Varying impacts of China’s coal ban
Source abstract
Abstract
Policies that encourage a shift away from solid fuels can improve public health, welfare and the environment. However, impacts and their distribution are rarely evaluated. Now research shows that benefits to home comfort, indoor air quality and well-being from China’s coal-to-electricity programme vary across rich and poor districts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energy and Environment Impacts · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (5)
Show source-provided references
1. Duan, X. et al. Appl. Energy 136, 692–703 (2014).10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.066 ↗
2. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network IHME Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 (GBD 2016) Results (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2017).
3. Barrington-Leigh, C. et al. Nat. Energy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0386-2 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0386-2 ↗
4. Zhang, X. et al. Energy Policy 127, 165–178 (2019).10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.008 ↗
5. Liu, J. et al. Environ. Int. 125, 236–244 (2019).10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.059 ↗