Critical surface strain regime for stable and active epitaxial platinum oxygen reduction electrocatalysts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Nanoporous metals and alloys · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Mavrikakis, M., Hammer, B. & Nørskov, J. K. Effect of strain on the reactivity of metal surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2819–2822 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2819 ↗
2. He, T. et al. Mastering the surface strain of platinum catalysts for efficient electrocatalysis. Nature 598, 76–81 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03870-z ↗
3. Strasser, P. et al. Lattice-strain control of the activity in dealloyed core–shell fuel cell catalysts. Nat. Chem. 2, 454–460 (2010).10.1038/nchem.623 ↗
4. Bu, L. et al. Biaxially strained PtPb/Pt core/shell nanoplate boosts oxygen reduction catalysis. Science 354, 1410–1414 (2016).10.1126/science.aah6133 ↗
5. Stamenkovic, V. R. et al. Improved oxygen reduction activity on Pt3Ni(111) via increased surface site availability. Science 315, 493–497 (2007).10.1126/science.1135941 ↗
6. Greeley, J. et al. Alloys of platinum and early transition metals as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat. Chem. 1, 552–556 (2009).10.1038/nchem.367 ↗
7. Escudero-Escribano, M. et al. Tuning the activity of Pt alloy electrocatalysts by means of the lanthanide contraction. Science 352, 73–76 (2016).10.1126/science.aad8892 ↗
8. Brimaud, S., Engstfeld, A. K., Alves, O. B., Hoster, H. E. & Behm, R. J. Oxygen reduction on structurally well defined, bimetallic PtRu surfaces: monolayer PtxRu1−x/Ru(0001) surface alloys versus Pt film covered Ru(0001). Top. Catal. 57, 222–235 (2014).10.1007/s11244-013-0177-0 ↗
9. Liu, G. et al. Site-specific reactivity of stepped Pt surfaces driven by stress release. Nature 626, 1005–1010 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07090-z ↗
10. Wang, L. et al. Tunable intrinsic strain in two-dimensional transition metal electrocatalysts. Science 363, 870–874 (2019).10.1126/science.aat8051 ↗
11. Chen, C. et al. Highly crystalline multimetallic nanoframes with three-dimensional electrocatalytic surfaces. Science 343, 1339–1343 (2014).10.1126/science.1249061 ↗
12. Huang, X. et al. High-performance transition metal–doped Pt3Ni octahedra for oxygen reduction reaction. Science 348, 1230–1234 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa8765 ↗
13. Tian, X. et al. Engineering bunched Pt-Ni alloy nanocages for efficient oxygen reduction in practical fuel cells. Science 366, 850–856 (2019).10.1126/science.aaw7493 ↗
14. Hydrogen Class 8 Long Haul Truck Targets 19006 (US DOE, 2019); https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/19006_hydrogen_class8_long_haul_truck_targets.pdf
15. Cullen, D. A. et al. New roads and challenges for fuel cells in heavy-duty transportation. Nat. Energy 6, 462–474 (2021).10.1038/s41560-021-00775-z ↗
16. Danilovic, N. et al. Activity–stability trends for the oxygen evolution reaction on monometallic oxides in acidic environments. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2474–2478 (2014).10.1021/jz501061n ↗
17. Chung, D. Y. et al. Dynamic stability of active sites in hydr(oxy)oxides for the oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Energy 5, 222–230 (2020).10.1038/s41560-020-0576-y ↗
18. Cui, C., Gan, L., Heggen, M., Rudi, S. & Strasser, P. Compositional segregation in shaped Pt alloy nanoparticles and their structural behaviour during electrocatalysis. Nat. Mater. 12, 765–771 (2013).10.1038/nmat3668 ↗
19. Li, M. et al. Ultrafine jagged platinum nanowires enable ultrahigh mass activity for the oxygen reduction reaction. Science 354, 1414–1419 (2016).10.1126/science.aaf9050 ↗
20. Koh, S. & Strasser, P. Electrocatalysis on bimetallic surfaces: modifying catalytic reactivity for oxygen reduction by voltammetric surface dealloying. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 12624–12625 (2007).10.1021/ja0742784 ↗
21. Wang, C. et al. Design and synthesis of bimetallic electrocatalyst with multilayered Pt-skin surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 14396–14403 (2011).10.1021/ja2047655 ↗
22. Asano, M., Kawamura, R., Sasakawa, R., Todoroki, N. & Wadayama, T. Oxygen reduction reaction activity for strain-controlled Pt-based model alloy catalysts: surface strains and direct electronic effects induced by alloying elements. ACS Catal. 6, 5285–5289 (2016).10.1021/acscatal.6b01466 ↗
23. Adit Maark, T. & Peterson, A. A. Understanding strain and ligand effects in hydrogen evolution over Pd(111) surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 4275–4281 (2014).10.1021/jp4121035 ↗
24. Huang, H. et al. Understanding of strain effects in the electrochemical reduction of CO2: using Pd nanostructures as an ideal platform. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 3594–3598 (2017).10.1002/anie.201612617 ↗
25. Wang, L. et al. Core–shell nanostructured cobalt–platinum electrocatalysts with enhanced durability. ACS Catal. 8, 35–42 (2018).10.1021/acscatal.7b02501 ↗
