Accelerating green shipping with spatially optimized offshore charging stations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. Ma, W. et al. A chaos-coupled multi-objective scheduling decision method for liner shipping based on the NSGA-III algorithm. Comput. Ind. Eng. 174, 108732 (2022).10.1016/j.cie.2022.108732 ↗
2. Li, B. et al. Berth allocation and scheduling at marine container terminals: a state-of-the-art review of solution approaches and relevant scheduling attributes. J. Comput. Des. Eng. 10, 1707–1735 (2023).
3. Asariotis, R. et al. Review of Maritime Transport. No. UNCTAD/RMT/2015 (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2015).
4. McLean, C. in Preparing a Workforce for the New Blue Economy 513–525 (Elsevier, 2021).10.1016/B978-0-12-821431-2.00060-3 ↗
5. Elmi, Z. et al. An epsilon-constraint-based exact multi-objective optimization approach for the ship schedule recovery problem in liner shipping. Comput. Ind. Eng. 183, 109472 (2023).10.1016/j.cie.2023.109472 ↗
6. National Maritime Day and Every Day, the U.S. Economy Relies on Waterborne Shipping (Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 2023); https://www.bts.gov/data-spotlight/national-maritime-day-and-every-day-us-economy-relies-waterborne-shipping
7. Cutting GHG Emissions (IMO, 2024); https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/Cutting-GHG-emissions.aspx
8. Shakeri, N., Zadeh, M. & Bremnes Nielsen, J. Hydrogen fuel cells for ship electric propulsion: Moving toward greener ships. IEEE Electrif. Mag. 8, 27–43 (2020).10.1109/MELE.2020.2985484 ↗
9. Nemmour, A., Inayat, A., Janajreh, I. & Ghenai, C. Green hydrogen-based e-fuels (e-methane, e-methanol, e-ammonia) to support clean energy transition: a literature review. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 48, 29011–29033 (2023).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.240 ↗
10. Prussi, M., Scarlat, N., Acciaro, M. & Kosmas, V. Potential and limiting factors in the use of alternative fuels in the european maritime sector. J. Clean. Prod. 291, 125849 (2021).10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125849 ↗
11. Proposal for a Regulation on Artificial Intelligence (European Commission, 2021); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021PC0206
12. World Energy Outlook 2022 (IEA, 2022).
13. Fan, A. et al. Decarbonising inland ship power system: alternative solution and assessment method. Energy 226, 120266 (2021).10.1016/j.energy.2021.120266 ↗
14. Kersey, J., Popovich, N. D. & Phadke, A. A. Rapid battery cost declines accelerate the prospects of all-electric interregional container shipping. Nat. Energy 7, 664–674 (2022).10.1038/s41560-022-01065-y ↗
15. Armstrong, R., Wolfram, C. & de Jong, K. et al. The frontiers of energy. Nat Energy 1, 15020 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2015.20 ↗
16. Schmuch, R., Wagner, R., Horpel, G., Placke, T. & Winter, M. Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 267–278 (2018).10.1038/s41560-018-0107-2 ↗
17. Comer, B. Transitioning Away from Heavy Fuel Oil in Arctic Shipping (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2019).
18. Gray, N., McDonagh, S., O’Shea, R., Smyth, B. & Murphy, J. D. Decarbonising ships, planes and trucks: an analysis of suitable low-carbon fuels for the maritime, aviation and haulage sectors. Adv. Appl. Energy 1, 100008 (2021).10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100008 ↗
19. Fichtner, M. et al. Rechargeable batteries of the future—the state of the art from a BATTERY 2030+ perspective. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2102904 (2021).10.1002/aenm.202102904 ↗
20. Nguyen, H. P. et al. The electric propulsion system as a green solution for management strategy of CO2 emission in ocean shipping: a comprehensive review. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 31, 11 (2022).
