Behavioural factors that drive stacking with traditional cooking fuels using the COM-B model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energy and Environment Impacts · Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations, 2015).
2. Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report (IEA, IRENA, UNSD, World Bank & WHO, 2020).
3. Household Air Pollution and Health (WHO, 2018); https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/household-air-pollution-and-health
4. The State of the World’s Forests (FAO, 2018); http://www.fao.org/state-of-forests/en/
5. Masera, O. R., Bailis, R., Drigo, R., Ghilardi, A. & Ruiz-Mercado, I. Environmental burden of traditional bioenergy use. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40, 121–150 (2015).10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021318 ↗
6. Ramanathan, V. & Carmichael, G. Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nat. Geosci. 1, 221–227 (2008).10.1038/ngeo156 ↗
7. Kar, A. & Zerriffi, H. From cookstove acquisition to cooking transition: framing the behavioural aspects of cookstove interventions. Energy Res. Social Sci. 42, 23–33 (2018).10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.015 ↗
8. The State of Access to Modern Energy Cooking Services (ESMAP, 2020).
9. Comparative Analysis of Fuels for Cooking (Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves, 2016).
10. Puzzolo, E. et al. Supply considerations for scaling up clean cooking fuels for household energy in low- and middle-income countries. GeoHealth 3, 370–390 (2019).10.1029/2019GH000208 ↗
11. Quinn, A. K. et al. An analysis of efforts to scale up clean household energy for cooking around the world. Energy Sustain. Dev. 46, 1–10 (2018).10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.011 ↗
12. Ruiz-Mercado, I., Masera, O., Zamora, H. & Smith, K. R. Adoption and sustained use of improved cookstoves. Energy Policy 39, 7557–7566 (2011).10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.028 ↗
13. Shankar, A. V. et al. Everybody stacks: lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions. Energy Policy 141, 111468 (2020).10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111468 ↗
14. Johnson, M. Quantitative guidance for stove usage and performance to achieve health and environmental targets. Environ. Health Perspect. 123, 820–826 (2015).10.1289/ehp.1408681 ↗
15. Kities, R., Mulder, P. & Rietveld, P. Energy poverty reduction by fuel switching. Impact evaluation of the LPG conversion program in Indonesia. Energy Policy 66, 436–449 (2014).10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.021 ↗
16. Williams, K. N. et al. Exploring the impact of a liquefied petroleum gas intervention on time use in rural Peru: a mixed methods study on perceptions, use, and implications of time savings. Environ. Int. 145, 105932 (2020).10.1016/j.envint.2020.105932 ↗
17. Puzzolo, E., Pope, D., Stanistreet, D., Rehfuess, E. A. & Bruce, N. G. Clean fuels for resource-poor settings: a systematic review of barriers and enablers to adoption and sustained use. Environ. Res. 146, 218–234 (2016).10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.002 ↗
18. Vigolo, V., Sallaku, R. & Testa, . Drivers and barriers to clean cooking: a systematic literature review from a consumer behavior perspective. Sustainability 10, 4322 (2018).10.3390/su10114322 ↗
19. Barnes, B. R. Behavioural change, indoor air pollution and child respiratory health in developing countries: a review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11, 4607–4618 (2014).10.3390/ijerph110504607 ↗
20. Furszyfer Del Rio, D. D. et al. Do we need better behaved cooks? Reviewing behavioural change strategies for improving the sustainability and effectiveness of cookstove programs. Energy Res. Social Sci. 70, 101788 (2020).10.1016/j.erss.2020.101788 ↗
21. Goodwin, N. J. et al. Use of behavior change techniques in clean cooking interventions: a review of the evidence and scorecard of effectiveness. J. Health Commun. 20, 43–54 (2015).10.1080/10810730.2014.1002958 ↗
22. Smith, K. R. & Sagar, A. Making the clean available: escaping India’s Chulha Trap. Energy Policy 75, 410–414 (2014).10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.024 ↗
23. Clements, W. et al. Unlocking electric cooking on Nepali micro-hydropower mini-grids. Energy Sustain. Dev. 57, 119–131 (2020).10.1016/j.esd.2020.05.005 ↗
24. AMPERES, Switch Batteries, REAM, DfiD & Loughborough Univ. E-waste to E-cook: Piloting a Scalable, Modular Power-Pack Using Upcycled Lithium-Ion Technology for Affordable and Reliable E-cooking in Myanmar (MECS-TRIID, 2020).
