journal article·2017-01-09Open access

Global progress and backsliding on gasoline taxes and subsidies

Michael L. Ross, Chad Hazlett, Paasha Mahdavi

Nature Energy· Volume 2· Issue 1

Abstract

To reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the coming decades, many governments will have to reform their energy policies. These policies are difficult to measure with any precision. As a result, it is unclear whether progress has been made towards important energy policy reforms, such as reducing fossil fuel subsidies. We use new data to measure net taxes and subsidies for gasoline in almost all countries at the monthly level and find evidence of both progress and backsliding. From 2003 to 2015, gasoline taxes rose in 83 states but fell in 46 states. During the same period, the global mean gasoline tax fell by 13.3% due to faster consumption growth in countries with lower taxes. Our results suggest that global progress towards fossil fuel price reform has been mixed, and that many governments are failing to exploit one of the most cost-effective policy tools for limiting greenhouse gas emissions. Reforms of energy markets are necessary to face the low carbon transition but are problematic to measure. New data evaluate implicit taxes and subsidies for gasoline in almost all countries at monthly intervals showing mixed results that highlight the difficulty in implementing effective policy tools.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Gupta, S. & Mahler, W. Taxation of petroleum products: theory and empirical evidence. Energy Econ. 17, 101–116 (1995).10.1016/0140-9883(95)00013-K ↗
2. Bacon, R. Petroleum taxes: trends in fuel taxes (and subsidies) and the implications. Viewpoint (World Bank) 240, 1–4 (2001).
3. IPCC Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (eds Houghton, J. T. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).
4. Coady, D., Parry, I., Sears, L. & Shang, B. How large are global energy subsidies? IMF Working Paper 105, 1–41 (2015).
5. Rentschler, J. & Bazilian, M. Reforming fossil fuel subsidies: drivers, barriers and the state of progress. Clim. Policy 16, 1–24 (2016).10.1080/14693062.2014.965657 ↗
6. Davis, L. W. The economic cost of global fuel subsidies. Am. Econ. Rev. 104, 581–585 (2014).10.1257/aer.104.5.581 ↗
7. Parry, I. W., Heine, M. D., Lis, E. & Li, S. Getting Energy Prices Right: From Principle to Practice (International Monetary Fund, 2014).
8. de Oliveira, A. & Laan, T. Lessons Learned from Brazil’s Experience with Fossil-Fuel Subsidies and their Reform (International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2010).
9. Aldy, J. E. & Pizer, W. A. Alternative metrics for comparing domestic climate change mitigation efforts and the emerging international climate policy architecture. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10, 3–24 (2016).10.1093/reep/rev013 ↗
10. Vagliasindi, M. Implementing Energy Subsidy Reforms: Evidence from Developing Countries (The World Bank, 2013).10.1596/978-0-8213-9561-5 ↗
11. Victor, D. G. The Politics of Fossil-Fuel Subsidies (IISD Global Subsidies Initiative Series, 2009).10.2139/ssrn.1520984 ↗
12. Cheon, A., Urpelainen, J. & Lackner, M. Why do governments subsidize gasoline consumption? An empirical analysis of global gasoline prices, 2002–2009. Energy Policy 56, 382–390 (2013).10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.075 ↗
13. Wagner, A. International Fuel Prices 2012/2013 (accessed 1 July 2014); https://energypedia.info/index.php/International_Fuel_Prices
14. Koplow, D. Measuring Energy Subsidies Using the Price-Gap Approach: What Does it Leave Out? (IISD Trade, Investment and Climate Change Series, 2009).10.2139/ssrn.1631668 ↗
15. Fattou, B. & El-Katiri, L. Energy subsidies in the Middle East and North Africa. Energy Strateg. Rev. 2, 108–115 (2013).10.1016/j.esr.2012.11.004 ↗
16. G20 Leaders’ Statement The Pittsburgh Summit, September 24–25, 2009 (accessed 14 May 2016); https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/international/g7-g20/Documents/pittsburgh_summit_leaders_statement_250909.pdf
17. Clements, B. et al. Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications (International Monetary Fund, 2013).
18. Kojima, M. Petroleum product pricing and complementary policies: experience of 65 developing countries since 2009. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6396, 1–116 (2013).
19. Coady, D. et al. Petroleum Product Subsidies: Costly, Inequitable, and Rising (International Monetary Fund, 2010).