Superhydrophobic states
Source abstract
Abstract
It is well known that the roughness of a hydrophobic solid enhances its hydrophobicity. The contact angle of water on such flat solids is typically of the order of 100 to 120 degrees, but reaches values as high as 160 to 175 degrees if they are rough or microtextured. This result is remarkable because such behaviour cannot be generated by surface chemistry alone. Two distinct hypotheses are classically proposed to explain this effect. On one hand, roughness increases the surface area of the solid, which geometrically enhances hydrophobicity (Wenzel model). On the other hand, air can remain trapped below the drop, which also leads to a superhydrophobic behaviour, because the drop sits partially on air (Cassie model). However, it is shown here that both situations are very different from their adhesive properties, because Wenzel drops are found to be highly pinned. In addition, irreversible transitions can be induced between Cassie and Wenzel states, with a loss of the anti-adhesive properties generally associated with superhydrophobicity.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Wenzel, R.N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 28, 988–994 ( 1936).10.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
2. Cassie, A.B.D. & Baxter, S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 40, 546–551 ( 1944).10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
3. Johnson, R.E. & Dettre, R.H. in Contact angle, Wettability and Adhesion Vol. 43 (ed. Fowkes, F. M.) 112–135 (Advances in Chemistry Series, ACS, Washington DC, 1964).10.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch007 ↗
4. Onda, T., Shibuichi, S., Satoh, N. & Tsujii, K. Super water-repellent fractal surfaces. Langmuir 12, 2125–2127 ( 1996).10.1021/la950418o ↗
5. Shibuichi, S., Onda, T., Satoh, N. & Tsujii, K. Super water-repellent surfaces resulting from fractal surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 19512–19517 ( 1996).10.1021/jp9616728 ↗
6. Neinhuis, C. & Barthlott, W. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann. Bot. 79, 667–677 ( 1997).10.1006/anbo.1997.0400 ↗
7. Bico, J., Marzolin, C. & Quéré, D. Pearl drops. Europhys. Lett. 47, 220–226 ( 1999).10.1209/epl/i1999-00548-y ↗
8. Herminghaus, S. Roughness-induced non-wetting. Europhys. Lett. 52, 165–170 ( 2000).10.1209/epl/i2000-00418-8 ↗
9. Öner, D. & McCarthy T.J. Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effects of topography length scales on wettability. Langmuir 16, 7777–7782 ( 2000).10.1021/la000598o ↗
10. Yoshimitsu, Z., Nakajima, A., Watanabe, T. & Hashimoto, K. Effects of surface structure on the hydrophobicity and sliding behavior of water droplets. Langmuir 18, 5818–5822 ( 2002).10.1021/la020088p ↗
11. Bico, J., Thiele, U. & Quéré, D. Wetting of textured surfaces. Colloids Surf. A 206, 41–46 ( 2002).10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00061-4 ↗
12. Patankar, N. On the modeling of hydrophobic contact angles on rough surfaces. Langmuir 19, 1249–1253 ( 2003).10.1021/la026612+ ↗
13. Taylor, G.I. & Michael, D.H. On making holes in a sheet of fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 58, 625–639 ( 1973).10.1017/S0022112073002375 ↗
14. Cottin-Bizonne, C., Barrat J.L., Bocquet, L. & Charlaix, E. Low friction flows of liquid at nanopatterned interfaces. Nature Mater. 2, 237–240 ( 2003).10.1038/nmat857 ↗