Reinventing the energy modelling–policy interface
Source abstract
Abstract
Energy modelling has a crucial underpinning role for policy making, but the modelling–policy interface faces several limitations. A reinvention of this interface would better provide timely, targeted, tested, transparent and iterated insights from such complex multidisciplinary tools.
The source flagged this abstract for review. Check formulas and completeness against the original publication.
Source: openaire · Quality: needs review · Source record ↗
Source flags: short_text
Source flags: short_text
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Integrated Energy Systems Optimization · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Environmental Impact and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. World Energy Outlook 2015 (International Energy Agency, 2015); www.worldenergyoutlook.org
2. Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan (US Energy Information Administration, 2015); http://go.nature.com/4CvjVM
3. Climate Smart Planning Platform (World Bank, 2015); http://www.climatesmartplanning.org
4. Mayer, I. et al. Int. J. Technol. Policy Manage. 4, 169–190 (2004).10.1504/IJTPM.2004.004819 ↗
5. Yücel, G. & van Daalen, E. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simulat. 12, 3–30 (2009).
6. Spruijt, P. et al. Environ. Sci. Policy 40, 16–25 (2014).10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.002 ↗
7. Stirling, A. Nature 468, 1029–1031 (2010).10.1038/4681029a ↗
8. Jebaraj, S. & Iniyan, S. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 10, 281–311 (2006).10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.004 ↗
9. Pilavachi, P. et al. Energy Policy 36, 1726–1735 (2008).10.1016/j.enpol.2008.01.028 ↗
10. Mundaca, L. et al. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35, 305–344 (2010).10.1146/annurev-environ-052810-164840 ↗
11. Pandey, R. Energy Policy 30, 97–106 (2002).10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00062-3 ↗
12. Borowski, I. & Hare, M. Water Resour. Manage. 21, 1049–1074 (2007).10.1007/s11269-006-9098-z ↗
13. Hyder, K. et al. Mar. Policy 61, 291–302 (2015).10.1016/j.marpol.2015.07.015 ↗
14. Metcalf, C. et al. Epidemics 10, 93–96 (2015).10.1016/j.epidem.2014.08.008 ↗
15. Dodds, P. et al. Environ. Model. Assess. 20, 83–102 (2014).10.1007/s10666-014-9417-3 ↗
16. Technical Manual and Selected Applications of the PRIMES Model (National Technical University of Athens, 2015); http://go.nature.com/hB15te
17. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014); www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/
18. Global Trade Analysis Project (Purdue University, 2015); www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/databases/default.asp
19. Edenhofer, O. et al. Energy J. 31, 11–49 (2010).10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-NoSI-2 ↗
20. Socolow, R. Climatic Change 108, 775–790 (2011).10.1007/s10584-011-0187-5 ↗
21. Strachan, N. Energy Policy 39, 1037–1040 (2011).10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.015 ↗
22. Upham, P. & Dendler, L. Environ. Sci. Policy 47, 137–147 (2015).10.1016/j.envsci.2014.11.005 ↗
23. Taylor, P. et al. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 4, 32–41 (2014).10.1016/j.erss.2014.08.007 ↗
24. Chiodi, A. et al. in Informing Energy and Climate Policies Using Energy Systems Models (eds Giannakidis, G. et al.) 15–41 (Springer, 2015).10.1007/978-3-319-16540-0_2 ↗
25. Howells, M. et al. Energy Policy 39, 5850–5870 (2011).10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.033 ↗
26. DeCarolis, J. et al. Energy Econ. 34, 1845–1853 (2012).10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.004 ↗
27. The Aqua Book: Guidance on Producing Quality Analysis for Government (Her Majesty's Government, 2015); http://go.nature.com/T15sy2