Techno-economic analysis of renewable fuels for ships carrying bulk cargo in Europe

1. ITF Transport Outlook 2019 (ITF, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1787/transp_outlook-en-2019-en10.1787/transp_outlook-en-2019-en ↗

2. Review of Maritime Transport 2019 (UNCTAD, 2019); https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2019_en.pdf

3. Fourth IMO GHG Study 2020 (IMO, 2020); https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/Reducing-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-ships.aspx

4. Thomson, E. S. et al. Intensification of ice nucleation observed in ocean ship emissions. Sci. Rep. 8, 1111 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-19297-y ↗

5. Capaldo, K., Corbett, J. J., Kasibhatla, P., Fischbeck, P. & Pandis, S. N. Effects of ship emissions on sulphur cycling and radiative climate forcing over the ocean. Nature 400, 743–746 (1999).10.1038/23438 ↗

6. Liu, H. et al. Emissions and health impacts from global shipping embodied in US–China bilateral trade. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1027–1033 (2019).10.1038/s41893-019-0414-z ↗

7. Sofiev, M. et al. Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs. Nat. Commun. 9(dec), 406 (2018).10.1038/s41467-017-02774-9 ↗

8. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. in: Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (2018); https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

9. Davis, S. J. et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 360, eaas9793 (2018).10.1126/science.aas9793 ↗

10. Bouman, E. A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A. I. & Strømman, A. H. State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping—a review. Transport. Res. D 52, 408–421 (2017).10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022 ↗

11. Held, M. et al. Scrapping probabilities and committed CO2 emissions of the international ship fleet in 7th International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management, and Economics (SNAM) (OnePetro, 2021); https://onepetro.org/SNAMESOME/proceedings/SOME21/2-SOME21/D021S003R001/46127710.5957/SOME-2021-006 ↗

12. Initial IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships (IMO, 2018); https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/Reducing-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-ships.aspx

13. European Commission, UMAS, CE Delft, Lloyd’s Register & Öko-Institut e.V. Study on Methods and Considerations for the Determination of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets for International Shipping (European Commission, 2019); https://cedelft.eu/publications/study-on-methods-and-considerations-for-the-determination-of-greenhouse-gas-emission-reduction-targets-for-international-shipping/

14. Balcombe, P. et al. How to decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies. Energy Convers. Manag. 182, 72–88 (2019).10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080 ↗

15. Detz, R. J., Reek, J. N. H. & van der Zwaan, B. C. C. The future of solar fuels: when could they become competitive? Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1653–1669 (2018).10.1039/C8EE00111A ↗

16. Zhou, Y. J., Kerkhoven, E. J. & Nielsen, J. Barriers and opportunities in bio-based production of hydrocarbons. Nat. Energy 3, 925–935 (2018).10.1038/s41560-018-0197-x ↗

17. Babacan, O. et al. Assessing the feasibility of carbon dioxide mitigation options in terms of energy usage. Nat. Energy 5, 720–728 (2020).10.1038/s41560-020-0646-1 ↗

18. Falter, C., Scharfenberg, N. & Habersetzer, A. Geographical potential of solar thermochemical jet fuel production. Energies 13, 802 (2020).10.3390/en13040802 ↗

19. Brynolf, S., Taljegard, M., Grahn, M. & Hansson, J. Electrofuels for the transport sector: a review of production costs. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 1887–1905 (2018).10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.288 ↗

20. Schemme, S., Samsun, R. C., Peters, R. & Stolten, D. Power-to-fuel as a key to sustainable transport systems—an analysis of diesel fuels produced from CO2 and renewable electricity. Fuel 205, 198–221 (2017).10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.061 ↗

21. Held, M. et al. On the energetic efficiency of producing polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers from CO2 using electrical energy. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1019–1034 (2019).10.1039/C8EE02849D ↗

22. Daioglou, V. et al. Greenhouse gas emission curves for advanced biofuel supply chains. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 920–924 (2017).10.1038/s41558-017-0006-8 ↗

