi, P.K., Gresse, V. & Tolou, A. Micromechanics of wood subjected to axial tension. Wood Sci. Technol. 29, 411–419 (1995).10.1007/BF00194199 ↗
12. Spatz, H.-CH., Köhler, L. & Niklas, K.J. Mechanical behaviour of plant tissues: Composite materials or structures? J. Exp. Biol. 202, 3269–3272 (1999).10.1242/jeb.202.23.3269 ↗
13. Köhler, L. & Spatz, H.-C. Micromechanics of plant tissues beyond the linear-elastic range. Planta 215, 33–40 (2002).10.1007/s00425-001-0718-9 ↗
14. Lichtenegger, H., Reiterer, A., Stanzl-Tschegg, S.E. & Fratzl, P. in Microfibril Angle in Wood (ed. Butterfield, B.G.) 140–156 (IAWA, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1998).
15. Schniewind, A.P. & Barrett, J.D. Cell wall model with complete shear restrain. Wood Fiber 1, 205–214 (1969).
16. Burgert, I., Keckes, J., Frühmann, K., Fratzl, P. & Tschegg, S.E. A comparison of two techniques for wood fibre isolation—evaluation by tensile tests on single fibres with different microfibril angle. Plant Biol. 4, 9–12 (2002).10.1055/s-2002-20430 ↗
17. Hepworth, D.G. & Vincent, J.F.V. Modelling the mechanical properties of xylem tissue from tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum 'Samsun') by considering the importance of molecular and micromechanisms. Ann. Bot. 81, 761–770 (1998).10.1006/anbo.1998.0632 ↗
18. Yamamoto, H. & Kojima, Y. Properties of cell wall constituents in relation to longitudinal elasticity of wood. Part 1. Formation of the longitudinal elasticity of an isolated wood fiber. Wood Sci. Technol. 36, 55–74 (2002).10.1007/s00226-001-0128-y ↗
19. Burgert, I., Frühmann, K., Keckes, J., Fratzl, P. & Stanzl-Tschegg, S.E. Microtensile testing of wood fibers combined with video extensometry for efficient strain detection. Holzforschung (in the press).
20. Fengel, D. & Wegener, G. Wood—Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions (De Gruyter, Berlin, 1998).
21. Bergander, A. & Salmen, L. Cell wall properties and their effects on the mechanical properties of fibers. J. Mater. Sci. 37, 151–156 (2002).10.1023/A:1013115925679 ↗