Estimation of useful-stage energy returns on investment for fossil fuels and implications for renewable energy systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The net energy implications of the energy transition have so far been analysed at best at the final energy stage. Here we argue that expanding the analysis to the useful stage is crucial. We estimate fossil fuelsʼ useful-stage energy returns on investment (EROIs) over the period 1971–2020, globally and nationally, and disaggregate EROIs by end use. We find that fossil fuelsʼ useful-stage EROIs (~3.5:1) are considerably lower than at the final stage (~8.5:1), due to low final-to-useful efficiencies. Further, we estimate the final-stage EROI for which electricity-yielding renewable energy would deliver the same net useful energy as fossil fuels (EROI equivalent) to be approximately 4.6:1. The EROIs of electricity-yielding renewable energy systems, based on published estimations, are found to be higher than the determined EROI equivalent, even considering the effects of intermittency under a range of energy transition scenarios. Results suggest that the energy transition may happen without a decline in net useful energy, countering the view that renewable energy systems cannot replace fossil fuels without incurring a substantial energy penalty.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Environmental Impact and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. Cottrell, W. F. Energy and Society: The Relationship Between Energy, Social Change, and Economic Development (McGraw Hill, 1955).
2. Brandt, A. R., Dale, M. & Barnhart, C. J. Calculating systems-scale energy efficiency and net energy returns: a bottom-up matrix-based approach. Energy 62, 235–247 (2013).10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.054 ↗
3. Murphy, D. J. & Hall, C. A. S. Year in review-EROI or energy return on (energy) invested: review: energy return on investment. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1185, 102–118 (2010).10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05282.x ↗
4. King, L. C. & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. Implications of net energy-return-on-investment for a low-carbon energy transition. Nat. Energy 3, 334–340 (2018).10.1038/s41560-018-0116-1 ↗
5. Capellán-Pérez, I., de Castro, C. & Miguel González, L. J. Dynamic energy return on energy investment (EROI) and material requirements in scenarios of global transition to renewable energies. Energy Strategy Rev. 26, 100399 (2019).10.1016/j.esr.2019.100399 ↗
6. Slameršak, A., Kallis, G. & Neill, D. W. O. Energy requirements and carbon emissions for a low-carbon energy transition. Nat. Commun. 13, 6932 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-33976-5 ↗
7. Sers, M. R. & Victor, P. A. The energy-emissions trap. Ecol. Econ. 151, 10–21 (2018).10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.004 ↗
8. Fagnart, J.-F., Germain, M. & Peeters, B. Can the energy transition be smooth? A general equilibrium approach to the EROEI. Sustainability 12, 1176 (2020).10.3390/su12031176 ↗
9. Dale, M., Krumdieck, S. & Bodger, P. Global energy modelling—a biophysical approach (GEMBA) part 2: methodology. Ecol. Econ. 73, 158–167 (2012).10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.028 ↗
10. Dupont, E., Germain, M. & Jeanmart, H. Feasibility and economic impacts of the energy transition. Sustainability 13, 5345 (2021).10.3390/su13105345 ↗
11. Jackson, A. & Jackson, T. Modelling energy transition risk: the impact of declining energy return on investment (EROI). Ecol. Econ. 185, 107023 (2021).10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107023 ↗
12. Hall, C. A., Lambert, J. G. & Balogh, S. B. EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy 64, 141–152 (2014).10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.049 ↗
13. Raugei, M. Net energy analysis must not compare apples and oranges. Nat. Energy 4, 86–88 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0327-0 ↗
14. Brockway, P. E., Owen, A., Brand-Correa, L. I. & Hardt, L. Estimation of global final-stage energy-return-on-investment for fossil fuels with comparison to renewable energy sources. Nat. Energy 4, 612–621 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0425-z ↗
15. Percebois, J. Is the concept of energy intensity meaningful? Energy Econ. 1, 148–155 (1979).10.1016/0140-9883(79)90046-X ↗
16. Ayres, R. & Voudouris, V. The economic growth enigma: capital, labour and useful energy? Energy Policy 64, 16–28 (2014).10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.001 ↗
