Personal vehicle electrification and charging solutions for high-energy days
Source abstract
Abstract
Questions remain on the effectiveness of different proposals for battery electric vehicle (BEV) charging and other supporting infrastructure. Here we investigate options for charging BEVs and supplementing them with long-range vehicles, including on the infrequent high-energy days that can otherwise impede personal vehicle electrification. We examine travel activities and their energy requirements—in Seattle and US-wide—to identify strategies that fit existing lifestyles. We find that home charging on- or off-street is pivotal in all strategies and that highway fast charging and/or supplementary vehicles can be impactful additions. For example, home charging can support the year-round energy requirements of approximately 10% of Seattle vehicles, assuming a lower-cost BEV, but adding occasional highway fast charging or supplementary vehicles on four days per year raises this value to nearly 40%. Infrequent supplementary vehicles may be needed even as battery technology improves. Our results outline potential solutions for nations, cities, companies and communities seeking to support widespread vehicle electrification despite the challenge of high-energy days. Current battery electric vehicles cannot meet all daily travel needs on a single charge. Wei et al. use travel survey data to model charging infrastructure scenarios under a range of battery sizes to find the best suite of charging options and use of supplemental vehicles to electrify personal vehicle transport.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Transportation and Mobility Innovations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2015 Technical Report (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2017).
2. Miotti, M., Supran, G. J., Kim, E. J. & Trancik, J. E. Personal vehicles evaluated against climate change mitigation targets. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 10795–10804 (2016).10.1021/acs.est.6b00177 ↗
3. Noshadravan, A., Cheah, L., Roth, R., Dias, L. & Gregory, J. Stochastic comparative assessment of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from conventional and electric vehicles. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20, 854–864 (2015).10.1007/s11367-015-0866-y ↗
4. Ma, H., Balthasar, F., Tait, N., Riera-Palou, X. & Harrison, A. A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles. Energy Policy 44, 160–173 (2012).10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.034 ↗
5. Coignard, J., Saxena, S., Greenblatt, J. & Wang, D. Clean vehicles as an enabler for a clean electricity grid. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 54031 (2018).10.1088/1748-9326/aabe97 ↗
6. Turrentine, T. S. Lifestyles and Life Politics: Towards a Green Car Market Techical Report (University of California, 1994).
7. Egbue, O. & Long, S. Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 48, 717–729 (2012).10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009 ↗
8. Bailey, J., Miele, A. & Axsen, J. Is awareness of public charging associated with consumer interest in plug-in electric vehicles? Transp. Res. D 36, 1–9 (2015).10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.001 ↗
9. Noel, L. & Sovacool, B. K. Why did better place fail? Range anxiety, interpretive flexibility, and electric vehicle promotion in Denmark and Israel. Energy Policy 94, 377–386 (2016).10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.029 ↗
10. Needell, Z. A., McNerney, J., Chang, M. T. & Trancik, J. E. Potential for widespread electrification of personal vehicle travel in the United States. Nat. Energy 1, 16112 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.112 ↗
11. Breetz, H. L. & Salon, D. Do electric vehicles need subsidies? Ownership costs for conventional, hybrid, and electric vehicles in 14 U.S. cities. Energy Policy 120, 238–249 (2018).10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.038 ↗
12. Neubauer, J. & Wood, E. The impact of range anxiety and home, workplace, and public charging infrastructure on simulated battery electric vehicle lifetime utility. J. Power Sources 257, 12–20 (2014).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.075 ↗
13. Neaimeh, M. et al. Analysing the usage and evidencing the importance of fast chargers for the adoption of battery electric vehicles. Energy Policy 108, 474–486 (2017).10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.033 ↗
14. Lin, Z. & Greene, D. L. Promoting the market for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Rec. 2252, 49–56 (2011).10.3141/2252-07 ↗
15. Pearre, N. S., Kempton, W., Guensler, R. L. & Elango, V. V. Electric vehicles: how much range is required for a day’s driving? Transp. Res. C 19, 1171–1184 (2011).10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.010 ↗
16. Zhang, L., Brown, T. & Samuelsen, S. Evaluation of charging infrastructure requirements and operating costs for plug-in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources 240, 515–524 (2013).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.048 ↗
17. Dong, J., Liu, C. & Lin, Z. Charging infrastructure planning for promoting battery electric vehicles: an activity-based approach using multiday travel data. Transp. Res. C 38, 44–55 (2014).10.1016/j.trc.2013.11.001 ↗
18. Dong, J. & Lin, Z. Stochastic modeling of battery electric vehicle driver behavior: impact of charging infrastructure deployment on the feasibility of battery electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Rec. 2454, 61–67 (2014).10.3141/2454-08 ↗
19. Greaves, S., Backman, H. & Ellison, A. B. An empirical assessment of the feasibility of battery electric vehicles for day-to-day driving. Transp. Res. A 66, 226–237 (2014).