23. Decarbonising Maritime Transport: Pathways to Zero-Carbon Shipping by 2035 (ITF, 2018); https://www.itf-oecd.org/decarbonising-maritime-transport-2035

24. Hansson, J., Månsson, S., Brynolf, S. & Grahn, M. Alternative marine fuels: prospects based on multi-criteria decision analysis involving Swedish stakeholders. Biomass Bioenergy 126, 159–173 (2019).10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.05.008 ↗

25. Gilbert, P. et al. Assessment of full life-cycle air emissions of alternative shipping fuels. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 855–866 (2018).10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.165 ↗

26. Winebrake, J. J., Corbett, J. J., Umar, F. & Yuska, D. Pollution tradeoffs for conventional and natural gas-based marine fuels. Sustainability 11, 2235 (2019).10.3390/su11082235 ↗

27. Energy Transition Outlook 2020: Maritime Forecast to 2050 (DNV, 2020); https://eto.dnv.com/2020/maritime

28. Techno-economic Assessment of Zero-Carbon Fuels (Lloyd’s Register and UMAS, 2020); https://www.lr.org/en/insights/global-marine-trends-2030/techno-economic-assessment-of-zero-carbon-fuels/

29. Energy Technology Perspectives 2020 (IEA, 2020); https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-perspectives-2020

30. Comparison of Alternative Marine Fuels Report no. 2019-0567, Rev. 3; document no. 11C8I1KZ-1 (DNV GL, 2019).

31. Van Hoecke, L. et al. Challenges in the use of hydrogen for maritime applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 815–843 (2021).10.1039/D0EE01545H ↗

32. Prussi, M., Scarlat, N., Acciaro, M. & Kosmas, V. Potential and limiting factors in the use of alternative fuels in the European maritime sector. J. Clean. Prod. 291, 125849 (2021).10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125849 ↗

33. Korberg, A. D., Brynolf, S., Grahn, M. & Skov, I. R. Techno-economic assessment of advanced fuels and propulsion systems in future fossil-free ships. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 142, 110861 (2021).10.1016/j.rser.2021.110861 ↗

34. Horvath, S., Fasihi, M. & Breyer, C. Techno-economic analysis of a decarbonized shipping sector: technology suggestions for a fleet in 2030 and 2040. Energy Convers. Manag. 164, 230–241 (2018).10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.098 ↗

35. Kim, K., Roh, G., Kim, W. & Chun, K. A preliminary study on an alternative ship propulsion system fueled by ammonia: environmental and economic assessments. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 8, 183 (2020).10.3390/jmse8030183 ↗

36. Mao, X., Rutherford, D., Osipova, L. & Comer, B. Refueling Assessment of a Zero-Emission Container Corridor between China and the United States: Could Hydrogen Replace Fossil Fuels? (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2020); https://theicct.org/publications/zero-emission-container-corridor-hydrogen-2020

37. Maritime Working Group Techno-economic Assessment of Low-Carbon Hydrogen Technologies for the Decarbonization of Shipping (Hydrogen Europe and Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH (LBST), in the press).

38. Brethomé, F. M., Williams, N. J., Seipp, C. A., Kidder, M. K. & Custelcean, R. Direct air capture of CO2 via aqueous-phase absorption and crystalline-phase release using concentrated solar power. Nat. Energy 3, 553–559 (2018).10.1038/s41560-018-0150-z ↗

39. Armstrong, R. C. et al. The frontiers of energy. Nat. Energy 1, 15020 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2015.20 ↗

40. Schmuch, R., Wagner, R., Hörpel, G., Placke, T. & Winter, M. Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 267–278 (2018).10.1038/s41560-018-0107-2 ↗

41. Net Zero by 2050—A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector (IEA, 2021); https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050

42. Roh, M.-I. & Lee, K.-Y. Computational Ship Design (Springer, 2018).10.1007/978-981-10-4885-2 ↗

43. CO2 Emission Report (EMSA/THETIS-MRV, 2021; accessed 15 May 2020); https://mrv.emsa.europa.eu/#public/emission-report

44. Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of 29 April 2015 on the Monitoring, Reporting and Verification of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Maritime Transport, and Amending Directive 2009/16/EC European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2015).