17. Cullen, J. M. & Allwood, J. M. The efficient use of energy: tracing the global flow of energy from fuel to service. Energy Policy 38, 75–81 (2010).10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.054 ↗
18. Cullen, J. M. & Allwood, J. M. Theoretical efficiency limits for energy conversion devices. Energy 35, 2059–2069 (2010).10.1016/j.energy.2010.01.024 ↗
19. Eyre, N. From using heat to using work: reconceptualising the zero carbon energy transition. Energy Effic. 14, 77 (2021).10.1007/s12053-021-09982-9 ↗
20. World Energy Outlook 2019 (IEA, 2019): https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019
21. Way, R., Ives, M. C., Mealy, P. & Farmer, J. D. Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition. Joule 6, 2057–2082 (2022).10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.009 ↗
22. Stadler, K. et al. EXIOBASE 3: developing a time series of detailed environmentally extended multi-regional input–output tables: EXIOBASE 3. J. Ind. Ecol. 22, 502–515 (2018).10.1111/jiec.12715 ↗
23. Heun, M. K., Owen, A. & Brockway, P. E. A physical supply-use table framework for energy analysis on the energy conversion chain. Appl. Energy 226, 1134–1162 (2018).10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.109 ↗
24. Aramendia, E., Heun, M. K., Brockway, P. E. & Taylor, P. G. Developing a multi-regional physical supply use table framework to improve the accuracy and reliability of energy analysis. Appl. Energy 310, 118413 (2022).10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118413 ↗
25. Marshall, Z. et al. A country-level primary-final-useful (CL-PFU) energy and exergy database v1.2, 1960–2020. University of Leeds https://doi.org/10.5518/1199 (2023).10.5518/1199 ↗
26. Brandt, A. R. & Dale, M. A general mathematical framework for calculating systems-scale efficiency of energy extraction and conversion: energy return on investment (EROI) and other energy return ratios. Energies 4, 1211–1245 (2011).10.3390/en4081211 ↗
27. Paelinck, J., De Caevel, J. & Degueldre, J. Analyse quantitative de certaines phénomenes du développment régional polarisé: essai de simulation statique d’itérarires de propogation. Bibliothèque Inst. Sci. écon.7, 341–387 (1965).
28. Dietzenbacher, E. & Lahr, M. L. Expanding extractions. Econ. Syst. Res. 25, 341–360 (2013).10.1080/09535314.2013.774266 ↗
29. Stadler, K. et al. Exiobase 3.8.2 Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5589597 (2021).10.5281/zenodo.5589597 ↗
30. Carbajales-Dale, M. When is EROI Not EROI? Biophys. Econ. Resour. Qual. 4, 16 (2019).10.1007/s41247-019-0065-8 ↗
31. Murphy, D. J., Raugei, M., Carbajales-Dale, M. & Rubio Estrada, B. Energy return on investment of major energy carriers: review and harmonization. Sustainability 14, 7098 (2022).10.3390/su14127098 ↗
32. Gielen, D. et al. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Rev. 24, 38–50 (2019).10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006 ↗
33. Bouckaert, S. et al. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector (IEA, 2021); https://www.iea.org/events/net-zero-by-2050-a-roadmap-for-the-global-energy-system
34. TYNDP 2022 Scenario Report (April 2022 version) (European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas & European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity, 2022); https://2022.entsos-tyndp-scenarios.eu/
35. Futurs énergétiques 2050 (Réseau de Transport d’Électricité, 2022); https://assets.rte-france.com/prod/public/2021-11/Futurs-Energetiques-2050-principaux-resultats_0.pdf
36. Futur Energy Scenarios (UK Electricity System Operator, 2023); https://www.nationalgrideso.com/document/283101/download
37. Gagnon, P. et al. 2022 Standard Scenarios Report: A U.S. Electricity Sector Outlook (NREL, 2022); https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/84327.pdf10.2172/1903762 ↗
38. Ward, H., Wenz, L., Steckel, J. C. & Minx, J. C. Truncation error estimates in process life cycle assessment using input-output analysis: truncation error estimates in life cycle assessment. J. Ind. Ecol. 22, 1080–1091 (2018).10.1111/jiec.12655 ↗
39. Perkins, J. & Suh, S. Uncertainty implications of hybrid approach in LCA: precision versus accuracy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 3681–3688 (2019).10.1021/acs.est.9b00084 ↗
40. Gamarra, A., Lechón, Y., Banacloche, S., Corona, B. & De Andrés, J. A comparison and methodological proposal for hybrid approaches to quantify environmental impacts: a case study for renewable energies. Sci. Total Environ. 867, 161502 (2023).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161502 ↗
