Conductive MOF electrodes for stable supercapacitors with high areal capacitance
Source abstract
Abstract
Owing to their high power density and superior cyclability relative to batteries, electrochemical double layer capacitors (EDLCs) have emerged as an important electrical energy storage technology that will play a critical role in the large-scale deployment of intermittent renewable energy sources, smart power grids, and electrical vehicles. Because the capacitance and charge-discharge rates of EDLCs scale with surface area and electrical conductivity, respectively, porous carbons such as activated carbon, carbon nanotubes and crosslinked or holey graphenes are used exclusively as the active electrode materials in EDLCs. One class of materials whose surface area far exceeds that of activated carbons, potentially allowing them to challenge the dominance of carbon electrodes in EDLCs, is metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). The high porosity of MOFs, however, is conventionally coupled to very poor electrical conductivity, which has thus far prevented the use of these materials as active electrodes in EDLCs. Here, we show that Ni3(2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene)2 (Ni3(HITP)2), a MOF with high electrical conductivity, can serve as the sole electrode material in an EDLC. This is the first example of a supercapacitor made entirely from neat MOFs as active materials, without conductive additives or other binders. The MOF-based device shows an areal capacitance that exceeds those of most carbon-based materials and capacity retention greater than 90% over 10,000 cycles, in line with commercial devices. Given the established structural and compositional tunability of MOFs, these results herald the advent of a new generation of supercapacitors whose active electrode materials can be tuned rationally, at the molecular level.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Conducting polymers and applications · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Larcher, D. & Tarascon, J. M. Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nat. Chem. 7, 19–29 (2014).10.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
2. Béguin, F. & Frackowiak, E. Supercapacitors: Materials, Systems, and Applications (Wiley-VCH, 2013).10.1002/9783527646661 ↗
3. Conway, B. E. Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications (Plenum Press, 1999).10.1007/978-1-4757-3058-6 ↗
4. Simon, P. & Gogotsi, Y. Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat. Mater. 7, 845–854 (2008).10.1038/nmat2297 ↗
5. Béguin, F., Presser, V., Balducci, A. & Frackowiak, E. Carbons and electrolytes for advanced supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 26, 2219–2251 (2014).10.1002/adma.201304137 ↗
6. Gu, W. & Yushin, G. Review of nanostructured carbon materials for electrochemical capacitor applications: advantages and limitations of activated carbon, carbide-derived carbon, zeolite-templated carbon, carbon aerogels, carbon nanotubes, onion-like carbon, and graphene. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 3, 424–473 (2014).10.1002/wene.102 ↗
7. Sevilla, M. & Mokaya, R. Energy storage applications of activated carbons: supercapacitors and hydrogen storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1250–1280 (2014).10.1039/C3EE43525C ↗
8. Xu, Y. et al. Holey graphene frameworks for highly efficient capacitive energy storage. Nat. Commun. 5, 4554 (2014).10.1038/ncomms5554 ↗
9. Zhu, Y. et al. Carbon-based supercapacitors produced by activation of graphene. Science 332, 1537–1541 (2011).10.1126/science.1200770 ↗
10. Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341, 1230444 (2013).10.1126/science.1230444 ↗
11. Sheberla, D. et al. High electrical conductivity in Ni3(2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene)2, a semiconducting metal–organic graphene analogue. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 8859–8862 (2014).10.1021/ja502765n ↗
12. Simon, P., Gogotsi, Y. & Dunn, B. Where do batteries end and supercapacitors begin? Science 343, 1210–1211 (2014).10.1126/science.1249625 ↗
13. Farha, O. K. et al. Metal–organic framework materials with ultrahigh surface areas: is the sky the limit? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15016–15021 (2012).10.1021/ja3055639 ↗
14. Salunkhe, R. R. et al. Asymmetric supercapacitors using 3D nanoporous carbon and cobalt oxide electrodes synthesized from a single metal–organic framework. ACS Nano 9, 6288–6296 (2015).10.1021/acsnano.5b01790 ↗
15. Wang, L. et al. Metal–organic frameworks for energy storage: batteries and supercapacitors. Coord. Chem. Rev. 307, 361–381 (2016).10.1016/j.ccr.2015.09.002 ↗
16. Choi, K. M. et al. Supercapacitors of nanocrystalline metal–organic frameworks. ACS Nano 8, 7451–7457 (2014).10.1021/nn5027092 ↗
17. Buerschaper, R. A. Thermal and electrical conductivity of graphite and carbon at low temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. 15, 452–454 (1944).10.1063/1.1707454 ↗
18. To, J. W. F. et al. Ultrahigh surface area three-dimensional porous graphitic carbon from conjugated polymeric molecular framework. ACS Cent. Sci. 1, 68–76 (2015).10.1021/acscentsci.5b00149 ↗
19. Sun, L., Campbell, M. G. & Dincă, M. Electrically conductive porous metal–organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 3566–3579 (2016).10.1002/anie.201506219 ↗
20. Miner, E. M. et al. Electrochemical oxygen reduction catalysed by Ni3(hexaiminotriphenylene)2 . Nat. Commun. 7, 10942 (2016).10.1038/ncomms10942 ↗
21. Pilon, L., Wang, H. & d’Entremont, A. Recent advances in continuum modeling of interfacial and transport phenomena in electric double layer capacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A5158–A5178 (2015).10.1149/2.0211505jes ↗
22. Herebian, D., Bothe, E., Neese, F., Weyhermüller, T. & Wieghardt, K. Molecular and electronic structures of bis-(o-diiminobenzosemiquinonato)metal(II) complexes (Ni, Pd, Pt), their monocations and -anions, and of dimeric dications containing weak metal −metal bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 9116–9128 (2003).10.1021/ja030123u ↗
23. Barthram, A. M., Cleary, R. L., Kowallick, R. & Ward, M. D. A new redox-tunable near-IR dye based on a trinuclear ruthenium(II) complex of hexahydroxytriphenylene. Chem. Commun. 34, 2695–2696 (1998).10.1039/a807835a ↗
24. Pohlmann, S., Ramirez-Castro, C. & Balducci, A. The influence of conductive salt ion selection on EDLC electrolyte characteristics and carbon-electrolyte interaction. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A5020–A5030 (2015).10.1149/2.0041505jes ↗
25. Gogotsi, Y. & Simon, P. True performance metrics in electrochemical energy storage. Science 334, 917–918 (2011).10.1126/science.1213003 ↗
26. Stoller, M. D. & Ruoff, R. S. Best practice methods for determining an electrode material’s performance for ultracapacitors. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1294–1301 (2010).10.1039/c0ee00074d ↗
27. Ji, H. et al. Capacitance of carbon-based electrical double-layer capacitors. Nat. Commun. 5, 3317 (2014).10.1038/ncomms4317 ↗
28. Quintero, R. et al. Carbon nanotube 3D current collectors for lightweight, high performance and low cost supercapacitor electrodes. RSC Adv. 4, 8230–8237 (2014).10.1039/c3ra47517d ↗
29. Taberna, P. L., Portet, C. & Simon, P. Electrode surface treatment and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study on carbon/carbon supercapacitors. Appl. Phys. A 82, 639–646 (2006).10.1007/s00339-005-3404-0 ↗
30. Chen, L. et al. Noncovalently netted, photoconductive sheets with extremely high carrier mobility and conduction anisotropy from triphenylene-fused metal trigon conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 7287–7292 (2009).10.1021/ja901357h ↗