Mitigation of hydrogen crossover in liquid alkaline water electrolysers using gas recombination catalysts
Source abstract
Abstract
The rising demand for hydrogen calls for improvements in the efficiency of liquid alkaline water electrolysers (LAWEs), which can be fulfilled by advanced electrodes or separators. Nevertheless, they also intensify hydrogen crossover and safety concerns, thus mandating efficient mitigation strategies. Here we studied the correlation between cathodes and hydrogen crossover behaviours and mitigated safety risks by designing a gas recombination catalyst (GRC). We attribute the elevated hydrogen crossover associated with platinum-based cathodes to their preferential utilization for the hydrogen evolution reaction that creates elevated hydrogen supersaturation, as evidenced by direct measurements of dissolved hydrogen concentration. Varying the placement of platinum layers relative to the cathode–separator interface also supports this conclusion. The implementation of a GRC reduces hydrogen crossover by 95% without affecting LAWE performance and functions for over 1,000 h at 1 A cm−2. This study provides insights into hydrogen supersaturation and the crossover mechanism, as well as offering a promising pathway to enhance the efficiency and reliability of alkaline water electrolysis. Alkaline water electrolysers are being optimized for higher performance, but measures such as advanced electrodes or thinner separators can increase hydrogen crossover and safety risks. Here the authors analyse crossover behaviour and show that a gas recombination catalyst cuts crossover by 95% without affecting electrolyser performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Xia, Y., Cheng, H., He, H. & Wei, W. Efficiency and consistency enhancement for alkaline electrolyzers driven by renewable energy sources. Commun. Eng. 2, 22 (2023).10.1038/s44172-023-00070-7 ↗
2. Global Hydrogen Review 2021 (IEA, 2021); https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2021
3. Wang, G. et al. Understanding performance limitation of liquid alkaline water electrolyzers. J. Electrochem. Soc. 171, 064501 (2024).10.1149/1945-7111/ad4fe6 ↗
4. Vermeiren, P., Adriansens, W., Moreels, J. P. & Leysen, R. Evaluation of the Zirfon® separator for use in alkaline water electrolysis and Ni-H2 batteries. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 23, 321–324 (1998).10.1016/S0360-3199(97)00069-4 ↗
5. Trinke, P. et al. Hydrogen crossover in PEM and alkaline water electrolysis: mechanisms, direct comparison and mitigation strategies. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, F502 (2018).10.1149/2.0541807jes ↗
6. Trinke, P., Bensmann, B. & Hanke-Rauschenbach, R. Current density effect on hydrogen permeation in PEM water electrolyzers. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 14355–14366 (2017).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.231 ↗
7. Gawas, R., Kushner, D. I., Peng, X. & Mukundan, R. Importance of hydrogen oxidation reaction current in quantifying hydrogen crossover in PEM water electrolyzers at high differential pressure. Energy Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EE00048C (2025).10.1039/D5EE00048C ↗
8. Martinho, D. L. & Berning, T. A conceptual approach to reduce the product gas crossover in alkaline electrolyzers. Membranes 15, 206 (2025).10.3390/membranes15070206 ↗
9. Pere, G. Installation for degassing and recycling the electrolyte in an electrolyzer for producing gas. US patent US4379044A (1983).