20. Kontou, E., Yin, Y., Lin, Z. & He, F. Socially optimal replacement of conventional with electric vehicles for the US household fleet. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 11, 749–763 (2017).10.1080/15568318.2017.1313341 ↗
21. Wu, X. Role of workplace charging opportunities on adoption of plug-in electric vehicles - Analysis based on GPS-based longitudinal travel data. Energy Policy 114, 367–379 (2018).10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.015 ↗
22. Zhou, Y., Wen, R., Wang, H. & Cai, H. Optimal battery electric vehicles range: a study considering heterogeneous travel patterns, charging behaviors, and access to charging infrastructure. Energy 197, 116945 (2020).10.1016/j.energy.2020.116945 ↗
23. Khan, M. & Kockelman, K. M. Predicting the market potential of plug-in electric vehicles using multiday GPS data. Energy Policy 46, 225–233 (2012).10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.055 ↗
24. Lin, Z. Optimizing and diversifying electric vehicle driving range for U.S. drivers. Transp. Sci. 48, 635–650 (2014).10.1287/trsc.2013.0516 ↗
25. Puget Sound Traffic Choices Study Technical Report (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2019); www.nrel.gov/tsdc
26. 2017 National Household Travel Survey Technical Report (US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 2018); www.nhts.ornl.gov
27. McNerney, J., Needell, Z. A., Chang, M. T., Miotti, M. & Trancik, J. E. TripEnergy: estimating personal vehicle energy consumption given limited travel survey data. Transportation Res. Rec. 2628, 58–66 (2017).10.3141/2628-07 ↗
28. Berry, I. M. The Effects of Driving Style and Vehicle Performance on the Real-World Fuel Consumption of US Light-Duty Vehicles. MSc Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2010).
29. Requia, W. J., Mohamed, M., Higgins, C. D., Arain, A. & Ferguson, M. How clean are electric vehicles? Evidence-based review of the effects of electric mobility on air pollutants, greenhouse gas emissions and human health. Atmos. Environ. 185, 64–77 (2018).10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.040 ↗
30. Hajat, A., Hsia, C. & O’Neill, M. S. Socioeconomic disparities and air pollution exposure: a global review. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2, 440–450 (2015).10.1007/s40572-015-0069-5 ↗
31. Klemun, M. M., Edwards, M. R. & Trancik, J. E. Research priorities for supporting subnational climate policies. WIREs Clim. Change 11, e646 (2020).10.1002/wcc.646 ↗
32. Jakobsson, N., Gnann, T., Plötz, P., Sprei, F. & Karlsson, S. Are multi-car households better suited for battery electric vehicles? Driving patterns and economics in Sweden and Germany. Transp. Res. C 65, 1–15 (2016).10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.018 ↗
33. Tong, F. & Azevedo, I. M. L. What are the best combinations of fuel-vehicle technologies to mitigate climate change and air pollution effects across the United States? Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 074046 (2020).10.1088/1748-9326/ab8a85 ↗
34. California Household Transportation Survey Technical Report (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2012); www.nrel.gov/transportation/secure-transportation-data/tsdc-california-travel-survey.html
35. Regional Travel Survey: Final report Technical Report (Atlanta Regional Commission, 2011); atlantaregional.org/transportation-mobility/modeling/household-travel-survey/
36. 2002–2011 Regional Travel Surveys with GPS data for Abilene, Austin, El Paso, Houston Galveston, Laredo, Rio Grande Valley, San Antonio, Tyler Longview, and Wichita Falls Technical Report (Texas Department of Transportation, 2014); www.nrel.gov/transportation/secure-transportation-data/tsdc-texas-regional-travel-surveys.html
37. Markel, T. J. et al. ADVISOR: a systems analysis tool for advanced vehicle modelling. J. Power Sources 110, 255–266 (2002).10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00189-1 ↗
38. Data on Cars used for Testing Fuel Economy (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2017); www.epa.gov/compliance-and-fuel-economy-data/data-cars-used-testing-fuel-economy
39. Miotti, M. Variability in the Emissions Savings Potential of Battery Electric Vehicles Across Regions and Individuals. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2020).
40. Nicol, F. Adaptive thermal comfort standards in the hot-humid tropics. Energy Build. 36, 628–637 (2004).10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.016 ↗
41. Wilcox, S. & Marion, W. Users Manual for TMY3 Data Sets Technical Report (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2008).10.2172/928611 ↗
42. National Solar Radiation Database Technical Report (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2019); nsrdb.nrel.gov/
43. Sears, J., Roberts, D. & Glitman, K. A comparison of electric vehicle level 1 and level 2 charging efficiency. In 2014 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability, SusTech 2014 255–258 (IEEE, 2014).10.1109/SusTech.2014.7046253 ↗
44. Genovese, A., Ortenzi, F. & Villante, C. On the energy efficiency of quick DC vehicle battery charging. World Electr. Veh. J. 7, 570–576 (2015).10.3390/wevj7040570 ↗
45. Trentadue, G., Lucas, A., Otura, M., Pliakostathis, K., Zanni, M. & Scholz, H. Evaluation of fast charging efficiency under extreme temperatures. Energies 11, 1–13 (2018).10.3390/en11081937 ↗
46. 2009 National Household Travel Survey Technical Report (US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 2011); www.nhts.ornl.gov