Business models and financial characteristics of community energy in the UK
Source abstract
Abstract
Community energy projects take a decentralized and participatory approach to low-carbon energy. Here we present a quantitative analysis of business models, financing mechanisms and financial performance of UK community energy projects, based on a new survey. We find that business models depend on technology, project size and the fine-tuning of operations to local contexts. Although larger projects rely more on loans, community shares are the most common and cheapest financial instrument in the sector. Community energy has pioneered low-cost citizen finance for renewables, but its future is threatened by reductions, and instability, in policy support. Over 90% of the projects in our sample make a financial surplus during our single-year snapshot, but this falls to just 20% if we remove income from price guarantee mechanisms, such as the Feed-in Tariff scheme. Renewed support and/or business model innovations are therefore needed for the sector to realize its potential contribution to the low-carbon energy transition.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Energy Management · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Braunholtz-Speight, T. et al. The Evolution of Community Energy in the UK (UK Energy Research Centre, 2018).
2. Hoicka, C. & MacArthur, J. From tip to toes: mapping community energy models in Canada and New Zealand. Energy Policy 121, 162–174 (2018).10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.002 ↗
3. Peters, M. et al. Community solar initiatives in the United States of America: comparisons with – and lessons for – the UK and other European countries. Energy Policy 121, 355–364 (2018).10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.022 ↗
4. Berka A. in Handbuch Energiewende und Partizipation (eds Holstenkamp, L. & Radtke, J.) 1011–1035 (Springer VS, 2017).10.1007/978-3-658-09416-4_59 ↗
5. Chapman, A. Community Energy in the UK (Green European Foundation, 2019).
6. Busch, H. et al. Scientific Review Paper on CE Drivers and Barriers (Co2mmunity Project, 2019).
7. Forman, A. Energy justice at the end of the wire: enacting community energy and equity in Wales. Energy Policy 107, 649–657 (2017).10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.006 ↗
8. Bauwens, T., Gotchev, B. & Holstenkamp, L. What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13, 136–147 (2016).10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016 ↗
9. Seyfang, J., Park, J. J. & Smith, A. A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy Policy 61, 977–989 (2013).10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030 ↗
10. Saunders, R. W., Gross, R. J. K. & Wade, J. Can premium tariffs for microgeneration and small-scale renewable heat help the fuel poor, and if so, how? Case studies of innovative finance for community energy schemes in the UK. Energy Policy 42, 78–88 (2012).10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.045 ↗
11. Walker, G. & Devine-Wright, P. Community renewable energy: what should it mean? Energy Policy 36, 497–500 (2008).10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019 ↗
12. REView: Renewable Energy View 2016 (Renewable Energy Association, 2016).
13. State of the Sector Report 2018 (Community Energy England and Community Energy Wales, 2018).
14. van der Schoor, T. & Scholtens, L. J. B. Scientific approaches of community energy: a literature review (Centre for Energy Economics Research, 2019).
15. Bauwens, T. Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: findings and policy implications from Flanders. Energy Policy 129, 841–852 (2019).10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.067 ↗
16. Holstenkamp, L. & Kahla, F. What are community energy companies trying to accomplish? An empirical investigation of investment motives in the German case. Energy Policy 97, 112–122 (2016).10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.010 ↗
17. Yildiz, O. Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation – the case of Germany. Renew. Energy 68, 677–685 (2014).10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.038 ↗
18. Yildiz, O. et al. Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 6, 59–73 (2015).10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001 ↗
19. Creamer E. et al. Community energy: entanglements of community, state and private sector. Geogr. Compass 12, e12378 (2018).10.1111/gec3.12378 ↗
20. Haf, S., Parkhill, K., McDonald, M. & Griffiths, G. Distributing power? Community energy projects’ experience of planning, policy and incumbents in the devolved nations of Scotland and Wales. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 62, 921–938 (2019).10.1080/09640568.2018.1453490 ↗
21. van Veelen, B. Making sense of the Scottish community energy sector – an organising typology. Scott. Geogr. J. 133, 1–20 (2017).10.1080/14702541.2016.1210820 ↗
22. Bomberg, E. & McEwen, N. Mobilising community energy. Energy Policy 51, 435–444 (2012).10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.045 ↗
23. Strachan, P. A. et al. Promoting community renewable energy in a corporate energy world. Sustain. Dev. 23, 96–109 (2015).10.1002/sd.1576 ↗
24. Haggett, C. et al. Community energy in Scotland: the social factors for success (ClimateXChange, 2013).
25. Park, J. J. Fostering community energy and equal opportunities between communities. Local Environ. 17, 387–408 (2012).10.1080/13549839.2012.678321 ↗
26. Hoffman, S. & High-Pippert, A. From private lives to collective action: recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program. Energy Policy 38, 7567–7574 (2010).10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.054 ↗
27. Walker, G. What are the barriers and incentives for community-owned means of energy production and use? Energy Policy 36, 4401–4405 (2008).10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.032 ↗
28. Community and Locally Owned Renewable Energy in Scotland at June 2018 (Energy Saving Trust, 2018).
29. Community Energy Finance Roundtable: Final Report and Recommendations (Department for Energy and Climate Change, 2014).
