Quantitative relations between interaction parameter, miscibility and function in organic solar cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Although it is known that molecular interactions govern morphology formation and purity of mixed domains of conjugated polymer donors and small-molecule acceptors, and thus largely control the achievable performance of organic solar cells, quantifying interaction-function relations has remained elusive. Here, we first determine the temperature-dependent effective amorphous-amorphous interaction parameter, χaa(T), by mapping out the phase diagram of a model amorphous polymer:fullerene material system. We then establish a quantitative 'constant-kink-saturation' relation between χaa and the fill factor in organic solar cells that is verified in detail in a model system and delineated across numerous high- and low-performing materials systems, including fullerene and non-fullerene acceptors. Our experimental and computational data reveal that a high fill factor is obtained only when χaa is large enough to lead to strong phase separation. Our work outlines a basis for using various miscibility tests and future simulation methods that will significantly reduce or eliminate trial-and-error approaches to material synthesis and device fabrication of functional semiconducting blends and organic blends in general.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Brédas, J.-L., Norton, J. E., Cornil, J. & Coropceanu, V. Molecular understanding of organic solar cells: the challenges. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 1691–1699 (2009).10.1021/ar900099h ↗
2. Huang, Y., Kramer, E. J., Heeger, A. J. & Bazan, G. C. Bulk heterojunction solar cells: morphology and performance relationships. Chem. Rev. 114, 7006–7043 (2014).10.1021/cr400353v ↗
3. Zhao, J. et al. Efficient organic solar cells processed from hydrocarbon solvents. Nat. Energy 1, 15027 (2016).
4. Li, S. et al. Energy-level modulation of small-molecule electron acceptors to achieve over 12% efficiency in polymer solar cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 9423–9429 (2016).10.1002/adma.201602776 ↗
5. Ye, L. et al. High-efficiency nonfullerene organic solar cells: critical factors that affect complex multi-length scale morphology and device performance. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602000 (2017).
6. Baran, D. et al. Reducing the efficiency-stability-cost gap of organic photovoltaics with highly efficient and stable small molecule acceptor ternary solar cells. Nat. Mater. 16, 363–369 (2017).10.1038/nmat4797 ↗
7. Zhao, F. et al. Single-junction binary-blend nonfullerene polymer solar cells with 12.1% efficiency. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700144 (2017).
8. Müller, C. et al. Binary organic photovoltaic blends: a simple rationale for optimum compositions. Adv. Mater. 20, 3510–3515 (2008).10.1002/adma.200800963 ↗
9. Kouijzer, S. et al. Predicting morphologies of solution processed polymer:fullerene blends. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12057–12067 (2013).10.1021/ja405493j ↗
10. Wolfer, P. et al. Identifying the optimum composition in organic solar cells comprising non-fullerene electron acceptors. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 5989–5995 (2013).10.1039/c3ta10554g ↗
11. Treat, N. D. et al. Polymer-fullerene miscibility: a metric for screening new materials for high-performance organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15869–15879 (2012).10.1021/ja305875u ↗
12. Roland, S. et al. Fullerene-free polymer solar cells with highly reduced bimolecular recombination and field-independent charge carrier generation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2815–2822 (2014).10.1021/jz501506z ↗
13. Ye, L. et al. Control of mesoscale morphology and photovoltaic performance in diketopyrrolopyrrole-based small band gap terpolymers. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1601138 (2017).
14. Mukherjee, S., Proctor, C. M., Bazan, G. C., Nguyen, T. Q. & Ade, H. Significance of average domain purity and mixed domains on the photovoltaic performance of high-efficiency solution-processed small-molecule BHJ solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500877 (2015).10.1002/aenm.201500877 ↗
15. Bates, F. S. Polymer-polymer phase behavior. Science 251, 898–905 (1991).10.1126/science.251.4996.898 ↗
16. Russell, T. P., Hjelm, R. P. & Seeger, P. A. Temperature dependence of the interaction parameter of polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate). Macromolecules 23, 890–893 (1990).10.1021/ma00205a033 ↗
17. Leman, D. et al In situ characterization of polymer–fullerene bilayer stability. Macromolecules 48, 383–392 (2015).10.1021/ma5021227 ↗
18. Li, N. et al. Abnormal strong burn-in degradation of highly efficient polymer solar cells caused by spinodal donor-acceptor demixing. Nat. Commun. 8, 14541 (2017).
