Reactive CO2 capture via controlled amine speciation in non-aqueous electrolytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Catalysts for Methane Reforming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Sullivan, I. et al. Coupling electrochemical CO2 conversion with CO2 capture. Nat. Catal. 4, 952–958 (2021).10.1038/s41929-021-00699-7 ↗
2. Morgan Summers, W., Herron, S. E. & Zoelle, A. Cost of Capturing CO2 from Industrial Sources (National Energy Technology Laboratory, Office of Fossil Energy, 2014).
3. Boot-Handford, M. E. et al. Carbon capture and storage update. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 130–189 (2013).10.1039/C3EE42350F ↗
4. Kim, Y. et al. Economic viability of Integrated CO2 capture and conversion. ACS Energy Lett. 10, 403–409 (2024).10.1021/acsenergylett.4c02852 ↗
5. Banerjee, A. & Morales-Guio, C. G. Integrated CO2 capture and electrochemical conversion: coupled effects of transport, kinetics and thermodynamics in the direct reduction of captured-CO2 adducts. EES Catal. 3, 205–234 (2025).10.1039/D4EY00285G ↗
6. Lee, G. et al. Electrochemical upgrade of CO2 from amine capture solution. Nat. Energy 6, 46–53 (2021).10.1038/s41560-020-00735-z ↗
7. Jerng, S. E. & Gallant, B. M. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 in the captured state using aqueous or nonaqueous amines. iScience 25, 104558 (2022).10.1016/j.isci.2022.104558 ↗
8. Kortunov, P. V., Siskin, M., Baugh, L. S. & Calabro, D. C. In situ nuclear magnetic resonance mechanistic studies of carbon dioxide reactions with liquid amines in aqueous systems: new insights on carbon capture reaction pathways. Energy Fuels 29, 5919–5939 (2015).10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00850 ↗
9. Shen, K. et al. On the origin of carbon sources in the electrochemical upgrade of CO2 from carbon capture solutions. Joule 7, 1260–1276 (2023).10.1016/j.joule.2023.05.010 ↗
10. Safipour, J., Weber, A. Z. & Bell, A. T. Detrimental effects of monoethanolamine and other amine-based capture agents on the electrochemical reduction of CO2. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 5012–5017 (2023).10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01953 ↗
11. Wang, M. et al. Acidic media enables oxygen-tolerant electrosynthesis of multicarbon products from simulated flue gas. Nat. Commun. 15, 1218 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-45527-1 ↗
12. Li, P. et al. Acid–base interaction enhancing oxygen tolerance in electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 10918–10923 (2020).10.1002/anie.202003093 ↗
13. Xu, Y. et al. Oxygen-tolerant electroproduction of C2 products from simulated flue gas. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 554–561 (2020).10.1039/C9EE03077H ↗
14. Leverick, G. et al. Uncovering the active species in amine-mediated CO2 reduction to CO on Ag. ACS Catal. 13, 12322–12337 (2023).10.1021/acscatal.3c02500 ↗
15. Bhattacharya, M., Sebghati, S., Vercella, Y. M. & Saouma, C. T. Electrochemical reduction of carbamates and carbamic acids: implications for combined carbon capture and electrochemical CO2 recycling. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167, 086507 (2020).10.1149/1945-7111/ab8ed0 ↗
16. Pérez-Gallent, E., Vankani, C., Sánchez-Martínez, C., Anastasopol, A. & Goetheer, E. Integrating CO2 capture with electrochemical conversion using amine-based capture solvents as electrolytes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60, 4269–4278 (2021).10.1021/acs.iecr.0c05848 ↗
17. Gomes, R. J. et al. Modulating water hydrogen bonding within a non-aqueous environment controls its reactivity in electrochemical transformations. Nat. Catal. 7, 689–701 (2024).10.1038/s41929-024-01162-z ↗
18. Kortunov, P. V., Siskin, M., Baugh, L. S. & Calabro, D. C. In situ nuclear magnetic resonance mechanistic studies of carbon dioxide reactions with liquid amines in non-aqueous systems: evidence for the formation of carbamic acids and zwitterionic species. Energy Fuels 29, 5940–5966 (2015).10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00985 ↗
19. Chu, A. T., Jung, O., Toh, W. L. & Surendranath, Y. Organic non-nucleophilic electrolyte resists carbonation during selective CO2 electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 9617–9623 (2023).10.1021/jacs.3c00506 ↗
20. Szwabińska, K. & Lota, G. Tuning the course of the oxygen reduction reaction at a carbon electrode using alkaline electrolytes based on binary DMSO–water solvent mixtures. Electrochem. Commun. 141, 107359 (2022).10.1016/j.elecom.2022.107359 ↗
21. Khurram, A., Yan, L., Yin, Y., Zhao, L. & Gallant, B. M. Promoting amine-activated electrochemical CO2 conversion with alkali salts. J. Phys. Chem. C. 123, 18222–18231 (2019).10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04258 ↗
