A cathode homogenization strategy for enabling long-cycle-life all-solid-state lithium batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
All-solid-state lithium batteries typically employ heterogeneous composite cathodes where conductive additives are introduced to improve mixed conduction. These electrochemically inactive additives are not fully compatible with layered oxide cathodes that undergo large volume change, significantly reducing battery energy density and cycle life. Here we propose a cathode homogenization strategy by cold pressing a zero-strain cathode material with efficient mixed conduction throughout the (dis)charge process. Li1.75Ti2(Ge0.25P0.75S3.8Se0.2)3 possesses considerable Li+/electronic conductivity of 0.22/242 mS cm-1 when fully charged, increasing monotonically to 0.66/412 mS cm-1 when fully discharged. It delivers a specific capacity of 250 mAh g-1 and undergoes a 1.2% volume change. Homogeneous cathodes composed of 100% Li1.75Ti2(Ge0.25P0.75S3.8Se0.2)3 enable room-temperature all-solid-state lithium batteries to achieve a cycle life of over 20,000 cycles at 2.5 C with a specific capacity retention of 70% and a high energy density of 390 Wh kg-1 at the cell level at 0.1 C. This cathode homogenization strategy contrasts to the conventional cathode heterogeneous design, potentially improving the viability of all-solid-state lithium batteries for commercial applications. Solid-state lithium batteries typically utilize heterogeneous composite cathodes with conductive additives, which limit energy density and cycle life. Here the authors present a cathode material that exhibits efficient mixed conduction and near-zero volume change during cycling, thereby improving battery performance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang, S., Yan, M., Li, Y., Vinado, C. & Yang, J. Separating electronic and ionic conductivity in mix-conducting layered lithium transition-metal oxides. J. Power Sources 393, 75–82 (2018).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.005 ↗
2. Strauss, F. et al. Impact of cathode material particle size on the capacity of bulk-type all-solid-state batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 992–996 (2018).10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00275 ↗
3. Liu, X. et al. Electrochemo-mechanical effects on structural integrity of Ni-rich cathodes with different microstructures in all solid-state batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2003583 (2021).10.1002/aenm.202003583 ↗
4. Park, M., Zhang, X., Chung, M., Less, G. B. & Sastry, A. M. A review of conduction phenomena in Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 195, 7904–7929 (2010).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.060 ↗
5. Qiu, X.-Y. et al. Electrochemical and electronic properties of LiCoO2 cathode investigated by galvanostatic cycling and EIS. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 2617–2630 (2012).10.1039/c2cp23626e ↗
6. Cao, Y. et al. Conductive polymers encapsulation to enhance electrochemical performance of Ni-rich cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 18270–18280 (2018).10.1021/acsami.8b02396 ↗
7. Li, M. et al. All-in-one ionic–electronic dual-carrier conducting framework thickening all-solid-state electrode. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 766–772 (2022).10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02666 ↗
8. Dewald, G. F., Ohno, S., Hering, J. G. C., Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. Analysis of charge carrier transport toward optimized cathode composites for all-solid-state Li−S batteries. Batteries Supercaps 4, 183–194 (2021).10.1002/batt.202000194 ↗
9. Ohta, N. et al. Enhancement of the high-rate capability of solid-state lithium batteries by nanoscale interfacial modification. Adv. Mater. 18, 2226–2229 (2006).10.1002/adma.200502604 ↗
10. Jung, S.-K. et al. Understanding the effects of chemical reactions at the cathode–electrolyte interface in sulfide based all-solid-state batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 22967–22976 (2019).10.1039/C9TA08517C ↗
11. Zhang, W. et al. Degradation mechanisms at the Li10GeP2S12/LiCoO2 cathode interface in an all-solid-state lithium-ion battery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 22226–22236 (2018).10.1021/acsami.8b05132 ↗
12. Walther, F. et al. Influence of carbon additives on the decomposition pathways in cathodes of lithium thiophosphate-based all-solid-state batteries. Chem. Mater. 32, 6123–6136 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01825 ↗
13. Sakai, H., Taniguchi, Y., Uosaki, K. & Masuda, T. Quantitative cross-sectional mapping of nanomechanical properties of composite films for lithium ion batteries using bimodal mode atomic force microscopy. J. Power Sources 413, 29–33 (2019).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.003 ↗
14. Maleki Kheimeh Sari, H. & Li, X. Controllable cathode–electrolyte interface of Li[Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1]O2 for lithium ion batteries: a review. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1901597 (2019).10.1002/aenm.201901597 ↗
15. Amin, R. & Chiang, Y.-M. Characterization of electronic and ionic transport in Li1−xNi0.33Mn0.33Co0.33O2 (NMC333) and Li1−xNi0.50Mn0.20Co0.30O2 (NMC523) as a function of Li content. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, A1512 (2016).10.1149/2.0131608jes ↗
16. Janek, J., Martin, M. & Becker, K. D. Physical chemistry of solids—the science behind materials engineering: concepts, models, methods. Z. Phys. Chem. 223, 1239–1258 (2009).10.1524/zpch.2009.6077 ↗
17. Kim, Y., Arumugam, N. & Goodenough, J. B. 3D framework structure of a new lithium thiophosphate, LiTi2(PS4)3, as lithium insertion hosts. Chem. Mater. 20, 470–474 (2008).10.1021/cm7028849 ↗
18. Shin, B. R. & Jung, Y. S. All-solid-state rechargeable lithium batteries using LiTi2(PS4)3 cathode with Li2S-P2S5 solid electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, A154 (2014).10.1149/2.072401jes ↗