19. Lyons, B. P., Clarke, N. & Groves, C. The relative importance of domain size, domain purity and domain interfaces to the performance of bulk-heterojunction organic photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7657–7663 (2012).10.1039/c2ee21327c ↗
20. Liu, F. et al. Molecular weight dependence of the morphology in P3HT:PCBM solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 19876–19887 (2014).10.1021/am505283k ↗
21. Bin, H. et al. 9.73% efficiency nonfullerene all organic small molecule solar cells with absorption-complementary donor and acceptor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 5085–5094 (2017).10.1021/jacs.6b12826 ↗
22. Ghasemi, M. et al. Panchromatic sequentially cast ternary polymer solar cells. Adv. Mater. 29, 1604603 (2017).10.1002/adma.201604603 ↗
23. Westacott, P. et al. Origin of fullerene-induced vitrification of fullerene:donor polymer photovoltaic blends and its impact on solar cell performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 2689–2700 (2017).10.1039/C6TA08950J ↗
24. Park, S. H. et al. Bulk heterojunction solar cells with internal quantum efficiency approaching 100%. Nat. Photon-. 3, 297–302 (2009).10.1038/nphoton.2009.69 ↗
25. Peters, C. H. et al. High efficiency polymer solar cells with long operating lifetimes. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 491–494 (2011).10.1002/aenm.201100138 ↗
26. Gélinas, S. et al. Ultrafast long-range charge separation in organic semiconductor photovoltaic diodes. Science 343, 512–516 (2014).10.1126/science.1246249 ↗
27. Mukherjee, S. et al. Importance of domain purity and molecular packing in efficient solution-processed small-molecule solar cells. Adv. Mater. 27, 1105–1111 (2015).10.1002/adma.201404388 ↗
28. Albrecht, S. et al. Quantifying charge extraction in organic solar cells: the case of fluorinated PCPDTBT. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 1131–1138 (2014).10.1021/jz500457b ↗
29. Ro, H. W. et al Poly(3-hexylthiophene) and [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester mixing in organic solar cells. Macromolecules 45, 6587–6599 (2012).10.1021/ma3008527 ↗
30. Eitouni, H. B. & Balsara, N. P. in Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook (ed. Mark, J. E.) 339–356 (Springer, New York, 2007).10.1007/978-0-387-69002-5_19 ↗
31. Synooka, O. et al. Influence of thermal annealing on PCDTBT:PCBM composition profiles. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1300981 (2014).10.1002/aenm.201300981 ↗
32. Gann, E. et al. Soft x-ray scattering facility at the Advanced Light Source with real-time data processing and analysis. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 045110 (2012).10.1063/1.3701831 ↗
33. Kozub, D. R. et al. Polymer crystallization of partially miscible polythiophene/fullerene mixtures controls morphology. Macromolecules 44, 5722–5726 (2011).10.1021/ma200855r ↗
34. Helfand, E. & Tagami, Y. Theory of the interface between immiscible polymers. II. J. Chem. Phys. 56, 3592–3601 (1972).10.1063/1.1677735 ↗
35. Roe, R.-J. Methods of X-ray and Neutron Scattering in Polymer Science (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000).
36. Nishi, T. & Wang, T. T. Melting point depression and kinetic effects of cooling on crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)-poly(methyl methacrylate) mixtures. Macromolecules 8, 909–915 (1975).10.1021/ma60048a040 ↗
37. Li, Z. et al. Donor polymer design enables efficient non-fullerene organic solar cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 13094 (2016).
38. Nielsen, C. B., Holliday, S., Chen, H.-Y., Cryer, S. J. & McCulloch, I. Non-fullerene electron acceptors for use in organic solar cells. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 2803–2812 (2015).10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00199 ↗
39. Meng, D. et al. High-performance solution-processed non-fullerene organic solar cells based on selenophene-containing perylene bisimide acceptor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 375–380 (2016).10.1021/jacs.5b11149 ↗
40. Stoltzfus, D. M., Clulow, A. J., Jin, H., Burn, P. L. & Gentle, I. R. Impact of dimerization on phase separation and crystallinity in bulk heterojunction films containing non-fullerene acceptors. Macromolecules 49, 4404–4415 (2016).10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00984 ↗
41. Staniec, P. A. et al. The nanoscale morphology of a PCDTBT:PCBM photovoltaic blend. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 499–504 (2011).10.1002/aenm.201100144 ↗
42. Li, Z. et al. Toward improved lifetimes of organic solar cells under thermal stress: substrate-dependent morphological stability of PCDTBT:PCBM films and devices. Sci. Rep. 5, 15149 (2015).
43. Bartelt, J. A. et al. The importance of fullerene percolation in the mixed regions of polymer-fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 364–374 (2013).10.1002/aenm.201200637 ↗
44. Ho, C. H. Y. et al. Using ultralow dosages of electron acceptor to reveal the early stage donor–acceptor electronic interactions in bulk heterojunction blends. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602360 (2017).
45. van Franeker, J. J., Turbiez, M., Li, W., Wienk, M. M. & Janssen, R. A. A real-time study of the benefits of co-solvents in polymer solar cell processing. Nat. Commun. 6, 6229 (2015).10.1038/ncomms7229 ↗
46. Dudowicz, J. & Freed, K. F. Effect of monomer structure and compressibility on the properties of multicomponent polymer blends and solutions: 1. Lattice Clust. Theory Compress. Syst. Macromol. 24, 5076–5095 (1991).
47. Aarts, D. G. A. L., Tuinier, R. & Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. Phase behaviour of mixtures of colloidal spheres and excluded-volume polymer chains. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 7551 (2002).
48. Mutch, K. J., van Duijneveldt, J. S. & Eastoe, J. Colloid-polymer mixtures in the protein limit. Soft Matter 3, 155–167 (2007).10.1039/B611137H ↗
49. Nikolka, M. et al. High operational and environmental stability of high-mobility conjugated polymer field-effect transistors through the use of molecular additives. Nat. Mater. 16, 356–362 (2017).10.1038/nmat4785 ↗
50. Kilcoyne, A. L. D. et al. Interferometer-controlled scanning transmission X-ray microscopes at the Advanced Light Source. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 10, 125–136 (2003).10.1107/S0909049502017739 ↗
51. Hexemer, A. et al. A SAXS/WAXS/GISAXS beamline with multilayer monochromator. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 247, 012007 (2010).10.1088/1742-6596/247/1/012007 ↗
52. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
53. Jackson, N. E. et al. Conformational order in aggregates of conjugated polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 6254–6262 (2015).10.1021/jacs.5b00493 ↗
54. Jorgensen, W. L. & Tirado-Rives, J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 1657–1666 (1988).10.1021/ja00214a001 ↗
55. Rathi, P., Huang, T.-M., Dayal, P. & Kyu, T. Crystalline−amorphous interaction in relation to the phase diagrams of binary polymer blends containing a crystalline constituent. J. Phys. Chem. B. 112, 6460–6466 (2008).10.1021/jp800275p ↗