Cathode catalyst layers modified with Brønsted acid oxides to improve proton exchange membrane electrolysers for impure water splitting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Ayers, K. et al. Perspectives on low-temperature electrolysis and potential for renewable hydrogen at scale. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 10, 219–239 (2019).10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060718-030241 ↗
2. Carmo, M., Fritz, D. L., Mergel, J. & Stolten, D. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38, 4901–4934 (2013).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 ↗
3. Chu, S. & Majumdar, A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488, 294–303 (2012).10.1038/nature11475 ↗
4. Lagadec, M. F. & Grimaud, A. Water electrolysers with closed and open electrochemical systems. Nat. Mater. 19, 1140–1150 (2020).10.1038/s41563-020-0788-3 ↗
5. Grigoriev, S. A., Fateev, V. N., Bessarabov, D. G. & Millet, P. Current status, research trends, and challenges in water electrolysis science and technology. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 26036–26058 (2020).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.109 ↗
6. Wang, Y., Pang, Y., Xu, H., Martinez, A. & Chen, K. S. PEM fuel cell and electrolysis cell technologies and hydrogen infrastructure development—a review. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 2288–2328 (2022).10.1039/D2EE00790H ↗
7. Buttler, A. & Spliethoff, H. Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 2440–2454 (2018).10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003 ↗
8. Global Energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050 (IRENA, 2019); https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Apr/IRENA_Global_Energy_Transformation_2019.pdf
9. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector (IEA, 2021); https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
10. Global Hydrogen Review 2023 (IEA, 2023); https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2023
11. Tsotridis, G. & Pilenga, A. EU Harmonised Protocols for Testing of Low Temperature Water Electrolysers (Publications Office of the European Union, 2021).
12. Becker, H. et al. Impact of impurities on water electrolysis: a review. Sustain. Energy Fuels 7, 1565–1603 (2023).10.1039/D2SE01517J ↗
13. Lindquist, G. A., Xu, Q., Oener, S. Z. & Boettcher, S. W. Membrane electrolyzers for impure-water splitting. Joule 4, 2549–2561 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.020 ↗
14. Tong, W. et al. Electrolysis of low-grade and saline surface water. Nat. Energy 5, 367–377 (2020).10.1038/s41560-020-0550-8 ↗
15. Feng, Q. et al. A review of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis on degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies. J. Power Sources 366, 33–55 (2017).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.006 ↗
16. He, C. et al. Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nat. Commun. 12, 4667 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-25026-3 ↗
17. Kumar, P., Date, A., Mahmood, N., Das, R. K. & Shabani, B. Freshwater supply for hydrogen production: an underestimated challenge. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 78, 202–217 (2024).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.257 ↗
18. Thomassen, M. S., Reksten, A. H., Barnett, A. O., Khoza, T. & Ayers, K. in Electrochemical Power Sources: Fundamentals, Systems, and Applications (eds Smolinka, T. and Garche, J.) Ch. 6 (Elsevier, 2022).
19. Mayyas, A., Ruth, M., Pivovar, B., Bender, J. & Wipke, K. Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers (NREL, 2019).10.2172/1557965 ↗
20. Kheirrouz, M., Melino, F. & Ancona, M. A. Fault detection and diagnosis methods for green hydrogen production: a review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47, 27747–27774 (2022).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.115 ↗
21. Wang, X. et al. The influence of ferric ion contamination on the solid polymer electrolyte water electrolysis performance. Electrochim. Acta 158, 253–257 (2015).10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.140 ↗
22. Kusoglu, A. & Weber, A. Z. New insights into perfluorinated sulfonic-acid ionomers. Chem. Rev. 117, 987–1104 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00159 ↗
23. Zhang, L., Jie, X., Shao, Z., Wang, X. & Yi, B. The dynamic-state effects of sodium ion contamination on the solid polymer electrolyte water electrolysis. J. Power Sources 241, 341–348 (2013).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.049 ↗
24. Marin, D. H. et al. Hydrogen production with seawater-resilient bipolar membrane electrolyzers. Joule 7, 765–781 (2023).10.1016/j.joule.2023.03.005 ↗
25. Li, N., Araya, S. S. & Kær, S. K. Long-term contamination effect of iron ions on cell performance degradation of proton exchange membrane water electrolyser. J. Power Sources 434, 226755 (2019).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226755 ↗
26. Frensch, S. H. et al. Impact of iron and hydrogen peroxide on membrane degradation for polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis: computational and experimental investigation on fluoride emission. J. Power Sources 420, 54–62 (2019).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.076 ↗
27. Subbaraman, R. et al. Enhancing hydrogen evolution activity in water splitting by tailoring Li+-Ni(OH)2-Pt interfaces. Science 334, 1256–1260 (2011).10.1126/science.1211934 ↗
28. Sheng, W. et al. Correlating hydrogen oxidation and evolution activity on platinum at different pH with measured hydrogen binding energy. Nat. Commun. 6, 5848 (2015).10.1038/ncomms6848 ↗
29. Guo, J. et al. Direct seawater electrolysis by adjusting the local reaction environment of a catalyst. Nat. Energy 8, 264–272 (2023).
