journal article·2024-01-03

Charge-carrier-concentration inhomogeneities in alkali-treated Cu(In,Ga)Se2 revealed by conductive atomic force microscopy tomography

Deepanjan Sharma, Nicoleta Nicoara, Philip Jackson, Wolfram Witte, Dimitrios Hariskos, Sascha Sadewasser

Nature Energy· Volume 9· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 59). Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 30, 3–12 (2022).10.1002/pip.3506 ↗
2. Zhang, L. et al. Effect of copassivation of Cl and Cu on CdTe grain boundaries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 155501 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.155501 ↗
3. Poplawsky, J. D. et al. Direct imaging of Cl- and Cu-induced short-circuit efficiency changes in CdTe solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1400454 (2014).10.1002/aenm.201400454 ↗
4. Alberi, K. et al. Measuring long-range carrier diffusion across multiple grains in polycrystalline semiconductors by photoluminescence imaging. Nat. Commun. 4, 2699 (2013).10.1038/ncomms3699 ↗
5. Shao, Y., Xiao, Z., Bi, C., Yuan, Y. & Huang, J. Origin and elimination of photocurrent hysteresis by fullerene passivation in CH3NH3PbI3 planar heterojunction solar cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 5784 (2014).10.1038/ncomms6784 ↗
6. Zhang, W., Eperon, G. E. & Snaith, H. J. Metal halide perovskites for energy applications. Nat. Energy 1, 16048 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.48 ↗
7. DeQuilettes, D. W. et al. Impact of microstructure on local carrier lifetime in perovskite solar cells. Science 348, 683–686 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa5333 ↗
8. Zuo, L. et al. Polymer-modified halide perovskite films for efficient and stable planar heterojunction solar cells. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700106 (2017).10.1126/sciadv.1700106 ↗
9. Nicoara, N. et al. Direct evidence for grain boundary passivation in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells through alkali-fluoride post-deposition treatments. Nat. Commun. 10, 3980 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-11996-y ↗
10. Siebentritt, S. et al. Heavy alkali treatment of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells: surface versus bulk effects. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903752 (2020).10.1002/aenm.201903752 ↗
11. Cojocaru-Mirédin, O., Raghuwanshi, M., Wuerz, R. & Sadewasser, S. Grain boundaries in Cu(In,Ga)Se2: a review on composition–electronic property relationships by atom probe tomography and correlative microscopy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2103119 (2021).10.1002/adfm.202103119 ↗
12. Chirilă, A. et al. Potassium-induced surface modification of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films for high-efficiency solar cells. Nat. Mater. 12, 1107–1111 (2013).10.1038/nmat3789 ↗
13. Jackson, P., Hariskos, D., Wuerz, R., Wischmann, W. & Powalla, M. Compositional investigation of potassium doped Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 20.8%. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 8, 219–222 (2014).10.1002/pssr.201409040 ↗
14. Ochoa, M., Yang, S.-C., Nishiwaki, S., Tiwari, A. N. & Carron, R. Charge carrier lifetime fluctuations and performance evaluation of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 absorbers via time-resolved-photoluminescence microscopy. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2102800 (2022).10.1002/aenm.202102800 ↗
15. Pianezzi, F. et al. Unveiling the effects of post-deposition treatment with different alkaline elements on the electronic properties of CIGS thin-film solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 8843–8851 (2014).10.1039/c4cp00614c ↗
16. Lin, T.-Y. et al. Alkali-induced grain boundary reconstruction on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells using cesium fluoride post-deposition treatment. Nano Energy 69, 104299 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104299 ↗
17. Laemmle, A., Wuerz, R. & Powalla, M. Efficiency enhancement of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells by a post-deposition treatment with potassium fluoride. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 7, 631–634 (2013).10.1002/pssr.201307238 ↗
18. Laemmle, A. et al. Investigation of the diffusion behavior of sodium in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 layers. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 154501 (2014).10.1063/1.4871457 ↗
19. Vilalta-Clemente, A. et al. Rubidium distribution at atomic scale in high efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 103105 (2018).10.1063/1.5020805 ↗
20. Schöppe, P. et al. Overall distribution of rubidium in highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 40592–40598 (2018).10.1021/acsami.8b16040 ↗
21. Stokes, A., Al-Jassim, M., Diercks, D., Clarke, A. & Gorman, B. Impact of wide-ranging nanoscale chemistry on band structure at Cu(In,Ga)Se2 grain boundaries. Sci. Rep. 7, 14163 (2017).10.1038/s41598-017-14215-0 ↗
22. Raghuwanshi, M. et al. Influence of RbF post-deposition treatment on heterojunction and grain boundaries in high efficient (21.1%) Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Nano Energy 60, 103–110 (2019).10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.028 ↗
23. Sadewasser, S. & Glatzel, T. (eds) Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy—Measuring and Compensating Electrostatic Forces (Springer, 2012).10.1007/978-3-642-22566-6 ↗