45. McGill, R., Remley, W. & Winther, K. Alternative Fuels for Marine Applications (IEA, 2013); https://www.iea-amf.org/app/webroot/files/file/AnnexReports/AMF_Annex_41.pdf

46. Setting the Course to Low Carbon Shipping: View of the Value Chain (American Bureau of Shipping, 2021); https://absinfo.eagle.org/acton/attachment/16130/f-c04f4eaf-a121-4560-9e15-5a56ee443f32/1/-/-/-/-/sustainability-outlook-iii-21055-web.pdf?utm_source=cision

47. Vestering, C. Which tanker fuels are best for profits and the environment? Maritime Impact (17 March 2021); https://www.dnv.com/expert-story/maritime-impact/Which-tanker-fuels-are-best-for-profits-and-the-environment.html

48. FleetMon. AIS and ship specification data from FleetMon.com, JAKOTA Cruise Systems GmbH, data provided on Dec 17, 2019 and Oct 19, 2020, Rostock, Germany, 2020; https://www.fleetmon.com/

49. Hjelle, H. M. The double load factor problem of Ro-Ro shipping. Marit. Policy Manag. 38, 235–249 (2011).10.1080/03088839.2011.572697 ↗

50. Jia, H., Prakash, V. & Smith, T. Estimating vessel payloads in bulk shipping using AIS data. Int. J. Shipping Transp. Logist. 11, 25–40 (2019).10.1504/IJSTL.2019.096864 ↗

51. Jalkanen, J.-P. et al. Extension of an assessment model of ship traffic exhaust emissions for particulate matter and carbon monoxide. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 2641–2659 (2012).10.5194/acp-12-2641-2012 ↗

52. Krantz, R., Søgaard, K. & Smith, T. Getting to Zero-Coalition: The scale of Investment Needed to Decarbonize International Shipping (UMAS and Energy Transitions Commission, 2020); www.globalmaritimeforum.org/content/2020/01/Getting-to-Zero-Coalition_Insight-brief_Scale-of-investment.pdf

53. Supply, Transformation and Consumption of Electricity: Electricity Available for Final Consumption (Eurostat, 2020); https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=nrg_cb_e&lang=en

54. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions: ‘Fit for 55’: delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the Way to Climate Neutrality (European Commission, 2021); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/

55. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Use of Renewable and Low-Carbon Fuels in Maritime Transport and amending Directive 2009/16/EC (European Commission, 2021); https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/fueleu_maritime_-_green_european_maritime_space.pdf

56. Johansson, L., Jalkanen, J.-P., Kalli, J. & Kukkonen, J. The evolution of shipping emissions and the costs of regulation changes in the northern EU area. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 11375–11389 (2013).10.5194/acp-13-11375-2013 ↗

57. Jalkanen, J.-P., Johansson, L. & Kukkonen, J. A comprehensive inventory of the ship traffic exhaust emissions in the Baltic Sea from 2006 to 2009. AMBIO 43, 311–324 (2014).10.1007/s13280-013-0389-3 ↗

58. World Port Index 27th edn, Pub 150 (US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, 2019); https://msi.nga.mil/Publications/WPI

59. Moreno-Gutiérrez, J. et al. Comparative analysis between different methods for calculating on-board ship’s emissions and energy consumption based on operational data. Sci. Total Environ. 650, 575–584 (2019).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.045 ↗

60. Goldsworthy, B. & Goldsworthy, L. Assigning machinery power values for estimating ship exhaust emissions: comparison of auxiliary power schemes. Sci. Total Environ. 657, 963–977 (2019).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.014 ↗

61. van Biert, L., Godjevac, M., Visser, K. & Aravind, P. V. A review of fuel cell systems for maritime applications. J. Power Sources 327, 345–364 (2016).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.007 ↗

62. Schimpe, M. et al. Energy efficiency evaluation of a stationary lithium-ion battery container storage system via electro-thermal modeling and detailed component analysis. Appl. Energy 210, 211–229 (2018).10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.129 ↗

