Tandem amine scrubbing and CO2 electrolysis via direct piperazine carbamate reduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. De Luna, P. et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364, eaav3506 (2019).10.1126/science.aav3506 ↗
2. Biddinger, E. J. & Modestino, M. A. Electro-organic syntheses for green chemical manufacturing. Electrochem. Soc. Interface 29, 43 (2020).10.1149/2.F06203IF ↗
3. Li, M., Irtem, E., Iglesias van Montfort, H.-P., Abdinejad, M. & Burdyny, T. Energy comparison of sequential and integrated CO2 capture and electrochemical conversion. Nat. Commun. 13, 5398 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-33145-8 ↗
4. González-Castaño, M., Dorneanu, B. & Arellano-García, H. The reverse water gas shift reaction: a process systems engineering perspective. React. Chem. Eng. 6, 954–976 (2021).10.1039/D0RE00478B ↗
5. Rochelle, G. in Absorption-based Post-Combustion Capture of Carbon Dioxide (ed Feron, P. H. M.) 35–67 (Elsevier: Woodhead Publishing, 2016).10.1016/B978-0-08-100514-9.00003-2 ↗
6. Sullivan, I. et al. Coupling electrochemical CO2 conversion with CO2 capture. Nat. Catal. 4, 952–958 (2021).10.1038/s41929-021-00699-7 ↗
7. Bown, R. M., Joyce, M., Zhang, Q., Reina, T. R. & Duyar, M. S. Identifying commercial opportunities for the reverse water gas shift reaction. Energy Technol. 9, 2100554 (2021).10.1002/ente.202100554 ↗
8. Heldebrant, D. J., Kothandaraman, J., Dowell, N. M. & Brickett, L. Next steps for solvent-based CO2 capture; integration of capture, conversion, and mineralisation. Chem. Sci. 13, 6445–6456 (2022).10.1039/D2SC00220E ↗
9. Freyman, M. C. et al. Reactive CO2 capture: a path forward for process integration in carbon management. Joule 7, 631–651 (2023).10.1016/j.joule.2023.03.013 ↗
10. Siegel, R. E., Pattanayak, S. & Berben, L. A. Reactive capture of CO2: opportunities and challenges. ACS Catal. 13, 766–784 (2022).10.1021/acscatal.2c05019 ↗
11. Lee, G. et al. Electrochemical upgrade of CO2 from amine capture solution. Nat. Energy 6, 46–53 (2021).10.1038/s41560-020-00735-z ↗
12. Conway, W. et al. Designer amines for post combustion CO2 capture processes. Energy Procedia 63, 1827–1834 (2014).10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.190 ↗
13. Nakao, S.-I., Yogo, K., Goto, K., Kai, T. & Yamada, H. in Advanced CO2 Capture Technologies: Absorption, Adsorption, and Membrane Separation Methods (ed Hall, C. A. S.) 3–22 (Springer, 2019).10.1007/978-3-030-18858-0_2 ↗
14. Phillips, R. & Dunnill, C. W. Zero gap alkaline electrolysis cell design for renewable energy storage as hydrogen gas. RSC Adv. 6, 100643–100651 (2016).10.1039/C6RA22242K ↗
15. Tong, W. et al. Electrolysis of low-grade and saline surface water. Nat. Energy 5, 367–377 (2020).10.1038/s41560-020-0550-8 ↗
16. Yang, Y. et al. Anion-exchange membrane water electrolyzers and fuel cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 9620–9693 (2022).10.1039/D2CS00038E ↗
17. Bernhardsen, I. M. & Knuutila, H. K. A review of potential amine solvents for CO2 absorption process: absorption capacity, cyclic capacity and pKa. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 61, 27–48 (2017).10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.021 ↗
18. Puxty, G. et al. Carbon dioxide postcombustion capture: a novel screening study of the carbon dioxide absorption performance of 76 amines. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6427–6433 (2009).10.1021/es901376a ↗
19. El Hadri, N., Quang, D. V., Goetheer, E. L. V. & Abu Zahra, M. R. M. Aqueous amine solution characterization for post-combustion CO2 capture process. Appl. Energy 185, 1433–1449 (2017).10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.043 ↗
20. Conway, W. et al. Toward the understanding of chemical absorption processes for post-combustion capture of carbon dioxide: electronic and steric considerations from the kinetics of reactions of CO2(aq) with sterically hindered amines. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 1163–1169 (2013).10.1021/es3025885 ↗
21. Yang, Q. et al. A carbon-13 NMR study of carbon dioxide absorption and desorption with aqueous amine solutions. Energy Procedia 1, 955–962 (2009).10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.127 ↗
22. Caplow, M. Kinetics of carbamate formation and breakdown. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90, 6795–6803 (1968).10.1021/ja01026a041 ↗
23. Johnson, S. & Morrison, D. L. Kinetics and mechanism of decarboxylation of N-arylcarbamates. Evidence for kinetically important zwitterionic carbamic acid species of short lifetime. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94, 1323–1334 (1972).10.1021/ja00759a045 ↗
24. da Silva, E. F. & Svendsen, H. F. Ab initio study of the reaction of carbamate formation from CO2 and alkanolamines. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43, 3413–3418 (2004).10.1021/ie030619k ↗
25. Stowe, H. M., Paek, E. & Hwang, G. S. First-principles assessment of CO2 capture mechanisms in aqueous piperazine solution. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 25296–25307 (2016).10.1039/C6CP03584A ↗
26. Rochelle, G. et al. Aqueous piperazine as the new standard for CO2 capture technology. Chem. Eng. J. 171, 725–733 (2011).10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.011 ↗
27. Bishnoi, S. & Rochelle, G. T. Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous piperazine: reaction kinetics, mass transfer and solubility. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55, 5531–5543 (2000).10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00182-2 ↗
28. Bishnoi, S. Carbon Dioxide Absorption and Solution Equilibrium in Piperazine-activated Methyldiethanolamine (Univ. of Texas at Austin, 2000).