19. Di Stefano, D. et al. Superionic diffusion through frustrated energy landscape. Chem 5, 2450–2460 (2019).10.1016/j.chempr.2019.07.001 ↗
20. Schlem, R. et al. Ionic conductivity of the NASICON-related thiophosphate Na1+xTi2−xGax(PS4)3. Chemistry 25, 4143–4148 (2019).10.1002/chem.201805569 ↗
21. Leube, B. T. et al. Activation of anionic redox in d0 transition metal chalcogenides by anion doping. Nat. Commun. 12, 5485 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-25760-8 ↗
22. Jobic, S., Brec, R. & Rouxel, J. Anionic polymeric bonds in transition metal ditellurides. J. Solid State Chem. 96, 169–180 (1992).10.1016/S0022-4596(05)80309-3 ↗
23. Friend, R. H., Jerome, D., Liang, W. Y., Mikkelsen, C. & Yoffe, A. D. Semimetallic character of TiSe2 and semiconductor character of TiS2 under pressure. J. Phys. C 10, L705 (1977).10.1088/0022-3719/10/24/006 ↗
24. Krauskopf, T. et al. Comparing the descriptors for investigating the influence of lattice dynamics on ionic transport using the superionic conductor Na3PS4–xSex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 14464–14473 (2018).10.1021/jacs.8b09340 ↗
25. Wenzel, S. et al. Direct observation of the interfacial instability of the fast ionic conductor Li10GeP2S12 at the lithium metal anode. Chem. Mater. 28, 2400–2407 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00610 ↗
26. Sakuda, A. et al. A reversible rocksalt to amorphous phase transition involving anion redox. Sci. Rep. 8, 15086 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-33518-4 ↗
27. Yuan, W. & Günter, J. R. Insertion of bivalent cations into monoclinic NbS3 prepared under high pressure and their secondary batteries. Solid State Ion. 76, 253–258 (1995).10.1016/0167-2738(95)00002-N ↗
28. Li, J., Ma, C., Chi, M., Liang, C. & Dudney, N. J. Solid electrolyte: the key for high-voltage lithium batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401408 (2015).10.1002/aenm.201401408 ↗
29. Lu, P. et al. Realizing long-cycling all-solid-state Li-In||TiS2 batteries using Li6+xMxAs1−xS5I (M=Si, Sn) sulfide solid electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 14, 4077 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-39686-w ↗
30. Peng, L. et al. Chlorine-rich lithium argyrodite enabling solid-state batteries with capabilities of high voltage, high rate, low-temperature and ultralong cyclability. Chem. Eng. J. 430, 132896 (2022).10.1016/j.cej.2021.132896 ↗
31. Ye, L. & Li, X. A dynamic stability design strategy for lithium metal solid state batteries. Nature 593, 218–222 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03486-3 ↗
32. Wang, Y., Ye, L., Chen, X. & Li, X. A two-parameter space to tune solid electrolytes for lithium dendrite constriction. JACS Au 2, 886–897 (2022).10.1021/jacsau.2c00009 ↗
33. Ma, T. et al. High-areal-capacity and long-cycle-life all-solid-state battery enabled by freeze drying technology. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 2142–2152 (2023).10.1039/D3EE00420A ↗
34. Yan, W. et al. Hard-carbon-stabilized Li–Si anodes for high-performance all-solid-state Li-ion batteries. Nat. Energy 8, 800–813 (2023).10.1038/s41560-023-01279-8 ↗
35. Tan, D. H. S. et al. Elucidating reversible electrochemical redox of Li6PS5Cl solid electrolyte. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 2418–2427 (2019).10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01693 ↗
36. Han, F., Gao, T., Zhu, Y., Gaskell, K. J. & Wang, C. A battery made from a single material. Adv. Mater. 27, 3473–3483 (2015).10.1002/adma.201500180 ↗
37. Kato, Y. et al. High-power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors. Nat. Energy 1, 16030 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.30 ↗
38. Xu, X. et al. Self-organized core–shell structure for high-power electrode in solid-state lithium batteries. Chem. Mater. 23, 3798–3804 (2011).10.1021/cm103665w ↗
39. Yi, J., Chen, L., Liu, Y., Geng, H. & Fan, L.-Z. High capacity and superior cyclic performances of all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries enabled by a high-conductivity Li10SnP2S12 solid electrolyte. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 36774–36781 (2019).10.1021/acsami.9b12846 ↗
40. Randau, S. et al. Benchmarking the performance of all-solid-state lithium batteries. Nat. Energy 5, 259–270 (2020).10.1038/s41560-020-0565-1 ↗
41. Xu, R. et al. Cathode-supported all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries with high cell-level energy density. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 1073–1079 (2019).10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00430 ↗
42. Kondrakov, A. O. et al. Anisotropic lattice strain and mechanical degradation of high- and low-nickel NCM cathode materials for li-ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 3286–3294 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12885 ↗
43. Koerver, R. et al. Capacity fade in solid-state batteries: interphase formation and chemomechanical processes in nickel-rich layered oxide cathodes and lithium thiophosphate solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 29, 5574–5582 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00931 ↗
44. Li, M. et al. Dense all-electrochem-active electrodes for all-solid-state lithium batteries. Adv. Mater. 33, 2008723 (2021).10.1002/adma.202008723 ↗
45. Yu, Z. et al. Rational solvent molecule tuning for high-performance lithium metal battery electrolytes. Nat. Energy 7, 94–106 (2022).10.1038/s41560-021-00962-y ↗
46. Bron, P. et al. Li10SnP2S12: an affordable lithium superionic conductor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15694–15697 (2013).10.1021/ja407393y ↗
47. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal-amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
48. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
49. MedeA 3.9 (Materials Design, 2024).
50. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof reply. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 891 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.891 ↗