25. Ruiz-Mercado, I., Canuz, E., Walker, J. L. & Smith, K. R. Quantitative metrics of stove adoption using Stove Use Monitors (SUMs). Biomass Bioenergy 57, 136–148 (2013).10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.07.002 ↗
26. Jewitt, S., Atagher, P. & Clifford, M. ‘We cannot stop cooking’: stove stacking, seasonality and the risky practices of household cookstove transitions in Nigeria. Energy Res. Social Sci. 61, 101340 (2020).10.1016/j.erss.2019.101340 ↗
27. Gould, C. F. & Urpelainen, J. LPG as a clean cooking fuel: adoption, use, and impact in rural India. Energy Policy 122, 395–408 (2018).10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042 ↗
28. Williams, K. N. et al. Beyond cost: exploring fuel choices and the socio-cultural dynamics of liquefied petroleum gas stove adoption in Peru. Energy Res. Social Sci. 66, 101591 (2020).10.1016/j.erss.2020.101591 ↗
29. Nuño Martínez, N., Mäusezahl, D. & Hartinger, S. M. A cultural perspective on cooking patterns, energy transfer programmes and determinants of liquefied petroleum gas use in the Andean Peru. Energy Sustain. Dev. 57, 160–167 (2020).10.1016/j.esd.2020.06.007 ↗
30. Pollard, S. L. et al. An evaluation of the Fondo de Inclusión Social Energético program to promote access to liquefied petroleum gas in Peru. Energy Sustain. Dev. 46, 82–93 (2018).10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.001 ↗
31. Raynes-Greenow, C. et al. A feasibility study assessing acceptability and supply issues of distributing LPG cookstoves and gas cylinders to pregnant women living in rural Bangladesh for poriborton: the CHANge trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 848 (2020).10.3390/ijerph17030848 ↗
32. Wang, Y. & Bailis, R. The revolution from the kitchen: social processes of the removal of traditional cookstoves in Himachal Pradesh, India. Energy Sustain. Dev. 27, 127–136 (2015).10.1016/j.esd.2015.05.001 ↗
33. Pye, A. et al. Drivers of the adoption and exclusive use of clean fuel for cooking in sub-Saharan Africa: learnings and policy considerations from Cameroon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 5874 (2020).10.3390/ijerph17165874 ↗
34. Ronzi, S. et al. Using photovoice methods as a community-based participatory research tool to advance uptake of clean cooking and improve health: the LPG adoption in Cameroon evaluation studies. Social Sci. Med. 228, 30–40 (2019).10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.044 ↗
35. Abdulai, M. A. et al. Experiences with the mass distribution of LPG stoves in rural communities of Ghana. EcoHealth 15, 757–767 (2018).10.1007/s10393-018-1369-7 ↗
36. Agbokey, F. et al. Determining the enablers and barriers for the adoption of clean cookstoves in the middle belt of Ghana—a qualitative study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 1207 (2019).10.3390/ijerph16071207 ↗
37. Asante, K. P. et al. Ghana’s rural liquefied petroleum gas program scale up: a case study. Energy Sustain. Dev. 46, 94–102 (2018).10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.010 ↗
