journal article·2022-08-11

Collective wind farm operation based on a predictive model increases utility-scale energy production

Michael F. Howland, Jesús Bas Quesada, Juan José Pena Martínez, Felipe Palou Larrañaga, Neeraj Yadav, Jasvipul S. Chawla, Varun Sivaram, John O. Dabiri

Nature Energy· Volume 7· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Wind turbines located in wind farms are operated to maximize only their own power production. Individual operation results in wake losses that reduce farm energy. In this study, we operate a wind turbine array collectively to maximize total array production through wake steering. The selection of the farm control strategy relies on the optimization of computationally efficient flow models. We develop a physics-based, data-assisted flow control model to predict the optimal control strategy. In contrast to previous studies, we first design and implement a multi-month field experiment at a utility-scale wind farm to validate the model over a range of control strategies, most of which are suboptimal. The flow control model is able to predict the optimal yaw misalignment angles for the array within +/-5 degrees for most wind directions (11-32% power gains). Using the validated model, we design a control protocol which increases the energy production of the farm in a second multi-month experiment by 2.7% and 1.0%, for the wind directions of interest and for wind speeds between 6 and 8 m/s and all wind speeds, respectively. The developed and validated predictive model can enable a wider adoption of collective wind farm operation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wind Energy Research and Development · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. IPCC Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2021).
2. IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
3. Gielen, D. et al. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Rev. 24, 38–50 (2019).10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006 ↗
4. Fact Sheet: President Biden Sets 2030 Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Target Aimed at Creating Good-Paying Union Jobs and Securing U.S. Leadership on Clean Energy Technologies (White House, 2021); https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/22/fact-sheet-president-biden-sets-2030-greenhouse-gas-pollution-reduction-target-aimed-at-creating-good-paying-union-jobs-and-securing-u-s-leadership-on-clean-energy-technologies
5. Renn, O. & Marshall, J. P. Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: from the 1950s to the ‘energiewende’. Energy Policy 99, 224–232 (2016).10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.004 ↗
6. Asif, M. & Muneer, T. Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies. Ren. Sust. Energy Rev. 11, 1388–1413 (2007).10.1016/j.rser.2005.12.004 ↗
7. Veers, P. et al. Grand challenges in the science of wind energy. Science 366, eaau2027 (2019).10.1126/science.aau2027 ↗
8. Wiser, R. et al. Wind vision: a new era for wind power in the United States. Electr. J. 28, 120–132 (2015).10.1016/j.tej.2015.09.016 ↗
9. Barthelmie, R. J. et al. Modelling and measuring flow and wind turbine wakes in large wind farms offshore. Wind Energy 12, 431–444 (2009).10.1002/we.348 ↗
10. Stevens, R. J. & Meneveau, C. Flow structure and turbulence in wind farms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 311–339 (2017).10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060206 ↗
11. Eberle, A., Roberts, J. O., Key, A., Bhaskar, P. & Dykes, K. L. NREL’s Balance-of-System Cost Model for Land-Based Wind, Technical Report (National Renewable Energy Lab, 2019).10.2172/1569457 ↗
12. Stevens, R. J., Hobbs, B. F., Ramos, A. & Meneveau, C. Combining economic and fluid dynamic models to determine the optimal spacing in very large wind farms. Wind Energy 20, 465–477 (2017).10.1002/we.2016 ↗
13. Meyers, J. & Meneveau, C. Optimal turbine spacing in fully developed wind farm boundary layers. Wind Energy 15, 305–317 (2012).10.1002/we.469 ↗