41. Cleveland, C. J., Costanza, R., Hall, C. A. S. & Kaufmann, R. Energy and the U.S. economy: a biophysical perspective. Science 225, 890–897 (1984).10.1126/science.225.4665.890 ↗
42. Gagnon, N., Hall, C. & Brinker, L. A preliminary investigation of energy return on energy investment for global oil and gas production. Energies 2, 490–503 (2009).10.3390/en20300490 ↗
43. Murphy, D. J. The implications of the declining energy return on investment of oil production. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20130126 (2014).10.1098/rsta.2013.0126 ↗
44. Delannoy, L., Longaretti, P.-Y., Murphy, D. J. & Prados, E. Peak oil and the low-carbon energy transition: a net-energy perspective. Appl. Energy 304, 117843 (2021).10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117843 ↗
45. de Castro, C. & Capellán-Pérez, I. Standard, point of use, and extended energy return on energy invested (EROI) from comprehensive material requirements of present global wind, solar, and hydro power technologies. Energies 13, 3036 (2020).10.3390/en13123036 ↗
46. Weißbach, D. et al. Energy intensities, EROIs (energy returned on invested), and energy payback times of electricity generating power plants. Energy 52, 210–221 (2013).10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.029 ↗
47. Raugei, M., Carbajales-Dale, M., Barnhart, C. J. & Fthenakis, V. Rebuttal: ‘comments on ‘Energy intensities, EROIs (energy returned on invested), and energy payback times of electricity generating power plants’–making clear of quite some confusion’. Energy 82, 1088–1091 (2015).10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.060 ↗
48. Carbajales-Dale, M., Raugei, M., Fthenakis, V. & Barnhart, C. Energy return on investment (EROI) of solar PV: an attempt at reconciliation [point of view]. Proc. IEEE 103, 995–999 (2015).10.1109/JPROC.2015.2438471 ↗
49. Dupont, E., Koppelaar, R. & Jeanmart, H. Global available wind energy with physical and energy return on investment constraints. Appl. Energy 209, 322–338 (2018).10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.085 ↗
50. Dupont, E., Koppelaar, R. & Jeanmart, H. Global available solar energy under physical and energy return on investment constraints. Appl. Energy 257, 113968 (2020).10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113968 ↗
51. Louwen, A., van Sark, W. G. J. H. M., Faaij, A. P. C. & Schropp, R. E. I. Re-assessment of net energy production and greenhouse gas emissions avoidance after 40 years of photovoltaics development. Nat. Commun. 7, 13728 (2016).10.1038/ncomms13728 ↗
52. IRENA Renewable Power Generation Costs 2020 (IRENA, 2020); https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/Jun/Renewable-Power-Costs-in-2020
53. IRENA Global Energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050 (2019 Edition) (IRENA, 2019); https://www.irena.org/publications/2019/Apr/Global-energy-transformation-A-roadmap-to-2050-2019Edition
54. Brand-Correa, L. I. & Steinberger, J. K. A framework for decoupling human need satisfaction from energy use. Ecol. Econ. 141, 43–52 (2017).10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.019 ↗
55. Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. K., Rao, N. D. & Oswald, Y. Providing decent living with minimum energy: a global scenario. Glob. Environ. Change 65, 102168 (2020).10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102168 ↗
56. Baltruszewicz, M. et al. Household final energy footprints in Nepal, Vietnam and Zambia: composition, inequality and links to well-being. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 025011 (2021).10.1088/1748-9326/abd588 ↗
57. Kikstra, J. S., Mastrucci, A., Min, J., Riahi, K. & Rao, N. D. Decent living gaps and energy needs around the world. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 095006 (2021).10.1088/1748-9326/ac1c27 ↗
58. Vogel, J., Steinberger, J. K., O’Neill, D. W., Lamb, W. F. & Krishnakumar, J. Socio-economic conditions for satisfying human needs at low energy use: an international analysis of social provisioning. Glob. Environ. Change 69, 102287 (2021).10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102287 ↗
59. Eurostat: Statistisches Amt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften (ed.) Eurostat Manual of Supply, Use and Input-Output Tables (Amt für amtliche Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, 2008); https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-manuals-and-guidelines/-/KS-RA-07-013
60. Heun, M. K., Aramendia, E. & Marshall, Z. IEATools: Tools for munging and manipulating IEA extended energy balance data. R package version 0.1.64 (2021).