24. Hui, F. & Lanza, M. Scanning probe microscopy for advanced nanoelectronics. Nat. Electron. 2, 221–229 (2019).10.1038/s41928-019-0264-8 ↗
25. Celano, U. et al. Mesoscopic physical removal of material using sliding nanodiamond contacts. Sci. Rep. 8, 2994 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-21171-w ↗
26. Luria, F. et al. Charge transport in CdTe solar cells revealed by conductive tomographic atomic force microscopy. Nat. Energy 1, 16150 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.150 ↗
27. Song, J., Zhou, Y., Padture, N. P. & Huey, B. D. Anomalous 3D nanoscale photoconduction in hybrid perovskite semiconductors revealed by tomographic atomic force microscopy. Nat. Commun. 11, 3308 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-17012-y ↗
28. Chintala, R. C. et al. Nanoscale 3D characterisation of soft organic material using conductive scanning probe tomography. AIP Adv. 9, 025105 (2019).10.1063/1.5066458 ↗
29. Hertz, H. On the contact of elastic solids. J. Reine Angew. Math. 92, 156–171 (1881).
30. Johnson, K. L., Kendall, K. & Roberts, A. D. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 324, 301–313 (1971).10.1098/rspa.1971.0141 ↗
31. Derjaguin, B. V., Muller, V. M. & Toporov, Y. P. Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 53, 314–326 (1975).10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1 ↗
32. Adams G. G. in Encyclopedia of Tribology (eds Wang, Q. J. & Chung, Y. W.) 3560–3565 (Springer, 2013).10.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_499 ↗
33. Nanosensors. NanoAndMore USA https://www.nanoandmore.com/AFM-Probe-CDT-NCHR (2022).
34. Clarysse, T., Vanhaeren, D., Hoflijk, I. & Vandervorst, W. Characterization of electrically active dopant profiles with the spreading resistance probe. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 47, 123–206 (2004).10.1016/j.mser.2004.12.002 ↗
35. Jensen, S. A. et al. Beneficial effect of post-deposition treatment in high-efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells through reduced potential fluctuations. J. Appl. Phys. 120, 063106 (2016).10.1063/1.4960344 ↗
36. Khatri, I., Fukai, H., Yamaguchi, H., Sugiyama, M. & Nakada, T. Effect of potassium fluoride post-deposition treatment on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films and solar cells fabricated onto sodalime glass substrates. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 155, 280–287 (2016).10.1016/j.solmat.2016.06.023 ↗
37. Karki, S. et al. Analysis of recombination mechanisms in RbF treated CIGS solar cells. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 9, 313–318 (2019).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2877596 ↗
38. Kodalle, T. et al. Elucidating the mechanism of an RbF post-deposition treatment in CIGS thin-film solar cells. Sol. RRL 2, 1800156 (2018).10.1002/solr.201800156 ↗
39. Ishizuka, S. & Fons, P. J. Role of the Cu-deficient interface in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film photovoltaics with alkali-metal doping. Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 054005 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.054005 ↗
40. Lin, T.-Y. et al. Alkali-induced grain boundary reconstruction on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells using cesium fluoride post-deposition treatment. Nano Energy 68, 104299 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104299 ↗
41. Burgelman, M., Nollet, P. & Degrave, S. Modelling polycrystalline semiconductor solar cells. Thin Solid Films 361–362, 527–532 (2000).10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-1 ↗
42. Jackson, P. et al. Effects of heavy alkali elements in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 22.6%. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 10, 583–586 (2016).10.1002/pssr.201600199 ↗
43. Jackson, P. et al. Properties of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with new record efficiencies up to 21.7%. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 9, 28–31 (2015).10.1002/pssr.201409520 ↗
44. Nakamura, M. et al. Cd-free Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 thin-film solar cell with record efficiency of 23.35%. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 9, 1863–1867 (2019).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2937218 ↗
45. Sozzi, G. et al. Influence of conduction band offsets at window/buffer and buffer/absorber interfaces on the roll-over of J–V curves of CIGS solar cells. In 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference 2205–2208 (IEEE, 2017).10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366649 ↗
46. Frisk, C. et al. Optimizing Ga-profiles for highly efficient Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells in simple and complex defect models. J. Phys. D 47, 485104 (2014).10.1088/0022-3727/47/48/485104 ↗
47. Spear, K. E. & Dismukes, J. P. (eds) Synthetic Diamond: Emerging CVD Science and Technology Vol. 25 (John Wiley & Sons, 1994).
48. Buzás, A. & Geretovszky, Z. Nanosecond laser-induced selective removal of the active layer of CuInGaSe2 solar cells by stress-assisted ablation. Phys. Rev. B 85, 245304 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.85.245304 ↗
49. Gerthoffer, A. et al. CIGS solar cells on ultra-thin glass substrates: determination of mechanical properties by nanoindentation and application to bending-induced strain calculation. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 166, 254–261 (2017).10.1016/j.solmat.2016.11.022 ↗