30. Xu, B., Sievers, C., Hong, S., Prins, R. & Vanbokhoven, J. Catalytic activity of Brønsted acid sites in zeolites: intrinsic activity, rate-limiting step, and influence of the local structure of the acid sites. J. Catal. 244, 163–168 (2006).10.1016/j.jcat.2006.08.022 ↗
31. Wen, Y. et al. Introducing Brønsted acid sites to accelerate the bridging-oxygen-assisted deprotonation in acidic water oxidation. Nat. Commun. 13, 4871 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-32581-w ↗
32. Qiu, Y. et al. Proton relay for the rate enhancement of electrochemical hydrogen reactions at heterogeneous interfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 26016–26027 (2023).10.1021/jacs.3c06398 ↗
33. Jiang, Y., Huang, J., Dai, W. & Hunger, M. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance investigations of the nature, property, and activity of acid sites on solid catalysts. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 39, 116–141 (2011).10.1016/j.ssnmr.2011.03.007 ↗
34. Wang, Y. H. et al. In situ Raman spectroscopy reveals the structure and dissociation of interfacial water. Nature 600, 81–85 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-04068-z ↗
35. Alsaif, M. M. Y. A. et al. Tunable plasmon resonances in two-dimensional molybdenum oxide nanoflakes. Adv. Mater. 26, 3931–3937 (2014).10.1002/adma.201306097 ↗
36. Chen, L., Xu, Q. & Boettcher, S. W. Kinetics and mechanism of heterogeneous voltage-driven water-dissociation catalysis. Joule 7, 1867–1886 (2023).10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.011 ↗
37. Rodellar, C. G., Gisbert-Gonzalez, J. M., Sarabia, F., Roldan Cuenya, B. & Oener, S. Z. Ion solvation kinetics in bipolar membranes and at electrolyte–metal interfaces. Nat. Energy 9, 548–558 (2024).10.1038/s41560-024-01484-z ↗
38. Oener, S. Z., Foster, M. J. & Boettcher, S. W. Accelerating water dissociation in bipolar membranes and for electrocatalysis. Science 369, 1099–1103 (2020).10.1126/science.aaz1487 ↗
39. Tan, H. et al. Engineering a local acid-like environment in alkaline medium for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Commun. 13, 2024 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-29710-w ↗
40. Wang, X., Xu, C., Jaroniec, M., Zheng, Y. & Qiao, S.-Z. Anomalous hydrogen evolution behavior in high-pH environment induced by locally generated hydronium ions. Nat. Commun. 10, 4876 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-12773-7 ↗
41. Oki, T. & Kanae, S. Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science 313, 1068–1072 (2006).10.1126/science.1128845 ↗
42. Tonelli, D. et al. Global land and water limits to electrolytic hydrogen production using wind and solar resources. Nat. Commun. 14, 5532 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-41107-x ↗
43. H2A-Lite: Hydrogen Analysis Lite Production Model (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2022); https://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/h2a-lite.html
44. El-Shafie, M. Hydrogen production by water electrolysis technologies: a review. Results Eng. 20, 101426 (2023).10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101426 ↗
45. Schwartz, J. et al. Real-time 3D analysis during electron tomography using tomviz. Nat. Commun. 13, 4458 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-32046-0 ↗
46. Zhu, Z., Ye, Z., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J. & Cao, F. Novel dual Pt-Pt/IrOx ultramicroelectrode for pH imaging using SECM in both potentiometric and amperometric modes. Electrochem. Commun. 88, 47–51 (2018).10.1016/j.elecom.2018.01.018 ↗