The effects of corporate investment and public grants on climate and energy startup outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Private Equity and Venture Capital · Innovation Policy and R&D · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach; (IEA, 2023); https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/d954f15d-36c5-41b9-a693-9b74daef59cc/NetZeroRoadmap_AGlobalPathwaytoKeepthe1.5CGoalinReach-2023Update.pdf
2. Gaddy, B. E., Sivaram, V., Jones, T. B. & Wayman, L. Venture capital and cleantech: the wrong model for energy innovation. Energy Policy 102, 385–395 (2017).10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.035 ↗
3. Doblinger, C., Surana, K. & Anadon, L. D. Governments as partners: the role of alliances in U.S. cleantech startup innovation. Res. Policy 48, 1458–1475 (2019).10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.006 ↗
4. Shinkle, G. A. & Suchard, J.-A. Innovation in newly public firms: the influence of government grants, venture capital, and private equity. Aust. J. Manage. 44, 248–281 (2019).10.1177/0312896218802611 ↗
5. van den Heuvel, M. & Popp, D. The Role of Venture Capital and Governments in Clean Energy: Lessons from the First Cleantech Bubble (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022); https://doi.org/10.3386/w2991910.3386/w29919 ↗
6. Migendt, M., Polzin, F., Schock, F., Täube, F. A. & von Flotow, P. Beyond venture capital: an exploratory study of the finance-innovation-policy nexus in cleantech. Ind. Corp. Change 26, 973–996 (2017).10.1093/icc/dtx014 ↗
7. Chan, G., Goldstein, A. P., Bin-Nun, A., Diaz Anadon, L. & Narayanamurti, V. Six principles for energy innovation. Nature 552, 25–27 (2017).10.1038/d41586-017-07761-0 ↗
8. Surana, K. et al. Regional Clean Energy Innovation (Energy Futures Initiative & Univ. of Maryland Global Sustainability Initiative, 2020); https://doi.org/10.13016/1BFC-DG1G10.13016/1BFC-DG1G ↗
9. Surana, K. et al. The role of corporate investment in start-ups for climate-tech innovation. Joule https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.02.017 (2023).10.1016/j.joule.2023.02.017 ↗
10. Goldstein, A., Doblinger, C., Baker, E. & Anadón, L. D. Patenting and business outcomes for cleantech startups funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. Nat. Energy 5, 803–810 (2020).10.1038/s41560-020-00683-8 ↗
11. Howell, S. T. Financing innovation: evidence from R&D grants. Am. Econ. Rev. 107, 1136–1164 (2017).10.1257/aer.20150808 ↗
12. Mazzucato, M. & Semieniuk, G. Financing renewable energy: who is financing what and why it matters. Technol. Forecasting Social Change 127, 8–22 (2018).10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021 ↗
13. Foray, D., Mowery, D. C. & Nelson, R. R. Public R&D and social challenges: what lessons from mission R&D programs? Res. Policy 41, 1697–1702 (2012).10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.011 ↗
14. Rossi, M., Festa, G., Solima, L. & Popa, S. Financing knowledge-intensive enterprises: evidence from CVCs in the US. J. Technol. Transf. 42, 338–353 (2017).10.1007/s10961-016-9495-2 ↗
15. Chesbrough, H. W. Making sense of corporate venture capital. Harv. Bus. Rev. 80, 90–99 (2002).
16. Benson, D. & Ziedonis, R. H. Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups. Organ. Sci. 20, 329–351 (2008).10.1287/orsc.1080.0386 ↗
17. Hegeman, P. D. & Sørheim, R. Why do they do it? Corporate venture capital investments in cleantech startups. J. Clean. Prod. 294, 126315 (2021).10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126315 ↗
18. Dushnitsky, G. & Lenox, M. J. When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? J. Bus. Venturing 21, 753–772 (2006).10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.012 ↗
19. Cunningham, C., Ederer, F. & Ma, S. Killer acquisitions. J. Polit. Econ. 129, 649–702 (2021).10.1086/712506 ↗
20. Maula, M., Autio, E. & Murray, G. Corporate venture capitalists and independent venture capitalists: what do they know, who do they know and should entrepreneurs care? Venture Cap. 7, 3–21 (2005).10.1080/1369106042000316332 ↗
21. Alvarez-Garrido, E. & Dushnitsky, G. Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs: comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs. Strategic Manage. J. 37, 819–834 (2016).10.1002/smj.2359 ↗
22. Maula, M. V. J., Autio, E. & Murray, G. C. Corporate venture capital and the balance of risks and rewards for portfolio companies. Spec. Issue Corp. Entrep. 24, 274–286 (2009).