14. Pao, L. Y. & Johnson, K. E. A tutorial on the dynamics and control of wind turbines and wind farms. In 2009 American Control Conference 2076–2089 (IEEE, 2009).10.1109/ACC.2009.5160195 ↗
15. Fleming, P. et al. Field-test results using a nacelle-mounted lidar for improving wind turbine power capture by reducing yaw misalignment. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 524, 012002 (2014).10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012002 ↗
16. Howland, M. F. et al. Influence of atmospheric conditions on the power production of utility-scale wind turbines in yaw misalignment. J. Ren. Sust. Energy 12, 063307 (2020).10.1063/5.0023746 ↗
17. Fleming, P. et al. Simulation comparison of wake mitigation control strategies for a two-turbine case. Wind Energy 18, 2135–2143 (2015).10.1002/we.1810 ↗
18. Damiani, R. et al. Assessment of wind turbine component loads under yaw-offset conditions. Wind Energy Sci. 3, 173–189 (2018).10.5194/wes-3-173-2018 ↗
19. Howland, M. F., Lele, S. K. & Dabiri, J. O. Wind farm power optimization through wake steering. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14495–14500 (2019).10.1073/pnas.1903680116 ↗
20. Fleming, P. et al. Field test of wake steering at an offshore wind farm. Wind Energy Sci. 2, 229–239 (2017).10.5194/wes-2-229-2017 ↗
21. Howland, M. F. et al. Optimal closed-loop wake steering–part 2: diurnal cycle atmospheric boundary layer conditions. Wind Energy Sci. 7, 345–365 (2022).10.5194/wes-7-345-2022 ↗
22. Quick, J. et al. Optimization under uncertainty for wake steering strategies. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 854, 012036 (2017).10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012036 ↗
23. Choi, H. & Moin, P. Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimates revisited. Phys. Fluids 24, 011702 (2012).10.1063/1.3676783 ↗
24. Gebraad, P. et al. Wind plant power optimization through yaw control using a parametric model for wake effects—a CFD simulation study. Wind Energy 19, 95–114 (2016).10.1002/we.1822 ↗
25. Meneveau, C. Big wind power: seven questions for turbulence research. J. Turbul. 20, 2–20 (2019).10.1080/14685248.2019.1584664 ↗
26. Howland, M. F. Wind farm yaw control set-point optimization under model parameter uncertainty. J. Ren. Sust. Energy 13, 043303 (2021).10.1063/5.0051071 ↗
27. Doekemeijer, B. M., van der Hoek, D. & van Wingerden, J.-W. Closed-loop model-based wind farm control using floris under time-varying inflow conditions. Ren. Energy 156, 719–730 (2020).10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.007 ↗
28. Bastankhah, M. & Porté-Agel, F. Wind farm power optimization via yaw angle control: a wind tunnel study. J. Ren. Sust. Energy 11, 023301 (2019).10.1063/1.5077038 ↗
29. Campagnolo, F., Weber, R., Schreiber, J. & Bottasso, C. L. Wind tunnel testing of wake steering with dynamic wind direction changes. Wind Energy Sci. 5, 1273–1295 (2020).10.5194/wes-5-1273-2020 ↗
30. Fleming, P. et al. Initial results from a field campaign of wake steering applied at a commercial wind farm–part 1. Wind Energy Sci. 4, 273–285 (2019).10.5194/wes-4-273-2019 ↗
31. Doekemeijer, B. M. et al. Field experiment for open-loop yaw-based wake steering at a commercial onshore wind farm in italy. Wind Energy Sci. 6, 159–176 (2021).10.5194/wes-6-159-2021 ↗
32. Fleming, P. et al. Experimental results of wake steering using fixed angles. Wind Energy Sci. 6, 1521–1531 (2021).10.5194/wes-6-1521-2021 ↗
33. Bastankhah, M. & Porté-Agel, F. A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes. Ren. Energy 70, 116–123 (2014).10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.002 ↗
34. Shapiro, C. R., Gayme, D. F. & Meneveau, C. Modelling yawed wind turbine wakes: a lifting line approach. J. Fluid Mech. 841, R1 (2018).10.1017/jfm.2018.75 ↗
