DataVXNature EnergyPaper
journal article·2023-11-02

Measurement-based differentiation of low-emission global natural gas supply chains

Arvind P. Ravikumar, Erin E. Tullos, David T. Allen, Ben Cahill, Steven P. Hamburg, Daniel Zimmerle, Thomas A. Fox, Manfredi Caltagirone, Lara Owens, Robert Stout, Andrew J. Grimes, Tania M. Fernandez, Carrie Jenks, Riley Duren, Antoine Halff, Morgan D. Bazilian, Stefanie Rucker

Nature Energy· Volume 8· Issue 11
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Ravikumar, A. P., Bazilian, M. & Webber, M. E. Nat. Energy 7, 6 (2022).10.1038/s41560-022-01054-1 ↗
2. Roman-White, S. A. et al. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9, 10857–10867 (2021).10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03307 ↗
3. Cahill, B. & Dawes, A. Transatlantic efforts to cut methane emissions. CSIS https://www.csis.org/analysis/transatlantic-efforts-cut-methane-emissions (2023).
4. EU and global partners reaffirm their commitment to tackling methane emissions from the natural gas value chain. European Commission https://energy.ec.europa.eu/news/eu-and-global-partners-reaffirm-their-commitment-tackling-methane-emissions-natural-gas-value-chain-2023-07-18_en (2023).
5. Tanaka, K., Cavalett, O., Collins, W. J. & Cherubini, F. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 389–396 (2019).10.1038/s41558-019-0457-1 ↗
6. Launch by United States, the European Union, and partners of the Global Methane Pledge to keep 1.5C within reach. European Commission https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_21_5766 (2021).
7. Garg, S., Boz, D. E., Gilbert, B. & Crompton, J. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 023002 (2023).10.1088/1748-9326/acb4af ↗
8. Alvarez, R. A. et al. Science 361, 186–188 (2018).10.1126/science.aar7204 ↗
9. Fox, T. A., Barchyn, T. E., Risk, D., Ravikumar, A. P. & Hugenholtz, C. H. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 053002 (2019).10.1088/1748-9326/ab0cc3 ↗
10. Tullos, E. E. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 8, 463–467 (2021).10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00239 ↗
11. Mineral Methane Initiative OGMP 2.0 framework. United Nations Environment Programme https://ogmpartnership.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/OGMP_20_Reporting_Framework-1.pdf (2023).
12. The MiQ standard. MiQ https://miq.org/the-technical-standard/ (2023).
13. Emission factors. US Environmental Protection Agency https://www3.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/c00s00.pdf (2023).
14. Methane emissions estimation protocol. ONE Future https://onefuture.us/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/ONE-Future-Methane-Intensity-Protocol_Version-2022-for-CY2021-Emissions_01102023.pdf (2023).
15. Lu, X. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2217900120 (2023).10.1073/pnas.2217900120 ↗