26. Schlapka, A., Lischka, M., Groß, A., Käsberger, U. & Jakob, P. Surface strain versus substrate interaction in heteroepitaxial metal layers: Pt on Ru(0001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 016101 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.016101 ↗
27. Debe, M. K., Atanasoski, R. T. & Steinbach, A. J. Nanostructured thin film electrocatalysts—current status and future potential. ECS Trans. 41, 937 (2011).10.1149/1.3635628 ↗
28. Debe, M. K. Tutorial on the fundamental characteristics and practical properties of nanostructured thin film (NSTF) catalysts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160, F522–F534 (2013).10.1149/2.049306jes ↗
29. Ha, Y. et al. In situ surface stress measurement and computational analysis examining the oxygen reduction reaction on Pt and Pd. Electrochim. Acta 260, 400–406 (2018).10.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.039 ↗
30. Zeng, Z., Chang, K.-C., Kubal, J., Markovic, N. M. & Greeley, J. Stabilization of ultrathin (hydroxy)oxide films on transition metal substrates for electrochemical energy conversion. Nat. Energy 2, 17070 (2017).10.1038/nenergy.2017.70 ↗
31. Lopes, P. P. et al. Eliminating dissolution of platinum-based electrocatalysts at the atomic scale. Nat. Mater. 19, 1207–1214 (2020).10.1038/s41563-020-0735-3 ↗
32. Wang, L. et al. Plating precious metals on nonprecious metal nanoparticles for sustainable electrocatalysts. Nano Lett. 17, 3391–3395 (2017).10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00046 ↗
33. Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap (US DRIVE, 2017); https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/11/f46/FCTT_Roadmap_Nov_2017_FINAL.pdf
34. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fuel Cell Technologies Office, (FCTO) Fuel Cells Multi-Year Research Development and Demonstration Plan (US DOE, 2016); https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2017/05/f34/fcto_myrdd_fuel_cells.pdf
35. Cherevko, S., Kulyk, N. & Mayrhofer, K. J. J. Durability of platinum-based fuel cell electrocatalysts: dissolution of bulk and nanoscale platinum. Nano Energy 29, 275–298 (2016).10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.005 ↗
36. Lopes, P. P. et al. Relationships between atomic level surface structure and stability/activity of platinum surface atoms in aqueous environments. ACS Catal. 6, 2536–2544 (2016).10.1021/acscatal.5b02920 ↗
37. Strickler, A. L., Jackson, A. & Jaramillo, T. F. Active and stable Ir@Pt core–shell catalysts for electrochemical oxygen reduction. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 244–249 (2017).10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00585 ↗
38. Zheng, H.-B. et al. Tuning the catalytic activity of Ir@Pt nanoparticles through controlling Ir core size on cathode performance for PEM fuel cell application. Front. Chem. 6, 299 (2018).10.3389/fchem.2018.00299 ↗
39. Chida, Y. et al. Experimental study platform for electrocatalysis of atomic-level controlled high-entropy alloy surfaces. Nat. Commun. 14, 4492 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-40246-5 ↗
40. Blochl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
41. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
42. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
43. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for open-shell transition metals. Phys. Rev. B 48, 13115–13118 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.48.13115 ↗
44. Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
45. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
46. Larsen, A. H. et al. The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
47. Nielsen, O. H. & Martin, R. M. Quantum-mechanical theory of stress and force. Phys. Rev. B 32, 3780–3791 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevB.32.3780 ↗
48. Ha, Y., Zeng, Z., Cohen, Y., Greeley, J. P. & Gewirth, A. A. Electrochemical surface stress development during CO and NO oxidation on Pt. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 205–210 (2015).
49. Vielstich, W., Lamm, A. & Gasteiger, H. Handbook of Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Technology, Applications (Wiley, 2003).
50. Cullen, D. A. et al. Linking morphology with activity through the lifetime of pretreated PtNi nanostructured thin film catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 11660–11667 (2015).10.1039/C5TA01854D ↗
51. Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537–541 (2005).10.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
52. Zabinsky, S. I., Rehr, J. J., Ankudinov, A., Albers, R. C. & Eller, M. J. Multiple-scattering calculations of x-ray-absorption spectra. Phys. Rev. B 52, 2995–3009 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevB.52.2995 ↗
53. Miller, J. T. et al. The effect of gold particle size on Au–Au bond length and reactivity toward oxygen in supported catalysts. J. Catal. 240, 222–234 (2006).10.1016/j.jcat.2006.04.004 ↗