35. Howland, M. F., Ghate, A. S., Lele, S. K. & Dabiri, J. O. Optimal closed-loop wake steering–part 1: conventionally neutral atmospheric boundary layer conditions. Wind Energy Sci. 5, 1315–1338 (2020).10.5194/wes-5-1315-2020 ↗
36. Burton, T., Jenkins, N., Sharpe, D. & Bossanyi, E. Wind Energy Handbook (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).10.1002/9781119992714 ↗
37. Howland, M. F., Bossuyt, J., Martínez-Tossas, L. A., Meyers, J. & Meneveau, C. Wake structure in actuator disk models of wind turbines in yaw under uniform inflow conditions. J. Ren. Sust. Energy 8, 043301 (2016).10.1063/1.4955091 ↗
38. Martínez-Tossas, L. A. et al. The curled wake model: a three-dimensional and extremely fast steady-state wake solver for wind plant flows. Wind Energy Sci. 6, 555–570 (2021).10.5194/wes-6-555-2021 ↗
39. Bastankhah, M., Welch, B. L., Martínez-Tossas, L. A., King, J. & Fleming, P. Analytical solution for the cumulative wake of wind turbines in wind farms. J. Fluid Mech. 911, A53 (2021).10.1017/jfm.2020.1037 ↗
40. Abkar, M., Sørensen, J. N. & Porté-Agel, F. An analytical model for the effect of vertical wind veer on wind turbine wakes. Energies 11, 1838 (2018).10.3390/en11071838 ↗
41. Peña, A., Réthoré, P.-E. & Rathmann, O. Modeling large offshore wind farms under different atmospheric stability regimes with the park wake model. Ren. Energy 70, 164–171 (2014).10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.019 ↗
42. Frandsen, S. Turbulence and Turbulence-Generated Structural Loading in Wind Turbine Clusters. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark (2007).
43. Bodini, N., Lundquist, J. K. & Kirincich, A. U.S. East Coast Lidar measurements show offshore wind turbines will encounter very low atmospheric turbulence. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 5582–5591 (2019).10.1029/2019GL082636 ↗
44. Fleming, P. A., Ning, A., Gebraad, P. M. & Dykes, K. Wind plant system engineering through optimization of layout and yaw control. Wind Energy 19, 329–344 (2016).10.1002/we.1836 ↗
45. Ciri, U., Rotea, M. A. & Leonardi, S. Model-free control of wind farms: a comparative study between individual and coordinated extremum seeking. Ren. Energy 113, 1033–1045 (2017).10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.065 ↗
46. Stanfel, P., Johnson, K., Bay, C. J. & King, J. Proof-of-concept of a reinforcement learning framework for wind farm energy capture maximization in time-varying wind. J. Ren. Sust. Energy 13, 043305 (2021).10.1063/5.0043091 ↗
47. Hulsman, P., Andersen, S. J. & Göçmen, T. Optimizing wind farm control through wake steering using surrogate models based on high-fidelity simulations. Wind Energy Sci. 5, 309–329 (2020).10.5194/wes-5-309-2020 ↗
48. Purohit, I. & Purohit, P. Wind energy in India: status and future prospects. J. Ren. Sust. Energy 1, 042701 (2009).10.1063/1.3156003 ↗
49. Boersma, S., Gebraad, P., Vali, M., Doekemeijer, B. & Van Wingerden, J. A control-oriented dynamic wind farm flow model: ‘wfsim’. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 753, 032005 (2016).10.1088/1742-6596/753/3/032005 ↗
50. Annoni, J. et al. Sparse-sensor placement for wind farm control. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1037, 032019 (2018).10.1088/1742-6596/1037/3/032019 ↗
51. Howland, M. F. & Dabiri, J. O. Influence of wake model superposition and secondary steering on model-based wake steering control with scada data assimilation. Energies 14, 52 (2021).10.3390/en14010052 ↗
52. King, J. et al. Controls-oriented model for secondary effects of wake steering. Wind Energy Sci. 6, 701–714 (2021).10.5194/wes-6-701-2021 ↗
53. Niayifar, A. & Porté-Agel, F. Analytical modeling of wind farms: a new approach for power prediction. Energies 9, 741 (2016).10.3390/en9090741 ↗
54. Stuart, A. M. Inverse problems: a Bayesian perspective. Acta Numer. 19, 451–559 (2010).10.1017/S0962492910000061 ↗
55. Evensen, G. The ensemble kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn. 53, 343–367 (2003).10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9 ↗