journal article·2020-11-02Open access

Multifaceted drivers for onshore wind energy repowering and their implications for energy transition

Lena Kitzing, Morten Kofoed Jensen, Thomas Telsnig, Eric Lantz

Nature Energy· Volume 5· Issue 12

Abstract

Wind energy is anticipated to become a backbone of the future energy system. Ageing wind turbine fleets, increasing land-use constraints and rising relevance of societal factors make the deployment of land-based (onshore) wind energy ever more complicated. Consequently, repowering is expected to become a rapidly growing point of focus for the wind industry. Here we propose a more holistic and socially informed project-level approach to analyse repowering activity that enables a more robust understanding of the process and potentials. We demonstrate that for wind pioneer in Denmark, only 67% of the capacity removed in repowering projects was related to the physical space needed for a new turbine. Other factors that drive repowering include regulation (for example, noise-related, 8–17%), development principles (for example, aesthetics, 7–20%) and political bargaining (4–13%). The recognition of repowering as a negotiated process between host communities and wind developers will probably be critical to unlock the full potential of wind energy in the future. As wind turbines age and wind fleets expand, their replacement becomes increasingly complex. Kitzing et al. analyse turbine repowering activity in Denmark holistically, uncovering a range of factors that affect repowering decisions beyond physical space that need to be considered carefully.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Wind Energy Research and Development · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Global Wind Energy Report 2018 (Global Wind Council Energy, 2019); https://gwec.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/GWEC-Global-Wind-Report-2018.pdf
2. Wind Energy in Europe in 2018—Trends and Statistics (WindEurope, 2019); www.windeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/files/about-wind/statistics/WindEurope-Annual-Statistics-2018.pdf
3. Rekord Lav CO2-Udledning fra Danskernes Elforbrug i 2019 (Energinet, 2020); www.energinet.dk/Om-nyheder/Nyheder/2020/01/16/Rekord-lav-CO2udledning-fra-danskernes-elforbrug-i-2019
4. Lantz, E., Leventhal, M. & Baring-Gould, I. Wind Power Project Repowering: Financial Feasibility, Decision Drivers, and Supply Chain Effects. Prepared under Task no. WE11.0630, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-60535 (NREL, 2013); www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/60535.pdf10.2172/1117058 ↗
5. Silvosa, A. C., Gómez, G. I. & Del Río, P. Analyzing the techno-economic determinants for the repowering of Wind Farms. Eng. Econ. 58, 282–303 (2013).10.1080/0013791X.2013.814737 ↗
6. Ziegler, L., Gonzalez, E., Rubert, T., Smolka, U. & Melero, J. J. Lifetime extension of onshore wind turbines: a review covering Germany, Spain, Denmark, and the UK. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 1261–1271 (2018).10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.100 ↗
7. Scherhaufer, P., Höltinger, S., Salak, B., Schauppenlehner, T. & Schmidt, J. Patterns of acceptance and non-acceptance within energy landscapes: a case study on wind energy expansion in Austria. Energy Policy 109, 863–870 (2017).10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.057 ↗
8. Smallwood, K. S. in Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions (ed. Köppel. J.) 175–187 (Springer 2017).
9. Steininger, G. Wind turbine repowering is on the horizon (L. Buchsbaum and S. Patel, interviewers) POWER Magazine (2016); https://www.powermag.com/wind-turbine-repowering-horizon/
10. Villena-Ruiz, R., Ramirez, F. J., Honrubia-Escribano, A. & Gómez-Lázaro, E. A techno-economic analysis of a real wind farm repowering experience: the Malpica case. Energy Convers. Manag. 172, 182–199 (2018).10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.024 ↗
11. Filgueira, A., Seijo, M. A., Munoz, E., Castro, L. & Piegari, L. Technical and economic study of two repowered wind farms in Bustelo and San Xoán, 24.7 MW and 15.84 MW respectively. In 2009 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP) (ICCEP, 2009); https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEP.2009.521199810.1109/ICCEP.2009.5211998 ↗
12. Prabu, T. & Kottayil, S. K. Repowering a wind farm—a techno-economic approach. Wind Eng. 39, 385–397 (2015).10.1260/0309-524X.39.4.385 ↗
13. Nivedh, B., Devi, R. & Sreevalsan, E. Repowering of wind farms—a case study. Wind Eng. 37, 137–150 (2013).10.1260/0309-524X.37.2.137 ↗
14. Paul, A. & Prabu, T. Technical and economic feasibility study on repowering of wind farms. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9, 1–9 (2016).
15. Goyal, M. Repowering—next big thing in India. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 1400–1409 (2010).10.1016/j.rser.2010.01.002 ↗
16. Del Río, P., Calvo Silvosa, A. & Iglesias Gómez, G. Policies and design elements for the repowering of wind farms: a qualitative analysis of different options. Energy Policy 39, 1897–1908 (2011).10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.035 ↗
17. Santos-Alamillos, F. J., Thomaidis, N. S., Usaola-García, J., Ruiz-Arias, J. A. & Pozo-Vázquez, D. Exploring the mean-variance portfolio optimization approach for planning wind repowering actions in Spain. Renew. Energy 106, 335–342 (2017).10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.041 ↗
