Impacts of micromobility on car displacement with evidence from a natural experiment and geofencing policy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Micromobility, such as electric scooters and electric bikes—an estimated US$300 billion global market by 2030—will accelerate electrification efforts and fundamentally change urban mobility patterns. However, the impacts of micromobility adoption on traffic congestion and sustainability remain unclear. Here we leverage advances in mobile geofencing and high-resolution data to study the effects of a policy intervention, which unexpectedly banned the use of scooters during evening hours with remote shutdown, guaranteeing near perfect compliance. We test theories of habit discontinuity to provide statistical identification for whether micromobility users substitute scooters for cars. Evidence from a natural experiment in a major US city shows increases in travel time of 9–11% for daily commuting and 37% for large events. Given the growing popularity of restrictions on the use of micromobility devices globally, cities should expect to see trade-offs between micromobility restrictions designed to promote public safety and increased emissions associated with heightened congestion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Urban Transport and Accessibility · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Smart Parking Systems Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. National Association of City Transportation Officials Shared Micromobility in the U.S: 2019 (NACTO, 2019); https://nacto.org/shared-micromobility-2019/
2. Research and Knowledge to Advance Glasgow Commitments (UK Science and Innovation Network, 2022); https://ukcop26.org/research-and-knowledge-to-advance-glasgow-commitments
3. Heineke, K., Kloss, B., & Scurtu, D. The future of micromobility: Ridership and revenue after a crisis (McKinsey & Company, 2020); https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/the-future-of-micromobility-ridership-and-revenue-after-a-crisis
4. Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B. & Johnson, J. X. Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8 (2019).10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8 ↗
5. Grahn, R., Qian, S., Matthews, H. S. & Hendrickson, C. Are travelers substituting between transportation networks companies (TNC) and public buses? A case study in Pittsburgh. Transportation 48, 977–1005 (2021).10.1007/s11116-020-10081-4 ↗
6. Ward, J. W., Michalek, J. J., Azevedo, I. L., Samaras, C. & Ferreira, P. Effects of on-demand ridesourcing on vehicle ownership, fuel consumption, vehicle miles traveled, and emissions per capita in the U.S. states. Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 108, 289–301 (2019).10.1016/j.trc.2019.07.026 ↗
7. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine The Role of Transit, Shared Modes, and Public Policy in the New Mobility Landscape (National Academies Press, 2021); https://doi.org/10.17226/2605310.17226/26053 ↗
8. Lime Lime for a Sustainable Paris. A Study on Lime’s Environmental Impact in Paris, 2018–2019 (Lime, 2019); https://www.li.me/hubfs/Assets/LIME_ENG_Paris%20Sustainability%20Report_11OCT2019_RGB.pdf
9. Are e-scooters causing Lyon’s dramatic drop in city traffic? 2nd Street, Lime https://www.li.me/second-street/e-scooters-lyon-dramatic-drop-city-traffic (2019).
10. Wang, K. et al. What travel modes do shared e-scooters displace? A review of recent research findings. Transp. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2015639 (2022).10.1080/01441647.2021.2015639 ↗
11. Department of Transportation Atlanta E-Scooter Survey: 2019 Results (City of Atlanta, 2019); https://www.atlantaga.gov/home/showdocument?id=45981
12. Temple, J. Sorry, scooters aren’t so climate-friendly after all. MIT Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/08/02/646/electric-scooters-arent-so-climate-friendly-after-all-lime-bird/ (2019).
13. Asensio, O. I., Apablaza, C. Z., Lawson, M. C. & Walsh, S. E. A field experiment on workplace norms and electric vehicle etiquette. J. Ind. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13116 (2021).10.1111/jiec.13116 ↗
14. Asensio, O. I. et al. Real-time data from mobile platforms to evaluate sustainable transportation infrastructure. Nat. Sustain. 3, 463–471 (2020).10.1038/s41893-020-0533-6 ↗
15. Diao, M., Kong, H. & Zhao, J. Impacts of transportation network companies on urban mobility. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00678-z (2021).10.1038/s41893-020-00678-z ↗
16. Asensio, O. I., Lawson, M. C. & Apablaza, C. Z. Electric vehicle charging stations in the workplace with high-resolution data from casual and habitual users. Sci. Data 8, 168 (2021).10.1038/s41597-021-00956-1 ↗
17. Ha, S., Marchetto, D. J., Dharur, S. & Asensio, O. I. Topic classification of electric vehicle consumer experiences with transformer-based deep learning. Patterns https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100195 (2021).10.1016/j.patter.2020.100195 ↗
18. Uber Movement Data. Uber Technologies, Inc. https://movement.uber.com/ (2021).
19. Mayor’s Office of Communications City of Atlanta Imposes a Nighttime Scooter and E-bike Ban Citywide No Ride Zone Effective Friday (City of Atlanta, 2019); https://www.atlantaga.gov/Home/Components/News/News/13118/672
20. Department of Transportation Micromobility Statistics Update: February–December 2019 (City of Atlanta, 2020); https://www.atlantaga.gov/home/showdocument?id=44818
21. Hogan, M. Atlanta Mayor Announces $5M Plan to Assist Micromobility, E-Scooters. Atlanta Inno https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/inno/stories/news/2019/09/26/atlanta-mayor-announces-5m-plan-to-assist.html (2019).
