Protonated phosphonic acid electrodes for high power heavy-duty vehicle fuel cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrogen fuel cells are attractive devices for automotive applicationswith benefits such as extended driving range, swiftrefuelling time and clean exhausts1. Although passenger fuelcell electric vehicles have been successfully launched, further technologicalinnovations are needed for the next-generation fuel cellplatform to evolve for heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs)2–4. One of thedifficulties encountered in HDV operation is adequate heat rejection.As current low-temperature polymer electrolyte membranefuel cells (LT-PEMFCs) operate at ~80 °C, the waste heat needs tobe rejected across a 40 °C temperature difference5. Heat rejection inHDVs is facilitated by high cell voltage at rated power (≥0.76 V)6,which translates to lower power densities (<0.45 W cm–2). Toachieve high power without the heat rejection issue, the operatingtemperature of the fuel cell stacks must increase to the enginecoolant temperature (100 °C) and ideally up to 160 °C. At thehigher operating temperature, the cost of fuel cell systems can bereduced by downsizing the fuel cell cooling system and eliminatinga large humidifier or complex temperature/humidity controllerunit7. Furthermore, enhanced CO tolerance would permit theuse of reformed methanol–water mixtures that typically contain 2%CO (ref. 8), which would further simplify the fuelling process andmitigate the complicated and energy-intensive liquefaction of purehydrogen transportation. If pure hydrogen fuel is replaced by methanol,the volume of the fuel, fuel tanks and reformer used to storeand convert the methanol into hydrogen becomes approximately30% of the volume-equivalent of compressed hydrogen, substantialincreasing the payload space of HDVs9.However, increasing the operating temperature for LT-PEMFCshas overwhelming challenges because perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA)electrolytes require adequate hydration, which is difficult whenthe cell operates at >100 °C due to high water partial vapour pressure10.Therefore, extensive research efforts to develop polymerelectrolytes for high-temperature polymer electrolyte membranefuel cells (HT-PEMFCs) have been undertaken over the pastdecade. HT-PEMFCs typically use phosphoric acid-doped polybenzimidazole(PA-PBI)11–13. However, PA-PBI-based fuel cells arechallenging to operate below 140 °C or during frequent startup/shutdown14 without suffering a loss of phosphoric acid, which makesHT-PEMFCs unfavourable for automotive applications. We previouslyreported that HT-PEMFCs based on quaternary ammoniumbiphosphate ion-pair coordination (ion-pair HT-PEMFCs) exhibitedexcellent phosphoric acid retention in the temperature range80–200 °C, but the performance of the ion-pair HT-PEMFCs waspoor15–17. Therefore, further performance improvement is requiredfor the ion-pair HT-PEMFCs to be commercially viable for HDVapplications18 (Table 1).Here we report on a protonated phosphonated ionomer thatincreases proton conductivity more than an order of magnitudecompared with a non-protonated phosphonated ionomer. We showexperimental and theoretical evidence of the protonation of phosphonicacids that is distinct from the hydrogen bonding of phosphonicacids18. Based on this concept, we designed protonatedphosphonic acid electrodes that enable remarkable power densityand are well suited for HDV fuel cells.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Cano, Z. P. et al. Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets. Nat. Energy 3, 279–289 (2018).10.1038/s41560-018-0108-1 ↗
2. Cullen, D. A. et al. New roads and challenges for fuel cells in heavy-duty transportation. Nat. Energy 6, 462–474 (2021).10.1038/s41560-021-00775-z ↗
3. Forrest, K., Kinnon, M. M., Tarroja, B. & Samuelsen, S. Estimating the technical feasibility of fuel cell and battery electric vehicles for the medium and heavy duty sectors in California. Appl. Energy 276, 115439 (2020).10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115439 ↗
