Building a better dialogue between energy research and policy
Source abstract
Abstract
The world is becoming more complex for policymakers and researchers alike as climate change, new technology and digitalization drive unprecedented energy-system change. Understanding one another is paramount if we are to address the challenges they present.
The source flagged this abstract for review. Check formulas and completeness against the original publication.
Source: openaire · Quality: needs review · Source record ↗
Source flags: short_text
Source flags: short_text
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Global Energy and Sustainability Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Kenny, C., Rose, D. C., Hobbs, A., Tyler, C. & Blackstock, J. The Role of Research in the UK Parliament (Houses of Parliament, 2019); https://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/The-Role-of-Research-in-the-UK-Parliament.pdf.
2. Cairney, P. & Kwiatkowski, R. Palgrave Commun. 3, 37 (2017).10.1057/s41599-017-0046-8 ↗
3. Preparing for a Changing World (Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, 2019); https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/POST-PB-0033
4. 100 Opportunities for Finland and the World (Finnish Committee for the Future, 2014); https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/tietoaeduskunnasta/julkaisut/Documents/tuvj_11+2014.pdf
5. Smith, H. & Gilbert, C. Sustainability 10, 449 (2018).10.3390/su10020449 ↗
6. Sovacool, B. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1, 1–29 (2014).10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003 ↗
7. Stirling, A. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1, 83–95 (2014).10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.001 ↗
8. Wu, Y. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 17673–17682 (2019).10.1073/pnas.1820007116 ↗
9. Winskel, M. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 37, 74–84 (2018).10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.012 ↗
10. Mallaband, B. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 25, 9–18 (2017).10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.001 ↗
11. Reich, S. M. & Reich, J. A. Am. J. Community Psychol. 38, 51–62 (2006).10.1007/s10464-006-9064-1 ↗
12. Martin, B. R. Res. Eval. 20, 247–254 (2011).10.3152/095820211X13118583635693 ↗
13. Pain, R. & Raynor, R. “A soup of different inspirations”: Co-produced research and recognising impact as a process, not an outcome. LSE Impact Blog https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/01/28/a-soup-of-different-inspirations-impact-and-co-produced-research/ (2016).
14. Demski, C. & Pidgeon, N. Paying for Energy Transitions: Public Perspectives and Acceptability (UKERC, 2019); http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/publications/paying-for-energy-transitions.html
15. Tyler, C. & Akerlof, K. Nature 566, 175–177 (2019).10.1038/d41586-019-00518-x ↗
16. Smith, H., Suldovsky, B. & Lindenfield, L. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 44, 78–95 (2016).10.1080/00909882.2015.1116707 ↗