21. Hoang, A. T. et al. Energy-related approach for reduction of CO2 emissions: a critical strategy on the port-to-ship pathway. J. Clean. Prod. 355, 131772 (2022).10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131772 ↗
22. Xing, H., Stuart, C., Spence, S. & Chen, H. Alternative fuel options for low carbon maritime transportation: pathways to 2050. J. Clean. Prod. 297, 126651 (2021).10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126651 ↗
23. Zhang, Y., Sun, L., Fan, T., Ma, F. & Xiong, Y. Speed and energy optimization method for the inland all-electric ship in battery-swapping mode. Ocean Eng. 284, 115234 (2023).10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115234 ↗
24. Yang, S., Yuan, J., Nian, V., Li, L. & Li, H. Economics of marinised offshore charging stations for electrifying the maritime sector. Appl. Energy 322, 119389 (2022).10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119389 ↗
25. Low Carbon Vessel and Energy Vector Analysis: Integration of Floating Offshore Wind (European Regional Development Fund, 2022).
26. Buljan, A. World’s first offshore vessel charging project expands to SOVs and PSVs. Offshore Wind https://www.offshorewind.biz/2022/10/06/worlds-first-offshore-vessel-charging-project-expands-to-sovs-and-psvs (7 October 2022).
27. Verlume. Renewable Energy Consortium Awarded £1.5m Funding to Install World-Leading Offshore Charging Station (Verlume, 2023); https://verlume.world/renewable-energy-consortium-awarded-1-5m-funding-to-install-world-leading-offshore-charging-station/news/
28. Huglen, Ø. VARD and partners awarded 105 million NOK for green research and innovation. VARD https://www.vard.com/articles/vard-and-partners-get-105-million-nok-for-green-research-and-innovation (21 December 2022).
29. Sruthy, V. & Preetha, P.K. Implementation and operational feasibility of an offshore floating charging station for sustainable marine transportation. Environ. Dev. Sustain 26, 20931–20962 (2024).10.1007/s10668-023-03512-6 ↗
30. Santhakumar, S., Meerman, H. & Faaij, A. Future costs of key emerging offshore renewable energy technologies. Renewable Energy 222, 119875 (2024).10.1016/j.renene.2023.119875 ↗
31. De Alegría, I. M., Martín, J. L., Kortabarria, I., Andreu, J. & Ereño, P. I. Transmission alternatives for offshore electrical power. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 1027–1038 (2009).10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.009 ↗
32. Van der Spek, M. et al. Perspective on the hydrogen economy as a pathway to reach net-zero CO2 emissions in Europe. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 1034–1077 (2022).10.1039/D1EE02118D ↗
33. Lepitzki, J. & Axsen, J. The role of a low carbon fuel standard in achieving long-term GHG reduction targets. Energy Policy 119, 423–440 (2018).10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.067 ↗
34. Fugazza, M. Bilateral maritime connectivity since 2006: a primer using new liner shipping bilateral connectivity index (LSBCI) calculations. UNCTAD Transport and Trade Facilitation Newsletter (4 December 2019).
35. UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport Ch. 2 (UNCTAD, 2023); http://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2023ch2_en.pdf
36. Global Ship Tracking Intelligence | AIS Marine Traffic (MarineTraffic, 2023); www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:-12.0/centery:25.0/zoom:4
37. NOAA Marine Wind Energy Resource Database (NOAA, 2023); https://www.noaa.gov
38. Weitemeyer, S., Kleinhans, D., Vogt, T. & Agert, C. Integration of renewable energy sources in future power systems: the role of storage. Renewable Energy 75, 14–20 (2015).10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.028 ↗
