The challenge of carbon dioxide removal for EU policy-making
Source abstract
Abstract
Most scenarios to meet the Paris Agreement require negative emissions technologies. The EU has assumed a global leadership role in mitigation action and low-carbon energy technology development and deployment, but carbon dioxide removal presents a serious challenge to its low-carbon policy paradigm and experience.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Smith, P. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2016).10.1038/nclimate2870 ↗
2. Peter, G. P. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 646–649 (2016).10.1038/nclimate3000 ↗
3. Van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Nat. Energy 2, 902–904 (2017).10.1038/s41560-017-0055-2 ↗
4. Peters, G. P. & Geden, O. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 619–621 (2017).10.1038/nclimate3369 ↗
5. Solano Rodriguez, B., Drummond, P. & Ekins, P. Clim. Policy 17, 93–110 (2016).10.1080/14693062.2016.1242058 ↗
6. Bollen, J. & Aalbers, R. Biomass-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage Should Be Used Immediately (CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, 2017).
7. Burns, T. R., Calvo, D. & Carson, M. Paradigms in Public Policy: Theory and Practice of Paradigm Shifts in the EU (Peter Lang, 2009).
8. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Towards Green Growth (OECD Publishing, 2011).
9. West, J. J. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 885–889 (2013).10.1038/nclimate2009 ↗
10. Duscha, V. et al. Energy Policy 95, 314–323 (2016).10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.011 ↗
11. Heyward, C. Polit. Sci. Polit. 46, 23–27 (2013).10.1017/S1049096512001436 ↗
12. Fischer, S. & Geden, O. Moving Targets: Negotiations on the EU’s Energy and Climate Policy Objectives for the Post-2020 Period and Implications for the German Energy Transition (German Institute for International and Security Affairs, 2014).
13. Renewable Energy Progress Report COM(2017) 57 Final (European Commission, 2017).
14. Bosch, R., van de Pol, M. & Philp, J. Nature 523, 526–528 (2015).10.1038/523526a ↗
15. Roni, M. S. et al. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 78, 1089–1101 (2017).10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.023 ↗
16. Scott, V. Energy Policy 54, 66–71 (2013).10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.026 ↗
17. Scott, V. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 105–111 (2013).10.1038/nclimate1695 ↗
18. Pye, S. et al. Nat. Energy 2, 17024 (2017).10.1038/nenergy.2017.24 ↗
19. Sanchez, D. L. & Kammen, D. M. Nat. Energy 1, 15002 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2015.2 ↗
20. Honegger, M. & Rainer, D. Clim. Policy 18, 306–321 (2018).10.1080/14693062.2017.1413322 ↗
21. Geden, O. WIREs Clim. Change 7, 790–797 (2016).10.1002/wcc.427 ↗
22. Stewart, R. J. et al. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 4, 481–494 (2014).10.1002/ghg.1410 ↗