From brittle to ductile fracture of bone
Source abstract
Abstract
Toughness is crucial to the structural function of bone. Usually, the toughness of a material is not just determined by its composition, but by the ability of its microstructure to dissipate deformation energy without propagation of the crack. Polymers are often able to dissipate energy by viscoplastic flow or the formation of non-connected microcracks. In ceramics, well-known toughening mechanisms are based on crack ligament bridging and crack deflection. Interestingly, all these phenomena were identified in bone, which is a composite of a fibrous polymer (collagen) and ceramic nanoparticles (carbonated hydroxyapatite). Here, we use controlled crack-extension experiments to explain the influence of fibre orientation on steering the various toughening mechanisms. We find that the fracture energy changes by two orders of magnitude depending on the collagen orientation, and the angle between collagen and crack propagation direction is decisive in switching between different toughening mechanisms.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Hahn, G. T. The influence of microstructure on brittle fracture toughness. Metall. Trans. A 15, 947–959 (1984).10.1007/BF02644685 ↗
2. Bower, D. I. An Introduction to Polymer Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2002).10.1017/CBO9780511801280 ↗
3. Sakai, M. & Bradt, R. C. Fracture toughness testing of brittle materials. Int. Mater. Rev. 38, 53–78 (1993).10.1179/imr.1993.38.2.53 ↗
4. Thompson, J. B. et al. Bone indentation recovery time correlates with bond reforming time. Nature 414, 773–776 (2001).10.1038/414773a ↗
5. Fantner, G. E. et al. Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bond fracture. Nature Mater. 4, 612–616 (2005).10.1038/nmat1428 ↗
6. Zioupos, P. & Currey, J. D. The extent of microcracking and the morphology of microcracks in damaged bone. J. Mater. Sci. 29, 978–986 (1994).10.1007/BF00351420 ↗
7. Zioupos, P., Wang, X. T. & Currey, J. D. The accumulation of fatigue microdamage in human cortical bone of two different ages in vitro. Clin. Biomech. 11, 365–375 (1996).10.1016/0268-0033(96)00010-1 ↗
8. Vashishth, D., Tanner, K. E. & Bonfield, W. Experimental validation of a microcracking-based toughening mechanism for cortical bone. J. Biomech. 36, 121–124 (2003).10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00319-6 ↗
9. Liu, D., Weiner, S. & Wagner, H. D. Anisotropic mechanical properties of lamellar bone using miniature cantilever bending specimens. J. Biomech. 32, 647–654 (1999).10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00051-2 ↗
10. Nalla, R. K., Kinney, J. H. & Ritchie, R. O. Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone. Nature Mater. 2, 164–168 (2003).10.1038/nmat832 ↗
11. Nalla, R. K., Kruzic, J. J. & Ritchie, R. O. On the origin of the toughness of mineralized tissue: microcracking or crack bridging? Bone 34, 790–798 (2004).10.1016/j.bone.2004.02.001 ↗
12. Nalla, R. K., Kruzic, J. J., Kinney, J. H. & Ritchie, R. O. Mechanistic aspects of fracture and R-curve behavior in human cortical bone. Biomaterials 26, 217–231 (2005).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.017 ↗
13. Currey, J. D. The design of mineralised hard tissues for their mechanical functions. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 3285–3294 (1999).10.1242/jeb.202.23.3285 ↗
14. Weiner, S. & Wagner, H. D. The material bone: structure mechanical function relations. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 271–298 (1998).10.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.271 ↗
15. Fratzl, P., Gupta, H. S., Paschalis, E. P. & Roschger, P. Structural and mechanical quality of the collagen-mineral nano-composite in bone. J. Mater. Chem. 14, 2115–2123 (2004).10.1039/B402005G ↗
16. Gao, H., Baohua, J., Jäger, I. L., Arzt, E. & Fratzl, P. Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: lessons from nature. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5597–5600 (2003).10.1073/pnas.0631609100 ↗
17. Keckes, J. et al. Cell-wall recovery after irreversible deformation of wood. Nature Mater. 2, 810–814 (2003).10.1038/nmat1019 ↗
18. Kamat, S., Su, X., Ballarini, R. & Heuer, A. H. Structural basis for the fracture toughness of the shell of the conch Strombus gigas. Nature 405, 1036–1040 (2000).10.1038/35016535 ↗
19. Aizenberg, J. et al. Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: Structural hierarchy from the nanoscale to the macroscale. Science 309, 275–278 (2005).10.1126/science.1112255 ↗
20. Giraud-Guille, M. Plywood structures in nature. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 3, 221–227 (1998).10.1016/S1359-0286(98)80094-6 ↗
21. Wagner, H. D. & Weiner, S. On the relationship between the microstructure of bone and its mechanical stiffness. J. Biomech. 25, 1311–1320 (1992).10.1016/0021-9290(92)90286-A ↗
22. Gupta, H. S. et al. Nanoscale deformation mechanisms in bone. Nano Lett. 5, 2108–2111 (2005).10.1021/nl051584b ↗
23. Peterlik, H. Crack bridging stresses in alumina during crack extension. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 20, 1703–1705 (2001).10.1023/A:1012485722195 ↗
24. Behiri, J. C. & Bonfield, W. Orientation dependence of the fracture-mechanics of cortical bone. J. Biomech. 22, 863–872 (1989).10.1016/0021-9290(89)90070-5 ↗
25. Martin, R. B. & Boardman, D. L. The effects of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density, and mineralization on bovine cortical bone bending properties. J. Biomech. 26, 1047–1054 (1993).10.1016/S0021-9290(05)80004-1 ↗
26. Reilly, D. T. & Burstein, A. H. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J. Biomech. 8, 393–405 (1975).10.1016/0021-9290(75)90075-5 ↗
27. Currey, J. D. Bones—Structure and Mechanics (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2002).10.1515/9781400849505 ↗
28. Katz, J. L. & Meunier, A. The elastic anisotropy of bone. J. Biomech. 20, 1063–1070 (1987).10.1016/0021-9290(87)90024-8 ↗
29. Hull, D. & Clyne, T. W. An Introduction to Composite Materials 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1996).10.1017/CBO9781139170130 ↗
30. Martin, R. B. & Ishida, J. The relative effects of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density, and mineralization on bone strength. J. Biomech. 22, 419–426 (1989).10.1016/0021-9290(89)90202-9 ↗