Oil price regimes and their role in price diversions from market fundamentals
Source abstract
Abstract
Speculative bubbles, market governance and property rights are thought to affect oil prices, but their timing and magnitude are uncertain. Here, we quantify these effects using econometric techniques that identify periods between 1938:1 and 2018:3 (denoting year:quarter) when prices strayed from the levels implied by market fundamentals. We identify nine price regimes that are associated with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries gaining control over the marginal supply of crude oil, US energy legislation, a precautionary demand shock, the Arab Spring and speculative bubbles. These bubbles raised real oil prices by US$14.31 and US$4.65 per barrel in 2007:4–2008:3 and 2010:1–2011:1, respectively, which transferred US$42.8 billion from US consumers to US oil producers and US$87.4 billion from the US economy to oil exporting nations. Conversely, some sharp changes, such as the price decline associated with the Asian financial crisis, can be explained by market fundamentals. Oil prices are thought to be affected by speculation but the exact impact of speculation on price is not known. Kaufmann and Connelly quantify this effect and identify its beneficiaries by building a price model based on supply and demand, market fundamentals and associating deviations with historical geopolitical events.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Market Dynamics and Volatility · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Global Energy and Sustainability Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Boyd, N. E., Harris, J. H. & Li, B. An update on speculation and financialization in commodity markets. J. Commod. Mark. 10, 91–104 (2018).10.1016/j.jcomm.2018.05.005 ↗
2. Haase, M., Zimmerman, Y. S. & Zimmerman, H. The impact of speculation on commodity futures markets – A review of the finding of 100 empirical studies. J. Commod. Mark. 2, 3–15 (2016).
3. Maugeri, L. The Age of Oil: The Mythology, History and Future of the World’s Most Controversial Resource (Praeger, 2006).
4. Noguera, J. Oil prices: breaks and trends. Energy Econ. 37, 60–67 (2013).10.1016/j.eneco.2012.12.008 ↗
5. Noguera-Santaella, J. Geopolitics and the oil price. Econ. Model. 52, 301–309 (2016).10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.018 ↗
6. Noguera, J. The Seven Sisters versus OPEC: solving the mystery of the petroleum market structure. Energy Econ. 37, 60–67 (2017).10.1016/j.eneco.2012.12.008 ↗
7. Yergin, D. The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, & Power (Simon & Schuster, 1991).
8. Hamilton, J. D. Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II. J. Polit. Econ. 91, 228–248 (1983).10.1086/261140 ↗
9. Hamilton, J. D. Historical causes of postwar oil shocks and recessions. Energy J. 6, 97–116 (1985).10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol6-No1-9 ↗
10. Hamilton, J. D. in Routledge Handbook of Major Events in Economic History (eds Parker, R. E. & Whaples, R.) 239–265 (Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2013).
11. Akins, J. E. The oil crisis: this time the wolf is here. Foreign Aff. 51, 463–490 (1973).10.2307/20037995 ↗
12. Murphy, R. P. Removing the 1970s crude oil price controls: lessons for free-market reform. J. Priv. Enterp. 33, 63–78 (2018).
13. Erickson, E. W. et al. The political economy of crude oil price controls. Nat. Resour. J. 18, 787–801 (1978).
14. Total Energy: Iranian Crude Oil Production (US Energy Information Administration); https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/browser/index.php?tbl=T11.01A#/?f=M&start=197812&end=201901&charted=13
15. Kilian, L. Not all oil price shocks are alike: disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. Am. Econ. Rev. 99, 1053–1069 (2009).10.1257/aer.99.3.1053 ↗
16. Alquist, R. & Kilian, L. What do we learn from the price of crude oil futures? J. Appl. Econ. 25, 539–573 (2010).10.1002/jae.1159 ↗
17. Pindyck, R. The dynamics of commodity spot and futures markets: a primer. Energy J. 22, 1–29 (2001).10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol22-No3-1 ↗
18. Total Energy: Petroleum Products Supplied by Type (US Energy Information Administration); https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/browser/index.php?tbl=T03.05#/?f=M&start=197301&end=201806&charted=9-13
19. Lowinger, T. & Ram, R. Product value as a determinant of OPEC’s official crude oil prices: additional evidence. Rev. Econ. Stat. 66, 691–695 (1984).10.2307/1935997 ↗
20. Verleger, P. K. The determinants of official OPEC crude prices. Rev. Econ. Stat. 64, 177–182 (1982).10.2307/1924296 ↗