4. Hong, B. K., Kim, S. H. & Kim, C. M. Powering the future through hydrogen and polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Current commercialisation and key challenges with focus on work at Hyundai. Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev. 64, 236–251 (2020).10.1595/205651319X15744200036826 ↗
5. Gittleman, C. S., Jia, H., De Castro, E. S., Chisholm, C. & Kim, Y. S. Proton conductors for heavy-duty vehicle fuel cells. Joule 5, 1660–1677 (2021).10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.016 ↗
6. US Drive Partnership Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap (US Department of Energy, 2017); https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2017/11/f46/FCTT_Roadmap_Nov_2017_FINAL.pdf
7. Dicks, A. L. & Rand, D. A. J. Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells in Fuel Cell Systems Explained 3rd edn, 69–133 (John Wiley, 2018).10.1002/9781118706992.ch4 ↗
8. Valdés-López, V. F., Mason, T., Shearing, P. R. & Brett, D. J. L. Carbon monoxide poisoning and mitigation strategies for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells—a review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 79, 100942 (2020).10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100842 ↗
9. Chan T. Methanol Fuel Cells: Powering the Future (Methanol Institute, 2020); https://www.methanol.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Methanol-Fuel-Cell-Powering-the-Future-webinar-presentation.pdf
10. Park, C. H. et al. Nanocrack-regulated self-humidifying membranes. Nature 532, 480–483 (2016).10.1038/nature17634 ↗
11. Yang, J. S. et al. High molecular weight polybenzimidazole membranes for high temperature PEMFC. Fuel Cells 14, 7–15 (2014).10.1002/fuce.201300070 ↗
12. Pingitore, A. T., Huang, F., Qian, G. Q. & Benicewicz, B. C. Durable high polymer content m/p-polybenzimidazole membranes for extended lifetime electrochemical devices. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 1720–1726 (2019).10.1021/acsaem.8b01820 ↗
13. Søndergaard, T. et al. Long-term durability of PBI-based HT-PEM fuel cells: effect of operating parameters. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, F3053–F3062 (2018).10.1149/2.0081806jes ↗
14. Jakobsen, M. T. D., Jensen, J. O., Cleemann, L. N. & Li, Q. in High Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells: Approaches, Status, and Perspectives (eds Li, Q. et al.) 487–509 (Springer, 2016).10.1007/978-3-319-17082-4_22 ↗
15. Lee, K. S., Spendelow, J. S., Choe, Y. K., Fujimoto, C. & Kim, Y. S. An operationally flexible fuel cell based on quaternary ammonium-biphosphate ion pairs. Nat. Energy 1, 16120 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.120 ↗
16. Lee, A. S., Choe, Y. K., Matanovic, I. & Kim, Y. S. The energetics of phosphoric acid interactions reveals a new acid loss mechanism. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 9867–9876 (2019).10.1039/C9TA01756A ↗
17. Atanasov, V. et al. Synergistically integrated phosphonated poly(pentafluorostyrene)s for fuel cells. Nat. Mater. 20, 370–377 (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-00841-z ↗
18. Kongkanand, A. & Mathias, M. F. The priority and challenge of high-power performance of low-platinum proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 1127–1137 (2016).10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 ↗
19. Kotz, R., Clouser, S., Sarangapani, S. & Yeager, E. Ionization of trifluoromethane sulfonic acid in phosphoric acid: Raman studies. J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 1097–1100 (1984).10.1149/1.2115757 ↗
20. Parvole, J. & Jannasch, P. Polysulfones grafted with poly(vinylphosphonic acid) for highly proton conducting fuel cell membranes in the hydrated and nominally dry state. Macromolecules 41, 3893–3903 (2008).10.1021/ma800042m ↗
21. Aili, D. et al. Phosphoric acid dynamics in high temperature polymer electrolyte membranes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167, 134507 (2020).10.1149/1945-7111/abb70c ↗