38. ClimDev, DfiD & Loughborough Univ. Enhancing LPG Access for Semi-Urban Populations in Nigeria (MECS-TRIID, 2020).
39. Banerjee, M., Prasad, R., Rehman, I. H. & Gill, B. Induction stoves as an option for clean cooking in rural India. Energy Policy 88, 159–167 (2016).10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.021 ↗
40. Thompson, L. M., Hengstermann, M., Weinstein, J. R. & Diaz-Artiga, A. Adoption of liquefied petroleum gas stoves in Guatemala: a mixed-methods study. EcoHealth 15, 745–756 (2018).10.1007/s10393-018-1368-8 ↗
41. Keese, J., Camacho, A. & Chavez, A. Follow-up study of improved cookstoves in the Cuzco region of Peru. Dev. Pract. 27, 26–36 (2017).10.1080/09614524.2017.1257565 ↗
42. EarthSpark International On- and Off- (Micro) Grid PV Electric Cooking: Field Data for Integrated Energy Access in Haiti (MECS, 2020).
43. Pailman, W., de Groot, J., Clifford, M., Jewitt, S. & Ray, C. Experiences with improved cookstoves in Southern Africa. J. Energy South. Afr. 29, 13–26 (2018).10.17159/2413-3051/2018/v29i4a5072 ↗
44. Leary, J. et al. eCook Tanzania Focus Group Discussions Summary Report (MECS, 2019).
45. Troncoso, K., Segurado, P., Aguilar, M. & Soares da Silva, A. Adoption of LPG for cooking in two rural communities of Chiapas, Mexico. Energy Policy 133, 110925 (2019).10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110925 ↗
46. Coley, W. & Galloway, S. Market Assessment for Modern Energy Cooking Services in Malawi (MECS, 2020).10.1109/GHTC46280.2020.9342930 ↗
47. Jagadish, A. & Dwivedi, P. In the hearth, on the mind: cultural consensus on fuelwood and cookstoves in the middle Himalayas of India. Energy Res. Social Sci. 37, 44–51 (2018).10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.017 ↗
48. Mguni, P. et al. What could go wrong with cooking? Exploring vulnerability at the water, energy and food nexus in Kampala through a social practices lens. Glob. Environ. Change 63, 102086 (2020).10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102086 ↗
49. Nathan, D. et al. The value of rural women’s labour in production and wood fuel use: a framework for analysis. Econ. Polit. Wkly 53, 56–63 (2018).
50. Leary, J., Scott, N., Serenje, N., Mwila, F. & Batchelor, S. eCook Zambia Cooking Diaries (MECS, 2019).
51. Hollada, J. et al. Perceptions of improved biomass and liquefied petroleum gas stoves in Puno, Peru: implications for promoting sustained and exclusive adoption of clean cooking technologies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, 182 (2017).10.3390/ijerph14020182 ↗
52. Chirwa, P. W., Ham, C., Maphiri, S. & Balmer, M. Bioenergy use and food preparation practices of two communities in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. J. Energy South. Afr. 21, 26–31 (2010).10.17159/2413-3051/2010/v21i4a3260 ↗
