journal article·2019-10-25

Carboxylated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Sensors with Varying pH for the Detection of Ammonia and Carbon Dioxide Using an Artificial Neural Network

Beomseok Kim, Thaddeus J. Norman, Ruth Sang Jones, Dong-il Moon, Jin-woo Han, M. Meyyappan

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 2· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) have long been advocated for the detection of various gases and vapors. Often, strategies to modify the nanotubes have been shown to be successful in eliciting a more sensitive response from the nanotubes when exposed to the target gas relative to the pristine material. Carboxylation of the SWCNTs is one such strategy commonly used in gas sensor construction. Interestingly, addition of acid or base to the carboxylation process can change the pH of the resulting material and yield inks with varying pH values that can be used in a sensor array. Here we show orthogonal responses to NH3 and CO2 from eight such materials with controlled pH values in the range of 1.9–12.1. The results and the approach will be applicable to sensing other acidic and basic gases and also can expand further to other sensor systems to maximize and obtain orthogonal sensor responses. A neural network architecture is used successfully to convert the measured resistance change into analyte concentration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035, United States

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Law, J.; Watkins, S.; Alexander, D. In-Flight Carbon Dioxide Exposures and Related Symptoms: Association, Susceptibility, and Operational Implications; NASA Technical Paper-2010-216126; 2010. Available in electronic form at http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/.
2. Macatangay, A.; Prokhorov, K.; Sweterlitsch, J. Strategies to Mitigate Ammonia Release on the International Space Station; 2007-01-3186; SAE International, 2007. Available in electronic form at https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/2007-01-3186/.10.4271/2007-01-3186 ↗
3. Pilgrim, J. S.; Wood, W. R.; Casias, M. E.; Vakhtin, A. B.; Johnson, M. D.; Mudgett, P. D. Optical Multi-Gas Monitor Technology Demonstration on the International Space Station. Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Environmental Systems; Tucson, AZ, July 13–17, 2014; Paper Number 58.
4. 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)85574-910.1016/S0003-2670(00)85574-9 ↗
5. 10.1021/ja300420t10.1021/ja300420t ↗
6. 10.1108/RPJ-09-2016-014210.1108/RPJ-09-2016-0142 ↗
7. Prater, T. J.; Werkheiser, N.; Ledbetter, F.; Jehle, A. NASA’s In-Space Manufacturing Project: Toward a Multimaterial Fabrication Laboratory for the International Space Station. AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition; Orlando, FL, September 12−14, 2017; p. 5277.10.2514/6.2017-5277 ↗
8. 10.1002/smll.20150255510.1002/smll.201502555 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20070448810.1002/anie.200704488 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0034010.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00340 ↗
11. 10.1021/acssensors.8b0051010.1021/acssensors.8b00510 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.snb.2013.10.03910.1016/j.snb.2013.10.039 ↗
13. 10.3390/s1060019310.3390/s10600193 ↗
14. 10.1021/acssensors.7b0035810.1021/acssensors.7b00358 ↗
15. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa6da710.1088/1361-6528/aa6da7 ↗
16. 10.1021/jp064371z10.1021/jp064371z ↗
17. Cho, K.; van Merrienboer, B.; Gulcehre, C.; Bahdanau, D.; Bougares, F.; Schwenk, H.; Bengio, Y. Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. 2014, arXiv:1406.1078 [cs.CL]. arXiv. org e-Print archive. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1078.10.3115/v1/D14-1179 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2014.07.00110.1016/j.chemolab.2014.07.001 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0925-4005(99)00460-810.1016/S0925-4005(99)00460-8 ↗
20. 10.1021/nl404335p10.1021/nl404335p ↗
21. 10.1149/1.206328910.1149/1.2063289 ↗
22. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-1210.1186/1556-276X-8-12 ↗
23. Nelson, R. Systematic pH Calculation Package for Python. https://pypi.org/project/pHcalc/ (accessed February 20).
24. 10.1021/ja027861n10.1021/ja027861n ↗
25. 10.1021/ja070327110.1021/ja0703271 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2017.04.00410.1016/j.chemphys.2017.04.004 ↗
27. 10.1166/sl.2014.330110.1166/sl.2014.3301 ↗
28. 10.1021/jp047185710.1021/jp0471857 ↗
29. 10.3390/s1608116310.3390/s16081163 ↗
30. Darrach, M. R.; Chutjian, A.; Bornstein, B. J.; Croonquist, A. P.; Garkanian, V.; Hofman, J.; Karmon, D.; Kenny, J.; Kidd, R. D.; Lee, S.; Trace Chemical and Major Constituents Measurements of the International Space Station Atmosphere by the Vehicle Cabin Atmosphere Monitor. Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Environmental Systems, San Diego, CA, July 15–19, 2012; AIAA 2012-3432.10.2514/6.2012-3432 ↗