10. Wang, G. et al. Probing electrode transformation under dynamic operation for alkaline water electrolysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 15, 2500886 (2025).10.1002/aenm.202500886 ↗
11. Brauns, J. et al. Evaluation of diaphragms and membranes as separators for alkaline water electrolysis. J. Electrochem. Soc. 168, 014510 (2021).10.1149/1945-7111/abda57 ↗
12. de Groot, M. T., Kraakman, J. & Garcia Barros, R. L. Optimal operating parameters for advanced alkaline water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47, 34773–34783 (2022).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.075 ↗
13. Wu, T., Zhou, Y., Yuan, F., Yang, Q. & Liu, B. Effects of trans-diaphragm liquid flow on hydrogen-in-oxygen in alkaline water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 105, 1393–1399 (2025).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.434 ↗
14. Lira Garcia Barros, R., Kraakman, J. T., Sebregts, C., van der Schaaf, J. & de Groot, M. T. Impact of an electrode-diaphragm gap on diffusive hydrogen crossover in alkaline water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 49, 886–896 (2024).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.280 ↗
15. Klose, C. et al. Membrane interlayer with Pt recombination particles for reduction of the anodic hydrogen content in PEM water electrolysis. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, F1271 (2018).10.1149/2.1241814jes ↗
16. Zeng, Z. et al. Innovative duo-recombination layer design for effective hydrogen crossover mitigation in advanced MEAs for PEM water electrolyzers. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 114, 534–544 (2025).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.380 ↗
17. Ehlers, J. C., Feidenhans’l, A. A., Therkildsen, K. T. & Larrazábal, G. O. Affordable green hydrogen from alkaline water electrolysis: key research needs from an industrial perspective. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 1502–1509 (2023).10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02897 ↗
18. Sebbahi, S. et al. A comprehensive review of recent advances in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 82, 583–599 (2024).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.428 ↗
19. Zhang, L. et al. Sodium-decorated amorphous/crystalline RuO2 with rich oxygen vacancies: a robust pH-universal oxygen evolution electrocatalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 18821–18829 (2021).10.1002/anie.202106631 ↗
20. Sugawara, Y., Nakase, Y., Anilkumar, G. M., Kamata, K. & Yamaguchi, T. Oxygen evolution activity of nickel-based phosphates and effects of their electronic orbitals. Nanoscale Adv. 7, 456–466 (2025).10.1039/D4NA00794H ↗
21. Yan, H. et al. Anion-modulated HER and OER activities of 3D Ni–V-based interstitial compound heterojunctions for high-efficiency and stable overall water splitting. Adv. Mater. 31, 1901174 (2019).10.1002/adma.201901174 ↗
22. Ferriday, T. B., Middleton, P. H. & Kolhe, M. L. Review of the hydrogen evolution reaction—a basic approach. Energies 14, 8535 (2021).10.3390/en14248535 ↗
23. Zhao, Z. et al. Surface-engineered PtNi-O nanostructure with record-high performance for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 9046–9050 (2018).10.1021/jacs.8b04770 ↗
24. Wan, C. et al. Amorphous nickel hydroxide shell tailors local chemical environment on platinum surface for alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Mater. 22, 1022–1029 (2023).10.1038/s41563-023-01584-3 ↗
25. Mayyas, A. T., Ruth, M. F., Pivovar, B. S., Bender, G. & Wipke, K. B. Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers Report No. NREL/TP-6A20-72740 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2019).10.2172/1557965 ↗
26. Witte, J. et al. Influence of contact pressure on hydrogen crossover and polarization behavior in AEM water electrolysis. J. Electrochem. Soc. 172, 014502 (2025).10.1149/1945-7111/ad9cce ↗
27. Najjar, Y. S. H. Hydrogen safety: the road toward green technology. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38, 10716–10728 (2013).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.126 ↗
28. ISO 22734:2019. Hydrogen Generators Using Water Electrolysis—Industrial, Commercial, and Residential Applications (ISO, 2019).
29. Qi, R. et al. Pressure control strategy to extend the loading range of an alkaline electrolysis system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46, 35997–36011 (2021).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.069 ↗