18. Möller, B. Changing wind-power landscapes: regional assessment of visual impact on land use and population in Northern Jutland, Denmark. Appl. Energy 83, 477–494 (2006).10.1016/j.apenergy.2005.04.004 ↗
19. Himpler, S. & Madlener, R. Optimal timing of wind farm repowering: a two-factor real options analysis. J. Energy Mark. 7, 3–34 (2014).10.21314/JEM.2014.111 ↗
20. Wind Energy in Europe: Outlook to 2023 (WindEurope, 2019); https://windeurope.org/about-wind/reports/wind-energy-in-europe-outlook-to-2023/#download
21. Lacal-Arántegu, R., Iglesias, A. & María Yusta, J. Technology effects in repowering wind turbines. Wind Energy 23, 660–675 (2019).10.1002/we.2450 ↗
22. Frantál, B. Have local government and public expectations of wind energy project benefits been met? Implications for repowering schemes. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 17, 217–236 (2015).10.1080/1523908X.2014.936583 ↗
23. Martínez, E., Latorre-Biel, J. I., Jiménez, E., Sanz, F. & Blanco, J. Life cycle assessment of a wind farm repowering process. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 93, 260–271 (2018).10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.044 ↗
24. Manchado, C. et al. Wind farm repowering guided by visual impact criteria. Renew. Energy 135, 197–207 (2019).10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.007 ↗
25. Hötker, H., Thomsen, K.-M. & Jeromin, H. Impacts on Biodiversity of Exploitation of Renewable Energy Sources: the Example of Birds and Bats—Facts, Gaps in Knowledge, Demands for Further Research, and Ornithological Guidelines for the Development of Renewable Energy Exploitation (Michael-Otto-Institut for the Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union, 2006).
26. Smallwood, K. S. & Karas, B. Avian and bat fatality rates at old-generation and repowered wind turbines in California. J. Wildl. Manage. 73, 1062–1071 (2009).10.2193/2008-464 ↗
27. Marques, A. T. et al. Understanding bird collisions at wind farms: an updated review on the causes and possible mitigation strategies. Biol. Conserv. 179, 40–52 (2014).10.1016/j.biocon.2014.08.017 ↗
28. Ferri, V., Battisti, C. & Soccini, C. Bats in a Mediterranean mountainous landscape: does wind farm repowering induce changes at assemblage and species level? Environ. Manage. 57, 1240–1246 (2016).10.1007/s00267-016-0686-2 ↗
29. Colmenar-Santos, A., Campíñez-Romero, S., Pérez-Molina, C. & Mur-Pérez, F. Repowering: An actual possibility for wind energy in Spain in a new scenario without feed-in-tariffs. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 41, 319–337 (2015).10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.041 ↗
30. Searchlist over all Plan Proposals and Plans Adopted Pursuant to the Planning Act (Danish Business Authority, 2019); kort.plandata.dk/searchlist/#/
31. Master Data Register for Wind Turbines—Data on Operating and Decommissioned Wind Turbines (Ultimo 02 2020) (Danish Energy Agency, accessed 26 March 2020; www.ens.dk/en/our-services/statistics-data-key-figures-and-energy-maps/overview-energy-sector
32. Afgifts og Tilskudsanalysen på Energiområdet—Delanalyse 6, Fremtidigt Tilskud til Landvind (Danish Ministry of Taxation, 2018); www.skm.dk/media/5361/afgifts-og-tilskudsanalysen-delanalyse-6.pdf
33. Bekendtgørelse om Planlægning for og Tilladelse til Opstilling af Vindmøller (Danish Ministry of Industry, Business and Financial Affairs, 2019); www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=210040
34. Vindmølleindustrien som Historisk Flagskib (Danish Energy Agency, 2011); www.ens.dk/sites/ens.dk/files/Vindenergi/vindmoelleindustrien_historisk_flagskib.pdf
35. Wind Energy Generation (Strategic Energy Technologies Information System, European Commission, 2013); setis.ec.europa.eu/system/files/Technology_Information_Sheet_Wind_Energy_Generation.pdf
36. Directive 2001/77/EC on the Promotion of Electricity Produced from Renewable Energy Sources in the Internal Energy Market OJ L 283/33 (European Parliament and Council, 2001).
37. Chatham House Rule (Chatham House, 2020); www.chathamhouse.org/chatham-house-rule
38. Vejledning om planlægning for og tilladelse til opstilling af vindmøller (Danish Nature Agency under the Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark., 2015); www.naturstyrelsen.dk/media/131731/vejledning_06012015_web.pdf
39. Støj fra Vindmøller–Vejledning fra Miljøstyrelsen nr 1 (Environmental Protection Agency under the Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark, 2012); www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publikationer/2012/05/978-87-92903-08-2.pdf
40. Vejledning om VVM i Planloven (Danish Nature Agency under the Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark, 2009); www.naturstyrelsen.dk/media/nst/9948968/vvm_vejledning2.pdf
41. Integration of Wind Power (Ea Energianalyse, 2015); www.ea-energianalyse.dk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/1550_Integration_vindkraft_viking_link_og_andre_tiltag-2.pdf
42. Uihlein, A., Telsnig, T. & Vazquez Hernandez, C. JRC Wind Energy Database (Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, 2019).
43. Lacal-Arántegui, R. & Uihlein, A. Repowering wind turbines—analysis of the effects of technology substitution in repowered wind farms. Appl. Energy 23, 660–675 (2020).