21. OPEC Cairo Cuts May Solve Quota Quandry (Petroleum Intelligence Weekly, 2004).
22. Parnes, D. Heterogeneous noncompliance with OPEC’s oil production cuts. Energy Econ. 78, 289–300 (2019).10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.023 ↗
23. Kaufmann, R. K., Bradford, A., Belanger, L. H., Mclaughlin, J. P. & Miki, Y. Determinants of OPEC production: implications for OPEC behavior. Energy Econ. 30, 333–351 (2008).10.1016/j.eneco.2007.04.003 ↗
24. Fundamentals don’t justify $70 oil price – Exxon CEO. Reuters; https://uk.reuters.com/article/exxon-oil-price/update-2-fundamentals-dont-justify-70-oil-price-exxon-ceo-idUKN0720445120070907
25. De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H. & Waldmann, R. J. Noise trader risk in financial markets. J. Polit. Econ. 98, 703–738 (1990).10.1086/261703 ↗
26. Tokic, D. Rational destabilizing speculation, positive feedback trading, and the oil bubble of 2008. Energy Policy 39, 2051–2061 (2011).10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.048 ↗
27. Kolodziej, M., Kaufmann, R. K., Kulatilaka, N., Bicchetti, D. & Maystre, N. Crude oil: commodity or financial asset? Energy Econ. 46, 216–223 (2014).10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.006 ↗
28. UNITED STATES (Petroleum Intelligence Weekly, 2009).
29. OPEC Will Have Hard Time Eeviving Prices, CGES Warns (Petroleum Intelligence Weekly, 2009).
30. Pundits See Oil Price Around $50 This Year (Petroleum Intelligence Weekly, 2009).
31. Factbox: OPEC ministerial comments at Quito meeting. Reuters https://www.reuters.com/article/us-opec-comments/factbox-opec-ministerial-comments-at-quito-meeting-idUSTRE6BA1UA20101211 (2010).
32. International Energy Agency members release strategic petroleum stocks. Today in Energy (US Energy Information Administration, accessed 30 November 2019); https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=1950
33. Manescu, C. B. & Nuño, G. Quantitative effects of the shale oil revoluton. Energy Policy 86, 855–866 (2015).10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.015 ↗
34. Ansari, D. OPEC, Saudi Arabia, and the shale revolution: insights from equilibrium modelling and oil politics. Energy Policy 111, 166–178 (2017).10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.010 ↗
35. Behar, A. & Ritz, R. A. OPEC vs US shale: analyzing the shift to a market-share strategy. Energy Econ. 63, 185–198 (2017).10.1016/j.eneco.2016.12.021 ↗
36. Ansari, E. & Kaufmann, R. K. The effect of oil and gas price and price volatility on rig activity in tight formations and OPEC strategy. Nat. Energy 4, 321–328 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0350-1 ↗
37. Sheikhs v shale - The new economics of oil. The Economist https://www.economist.com/leaders/2014/12/04/sheikhs-v-shale (2014).