30. Berka, A. et al. A comparative analysis of the costs of onshore wind energy: is there a case for community-specific policy support? Energy Policy 106, 394–403 (2017).10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.070 ↗
31. Harnmeijer, J. et al. The comparative costs of community and commercial renewable energy projects in Scotland (ClimateXChange, 2015).
32. Hall, S., Foxon, T. J. & Bolton, R. Financing the civic energy sector: how financial institutions affect ownership models in Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 12, 5–15 (2015).10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.004 ↗
33. Databuild Research & Solutions Ltd and Energy Saving Trust. Community Energy in the UK: Part 2 (Department for Energy and Climate Change, 2014) .
34. Osterwalder, A. & Pigneur, Y. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. (John Wiley and Sons, 2010).
35. Solar Photovoltaic Deployment (Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2019).
36. The Community Shares Handbook (Community Shares Unit, 2015).
37. Urban community energy fund. GOV.UK (Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2016); https://www.gov.uk/guidance/urban-community-energy-fund
38. Rural community energy fund. GOV.UK (Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2019); https://www.gov.uk/guidance/rural-community-energy-fund
39. Nolden, C. Governing community energy—Feed-in tariffs and the development of community wind energy schemes in the United Kingdom and Germany. Energy Policy 63, 543–552 (2013).10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.050 ↗
40. Mitchell, C., Bauknecht, D. & Connor, P. M. Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany. Energy Policy 34, 297–305 (2006).10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.004 ↗
41. Couture, T. & Gagnon, Y. An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: implications for renewable energy investment. Energy Policy 38, 955–965 (2010).10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.047 ↗
42. Prices of fuels purchased by non-domestic consumers in the UK (Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2018).
43. Lehner, O. Crowdfunding social ventures: a model and research agenda. Venture Cap. 15, 289–311 (2013).10.1080/13691066.2013.782624 ↗
44. Floyd, D., Gregory, D. & Wilson, N. After the Gold Rush: Report of The Alternative Commission on Social Investment (The Alternative Commission on Social Investment, 2015).
45. Hall S., Foxon, T. J. & Bolton, R. Investing in low-carbon transitions: energy finance as an adaptive market. Climate Policy 17, 280–298 (2017).10.1080/14693062.2015.1094731 ↗
46. Blyth, W., McCarthy, R. & Gross, R. J. K. Financing the UK power sector: is the money available? Energy Policy 87, 607–622 (2015).10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.028 ↗
47. Unruh, G. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28, 817–830 (2000).10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7 ↗
48. McInerney, C. & Bunn, D. W. Expansion of the investor base for the energy transition. Energy Policy 129, 1240–1244 (2019).10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.035 ↗
49. Mazzucato, M. & Semieniuk, G. Financing renewable energy: who is financing what and why it matters? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 127, 8–22 (2018).10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021 ↗
50. Bolton, R. & Foxon, T. A socio-technical perspective on low carbon investment challenges – insights for UK energy policy. Environ. Innov. Soc.Transit. 14, 165–181 (2015).10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.005 ↗
51. Inside the Market Report: June 2015 (Community Shares Unit, 2015).
52. Lundberg, L. Auctions for all? Reviewing the German wind power auctions in 2017. Energy Policy 128, 449–458 (2019).10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.024 ↗
53. Leiren, M. D. & Reimer, I. Historical institutionalist perspective on the shift from feed-in tariffs towards auctioning in German renewable energy policy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 43, 33–40 (2018).10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.022 ↗
54. Mirzania, P., Ford, A., Andrews, D., Ofori, G. & Maidment, G. The impact of policy changes: the opportunities of community renewable energy projects in the UK and the barriers they face. Energy Policy 129, 1282–1296 (2019).10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.066 ↗
55. Joint response to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Consultation on a Smart Export Guarantee (Community Energy England, Community Energy Wales and Community Energy Scotland, 2019).
56. Contracts for Difference (CfD): Draft Budget Notice for the third allocation round (Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2018).
57. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).
58. Wickham, H., Francois, R., Henry, L. & Muller, K. dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0.7.1. (2017).
59. Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M. & Hornik, K. cluster: Cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.0.4. (2016).
60. Kassambara, A. & Mundt, F. factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R package version 3.1.2. (2017).10.32614/CRAN.package.factoextra ↗
61. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2009).10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 ↗
62. Krijthe, J. H. Rtsne: T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding using a Barnes-Hut implementation. R package version 0.15. (2015).10.32614/CRAN.package.Rtsne ↗
63. Hahsler, M. & Piekenbrock, M. dbscan: Density based clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) and related algorithms (2019).
64. Hennig, C. fpc: Flexible procedures for clustering. R package version 2.2-3 ed. (2019).
65. Szepannek, G. clustMixType: user-friendly clustering of mixed-type data in R. R J. 10, 200–208 (2018).10.32614/RJ-2018-048 ↗
66. Wooldridge, J. Introduction to Econometrics: Europe, Middle East and Africa edition (Cengage Learning, 2014).
67. Environmental Programmes (Ofgem, 2019); https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/environmental-programmes