53. Leary, J., Serenje, N., Mwila. F & Batchelor, S. eCook Zambia Focus Group Discussions Summary Report (MECS, 2019).
54. Serenje, N. & Price, M. Zambia Cooking Diaries 2.0 Follow Up Survey (MECS, 2020).
55. Dickinson, K. L. et al. Adoption of improved biomass stoves and stove/fuel stacking in the REACCTING intervention study in Northern Ghana. Energy Policy 130, 361–374 (2019).10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.007 ↗
56. Nguyen, T. T. P. T. & McLennan, S. Lali’an versus improved cook stoves: how change happens in urban households in Timor-Leste. Ann. Anthropol. Pract. 43, 72–85 (2019).10.1111/napa.12128 ↗
57. Rosenbaum, J., Derby, E. & Dutta, K. Understanding consumer preference and willingness to pay for improved cookstoves in Bangladesh. J. Health Commun. 20, 20–27 (2015).10.1080/10810730.2014.989345 ↗
58. Lam, N. L. et al. Seasonal fuel consumption, stoves, and end-uses in rural households of the far-western development region of Nepal. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 125011 (2017).10.1088/1748-9326/aa98cc ↗
59. Bielecki, C. & Wingenbach, G. Rethinking improved cookstove diffusion programs: a case study of social perceptions and cooking choices in rural Guatemala. Energy Policy 66, 350–358 (2014).10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.082 ↗
60. Onyeneke, R. U. et al. Improved cook-stoves and environmental and health outcomes: lessons from cross river state, Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 3520 (2019).10.3390/ijerph16193520 ↗
61. Ochieng, C. A., Zhang, Y., Nyabwa, J. K., Otieno, D. I. & Spillane, C. Household perspectives on cookstove and fuel stacking: a qualitative study in urban and rural Kenya. Energy Sustain. Dev. 59, 151–159 (2020).10.1016/j.esd.2020.10.002 ↗
62. Bauer, G. Evaluation of usage and fuel savings of solar ovens in Nicaragua. Energy Policy 97, 250–257 (2016).10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.041 ↗
63. Malakar, Y., Greig, C. & van de Fliert, E. Resistance in rejecting solid fuels: beyond availability and adoption in the structural dominations of cooking practices in rural India. Energy Res. Social Sci. 46, 225–235 (2018).10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.025 ↗
64. Rohingya Refugee Response in Bangladesh: Factsheet - Energy & Environment, August (UNHCR, 2020).
65. Perros, T., Büttner, P., Leary, J. & Parikh, P. Pay-as-you-go LPG: a mixed-methods pilot study in urban Rwanda. Energy Sustain. Dev. 65, 117–129 (2021).10.1016/j.esd.2021.10.003 ↗
66. Shupler, M. et al. Pay-as-you-go LPG supports sustainable clean cooking in Kenyan informal urban settlement, including during a period of COVID-19 lockdown. Appl. Energy 292, 116769 (2021).10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116769 ↗
67. Pillarisetti, A. et al. Promoting LPG usage during pregnancy: a pilot study in rural Maharashtra, India. Environ. Int. 127, 540–549 (2019).10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.017 ↗
68. Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) Trial: Exposure Contrasts and Adherence to the LPG Stove and Fuel Intervention During Pregnancy (ASHES, 2021).
69. Williams, K. N. et al. Designing a comprehensive behaviour change intervention to promote and monitor exclusive use of liquefied petroleum gas stoves for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial. BMJ Open 10, e037761 (2020).10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037761 ↗
70. What Drives the Transition to Modern Energy Cooking Services? A Systematic Review of the Evidence (ESMAP, 2021).
71. Michie, S., Van Stralen, M. & West, R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Sci. 6, 42 (2011).10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 ↗
72. Pandemic Fatigue: Reinvigorating the Public to Prevent COVID-19 (WHO, 2020).
73. Handley, M. A. et al. Applying the COM-B model to creation of an IT-enabled health coaching and resource linkage program for low-income Latina moms with recent gestational diabetes: the STAR MAMA program. Implementation Sci. 11, 73 (2016).10.1186/s13012-016-0426-2 ↗
74. Jackson, C., Eliasson, L., Barber, N. & Weinman, J. Applying COM-B to medication adherence. Bull. Eur. Health Psychol. Soc. 16, 7–17 (2014).
75. Barker, F., Atkins, L. & de Lusignan, S. Applying the COM-B behaviour model and behaviour change wheel to develop an intervention to improve hearing-aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation. Int. J. Audiol. 55, S90–S98 (2016).10.3109/14992027.2015.1120894 ↗
76. Thompson, L. M., Diaz-Artiga, A., Weinstein, J. R. & Handley, M. A. Designing a behavioral intervention using the COM-B model and the theoretical domains framework to promote gas stove use in rural Guatemala: a formative research study. BMC Public Health 18, 253 (2018).10.1186/s12889-018-5138-x ↗
77. Davidoff, F., Dixon-Woods, M., Leviton, L. & Michie, S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual. Saf. 24, 228–238 (2015).10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627 ↗
78. Allison, A. L., Lorencatto, F., Miodownik, M. & Michie, S. Influences on single-use and reusable cup use: a multidisciplinary mixed-methods approach to designing interventions reducing plastic waste. UCL Open Environ. 3, 4 (2021).10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000025 ↗
79. Scopus (Elsevier, accessed 12 February 2022); https://www.elsevier.com/en-gb/solutions/scopus
80. Pandit, S., Gautam, B., Clements, W., Williamson, S. & Silwal, K. Assessing Electric Cooking Potential in Micro Hydropower Microgrids in Nepal (MECS, 2020).
81. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006).10.1191/1478088706qp063oa ↗
82. Boyatzis, R. E. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (SAGE Publications Ltd, 1998).
83. Tobin, G. A. & Begley, C. M. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J. Adv. Nurs. 48, 388–396 (2004).10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x ↗
84. Fereday, J. & Muir-Cochrane, E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int. J. Qual. Methods 5, 80–92 (2006).10.1177/160940690600500107 ↗
85. Cane, J., O’Connor, D. & Michie, S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Sci. 7, 37 (2012).10.1186/1748-5908-7-37 ↗
86. Allison, A. L., Lorencatto, F., Michie, S. & Miodownik, M. Barriers and enablers to buying biodegradable and compostable plastic packaging. Sustainability 13, 1463 (2021).10.3390/su13031463 ↗
87. Timlin, D., McCormack, J. M. & Simpson, E. E. A. Using the COM-B model to identify barriers and facilitators towards adoption of a diet associated with cognitive function (MIND diet). Public Health Nutr. 24, 1657–1670 (2021).10.1017/S1368980020001445 ↗
88. Zhu, X. et al. Stacked use and transition trends of rural household energy in mainland China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 521–529 (2019).10.1021/acs.est.8b04280 ↗
89. Christiaensen, L. & Heltberg, R. Greening China’s rural energy: new insights on the potential of smallholder biogas. Environ. Dev. Econ. 19, 8–29 (2014).10.1017/S1355770X13000375 ↗
90. Leary, J. et al. eCook Myanmar Focus Group Discussions (MECS, 2019).
91. Leary, J. et al. eCook Myanmar Cooking Diaries (MECS, 2019).
92. Nansaior, A., Patanothai, A., Rambo, A. T. & Simaraks, S. Climbing the energy ladder or diversifying energy sources? The continuing importance of household use of biomass energy in urbanizing communities in Northeast Thailand. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 4180–4188 (2011).10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.046 ↗
93. International Development Enterprises, DFID & Loughborough Univ. Exploring Futures of Alternative Cooking in Cambodia (MECS-TRIID, 2020).
94. Clark, S. et al. Adoption and use of a semi-gasifier cooking and water heating stove and fuel intervention in the Tibetan Plateau, China. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 075004 (2017).10.1088/1748-9326/aa751e ↗
95. Gould, C. F. et al. Prevalent degradation and patterns of use, maintenance, repair, and access to post-acquisition services for biomass stoves in Peru. Energy Sustain. Dev. 45, 79–87 (2018).10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.004 ↗
96. Pine, K. et al. Adoption and use of improved biomass stoves in rural Mexico. Energy Sustain. Dev. 15, 176–183 (2011).10.1016/j.esd.2011.04.001 ↗
97. Ruiz-Mercado, I. & Masera, O. Patterns of stove use in the context of fuel–device stacking: rationale and implications. EcoHealth 12, 42–56 (2015).10.1007/s10393-015-1009-4 ↗
98. Williams, K. N. et al. Use of liquefied petroleum gas in Puno, Peru: fuel needs under conditions of free fuel and near-exclusive use. Energy Sustain. Dev. 58, 150–157 (2020).10.1016/j.esd.2020.07.011 ↗
99. Labriet M. & Alfaro, O. Scaling Up Demand for LPG in Guatemala: Motivators, Barriers and Opportunities (Clean Cooking Alliance, 2015).
100. Rapid Assessment of User Perceptions of Carbonized Agricultural Waste Briquette Fuels: Haiti 2016 (Berkeley Air Monitoring Group, 2016).