39. The Cost of Floating Offshore Wind Energy in California Between 2019 and 2032 (US DOE, 2020).
40. Ofgem estimate that network costs currently make up around 23 per cent of a dual fuel (gas and electricity) bill; network costs (UK Parliament Energy and Climate Change Committee, 2014); https://committees.parliament.uk/work/2406/network-costs/
41. Cevik, S. & Keitaro, N. Chasing the sun and catching the wind: energy transition and electricity prices in Europe. J. Econ. Financ. 47, 912–935 (2023).10.1007/s12197-023-09626-x ↗
42. Lin, J. & Wei, Z. Important factors to daily vehicle routing cost of battery electric delivery trucks. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 15, 541–558 (2021).10.1080/15568318.2020.1770903 ↗
43. Bakar, N. N. A., Bazmohammadi, N., Vasquez, J. C. & Guerrero, J. M. Electrification of onshore power systems in maritime transportation towards decarbonization of ports: a review of the cold ironing technology. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 178, 113243 (2023).10.1016/j.rser.2023.113243 ↗
44. Mallouppas, G. & Yfantis, E. A. Decarbonization in shipping industry: a review of research, technology development, and innovation proposals. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 9, 415 (2021).10.3390/jmse9040415 ↗
45. Carbon Intensity of Electricity Generation, 2020 (Our World in Data, 2023); https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-intensity-electricity?time=2020
46. Jafari, M., Korpås, M. & Botterud, A. Power system decarbonization: Impacts of energy storage duration and interannual renewables variability. Renewable Energy 156, 1171–1185 (2020).10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.144 ↗
47. Haller, M., Ludig, S. & Bauer, N. Decarbonization scenarios for the EU and MENA power system: considering spatial distribution and short term dynamics of renewable generation. Energy Policy 47, 282–290 (2012).10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.069 ↗
48. Alejandra, B., Joerg, H. & Johan, B. Latin America’s Opportunity in Critical Minerals for the Clean Energy Transition (IEA, 2023); https://www.iea.org/commentaries/latin-america-s-opportunity-in-critical-minerals-for-the-clean-energy-transition
49. Wind and Solar Resources Data (IEA, 2023); http://www.iea.org/energy-system/renewables/wind
50. Akash, G. For Asia-Pacific, climate change poses an ‘existential threat’ of extreme weather, worsening poverty and risks to public health, says UNDP report. UNDP https://www.undp.org/asia-pacific/news/asia-pacific-climate-change-poses-existential-threat-extreme-weather-worsening-poverty-and-risks-public-health-says-undp-report (7 December 2023).
51. World Energy Investment 2024 (IEA 2024); https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2024/middle-east
52. Wen, X., Chen, Q., Yin, Y. Q., Lau, Y. Y. & Dulebenets, M. A. Multi-objective optimization for ship scheduling with port congestion and environmental considerations. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 12, 114 (2024).10.3390/jmse12010114 ↗
53. Yu, J., Voß, S. & Tang, G. Strategy development for retrofitting ships for implementing shore side electricity. Transp. Res. D. Trans. Environ. 74, 201–213 (2019).10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.004 ↗
54. Kebede, A., Ludig, S. & Bauer, N. A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev. 159, 112213 (2022).10.1016/j.rser.2022.112213 ↗
55. Wang, W., Liu, Y., Zhen, L. & Wang, H. How to deploy electric ships for green shipping. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 10, 1611 (2022).10.3390/jmse10111611 ↗
56. Ibrahim, O. S. et al. Dedicated large-scale floating offshore wind to hydrogen: assessing design variables in proposed typologies. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev. 160, 112310 (2022).10.1016/j.rser.2022.112310 ↗
57. Giampieri, A., Ling-Chin, J. & Roskilly, A. P. Techno-economic assessment of offshore wind-to-hydrogen scenarios: a UK case study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 52, 589–617 (2024).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.346 ↗
58. Morgan, E. R., Manwell, J. F. & McGowan, J. G. Sustainable ammonia production from US offshore wind farms: a techno-economic review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 9554–9567 (2017).10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02070 ↗
59. Reddy, V. J., Hariram, N. P., Maity, R., Ghazali, M. F. & Kumarasamy, S. Sustainable e-fuels: green hydrogen, methanol and ammonia for carbon-neutral transportation. World Electr. Veh. J. 14, 349 (2023).10.3390/wevj14120349 ↗
60. Ajdin, A. World’s first ammonia-powered boxship set to deliver in 2026. Splash247 https://splash247.com/worlds-first-ammonia-powered-boxship-set-to-deliver-in-2026/ (2 November 2023).