30. Levich, V. G. Physicochemical Hydrodynamics (Prentice-Hall, 1962).
31. Ilevbare, G. A., Liu, H., Edgar, K. J. & Taylor, L. S. Maintaining supersaturation in aqueous drug solutions: impact of different polymers on induction times. Cryst. Growth Des. 13, 740–751 (2013).10.1021/cg301447d ↗
32. Shibata, S. Supersolubility of hydyogen in acidic solution in the vicinity of hydrogen-evolving platinum cathodes in different surface states. Denki Kagaku oyobi Kogyo Butsuri Kagaku 44, 709–712 (1976).10.5796/kogyobutsurikagaku.44.709 ↗
33. Chen, Q., Luo, L. & White, H. S. Electrochemical generation of a hydrogen bubble at a recessed platinum nanopore electrode. Langmuir 31, 4573–4581 (2015).10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00234 ↗
34. Dukovic, J. & Tobias, C. W. The influence of attached bubbles on potential drop and current distribution at gas-evolving electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 134, 331 (1987).10.1149/1.2100456 ↗
35. Mahmood, N. et al. Electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution in alkaline electrolytes: mechanisms, challenges, and prospective solutions. Adv. Sci. 5, 1700464 (2018).10.1002/advs.201700464 ↗
36. Lee, J. K. et al. Ionomer-free and recyclable porous-transport electrode for high-performing proton-exchange-membrane water electrolysis. Nat. Commun. 14, 4592 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-40375-x ↗
37. Tham, M. J., Walker, R. D. Jr & Gubbins, K. E. Diffusion of oxygen and hydrogen in aqueous potassium hydroxide solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 74, 1747–1751 (1970).10.1021/j100703a015 ↗
38. Lalik, E. et al. Humidity induced deactivation of Al2O3 and SiO2 supported Pd, Pt, Pd-Pt catalysts in H2+O2 recombination reaction: the catalytic, microcalorimetric and DFT studies. Appl. Catal. A 501, 27–40 (2015).10.1016/j.apcata.2015.04.029 ↗
39. Reier, T., Oezaslan, M. & Strasser, P. Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on Ru, Ir, and Pt catalysts: a comparative study of nanoparticles and bulk materials. ACS Catal. 2, 1765–1772 (2012).10.1021/cs3003098 ↗
40. Sheng, W. et al. Correlating hydrogen oxidation and evolution activity on platinum at different pH with measured hydrogen binding energy. Nat. Commun. 6, 5848 (2015).10.1038/ncomms6848 ↗
41. Zalitis, C. M., Sharman, J., Wright, E. & Kucernak, A. R. Properties of the hydrogen oxidation reaction on Pt/C catalysts at optimised high mass transport conditions and its relevance to the anode reaction in PEFCs and cathode reactions in electrolysers. Electrochim. Acta 176, 763–776 (2015).10.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.146 ↗
42. Delgado, D., Bizzotto, F., Zana, A. & Arenz, M. Accelerated durability test for high-surface-area oxyhydroxide nickel supported on Raney nickel as catalyst for the alkaline oxygen evolution reaction. ChemPhysChem 20, 3147–3153 (2019).10.1002/cphc.201900195 ↗
43. Gankhuyag, T., Obata, K. & Takanabe, K. Potential regulation for stable electrocatalysts in alkaline water electrolyzers during dynamic on and off operation through double-layer capacitance engineering. J. Phys. Chem. C 129, 18043–18050 (2025).10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c04643 ↗
44. Cole, K. M., Patterson, N., Zeng, J., Awara, M. & Albrecht, T. A. In-operando impedance spectroscopy study for accelerated lifetime studies of dynamic alkaline water electrolysis under industrial conditions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 137, 125–130 (2025).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.055 ↗
45. Ruetschi, P. & Amlie, R. F. Solubility of hydrogen in potassium hydroxide and sulfuric acid. Salting-out and hydration. J. Phys. Chem. 70, 718–723 (1966).10.1021/j100875a018 ↗
46. Davis, R. E., Horvath, G. L. & Tobias, C. W. The solubility and diffusion coefficient of oxygen in potassium hydroxide solutions. Electrochim. Acta 12, 287–297 (1967).10.1016/0013-4686(67)80007-0 ↗
47. Hodges, A. et al. Critical analysis of published physical property data for aqueous potassium hydroxide. Collation into detailed models for alkaline electrolysis. J. Chem. Eng. Data 68, 1485–1506 (2023).10.1021/acs.jced.3c00040 ↗