Scaling and heating will drive low-temperature CO2 electrolysers to operate at higher temperatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Barecka, M. H. & Ager, J. W. Towards an accelerated decarbonization of the chemical industry by electrolysis. Energy Adv. 2, 268–279 (2023).10.1039/D2YA00134A ↗
2. Segets, D., Andronescu, C. & Apfel, U.-P. Accelerating CO2 electrochemical conversion towards industrial implementation. Nat. Commun. 14, 7950 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-43762-6 ↗
3. Burdyny, T. & Mulder, F. M. Scale-up of CO2 and CO electrolyzers. Joule 8, 2449–2452 (2024).10.1016/j.joule.2024.08.010 ↗
4. Petrov, K. V. et al. Bipolar membranes for intrinsically stable and scalable CO2 electrolysis. Nat. Energy https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01574-y (2024).10.1038/s41560-024-01574-y ↗
5. Ozden, A. et al. Energy- and carbon-efficient CO2/CO electrolysis to multicarbon products via asymmetric ion migration–adsorption. Nat. Energy 8, 179–190 (2023).10.1038/s41560-022-01188-2 ↗
6. Reichbauer, T. et al. Electrical energy input efficiency limitations in CO2-to-CO electrolysis and attempts for improvement. Electrochem. Sci. Adv. 4, e2300024 (2024).10.1002/elsa.202300024 ↗
7. Endrődi, B. et al. High carbonate ion conductance of a robust PiperION membrane allows industrial current density and conversion in a zero-gap carbon dioxide electrolyzer cell. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 4098–4105 (2020).10.1039/D0EE02589E ↗
8. Technical targets for proton exchange membrane electrolysis. US Department of Energy (accessed 20 March 2025); https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/technical-targets-proton-exchange-membrane-electrolysis
9. Giron Rodriguez, C. A. et al. Insights into zero-gap CO2 electrolysis at elevated temperatures. EES Catal. 2, 850–861 (2024).10.1039/D3EY00224A ↗
10. Vos, R. E. et al. How temperature affects the selectivity of the electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper. ACS Catal. 13, 8080–8091 (2023).10.1021/acscatal.3c00706 ↗
11. Schellekens, M. P., Raaijman, S. J., Koper, M. T. M. & Corbett, P. J. Temperature-dependent selectivity for CO electroreduction on copper-based gas-diffusion electrodes at high current densities. Chem. Eng. J. 483, 149105 (2024).10.1016/j.cej.2024.149105 ↗
12. Krause, R. et al. Industrial application aspects of the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Ing. Tech. 92, 53–61 (2020).10.1002/cite.201900092 ↗
13. Quentmeier, M., Schmid, B., Tempel, H. & Eichel, R.-A. Modular CO2-to-CO electrolysis short-stack design—impact of temperature gradients and insights into position-dependent cell behavior. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 12, 3876–3885 (2024).10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c00630 ↗
14. Crandall, B. S. et al. Kilowatt-scale tandem CO2 electrolysis for enhanced acetate and ethylene production. Nat. Chem. Eng. 1, 421–429 (2024).10.1038/s44286-024-00076-8 ↗
15. Wakerley, D. et al. Gas diffusion electrodes, reactor designs and key metrics of low-temperature CO2 electrolysers. Nat. Energy 7, 130–143 (2022).10.1038/s41560-021-00973-9 ↗
16. Lees, E. W., Mowbray, B. A. W., Parlane, F. G. L. & Berlinguette, C. P. Gas diffusion electrodes and membranes for CO2 reduction electrolysers. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 55–64 (2022).10.1038/s41578-021-00356-2 ↗
17. Iglesias van Montfort, H.-P. et al. An advanced guide to assembly and operation of CO2 electrolyzers. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 4156–4161 (2023).10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01561 ↗
18. Kibria, M. G. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction into chemical feedstocks: from mechanistic electrocatalysis models to system design. Adv. Mater. 31, 1807166 (2019).10.1002/adma.201807166 ↗
19. Weng, L.-C., Bell, A. T. & Weber, A. Z. Towards membrane-electrode assembly systems for CO2 reduction: a modeling study. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1950–1968 (2019).10.1039/C9EE00909D ↗
20. Hansen, K. U., Cherniack, L. H. & Jiao, F. Voltage loss diagnosis in CO2 electrolyzers using five-electrode technique. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 4504–4511 (2022).10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02096 ↗
21. Garg, S., Giron Rodriguez, C. A., Rufford, T. E., Varcoe, J. R. & Seger, B. How membrane characteristics influence the performance of CO2 and CO electrolysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 4440–4469 (2022).10.1039/D2EE01818G ↗
22. Incropera, F. P., DeWitt, D. P., Bergman, T. L. & Lavine, A. S. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer 6th edn (Wiley, 2007).
