journal article·2016-02

Tough bonding of hydrogels to diverse non-porous surfaces

Hyunwoo Yuk, Teng Zhang, Shaoting Lin, German Alberto Parada, Xuanhe Zhao

Nature Materials· Volume 15· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

In many animals, the bonding of tendon and cartilage to bone is extremely tough (for example, interfacial toughness ∼800 J m(-2); refs ,), yet such tough interfaces have not been achieved between synthetic hydrogels and non-porous surfaces of engineered solids. Here, we report a strategy to design tough transparent and conductive bonding of synthetic hydrogels containing 90% water to non-porous surfaces of diverse solids, including glass, silicon, ceramics, titanium and aluminium. The design strategy is to anchor the long-chain polymer networks of tough hydrogels covalently to non-porous solid surfaces, which can be achieved by the silanation of such surfaces. Compared with physical interactions, the chemical anchorage results in a higher intrinsic work of adhesion and in significant energy dissipation of bulk hydrogel during detachment, which lead to interfacial toughness values over 1,000 J m(-2). We also demonstrate applications of robust hydrogel-solid hybrids, including hydrogel superglues, mechanically protective hydrogel coatings, hydrogel joints for robotic structures and robust hydrogel-metal conductors.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Cephalopods and Marine Biology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Bobyn, J., Wilson, G., MacGregor, D., Pilliar, R. & Weatherly, G. Effect of pore size on the peel strength of attachment of fibrous tissue to porous-surfaced implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 16, 571–584 (1982).10.1002/jbm.820160505 ↗
2. Moretti, M. et al. Structural characterization and reliable biomechanical assessment of integrative cartilage repair. J. Biomech. 38, 1846–1854 (2005).10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.08.021 ↗
3. Gong, J. P., Katsuyama, Y., Kurokawa, T. & Osada, Y. Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Adv. Mater. 15, 1155–1158 (2003).10.1002/adma.200304907 ↗
4. Wang, Q. et al. High-water-content mouldable hydrogels by mixing clay and a dendritic molecular binder. Nature 463, 339–343 (2010).10.1038/nature08693 ↗
5. Henderson, K. J., Zhou, T. C., Otim, K. J. & Shull, K. R. Ionically cross-linked triblock copolymer hydrogels with high strength. Macromolecules 43, 6193–6201 (2010).10.1021/ma100963m ↗
6. Sun, J.-Y. et al. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489, 133–136 (2012).10.1038/nature11409 ↗
7. Sun, T. L. et al. Physical hydrogels composed of polyampholytes demonstrate high toughness and viscoelasticity. Nature Mater. 12, 932–937 (2013).10.1038/nmat3713 ↗
8. Kamata, H., Akagi, Y., Kayasuga-Kariya, Y., Chung, U.-i. & Sakai, T. “Nonswellable” hydrogel without mechanical hysteresis. Science 343, 873–875 (2014).10.1126/science.1247811 ↗
9. Liu, M. et al. An anisotropic hydrogel with electrostatic repulsion between cofacially aligned nanosheets. Nature 517, 68–72 (2015).10.1038/nature14060 ↗
10. Peppas, N. A., Hilt, J. Z., Khademhosseini, A. & Langer, R. Hydrogels in biology and medicine: From molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv. Mater. 18, 1345–1360 (2006).10.1002/adma.200501612 ↗
11. Lee, K. Y. & Mooney, D. J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem. Rev. 101, 1869–1880 (2001).10.1021/cr000108x ↗
12. Sidorenko, A., Krupenkin, T., Taylor, A., Fratzl, P. & Aizenberg, J. Reversible switching of hydrogel-actuated nanostructures into complex micropatterns. Science 315, 487–490 (2007).10.1126/science.1135516 ↗
13. Banerjee, I., Pangule, R. C. & Kane, R. S. Antifouling coatings: Recent developments in the design of surfaces that prevent fouling by proteins, bacteria, and marine organisms. Adv. Mater. 23, 690–718 (2011).10.1002/adma.201001215 ↗
14. Dong, L., Agarwal, A. K., Beebe, D. J. & Jiang, H. Adaptive liquid microlenses activated by stimuli-responsive hydrogels. Nature 442, 551–554 (2006).10.1038/nature05024 ↗
15. Beebe, D. J. et al. Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels. Nature 404, 588–590 (2000).10.1038/35007047 ↗
16. Keplinger, C. et al. Stretchable, transparent, ionic conductors. Science 341, 984–987 (2013).10.1126/science.1240228 ↗
17. Yu, C. et al. Electronically programmable, reversible shape change in two-and three-dimensional hydrogel structures. Adv. Mater. 25, 1541–1546 (2013).10.1002/adma.201204180 ↗
18. Kurokawa, T., Furukawa, H., Wang, W., Tanaka, Y. & Gong, J. P. Formation of a strong hydrogel–porous solid interface via the double-network principle. Acta Biomater. 6, 1353–1359 (2010).10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.046 ↗