29. Freeman, S. A., Dugas, R., Van Wagener, D. H., Nguyen, T. & Rochelle, G. T. Carbon dioxide capture with concentrated, aqueous piperazine. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 119–124 (2010).10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.10.008 ↗
30. Robinson, K., McCluskey, A. & Attalla, M. I. An ATR‐FTIR study on the effect of molecular structural variations on the CO2 absorption characteristics of heterocyclic amines, part II. ChemPhysChem 13, 2331–2341 (2012).10.1002/cphc.201200066 ↗
31. Robinson, K., McCluskey, A. & Attalla, M. I. An FTIR spectroscopic study on the effect of molecular structural variations on the CO2 absorption characteristics of heterocyclic amines. ChemPhysChem 12, 1088–1099 (2011).10.1002/cphc.201001056 ↗
32. Xu, Y. et al. Diffusivity in novel diamine-based water-lean absorbent systems for CO2 capture applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 61, 12493–12503 (2022).10.1021/acs.iecr.2c01990 ↗
33. Leverick, G. et al. Uncovering the active species in amine-mediated CO2 reduction to CO on Ag. ACS Catal. 13, 12322–12337 (2023).10.1021/acscatal.3c02500 ↗
34. Safipour, J., Weber, A. Z. & Bell, A. T. Detrimental effects of monoethanolamine and other amine-based capture agents on the electrochemical reduction of CO2. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 5012–5017 (2023).10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01953 ↗
35. Gu, J., Hsu, C.-S., Bai, L., Chen, H. M. & Hu, X. Atomically dispersed Fe3+ sites catalyze efficient CO2 electroreduction to CO. Science 364, 1091–1094 (2019).10.1126/science.aaw7515 ↗
36. Vijay, S. et al. Unified mechanistic understanding of CO2 reduction to CO on transition metal and single atom catalysts. Nat. Catal. 4, 1024–1031 (2021).10.1038/s41929-021-00705-y ↗
37. Xia, C. et al. General synthesis of single-atom catalysts with high metal loading using graphene quantum dots. Nat. Chem. 13, 887–894 (2021).10.1038/s41557-021-00734-x ↗
38. Birdja, Y. Y. et al. Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels. Nat. Energy 4, 732–745 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y ↗
39. Huang, L. et al. Pressure dependence in aqueous-based electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Commun. 14, 2958 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-38775-0 ↗
40. Vermaas, D. A. & Smith, W. A. Synergistic electrochemical CO2 reduction and water oxidation with a bipolar membrane. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 1143–1148 (2016).10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00557 ↗
41. Sheng, X., Ge, W., Jiang, H. & Li, C. Engineering the Ni-N-C catalyst microenvironment enabling CO2 electroreduction with nearly 100% CO selectivity in acid. Adv. Mater. 34, 2201295 (2022).10.1002/adma.202201295 ↗
42. Xie, Y. et al. High carbon utilization in CO2 reduction to multi-carbon products in acidic media. Nat. Catal. 5, 564–570 (2022).10.1038/s41929-022-00788-1 ↗
43. Chen, L. et al. Energy-efficient CO(2) conversion to multicarbon products at high rates on CuGa bimetallic catalyst. Nat. Commun. 15, 7053 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-51466-8 ↗
44. Langie, K. M. G. et al. Toward economical application of carbon capture and utilization technology with near-zero carbon emission. Nat. Commun. 13, 7482 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-35239-9 ↗
45. Kim, J. H. et al. The insensitive cation effect on a single atom Ni catalyst allows selective electrochemical conversion of captured CO2 in universal media. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 4301–4312 (2022).10.1039/D2EE01825J ↗
46. Almajed, H. M. et al. Closing the loop: unexamined performance trade-offs of integrating direct air capture with (bi)carbonate electrolysis. ACS Energy Lett. 9, 2472–2483 (2024).10.1021/acsenergylett.4c00807 ↗
47. MacDonald, T. S. C., Price, W. S. & Beves, J. E. Time-resolved diffusion NMR measurements for transient processes. ChemPhysChem 20, 926–930 (2019).10.1002/cphc.201900150 ↗
48. Price, W. S. Pulsed-field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance as a tool for studying translational diffusion: part II. experimental aspects. Concepts Magn. Reson. 10, 197–237 (1998).10.1002/(SICI)1099-0534(1998)10:4<197::AID-CMR1>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
49. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
50. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
51. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
52. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
53. Blöchl, P. E., Jepsen, O. & Andersen, O. K. Improved tetrahedron method for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 49, 16223–16233 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.49.16223 ↗
54. Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344 (2010).10.1063/1.3382344 ↗
55. Klimeš, J., Bowler, D. R. & Michaelides, A. Van der Waals density functionals applied to solids. Phys. Rev. B https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.195131 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.83.195131 ↗
56. Di Liberto, G., Cipriano, L. A. & Pacchioni, G. Universal principles for the rational design of single atom electrocatalysts? Handle with care. ACS Catal. 12, 5846–5856 (2022).10.1021/acscatal.2c01011 ↗
57. Cipriano, L. A., Di Liberto, G. & Pacchioni, G. Superoxo and peroxo complexes on single-atom catalysts: impact on the oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Catal. 12, 11682–11691 (2022).10.1021/acscatal.2c03020 ↗
58. Stukowski, A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
59. Mao, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, H.-F. & Hu, P. Understanding catalytic reactions over zeolites: a density functional theory study of selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3 over Cu-SAPO-34. ACS Catal. 6, 7882–7891 (2016).10.1021/acscatal.6b01449 ↗
60. Wang, Z., Cao, X. M., Zhu, J. & Hu, P. Activity and coke formation of nickel and nickel carbide in dry reforming: a deactivation scheme from density functional theory. J. Catal. 311, 469–480 (2014).10.1016/j.jcat.2013.12.015 ↗
61. Nørskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004).10.1021/jp047349j ↗
62. Porezag, D. & Pederson, M. R. Infrared intensities and Raman-scattering activities within density-functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 54, 7830–7836 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.7830 ↗
63. Hjorth Larsen, A. et al. The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
64. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01 (Gaussian, Inc, 2016).
65. Lee, C., Yang, W. & Parr, R. G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 37, 785–789 (1988).10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
66. Weigend, F. Accurate Coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 1057–1065 (2006).10.1039/b515623h ↗
67. Weigend, F. & Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3297–3305 (2005).10.1039/b508541a ↗
68. Marenich, A. V., Cramer, C. J. & Truhlar, D. G. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 6378–6396 (2009).10.1021/jp810292n ↗
69. Renon, H. & Prausnitz, J. M. Local compositions in thermodynamic excess functions for liquid mixtures. AlChE J. 14, 135–144 (1968).10.1002/aic.690140124 ↗
70. Frailie, P., Plaza, J., Van Wagener, D. & Rochelle, G. T. Modeling piperazine thermodynamics. Energy Procedia 4, 35–42 (2011).10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.020 ↗
71. Du, Y. & Rochelle, G. T. Thermodynamic modeling of aqueous piperazine/N-(2-aminoethyl) piperazine for CO2 capture. Energy Procedia 63, 997–1017 (2014).10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.108 ↗
72. Yan, Y. & Chen, C.-C. Thermodynamic modeling of CO2 solubility in aqueous solutions of NaCl and Na2SO4. J. Supercrit. Fluids 55, 623–634 (2010).10.1016/j.supflu.2010.09.039 ↗
73. Hamborg, E. S. & Versteeg, G. F. Dissociation constants and thermodynamic properties of amines and alkanolamines from (293 to 353) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 54, 1318–1328 (2009).10.1021/je800897v ↗
74. Hilliard, M. D. A Predictive Thermodynamic Model for an Aqueous Blend of Potassium Carbonate, Piperazine, and Monoethanolamine for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Flue Gas (Univ. of Texas at Austin, 2008).
75. Kamps, Á. P.-S., Xia, J. & Maurer, G. Solubility of CO2 in (H2O+piperazine) and in (H2O+MDEA+piperazine). AlChE J. 49, 2662–2670 (2003).10.1002/aic.690491019 ↗
76. Ermatchkov, V., Pérez-Salado Kamps, Á., Speyer, D. & Maurer, G. Solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of piperazine in the low gas loading region. J. Chem. Eng. Data 51, 1788–1796 (2006).10.1021/je0601917 ↗
77. Dugas, R. E. Carbon Dioxide Absorption, Desorption, and Diffusion in Aqueous Piperazine and Monoethanolamine (Univ. of Texas at Austin, 2009).
78. Xu, Q. & Rochelle, G. Total pressure and CO2 solubility at high temperature in aqueous amines. Energy Procedia 4, 117–124 (2011).10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.031 ↗
79. Ermatchkov, V., Pérez-Salado Kamps, Á. & Maurer, G. Chemical equilibrium constants for the formation of carbamates in (carbon dioxide+piperazine+water) from 1H-NMR-spectroscopy. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 35, 1277–1289 (2003).10.1016/S0021-9614(03)00076-4 ↗
80. Gu, J. et al. Modulating electric field distribution by alkali cations for CO2 electroreduction in strongly acidic medium. Nat. Catal. 5, 268–276 (2022).10.1038/s41929-022-00761-y ↗