63. César, P. P. et al. Evaluation of the CO2 emissions reduction potential of Li-ion batteries in ship power systems. Energies 12, 375 (2019).10.3390/en12030375 ↗

64. Mongird, K. et al. Energy Storage Technology and Cost Characterization Report (US Department of Energy, 2019); https://doi.org/10.2172/157348710.2172/1573487 ↗

65. Beuse, M., Steffen, B. & Schmidt, T. S. Projecting the competition between energy-storage technologies in the electricity sector. Joule 4, 2162–2184 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.017 ↗

66. Energy Storage: Tracking the Technologies that will Transform the Power Sector (Deloitte & Touche LLP, 2015); https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/no/Documents/energy-resources/energy-storage-tracking-technologies-transform-power-sector.pdf

67. Bielmann, M., Vogt, U. F., Zimmermann, M. & Züttel, A. Seasonal energy storage system based on hydrogen for self sufficient living. J. Power Sources 196, 4054–4060 (2011).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.096 ↗

68. Mestemaker, B. T. W, Gonçalves Castro, M. B., van der Blom, E. C., Cornege, H. J. & Visser, K. Zero emission vessels from a shipbuilders perspective. In 2nd International Conference on Smart & Green Technology for the Future of Marine Industries (SMATECH 2019) 52–61 (ASRANet, 2019). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334480164_Zero_emission_vessels_from_a_shipbuilders_perspective

69. Taccani, R., Malabotti, S., Dall’Armi, C. & Micheli, D. High energy density storage of gaseous marine fuels: an innovative concept and its application to a hydrogen powered ferry. Int. Shipbuild. Prog. 67, 33–56 (2020).10.3233/ISP-190274 ↗

70. Nuchturee, C., Li, T. & Xia, H. Energy efficiency of integrated electric propulsion for ships—a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 134, 110145 (2020).10.1016/j.rser.2020.110145 ↗

71. Klell, M. in Handbook of Hydrogen Storage (ed. Hirscher, M.) 1–37 (Wiley, 2010); https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527629800.ch110.1002/9783527629800.ch1 ↗

72. Battery Requirements for Future Automotive Applications (EUCAR, 2019); https://www.eucar.be/battery-requirements-for-future-automotive-applications/

73. Bloch, C., Newcomb, J., Shiledar, S. & Tyson, M. Breakthrough Batteries: Powering the Era of Clean Electrification (RMI, 2020); http://www.rmi.org/breakthrough-batteries

74. Placke, T., Kloepsch, R., Dühnen, S. & Winter, M. Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density. J. Solid State Electrochem. 21, 1939–1964 (2017).10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7 ↗

75. Ue, M., Sakaushi, K. & Uosaki, K. Basic knowledge in battery research bridging the gap between academia and industry. Mater. Horiz. 7, 1937–1954 (2020).10.1039/D0MH00067A ↗

76. Quinn, J. B., Waldmann, T., Richter, K., Kasper, M. & Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M. Energy density of cylindrical Li-ion cells: a comparison of commercial 18650 to the 21700 cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A3284–A3291 (2018).10.1149/2.0281814jes ↗

77. Liener, P. VW-backed battery maker QuantumScape to go public at $3.3 billion valuation. Reuters Business News 15 September 2020); https://www.reuters.com/article/us-quantumscape-m-a-kensington/vw-backed-u-s-battery-maker-quantumscape-to-go-public-at-3-3-billion-valuation-idUSKBN25U1JH

78. Prussi, M., Yugo, M., De Prada, L., Padella, M. & Edwards, R. JEC Well-To-Wheels Report v5 EUR 30284 EN (Publications Office of the European Union, 2020); https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/jec-well-wheels-report-v5

79. Das, L. On-board hydrogen storage systems for automotive application. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 21, 789–800 (1996).10.1016/0360-3199(96)00006-7 ↗

80. Lindstad, E. Alternative fuels versus traditional fuels in shipping. In 6th International Symposium on Ship Operations, Management and Economics (SNAME) 2018 (OnePetro, 2018. URL https://onepetro.org/SNAMESOME/proceedings-abstract/SOME18/All-SOME18/SNAME-SOME-2018-014/21299