22. Verplanken, Bas et al. Attitude versus general habit: antecedents of travel mode choice. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 24, 285–300 (1994).10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00583.x ↗
23. Verplanken, B. & Wood, W. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. J. Public Policy Mark. 25, 90–103 (2006).10.1509/jppm.25.1.90 ↗
24. Verplanken, B., Walker, I., Davis, A. & Jurasek, M. Context change and travel mode choice: combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses. J. Environ. Psychol. 28, 121–127 (2008).10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.005 ↗
25. Verplanken, B. & Whitmarsh, L. Habit and climate change. Behav. Sci. 42, 42–46 (2021).
26. Gärling, T. & Axhausen, K. W. Introduction: habitual travel choice. Transportation 30, 1–11 (2003).10.1023/A:1021230223001 ↗
27. Aarts, H., Verplanken, B. & Van Knippenberg, A. Predicting behavior from actions in the past: repeated decision making or a matter of habit? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28, 1355–1374 (1998).10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01681.x ↗
28. Bamberg, S. & Schmidt, P. Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environ. Behav. 35, 264–285 (2003).10.1177/0013916502250134 ↗
29. Haggar, P., Whitmarsh, L. & Skippon, S. M. Habit discontinuity and student travel mode choice. Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 64, 1–13 (2019).10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.022 ↗
30. Burd, C., Burrows, M. & McKenzie, B. Travel Time to Work in the United States: 2019 (American Community Survey Reports, 2005); https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2021/acs/acs-47.pdf
31. Cambridge Systematics Traffic Congestion and Reliability: Trends and Advanced Strategies for Congestion Mitigation (US Department of Transportation, 2005); https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/20656
32. Sheikh, A., Guin, A. & Guensler, R. Value of travel time savings: evidence from I-85 express lanes in Atlanta, Georgia. Transp. Res. Rec. 2470, 161–168 (2019).10.3141/2470-17 ↗
33. Office of Mobility Planning, Department of City Planning Shareable Dockless Mobility Device, 90 Days Report to Council (City of Atlanta, 2019); https://citycouncil.atlantaga.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=1720
34. Schrank, D., Eisele, B. & Lomax, T. 2019 Urban Mobility Report (Texas A&M Transportation Institute, 2019); https://trid.trb.org/view/1647076
35. Fan, Z. & Harper, C. D. Congestion and environmental impacts of short car trip replacement with micromobility modes. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 103, 103173 (2022).10.1016/j.trd.2022.103173 ↗
36. Fan, Y. & Zheng, S. Dockless bike sharing alleviates road congestion by complementing subway travel: evidence from Beijing. Cities 107, 102895 (2020).10.1016/j.cities.2020.102895 ↗
37. World Data Forum (United Nations, 2021); https://unstats.un.org/unsd/undataforum
38. Fishman, E., Washington, S. & Haworth, N. Bike share’s impact on car use: evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 31, 13–20 (2014).10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.013 ↗
39. NOAA Climate Data Online: Hourly Precipitations (National Centers for Environmental Information, 2021); https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datasets
40. American Community Survey (US Census, 2015); https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs
41. Berck, P. & Villas-Boas, S. B. A note on the triple difference in economic models. Appl. Econ. Lett. 23, 239–242 (2015).10.1080/13504851.2015.1068912 ↗
42. Olden, A. & Møen, J. The triple difference estimator. Econ. J. https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utac010 (2022).10.1093/ectj/utac010 ↗
43. Memmott, J. L. & Young, P. Seasonal variation in traffic congestion: a study of three U.S. cities. BTS Tech. Rep. 5, 1–5 (2008).
44. Elango, V. V., Guensler, R. & Ogle, J. Day-to-day travel variability in the Commute Atlanta, Georgia, study. Transp. Res. Rec. 2014, 39–49 (2007).10.3141/2014-06 ↗
45. Schlich, R. & Axhausen, K. W. Habitual travel behaviour: evidence from a six-week travel diary. Transportation 30, 13–36 (2003).10.1023/A:1021230507071 ↗
46. Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B. & Miller, D. L. Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 29, 238–249 (2011).10.1198/jbes.2010.07136 ↗
47. Mahmassani, H., Hou, T. & Dong, J. Characterizing travel time variability in vehicular traffic networks. Transp. Res. Rec. 2315, 141–152 (2012).10.3141/2315-15 ↗
48. 2019 Regional Commuter Survey Technical Report: Georgia Commute Options (Atlanta Regional Commission, 2020); https://cdn.atlantaregional.org/wp-content/uploads/regionalcommutersurvey-technical-report-020620-final.pdf
49. 2011–2015 5-Year ACS Commuting Flows, Table 1 (US Census Bureau, 2015); https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2015/demo/metro-micro/commuting-flows-2015.html
50. Federal Highway Administration & US Department of Transportation Summary of Travel Trends. 2017 National Household Travel Survey (US Department of Transportation, 2017); https://nhts.ornl.gov/assets/2017_nhts_summary_travel_trends.pdf