38. Kleinberg, R. L., Paltsev, S., Ebinger, C. K. E., Hobbs, D. A. & Boersma, T. Tight oil market dynamics: Benchmarks, breakeven points, and inelasticities. Energy Econ. 70, 70–83 (2018).10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.018 ↗
39. Shrestha, K. Price discovery in energy markets. Energy Econ. 45, 229–233 (2014).10.1016/j.eneco.2014.06.007 ↗
40. Silvério, R. & Szklo, A. The effect of the financial sector on the evolution of oil prices: analysis of the contribution of the futures market to the price discovery process in the WTI spot market. Energy Econ. 34, 1799–1808 (2012).10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.014 ↗
41. Kaufmann, R. K. & Ullman, B. Oil prices, speculation, and fundamentals: interpreting causal relations among spot and futures prices. Energy Econ. 31, 550–558 (2009).10.1016/j.eneco.2009.01.013 ↗
42. Ederington, L. & Lee, J. H. Who trades futures and how: evidence from the heating oil futures market. J. Bus. 75, 353–373 (2002).10.1086/338706 ↗
43. WTI - Economic Data Series (FRED, St. Louis Fed, accessed January 2019); https://fred.stlouisfed.org/tags/series?t=wti;http://www.imf.org/external/np/res/commod/index.aspx
44. Kaufmann, R. K. Price differences among crude oils: the private costs of supply disruptions. Energy Econ. 56, 1–8 (2016).10.1016/j.eneco.2016.02.005 ↗
45. Scheitrum, D. P. & Carter, C. A. WTI and Brent future pricing structure. Energy Econ. 72, 462–469 (2018).10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.039 ↗
46. Bureau of Labor Statistics Data (US Bureau of Labour Statistics, accessed January 2019); https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost
47. Kaufmann, R. K. A model of the world oil market for Project LINK integrating economics, geology and politics. Econ. Model. 12, 165–178 (1995).10.1016/0264-9993(94)00004-O ↗
48. Kaufmann, R. K., Dees, S., Karadeloglou, P., Sánchez, M. & Sanchez, M. Does OPEC matter? An econometric analysis of oil prices. Energy J. 25, 67–90 (2004).10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol25-No4-4 ↗
49. Kaufmann, R. K., Dees, S., Gasteuil, A. & Mann, M. The role of refinery utilization futures markets, and non-linearities. Energy Econ. 30, 2609–2622 (2008).10.1016/j.eneco.2008.04.010 ↗
50. Prindle, D. F. Petroleum Politics and the Texas Railroad Commission (Univ. of Texas Press, 1981).
51. 3c. OPEC Crude Oil (excluding condensates) Supply. STEO Data Browser (US Energy Information Administration); https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/data/browser/#/?v=7&f=M&s=0&start=201401&end=201912&linechart=COPR_AG~COPC_OPEC&maptype=0&ctype=linechart&map
52. Petroleum Trade: Exports by Country Destination (US Energy Information Administration); https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/sec3_13.pdf
53. Petroleum Facts and Figures (American Petroleum Institute, 1971).
54. American Petroleum Institute in Basic Petroleum Data Book Section VIII (American Petroleum Institute, 1981).
55. U.S. Refinery Utilization and Capacity (US Energy Information Administration); https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pnp_unc_dcu_nus_a.htm
56. Eliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J. & Stock, J. H. Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64, 813–836 (1996).10.2307/2171846 ↗
57. Stock, J. H. & Watson, M. W. A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61, 783–820 (1993).10.2307/2951763 ↗
58. Schwarz, G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annu. Stat. 6, 461–464 (1978).10.1214/aos/1176344136 ↗
59. Newey, W. K. & West, K. D. A simple positive semi-definite heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55, 703–708 (1987).10.2307/1913610 ↗
60. Akaike, H. in 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory (eds Petrov, P. N. & Csaki, F.) 267–281 (Akadémiai Kiado, 1973).
61. General-to-Specific (GETS) Modelling and Indicator Saturation Methods v0.21 (CRAN, 2019); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gets/index.html
62. Castle, J., Doornik, J., Hendry, D. & Pretis, F. Detecting location shifts during model selection by step-indicator saturation. Econometrics 3, 240–264 (2015).10.3390/econometrics3020240 ↗