81. Mendez, A., Leo, T. & Herreros, M. Current state of technology of fuel cell power systems for autonomous underwater vehicles. Energies 7, 4676–4693 (2014).10.3390/en7074676 ↗

82. Ustolin, F., Paltrinieri, N. & Berto, F. Loss of integrity of hydrogen technologies: a critical review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 23809–23840 (2020).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.021 ↗

83. Rivard, E., Trudeau, M. & Zaghib, K. Hydrogen storage for mobility: a review. Materials 12, 1973 (2019).10.3390/ma12121973 ↗

84. Kircher, O., Greim, G. & Brunner, T. Validation of cryo-compressed hydrogen storage (CCH2)—a probabilistic approach. In International Conference on Hydrogen Safety (HyodrogenTools, 2011); http://conference.ing.unipi.it/ichs2011/papers/258.pdf

85. Züttel, A., Remhof, A., Borgschulte, A. & Friedrichs, O. Hydrogen: the future energy carrier. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 3329–3342 (2010).10.1098/rsta.2010.0113 ↗

86. Takeichi, N. ‘Hybrid hydrogen storage vessel’, a novel high-pressure hydrogen storage vessel combined with hydrogen storage material. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 28, 1121–1129 (2003).

87. Nazir, H. et al. Is the H2 economy realizable in the foreseeable future? Part II: H2 storage, transportation, and distribution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 20693–20708 (2020).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.241 ↗

88. Hua, T. Q. et al. Technical assessment of compressed hydrogen storage tank systems for automotive applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36, 3037–3049 (2011).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.090 ↗

89. MARIN Sustainable Power (European Sustainable Shipping Forum, 2020; accessed 10 February 2020); https://sustainablepower.application.marin.nl/table

90. Norwegian Future Value Chains for Liquid Hydrogen (NCE Maritime CleanTech, 2016); https://maritimecleantech.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Report-liquid-hydrogen.pdf

91. Liu, X., Elgowainy, A. & Wang, M. Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ammonia production from renewable resources and industrial by-products. Green Chem. 22, 5751–5761 (2020).10.1039/D0GC02301A ↗

92. Beuttler, C., Charles, L. & Wurzbacher, J. The role of direct air capture in mitigation of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Front. Clim. 1, 10 (2019).10.3389/fclim.2019.00010 ↗

93. Lee, S. G., Choi, G. B. & Lee, J. M. Optimal design and operating conditions of the CO2 liquefaction process, considering variations in cooling water temperature. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 54, 12855–12866 (2015).10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02391 ↗

94. Pospíšil, J. Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 99, 1–15 (2019).10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.027 ↗

95. Assessment of Selected Alternative Fuels and Technologies (DNV GL, 2018); https://www.dnvgl.com/maritime/publications/alternative-fuel-assessment-download.html

96. Van-Dal, É. S. & Bouallou, C. Design and simulation of a methanol production plant from CO2 hydrogenation. J. Clean. Prod. 57, 38–45 (2013).10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.008 ↗

97. Ammonia: Zero-Carbon Fertiliser, Fuel and Energy Store (The Royal Society, 2020); https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/low-carbon-energy-programme/green-ammonia/

98. Geertsma, R. & Krijgsman, M. Alternative Fuels and Power Systems to Reduce Environmental Impact of Support Vessels (Delft University of Technology, 2019); https://doi.org/10.24868/issn.2515-8198.2019.00310.24868/issn.2515-8198.2019.003 ↗

99. Pavlenko, N., Comer, B., Zhou, Y., Clark, N. & Rutherford, D. The Climate Implications of Using LNG as a Marine Fuel Working Paper 2020-02 (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2020); https://theicct.org/publications/climate-impacts-LNG-marine-fuel-2020

100. Kofod, M. & Mundt, T. Well-to-wake greenhouse gas emissions from LNG in marine applications. MTZ Ind. 5, 62–71 (2015).10.1007/s40353-015-0524-7 ↗