22. Haouas, M., Taulelle, F., Prudhomme, N. & Cambon, O. NMR analysis of GaPO4 crystal growth in mixtures of phosphoric and sulfuric acids. J. Cryst. Growth 296, 197–206 (2006).10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.08.030 ↗
23. Melchior, J.-P., Majer, G. & Kreuer, K.-D. Why do proton conducting benzimidazole phosphoric acid membranes perform well in high-temperature PEM fuel cells? Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 601–612 (2017).10.1039/C6CP05331A ↗
24. Frisch, M. J., Head-Gordon, M. & Pople, J. A. Direct MP2 gradient method. Chem. Phys. Lett. 166, 275–280 (1990).10.1016/0009-2614(90)80029-D ↗
25. Zhang, S. M., Baker, J. & Pulay, P. A reliable and efficient first principles-based method for predicting pKa values. 1. Methodology. J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 425–431 (2010).10.1021/jp9067069 ↗
26. Matanovic, I., Chung, H. T. & Kim, Y. S. Benzene adsorption: a significant inhibitor for the hydrogen oxidation reaction in alkaline conditions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 4918–4924 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02228 ↗
27. Li, D., Chung, H. T., Maurya, S., Matanovic, I. & Kim, Y. S. Impact of ionomer adsorption on alkaline hydrogen oxidation activity and fuel cell performance. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 12, 189–195 (2018).10.1016/j.coelec.2018.11.012 ↗
28. He, Q. G., Shyam, B., Nishijima, M. & Ramaker, D. Mitigating phosphate anion poisoning of cathodic Pt/C catalysts in phosphoric acid fuel cells. J. Phys. Chem. C. 117, 4877–4887 (2013).10.1021/jp309282n ↗
29. Li, Q. et al. Phosphate-tolerant oxygen reduction catalysts. ACS Catal. 4, 3193–3200 (2014).10.1021/cs500807v ↗
30. Lee, K.-S. et al. Intermediate temperature fuel cells via an ion-pair coordinated polymer electrolyte. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 979–987 (2018).10.1039/C7EE03595K ↗
31. Eberhardt, S. H. et al. Dynamic operation of HT-PEFC: in-operando imaging of phosphoric acid profiles and (re)distribution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, F310–F316 (2015).10.1149/2.0751503jes ↗
32. Matanovic, I., Lee, A. S. & Kim, Y. S. Energetics of base–acid pairs for the design of high-temperature fuel cell polymer electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. B 124, 7725–7734 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c05672 ↗
33. Maurya, S. et al. Rational design of polyaromatic ionomers for alkaline membrane fuel cells with >1 W cm–2 power density. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 3283–3291 (2018).10.1039/C8EE02192A ↗
34. Ott, S. et al. Ionomer distribution control in porous carbon-supported catalyst layers for high-power and low Pt-loaded proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Energy 19, 77–85 (2020).
35. Cleve, T. V. et al. Tailoring electrode microstructure via ink content to enable improved rated power performance for platinum cobalt/high surface area carbon based polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Power Sources 482, 228889 (2021).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228889 ↗
36. Lai, Y.-H. et al. Accelerated stress testing of fuel cell membranes subjected to combined mechanical/chemical stressors and cerium migration. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, F3100–F3103 (2018).10.1149/2.0241806jes ↗
37. Noh, S., Jeon, J. Y., Adhikari, S., Kim, Y. S. & Bae, C. Molecular engineering of hydroxide conducting polymers for anion exchange membranes in electrochemical energy conversion technology. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2745–2755 (2019).10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00355 ↗
38. Wang, J. et al. Poly(aryl piperidinium) membranes and ionomers for hydroxide exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Energy 4, 392–398 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0372-8 ↗
39. Mader, J., Xiao, L., Schmidt, T. J. & Benicewicz, B. C. Polybenzimidazole/acid complexes as high-temperature membranes. Adv. Polym. Sci. 216, 63–124 (2008).
