Band alignment of rutile and anatase TiO2
Source abstract
Abstract
The most widely used oxide for photocatalytic applications owing to its low cost and high activity is TiO₂. The discovery of the photolysis of water on the surface of TiO₂ in 1972 launched four decades of intensive research into the underlying chemical and physical processes involved. Despite much collected evidence, a thoroughly convincing explanation of why mixed-phase samples of anatase and rutile outperform the individual polymorphs has remained elusive. One long-standing controversy is the energetic alignment of the band edges of the rutile and anatase polymorphs of TiO₂ (ref. ). We demonstrate, through a combination of state-of-the-art materials simulation techniques and X-ray photoemission experiments, that a type-II, staggered, band alignment of ~ 0.4 eV exists between anatase and rutile with anatase possessing the higher electron affinity, or work function. Our results help to explain the robust separation of photoexcited charge carriers between the two phases and highlight a route to improved photocatalysts.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Fujishima, A. & Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238, 37–38 (1972).10.1038/238037a0 ↗
2. Dunnill, C. W. et al. Nanoparticulate silver coated-titania thin films-Photo-oxidative destruction of stearic acid under different light sources and antimicrobial effects under hospital lighting conditions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 220, 113–123 (2011).10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.04.001 ↗
3. Gratzel, M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 414, 338–344 (2001).10.1038/35104607 ↗
4. Khan, S. U. M., Al-Shahry, M. & Ingler, W. B. Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2 . Science 297, 2243–2245 (2002).10.1126/science.1075035 ↗
5. Yang, H. G. et al. Anatase TiO2 single crystals with a large percentage of reactive facets. Nature 453, 638–641 (2008).10.1038/nature06964 ↗
6. Li, G. H. & Gray, K. A. The solid-solid interface: Explaining the high and unique photocatalytic reactivity of TiO2-based nanocomposite materials. Chem. Phys. 339, 173–187 (2007).10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.05.023 ↗
7. Deak, P., Aradi, B. & Frauenheim, T. Band lineup and charge carrier separation in mixed rutile-anatase systems. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 3443–3446 (2011).10.1021/jp1115492 ↗
8. Kavan, L., Gratzel, M., Gilbert, S. E., Klemenz, C. & Scheel, H. J. Electrochemical and photoelectrochemical investigation of single-crystal anatase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 6716–6723 (1996).10.1021/ja954172l ↗
9. Kawahara, T. et al. A patterned TiO2(anatase)/TiO2(rutile) bilayer-type photocatalyst: Effect of the anatase/rutile junction on the photocatalytic activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 2811–2813 (2002).10.1002/1521-3773(20020802)41:15<2811::AID-ANIE2811>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
10. Miyagi, T., Kamei, M., Mitsuhashi, T., Ishigaki, T. & Yamazaki, A. Charge separation at the rutile/anatase interface: A dominant factor of photocatalytic activity. Chem. Phys. Lett. 390, 399–402 (2004).10.1016/j.cplett.2004.04.042 ↗
11. Nakajima, H., Mori, T., Shen, Q. & Toyoda, T. Photoluminescence study of mixtures of anatase and rutile TiO2 nanoparticles: Influence of charge transfer between the nanoparticles on their photo luminescence excitation bands. Chem. Phys. Lett. 409, 81–84 (2005).10.1016/j.cplett.2005.04.093 ↗
12. Xiong, G. et al. Photoemission electron microscopy of TiO2 anatase films embedded with rutile nanocrystals. Adv. Funct. Mater 17, 2133–2138 (2007).10.1002/adfm.200700146 ↗
13. Hurum, D. C. et al. Probing reaction mechanisms in mixed phase TiO2 by EPR. J. Electron Spectrosc. 150, 155–163 (2006).10.1016/j.elspec.2005.01.294 ↗
14. Hurum, D. C., Agrios, A. G., Gray, K. A., Rajh, T. & Thurnauer, M. C. Explaining the enhanced photocatalytic activity of Degussa P25 mixed-phase TiO2 using EPR. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 4545–4549 (2003).10.1021/jp0273934 ↗
15. Hurum, D. C., Gray, K. A., Rajh, T. & Thurnauer, M. C. Recombination pathways in the Degussa P25 formulation of TiO2: Surface versus lattice mechanisms. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 977–980 (2005).10.1021/jp045395d ↗
16. Leytner, S. & Hupp, J. T. Evaluation of the energetics of electron trap states at the nanocrystalline titanium dioxide/aqueous solution interface via time-resolved photoacoustic spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 330, 231–236 (2000).10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01112-X ↗
17. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab-initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
18. Krukau, A. V., Vydrov, O. A., Izmaylov, A. F. & Scuseria, G. E. Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 125, 224106 (2006).10.1063/1.2404663 ↗
19. Madelung, E. The electric field in systems of regularly arranged point charges. Phys. Z 19, 524–533 (1918).
20. Dick, B. G. & Overhauser, A. W. Theory of the dielectric constants of alkali halide crystals. Phys. Rev. 112, 90–103 (1958).10.1103/PhysRev.112.90 ↗
21. Catlow, C. R. A. et al. Advances in computational studies of energy materials. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 368, 3379–3456 (2010).10.1098/rsta.2010.0111 ↗
22. Wang, J. et al. Measurement of wurtzite ZnO/rutile TiO2 heterojunction band offsets by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. A 103, 1099–1103 (2011).10.1007/s00339-010-6048-7 ↗
23. Sokol, A. A., Bromley, S. T., French, S. A., Catlow, C. R. A. & Sherwood, P. Hybrid QM/MM embedding approach for the treatment of localized surface states in ionic materials. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 99, 695–712 (2004).10.1002/qua.20032 ↗
24. Sherwood, P. et al. QUASI: A general purpose implementation of the QM/MM approach and its application to problems in catalysis. J. Mol. Struct.-Theochem. 632, 1–28 (2003).10.1016/S0166-1280(03)00285-9 ↗
25. Cheng, J. & Sprik, M. Aligning electronic energy levels at the TiO2/H2O interface. Phys. Rev. B 82, 081406 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.82.081406 ↗
26. Swank, R. K. Surface properties of 2–6 compounds. Phys. Rev. 153, 844–849 (1967).10.1103/PhysRev.153.844 ↗
27. Sokol, A. A. et al. Point defects in ZnO. Faraday Discuss. 134, 267–282 (2007).10.1039/B607406E ↗
28. Grant, R. W., Kraut, E. A., Kowalczyk, S. P. & Waldrop, J. R. Measurement of potential at semiconductor interfaces by electron-spectroscopy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1, 320–327 (1983).10.1116/1.582550 ↗
29. Kraut, E. A., Grant, R. W., Waldrop, J. R. & Kowalczyk, S. P. Semiconductor core-level to valence-band maximum binding-energy differences—precise determination by X-ray photoelectron-spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 28, 1965–1977 (1983).10.1103/PhysRevB.28.1965 ↗
30. Waldrop, J. R., Kowalczyk, S. P., Grant, R. W., Kraut, E. A. & Miller, D. L. XPS measurement of GaAs-AlAs heterojunction band discontinuities—growth sequence dependence. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 19, 573–575 (1981).10.1116/1.571130 ↗