19. Ahagon, A. & Gent, A. Effect of interfacial bonding on the strength of adhesion. J. Polym. Sci. 13, 1285–1300 (1975).
20. Gent, A. Adhesion and strength of viscoelastic solids. Is there a relationship between adhesion and bulk properties? Langmuir 12, 4492–4496 (1996).10.1021/la950887q ↗
21. Kaelble, D. Peel adhesion: Influence of surface energies and adhesive rheology. J. Adhes. 1, 102–123 (1969).10.1080/00218466908078882 ↗
22. Derail, C., Allal, A., Marin, G. & Tordjeman, P. Relationship between viscoelastic and peeling properties of model adhesives. Part 1. Cohesive fracture. J. Adhes. 61, 123–157 (1997).10.1080/00218469708010519 ↗
23. Sudre, G., Olanier, L., Tran, Y., Hourdet, D. & Creton, C. Reversible adhesion between a hydrogel and a polymer brush. Soft Matter 8, 8184–8193 (2012).10.1039/c2sm25868d ↗
24. Weissman, J. M., Sunkara, H. B., Albert, S. T. & Asher, S. A. Thermally switchable periodicities and diffraction from mesoscopically ordered materials. Science 274, 959–963 (1996).10.1126/science.274.5289.959 ↗
25. Gong, J. P. Why are double network hydrogels so tough? Soft Matter 6, 2583–2590 (2010).10.1039/b924290b ↗
26. Zhao, X. Multi-scale multi-mechanism design of tough hydrogels: Building dissipation into stretchy networks. Soft Matter 10, 672–687 (2014).10.1039/C3SM52272E ↗
27. Lake, G. J. & Thomas, A. G. Strength of highly elastic materials. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 300, 108–119 (1967).10.1098/rspa.1967.0160 ↗
28. Webber, R. E., Creton, C., Brown, H. R. & Gong, J. P. Large strain hysteresis and Mullins effect of tough double-network hydrogels. Macromolecules 40, 2919–2927 (2007).10.1021/ma062924y ↗
29. Tegelström, H. & Wyöni, P. I. Silanization of supporting glass plates avoiding fixation of polyacrylamide gels to glass cover plates. Electrophoresis 7, 99 (1986).10.1002/elps.1150070209 ↗
30. Kendall, K. Thin-film peeling-the elastic term. J. Phys. D 8, 1449–1452 (1975).10.1088/0022-3727/8/13/005 ↗
31. Ghatak, A., Chaudhury, M. K., Shenoy, V. & Sharma, A. Meniscus instability in a thin elastic film. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4329–4332 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4329 ↗
32. Biggins, J. S., Saintyves, B., Wei, Z., Bouchaud, E. & Mahadevan, L. Digital instability of a confined elastic meniscus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12545–12548 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1302269110 ↗
33. Ogden, R. & Roxburgh, D. A pseudo–elastic model for the Mullins effect in filled rubber. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 455, 2861–2877 (1999).10.1098/rspa.1999.0431 ↗
34. Lin, S., Zhou, Y. & Zhao, X. Designing extremely resilient and tough hydrogels via delayed dissipation. Extreme Mech. Lett. 1, 70–75 (2014).10.1016/j.eml.2014.11.002 ↗
35. Hong, S. et al. 3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures. Adv. Mater. 27, 4035–4040 (2015).10.1002/adma.201501099 ↗
36. Darnell, M. C. et al. Performance and biocompatibility of extremely tough alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogels. Biomaterials 34, 8042–8048 (2013).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.061 ↗
37. Nemir, S., Hayenga, H. N. & West, J. L. PEGDA hydrogels with patterned elasticity: Novel tools for the study of cell response to substrate rigidity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105, 636–644 (2010).10.1002/bit.22574 ↗
38. Dugas, V. & Chevalier, Y. Surface hydroxylation and silane grafting on fumed and thermal silica. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 264, 354–361 (2003).10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00552-6 ↗
39. Yoshida, W., Castro, R. P., Jou, J.-D. & Cohen, Y. Multilayer alkoxysilane silylation of oxide surfaces. Langmuir 17, 5882–5888 (2001).10.1021/la001780s ↗
40. Muir, B. V., Myung, D., Knoll, W. & Frank, C. W. Grafting of cross-linked hydrogel networks to titanium surfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 958–966 (2014).10.1021/am404361v ↗
41. Cha, C. et al. Tailoring hydrogel adhesion to polydimethylsiloxane substrates using polysaccharide glue. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 6949–6952 (2013).10.1002/anie.201302925 ↗
42. Stile, R. A., Barber, T. A., Castner, D. G. & Healy, K. E. Sequential robust design methodology and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to analyze the grafting of hyaluronic acid to glass substrates. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 61, 391–398 (2002).10.1002/jbm.10154 ↗
43. Bai, Y. et al. Transparent hydrogel with enhanced water retention capacity by introducing highly hydratable salt. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 151903 (2014).10.1063/1.4898189 ↗
44. Yang, C. H. et al. Ionic cable. Extreme Mech. Lett. 3, 59–65 (2015).10.1016/j.eml.2015.03.001 ↗