22. Kuo, F. Y., Jerng, S. E. & Gallant, B. M. Dual salt cation-swing process for electrochemical CO2 separation. ACS Cent. Sci. 9, 1750–1757 (2023).10.1021/acscentsci.3c00692 ↗
23. Dijkstra, Z. J. et al. Formation of carbamic acid in organic solvents and in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 41, 109–114 (2007).10.1016/j.supflu.2006.08.012 ↗
24. Kash, B., Gomes, R. & Amanchukwu, C. Mitigating electrode inactivation during CO2 electrocatalysis in aprotic solvents with alkali cations. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 920–926 (2023).10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03498 ↗
25. Niu, S., Li, S., Du, Y., Han, X. & Xu, P. How to reliably report the overpotential of an electrocatalyst. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1083–1087 (2020).10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00321 ↗
26. Won, D. H. et al. Highly efficient, selective, and stable CO2 electroreduction on a hexagonal Zn catalyst. Angew. Chem. 128, 9443–9446 (2016).10.1002/ange.201602888 ↗
27. Rosen, J. et al. Electrodeposited Zn dendrites with enhanced CO selectivity for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. ACS Catal. 5, 4586–4591 (2015).10.1021/acscatal.5b00922 ↗
28. Ikeda, S., Takagi, T. & Ito, K. Selective formation of formic acid, oxalic acid, and carbon monoxide by electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 60, 2517–2522 (1987).10.1246/bcsj.60.2517 ↗
29. Bagger, A., Christensen, O., Ivaništšev, V. & Rossmeisl, J. Catalytic CO2/CO reduction: gas, aqueous, and aprotic phases. ACS Catal. 12, 2561–2568 (2022).10.1021/acscatal.1c05358 ↗
30. Welford, P. J. et al. The electro-reduction of carbon dioxide in dimethyl sulfoxide at gold microdisk electrodes: current | voltage waveshape analysis. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 5253–5261 (2001).10.1021/jp010467b ↗
31. Gomes, R. J. et al. Probing electrolyte influence on CO2 reduction in aprotic solvents. J. Phys. Chem. C. 126, 13595–13606 (2022).10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c03321 ↗
32. Khurram, A., He, M. & Gallant, B. M. Tailoring the discharge reaction in Li-CO2 batteries through incorporation of CO2 capture chemistry. Joule 2, 2649–2666 (2018).10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.002 ↗
33. Xiao, Y. C. et al. Reactive capture of CO2 via amino acid. Nat. Commun. 15, 7849 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-51908-3 ↗
34. Lu, Q. et al. A selective and efficient electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 5, 3242 (2014).10.1038/ncomms4242 ↗
35. Barlow, J. M. & Yang, J. Y. Oxygen-stable electrochemical CO2 capture and concentration with quinones using alcohol additives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 14161–14169 (2022).10.1021/jacs.2c04044 ↗
36. Lazouski, N., Chung, M., Williams, K., Gala, M. L. & Manthiram, K. Non-aqueous gas diffusion electrodes for rapid ammonia synthesis from nitrogen and water-splitting-derived hydrogen. Nat. Catal. 3, 463–469 (2020).10.1038/s41929-020-0455-8 ↗
37. Alie, C., Backham, L., Croiset, E. & Douglas, P. L. Simulation of CO2 capture using MEA scrubbing: a flowsheet decomposition method. Energy Convers. Manag. 46, 475–487 (2005).10.1016/j.enconman.2004.03.003 ↗
38. Omasta, T. J. et al. Beyond 1.0 W cm−2 performance without platinum: the beginning of a new era in anion exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, J3039–J3044 (2018).10.1149/2.0071815jes ↗
39. Rey, A. et al. Amine degradation in CO2 capture. 2. New degradation products of MEA. Pyrazine and alkylpyrazines: analysis, mechanism of formation and toxicity. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control 19, 576–583 (2013).10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.10.018 ↗
40. Sharon, D. et al. Oxidation of dimethyl sulfoxide solutions by electrochemical reduction of oxygen. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 3115–3119 (2013).10.1021/jz4017188 ↗
41. Delima, R. S., Sherbo, R. S., Dvorak, D. J., Kurimoto, A. & Berlinguette, C. P. Supported palladium membrane reactor architecture for electrocatalytic hydrogenation. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 7, 26586–26595 (2019).10.1039/C9TA07957B ↗
42. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
43. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
44. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
45. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
46. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
47. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
48. AmanchukwuLab, Repository for DFT optimized structures and techno-economic analysis workflows supporting reactive CO2 capture in nonaqueous electrolytes. GitHub https://github.com/AmanchukwuLab/reactive-co2-capture-nonaqueous-electrolyte (2024).