61. Peters, R., Vaessen, J. & Meer, R. Offshore Hydrogen Production in the North Sea Enables Far Offshore Wind Development OTC-30698-MS (Offshore Technology Conference, 2020).10.4043/30698-MS ↗
62. Ishaq, H. & Crawford, C. Review and evaluation of sustainable ammonia production, storage and utilization. Energy Convers. Manage. 300, 117869 (2024).10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117869 ↗
63. Stolz, B. et al. Techno-economic analysis of renewable fuels for ships carrying bulk cargo in Europe. Nat. Energy 7, 203–212 (2022).10.1038/s41560-021-00957-9 ↗
64. McKinlay, C. J., Turnock, S. R. & Hudson, D. A. Route to zero emission shipping: hydrogen, ammonia or methanol? Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46, 28282–28297 (2021).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.066 ↗
65. NASA Database of Solar and Meteorological (NASA Power Project, 2023); https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-access-viewer
66. GEBCO Database of Ocean Depth (GEBCO, 2023); https://www.gebco.net
67. NOAA Database of Wave Height (ERDDAP NOAA, 2023); https://coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap/griddap/NWW3_Global_Best.html
68. Pense, C., Bulent, A. & Oguz, A. Evaluating Maritime Intelligent Transportation Systems: The Case of Using Electric Ferries and Renewable Energy in Türkiye (Middle East Technical University, 2022).
69. Nazir, C. Offshore electric ship charging station: a techno-economic analysis. Int. J. Mar. Eng. Innov. Res. 6, 210–225 (2021).10.12962/j25481479.v6i4.10763 ↗
70. Jun, Y. & Victor, N. A preliminary evaluation of marinized offshore charging stations for future electric ships. Asian Development Bank Institute https://www.adb.org/publications/preliminary-evaluation-marinized-offshore-charging-stations-future-electric-ships (2020).
71. Dufo-López, R., Cortés-Arcos, T., Artal-Sevil, J. S. & Bernal-Agustín, J. L. Comparison of lead-acid and li-ion batteries lifetime prediction models in stand-alone photovoltaic systems. Appl. Sci. 11, 1099 (2021).10.3390/app11031099 ↗
72. Gauthier, R. et al. How do depth of discharge, c-rate and calendar age affect capacity retention, impedance growth, the electrodes, and the electrolyte in li-ion cells? J. Electrochem. Soc. 169, 020518 (2022).
73. Burak, Z. Environmental and economic evaluation of ammonia as a fuel for short-sea shipping: a case study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47, 18148–18168 (2022).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.281 ↗
74. Haralambides, H. E. Gigantism in container shipping, ports and global logistics: a time-lapse into the future. Marit. Econ. Logist. 21, 1–60 (2019).10.1057/s41278-018-00116-0 ↗
75. Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers (ABS, 2019); https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/publications/reference-report/CSR_BulkCarriers.pdf
76. Karayel, G. K. & Dincer, I. A study on green hydrogen production potential of Canada with onshore and offshore wind power. J. Clean. Prod. 437, 140660 (2024).10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140660 ↗
77. Wen, D. & Aziz, M. Techno-economic analyses of power-to-ammonia-to-power and biomass-to-ammonia-to-power pathways for carbon neutrality scenario. Appl. Energy 319, 119272 (2022).10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119272 ↗
78. Li, H. Data and codes in support of ‘accelerating green shipping by spatially optimized offshore charging stations’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13985434 (2024).10.5281/zenodo.13985434 ↗
79. 4C Offhsore Wind Farm Maps (TGS, 2024); https://map.4coffshore.com/offshorewind/
80. NDRC Notice on Improving the Feed-In Tariff Policy for Wind Power, China (NRDC, 2019); https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/201905/t20190524_962453.html?code=&state=123
81. Song, X., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, W. & Ge, Z. An appraisal on China’s feed-in tariff policies for PV and wind power: implementation effects and optimization. Sustainability 15, 5137 (2023).10.3390/su15065137 ↗
82. Beiter, P. et al. The Cost of Floating Offshore Wind Energy in California Between 2019 and 2032 NREL/TP-5000-77384 (NREL, 2020); https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/77384.pdf10.2172/1710181 ↗