40. Li, X. et al. Highly conductive and mechanically stable imidazole-rich cross-linked networks for high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Chem. Mater. 32, 1182–1191 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04321 ↗
41. Krishnan, N. N. et al. Phosphoric acid doped crosslinked polybenzimidazole (PBI-OO) blend membranes for high temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Membr. Sci. 544, 416–424 (2017).10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.049 ↗
42. Wang, L., Liu, Z., Liu, Y. & Wang, L. Crosslinked polybenzimidazole containing branching structure with no sacrifice of effective N-H sites: Towards high-performance high-temperature proton exchange membranes for fuel cells. J. Membr. Sci. 583, 110–117 (2019).10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.030 ↗
43. Ghosh, P. et al. Enhanced power generation, faster transient response and longer durability of HT-PEMFC using composite benzimidazole electrolyte membrane with optimum rGO loading. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 16708–16723 (2020).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.124 ↗
44. Xie, J., Wood, D. L., More, K. L., Atanassov, P. & Borup, R. L. Microstructural changes of membrane electrode assemblies during PEFC durability testing at high humidity conditions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, A1011–A1020 (2005).10.1149/1.1873492 ↗
45. Yu, J. R., Matsuura, T., Yoshikawa, Y., Islam, M. N. & Hori, M. In situ analysis of performance degradation of a PEMFC under nonsaturated humidification. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 8, A156–A158 (2005).10.1149/1.1854781 ↗
46. Schmidt, T. J. & Baurmeister, J. Properties of high-temperature PEFC Celtec®-P 1000 MEAs in start/stop operation mode. J. Power Sources 176, 428–434 (2008).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.055 ↗
47. Borup, R. et al. Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation. Chem. Rev. 107, 3904–3951 (2007).10.1021/cr050182l ↗
48. Marcinkoski, J. et al. Hydrogen Class 8 Long Haul Truck Targets (US DOE, 2019); https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/19006_hydrogen_class8_long_haul_truck_targets.pdf
49. Hibbs, M. R. Alkaline stability of poly(phenylene)-based anion exchange membranes with various cations. J. Polym. Sci. B 51, 1736–1742 (2013).10.1002/polb.23149 ↗
50. Maurya, S., Fujimoto, C., Hibbs, M. R., Villarrubia, C. N. & Kim, Y. S. Toward improved alkaline membrane fuel cell performance using quaternized aryl-ether free polyaromatics. Chem. Mater. 30, 2188–2192 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00358 ↗
51. Atanasov, V. & Kerres, J. Highly phosphonated polypentafluorostyrene. Macromolecules 44, 6416–6423 (2011).10.1021/ma2011574 ↗
52. Marenich, A. V., Cramer, C. J. & Truhlar, D. G. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 6378–6396 (2009).10.1021/jp810292n ↗
53. Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 120, 215–241 (2008).10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x ↗
54. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09 Revision C.01 (Gaussian, 2010).
55. Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. A new local density functional for main-group thermochemistry, transition metal bonding, thermochemical kinetics, and noncovalent interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 125, 194101 (2006).10.1063/1.2370993 ↗
56. Kim, Y. S. et al. Origin of toughness in dispersion-cast Nafion membranes. Macromolecules 48, 2161–2172 (2015).10.1021/ma502538k ↗
57. Asghari, S., Mokmeli, A. & Samavati, M. Study of PEM fuel cell performance by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35, 9283–9290 (2010).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.069 ↗
58. Stampino, P. G. et al. Investigation of hydrophobic treatments with perfluoropolyether derivatives of gas diffusion layers by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in PEM-FC. Solid State Ion. 216, 100–104 (2012).10.1016/j.ssi.2012.03.032 ↗
59. Liang, H., Su, H., Pollet, B. G., Linkov, V. & Pasupathi, S. Membrane electrode assembly with enhanced platinum utilization for high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell prepared by catalyst coating membrane method. J. Power Sources 266, 107–113 (2014).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.014 ↗