Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Investigation of the Structure of Graphene Oxide: pH-Dependence of the Spectroscopic Response
Source abstract
Abstract
The time-dependence of the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signal arising from purified graphene oxide (GO) in various solvents has been investigated. The prepared GO was sequentially base and acid (ba) treated to remove manganese impurities. The EPR signal of ba-GO was found to be pH-dependent when exposed to different aqueous solutions, which is related to the decarboxylation process the material undergoes in solution. This process involves the fragmentation of the carbonaceous framework and occurs most rapidly in alkaline conditions. Under acidic conditions, fragmentation is much slower, leading to a gradual increase in the EPR signal from ba-GO in the presence of oxygen. Inferred structural changes were correlated with those deduced from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to explain the observed pH- and time-dependent effects. Comparative experiments showed that the oxygen molecule was the key to the increase of unpaired electron density. Exposure to superoxide anions in situ confirmed that the scavenging ability of ba-GO was related to the oxidation of the sp2-carbon structure, which led to an increase of the EPR signal. Overall, the results demonstrate changes of the structure and stability of GO at different pH values.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Science, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF, United Kingdom
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · University of Manchester
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0496910.1038/nature04969 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20100106810.1002/adma.201001068 ↗
3. 10.1021/nn901311t10.1021/nn901311t ↗
4. 10.1021/ja901105a10.1021/ja901105a ↗
5. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2011.11.00110.1016/j.nanoen.2011.11.001 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12274-008-8021-810.1007/s12274-008-8021-8 ↗
7. 10.1021/ar300159f10.1021/ar300159f ↗
8. 10.1038/nmat502510.1038/nmat5025 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20090368910.1002/adma.200903689 ↗
10. 10.1038/nature0601610.1038/nature06016 ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20120138910.1002/anie.201201389 ↗
12. 10.1039/c0cc02374d10.1039/c0cc02374d ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20090378310.1002/adma.200903783 ↗
14. 10.1002/cctc.20120021010.1002/cctc.201200210 ↗
15. Dreyer D. R. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2010 · 49 · 681310.1002/anie.201002160 ↗
16. 10.1039/c1sc00035g10.1039/c1sc00035g ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20140529510.1002/anie.201405295 ↗
18. 10.1021/jp973182110.1021/jp9731821 ↗
19. 10.1038/nchem.28110.1038/nchem.281 ↗
20. 10.1021/nn102602a10.1021/nn102602a ↗
21. 10.1039/C4TC01383B10.1039/C4TC01383B ↗
22. 10.1063/1.487029710.1063/1.4870297 ↗
23. 10.1038/ncomms231510.1038/ncomms2315 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0124810.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01248 ↗
25. 10.1021/cm060258+10.1021/cm060258+ ↗
26. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/11300410.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113004 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.497436410.1063/1.4974364 ↗
28. 10.1039/c2jm13667h10.1039/c2jm13667h ↗
29. 10.1021/jp311727t10.1021/jp311727t ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.19513910.1103/PhysRevB.86.195139 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.06010.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.060 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.physe.2011.07.01910.1016/j.physe.2011.07.019 ↗
33. 10.1002/pssb.20100044810.1002/pssb.201000448 ↗
34. 10.1039/C4NR03275F10.1039/C4NR03275F ↗
35. 10.1002/anie.20100752010.1002/anie.201007520 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.20542010.1103/PhysRevB.81.205420 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ssc.2009.02.05410.1016/j.ssc.2009.02.054 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.11540810.1103/PhysRevB.81.115408 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0194110.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01941 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.03410.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.01.01410.1016/j.carbon.2010.01.014 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.09.04510.1016/j.carbon.2008.09.045 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.02.01210.1016/j.carbon.2008.02.012 ↗
44. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/6/06200110.1088/0022-3727/41/6/062001 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.07610.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.076 ↗
46. 10.1021/nn304737810.1021/nn3047378 ↗
47. 10.1021/jz300236w10.1021/jz300236w ↗
48. 10.1002/pssb.20066921810.1002/pssb.200669218 ↗
49. 10.1039/C4RA13315C10.1039/C4RA13315C ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ssc.2012.01.00510.1016/j.ssc.2012.01.005 ↗
51. 10.1021/nn302615f10.1021/nn302615f ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0040710.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00407 ↗
53. 10.1021/jo00361a03010.1021/jo00361a030 ↗
54. 10.1021/nl402164910.1021/nl4021649 ↗
55. 10.1021/nn505210310.1021/nn5052103 ↗
56. 10.1021/ja01539a01710.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
57. Thermo Scientific.Cost effective analysis for low sample throughput requirements; 2017;https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/CMD/Specification-Sheets/PS-43229-ICP-OES-iCAP-7200-PS43229-EN.pdf.