23. Yao, T. & O’Neill, H. Venture capital exit pressure and venture exit: a board perspective. Strategic Manage. J. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3432 (2022).10.1002/smj.3432 ↗
24. Masulis, R. W. & Nahata, R. Venture capital conflicts of interest: evidence from acquisitions of venture-backed firms. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 46, 395–430 (2011).10.1017/S0022109010000827 ↗
25. Cleantech Group I3 Database (i3, 2024); https://www.cleantech.com/
26. Park, H. D. & Steensma, H. K. When does corporate venture capital add value for new ventures? Strategic Manage. J. 33, 1–22 (2012).10.1002/smj.937 ↗
27. Momtaz, P. P. Econometric models of duration data in entrepreneurship with an application to start-ups’ time-to-funding by venture capitalists (VCs). J. Appl. Stat. 48, 2673–2694 (2021).10.1080/02664763.2021.1896686 ↗
28. Therneau, T., Crowson, C. & Atkinson, E. Using Time Dependent Covariates and Time Dependent Coefficients in the Cox Model (Comprehensive R Archive Network, 2022); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/vignettes/timedep.pdf
29. Cook, R. J & Lawless, J. F. The Statistical Analysis of Recurrent Events; Statistics for Biology and Health (Springer, 2007).
30. Cornelli, G., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L. & Merrouche, O. Climate Tech 2.0: Social Efficiency Versus Private Returns BIS Working Paper number 1072 (Bank for International Settlements, 2023); https://www.bis.org/publ/work1072.pdf
31. Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (US House, 2022); https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5376
32. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (US House, 2021); https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3684/text
33. Rozansky, R. Becoming America’s Seed Fund: Why NSF’s SBIR Program Should Be a Model for the Rest of Government (Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, 2019); https://itif.org/publications/2019/09/26/becoming-americas-seed-fund-why-nsfs-sbir-program-should-be-model-rest/
34. Kurowski, S. From atoms to bits: resource mobilization of non-digital, hybrid, and digital cleantech startups. Heliyon 10, e23697 (2024).10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23697 ↗
35. Mazza, P. & Shuwaikh, F. Industry-relatedness, geographic proximity and strategic decisions of corporate and independent venture capital-backed companies. J. Small Bus. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2022.2108432 (2022).10.1080/00472778.2022.2108432 ↗
36. Sjöholm, F. Navigating the New Normal: The European Union’s Changing Stance on Globalization in the Era of Trade Conflicts IFN Working Paper number 1466 (Research Institute of Industrial Economics, 2023); https://www.ifn.se/media/p34dyzls/wp1466.pdf
37. Katila, R., Rosenberger, J. D. & Eisenhardt, K. M. Swimming with sharks: technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Adm. Sci. Q. 53, 295–332 (2008).10.2189/asqu.53.2.295 ↗
38. Le Marois, J.-B. & Bennett, S. Tracking Clean Energy Innovation (IEA, 2020); https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-clean-energy-innovation
39. Belcher, K., Maitra, M., Pizzuto, E., Donovan, D. & Oftedal, E. The Future of Climate Tech (Silicon Valley Bank, 2021); https://www.svb.com/globalassets/trendsandinsights/reports/future-of-climate/svb-future-of-climate-tech-report.pdf
40. State of Climate Tech 2021 (PwC, 2021).
41. Clean Energy Innovation (IEA, 2020); https://www.iea.org/reports/clean-energy-innovation
42. Global Climate Tech Venture Capital–Full Year 2021 (HolonIQ, 2022); https://www.holoniq.com/notes/global-climatetech-vc-report-full-year-2021/
43. Climate Tech Investment Trends–Five Years on Since the Paris Agreement (Dealroom.co, 2021); https://dealroom.co/blog/climate-tech-investment-trends
44. Venture Capital, PE Invest $53.7 Billion in Climate Tech (BloombergNEF, 2022); https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/blog/venture-capital-pe-invest-53-7-billion-in-climate-tech/
45. Baker, C. Patentsview: An R Client to the ‘PatentsView’ API version 0.3.0 (2021); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/patentsview/index.html
46. Kassambara, A., Kosinski, M. & Biecek, P. Survminer: Drawing Survival Curves Using ‘Ggplot2’ version 0.4.9 (2021); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survminer/index.html
47. Therneau, T. M. & Grambsch, P. M. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model (Springer, 2001).10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8 ↗
48. Keogh, D. & K.N. Johnson, D. Survival of the funded: econometric analysis of startup longevity and success. J. Entrepreneurship. Manage. Innovation 17, 29–49 (2021).10.7341/20211742 ↗
49. Saxenian, A. Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. Calif. Manage. Rev. 33, 89–112 (1990).10.2307/41166640 ↗
50. Guzman, J. & Stern, S. Where is Silicon Valley? Science 347, 606–609 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa0201 ↗