61. Aramendia, E. & Heun, M. K. ECCTools: Tools for modifying the energy conversion chain. R package version 0.1.5 (2022).
62. Heun, M. K. & Aramendia, E. Recca: R energy conversion chain analysis. R package version 0.1.38 (2021).
63. Aramendia, E. & Heun, M. K. EROITools: Tools for calculating and aggregating energy return on investment values. R package version: v.0.1.1 (2023).
64. EU Refinery Energy Systems and Efficiency (Concawe, 2012); https://www.concawe.eu/publication/report-no-312/
65. Moeller, D. & Murphy, D. Net energy analysis of gas production from the Marcellus Shale. Biophys. Econ. Resour. Qual. 1, 5 (2016).10.1007/s41247-016-0006-8 ↗
66. Moeller, D. & Murphy, D. Comments on energy return on investment (EROI): reconciling boundary and methodological issues. Biophys. Econ. Resour. Qual. 4, 7 (2019).10.1007/s41247-019-0055-x ↗
67. Aucott, M. Comment on article ‘net energy analysis of gas production from the Marcellus Shale’ by Devin Moeller and David Murphy. Biophys. Econ. Resour. Qual. 2, 7 (2017).10.1007/s41247-017-0024-1 ↗
68. Brandt, A. R. et al. Energy return on investment (EROI) for forty global oilfields using a detailed engineering-based model of oil production. PLoS ONE 10, e0144141 (2015).10.1371/journal.pone.0144141 ↗
69. Ecclesia, M. V., Santos, J., Brockway, P. E. & Domingos, T. A comprehensive societal energy return on investment study of Portugal reveals a low but stable value. Energies 15, 3549 (2022).10.3390/en15103549 ↗
70. Brand-Correa, L. et al. Developing an input-output based method to estimate a national-level energy return on investment (EROI). Energies 10, 534 (2017).10.3390/en10040534 ↗
71. Heptonstall, P. J. & Gross, R. J. K. A systematic review of the costs and impacts of integrating variable renewables into power grids. Nat. Energy 6, 72–83 (2020).10.1038/s41560-020-00695-4 ↗
72. Barnhart, C. J., Dale, M., Brandt, A. R. & Benson, S. M. The energetic implications of curtailing versus storing solar- and wind-generated electricity. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 2804 (2013).10.1039/c3ee41973h ↗
73. Sgouridis, S., Carbajales-Dale, M., Csala, D., Chiesa, M. & Bardi, U. Comparative net energy analysis of renewable electricity and carbon capture and storage. Nat. Energy 4, 456–465 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0365-7 ↗
74. Pulido-Sánchez, D., Capellán-Pérez, I., de Castro, C. & Frechoso, F. Material and energy requirements of transport electrification. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 4872–4910 (2022).10.1039/D2EE00802E ↗
75. Raugei, M., Leccisi, E. & Fthenakis, V. M. What are the energy and environmental impacts of adding battery storage to photovoltaics? A generalized life cycle assessment. Energy Technol. 8, 1901146 (2020).10.1002/ente.201901146 ↗
76. Bhandari, K. P., Collier, J. M., Ellingson, R. J. & Apul, D. S. Energy payback time (EPBT) and energy return on energy invested (EROI) of solar photovoltaic systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 47, 133–141 (2015).10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.057 ↗
77. Koppelaar, R. Solar-PV energy payback and net energy: meta-assessment of study quality, reproducibility, and results harmonization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 72, 1241–1255 (2017).10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.077 ↗
78. Aramendia, E. et al. Final- and useful-stage energy returns on investment (EROI) of fossil fuels, and final-stage EROI equivalent of renewable energy. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25311358 (2024).10.6084/m9.figshare.25311358 ↗