23. Wijaya, G. H. A., Im, K. S. & Nam, S. Y. Advancements in commercial anion exchange membranes: a review of membrane properties in water electrolysis applications. Desalin. Water Treat. 320, 100605 (2024).10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100605 ↗
24. Industrial Cooling Systems (Callens, accessed 19 September 2024); https://www.callens.eu/en/air-technology/industrial-cooling
25. Mokhatab, S., Poe, W. A. & Mak, J. Y. in Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing: Principles and Practices 537–578 (Elsevier, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815817-3.00018-610.1016/B978-0-12-815817-3.00018-6 ↗
26. Toghyani, S., Afshari, E., Baniasadi, E. & Atyabi, S. A. Thermal and electrochemical analysis of different flow field patterns in a PEM electrolyzer. Electrochim. Acta 267, 234–245 (2018).10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.078 ↗
27. Rossen, A., Daems, N., Choukroun, D. & Breugelmans, T. Differential pressure across a gas diffusion electrode controls efficiency of liquid-fed electrolyzers for CO2 electroreduction at elevated temperatures. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c01908 (2024).10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c01908 ↗
28. Deng, X., Yang, F., Li, Y., Dang, J. & Ouyang, M. Quantitative study on gas evolution effects under large current density in zero-gap alkaline water electrolyzers. J. Power Sources 555, 232378 (2023).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232378 ↗
29. Belsa, B. et al. Materials challenges on the path to gigatonne CO2 electrolysis. Nat. Rev. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-024-00696-9 (2024).10.1038/s41578-024-00696-9 ↗
30. Moss, A. B. et al. In operando investigations of oscillatory water and carbonate effects in MEA-based CO2 electrolysis devices. Joule 7, 350–365 (2023).10.1016/j.joule.2023.01.013 ↗
31. Disch, J. et al. High-resolution neutron imaging of salt precipitation and water transport in zero-gap CO2 electrolysis. Nat. Commun. 13, 6099 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-33694-y ↗
32. Joensen, B. Ó. et al. Unveiling transport mechanisms of cesium and water in operando zero-gap CO2 electrolyzers. Joule https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2024.02.027 (2024).10.1016/j.joule.2024.02.027 ↗
33. Sisler, J. et al. Ethylene electrosynthesis: a comparative techno-economic analysis of alkaline vs membrane electrode assembly vs CO2–CO–C2H4 tandems. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 997–1002 (2021).10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02633 ↗
34. García De Arquer, F. P. CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at activities greater than 1 A cm−2. Science 367, 661–666 (2020).10.1126/science.aay4217 ↗
35. Nesbitt, N. T. et al. Liquid–solid boundaries dominate activity of CO2 reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes. ACS Catal. 10, 14093–14106 (2020).10.1021/acscatal.0c03319 ↗
36. Biemolt, J., Singh, J., Prats Vergel, G., Pelzer, H. M. & Burdyny, T. Preventing salt formation in zero-gap CO2 electrolyzers by quantifying cation accumulation. ACS Energy Lett. 10, 807–814 (2025).10.1021/acsenergylett.4c03242 ↗
37. Nesbitt, N. T. & Smith, W. A. Water and solute activities regulate CO2 reduction in gas-diffusion electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 13085–13095 (2021).10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c01923 ↗
38. Zhang, H., Gao, J., Raciti, D. & Hall, A. S. Promoting Cu-catalysed CO2 electroreduction to multicarbon products by tuning the activity of H2O. Nat. Catal. 6, 807–817 (2023).10.1038/s41929-023-01010-6 ↗
39. Luo, X., Rojas-Carbonell, S., Yan, Y. & Kusoglu, A. Structure–transport relationships of poly(aryl piperidinium) anion-exchange membranes: effect of anions and hydration. J. Membr. Sci. 598, 117680 (2020).10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117680 ↗
40. Wheeler, D. G. et al. Quantification of water transport in a CO2 electrolyzer. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 5126–5134 (2020).10.1039/D0EE02219E ↗
41. Hurkmans, J.-W., Pelzer, H. M., Burdyny, T., Peeters, J. & Vermaas, D. A. Heating dictates the scalability of CO2 electrolyzer types. EES Catal. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EY00190G (2025)10.1039/D4EY00190G ↗
42. Jensen, J. K. et al. Heat pump COP, part 2: generalized COP estimation of heat pump processes. In Proc. 13th IIR Gustav Lorentzen Conference on Natural Refrigerants (GL2018) (International Institute of Refrigeration, 2018); https://doi.org/10.18462/IIR.GL.2018.138610.18462/IIR.GL.2018.1386 ↗
43. Siegmund, D. et al. Crossing the valley of death: from fundamental to applied research in electrolysis. JACS Au 1, 527–535 (2021).10.1021/jacsau.1c00092 ↗
44. Garg, S. et al. How alkali cations affect salt precipitation and CO2 electrolysis performance in membrane electrode assembly electrolyzers. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 1631–1643 (2023).10.1039/D2EE03725D ↗
45. Solubility Table for Water at Temperature (Merck, accessed 10 September 2024); https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/NL/en/support/calculators-and-apps/solubility-table-compounds-water-temperature
46. Sustainion® Anion Exchange Membranes (Dioxide Materials, accessed 11 September 2024); https://dioxidematerials.com/technology/sustainion-membranes/
47. Vaughan, G. L. & Carrington, C. G. Psychrometric properties of a moist carbon dioxide atmosphere. Int. J. Food Prop. 1, 77–87 (1998).10.1080/10942919809524567 ↗
48. Zheng, Y. et al. Energy related CO2 conversion and utilization: advanced materials/nanomaterials, reaction mechanisms and technologies. Nano Energy 40, 512–539 (2017).10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.049 ↗