Lithium anode interlayer design for all-solid-state lithium-metal batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Larcher, D. & Tarascon, J.-M. Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. Nat. Chem. 7, 19–29 (2015).10.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
2. Nunes, A., Woodley, L. & Rossetti, P. Re-thinking procurement incentives for electric vehicles to achieve net-zero emissions. Nat. Sustain. 5, 527–532 (2022).10.1038/s41893-022-00862-3 ↗
3. Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. A solid future for battery development. Nat. Energy 1, 16141 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
4. Famprikis, T., Canepa, P., Dawson, J. A., Islam, M. S. & Masquelier, C. Fundamentals of inorganic solid-state electrolytes for batteries. Nat. Mater. 18, 1278–1291 (2019).10.1038/s41563-019-0431-3 ↗
5. Bates, A. M. et al. Are solid-state batteries safer than lithium-ion batteries? Joule 6, 742–755 (2022).10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.007 ↗
6. He, X. et al. The passivity of lithium electrodes in liquid electrolytes for secondary batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 1036–1052 (2021).10.1038/s41578-021-00345-5 ↗
7. Monroe, C. & Newman, J. The impact of elastic deformation on deposition kinetics at lithium/polymer interfaces. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, A396 (2005).10.1149/1.1850854 ↗
8. Wang, Y., Dang, D., Wang, M., Xiao, X. & Cheng, Y. T. Mechanical behavior of electroplated mossy lithium at room temperature studied by flat punch indentation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 043903 (2019).10.1063/1.5111150 ↗
9. Cao, D. et al. Lithium dendrite in all-solid-state batteries: growth mechanisms, suppression strategies, and characterizations. Matter 3, 57–94 (2020).10.1016/j.matt.2020.03.015 ↗
10. Swamy, T. et al. Lithium metal penetration induced by electrodeposition through solid electrolytes: example in single-crystal Li6La3ZrTaO12 garnet. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, A3648–A3655 (2018).10.1149/2.1391814jes ↗
11. Liu, H. et al. Controlling dendrite growth in solid-state electrolytes. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 833–843 (2020).10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02660 ↗
12. Han, F. D. et al. High electronic conductivity as the origin of lithium dendrite formation within solid electrolytes. Nat. Energy 4, 187–196 (2019).10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z ↗
13. Liu, X. et al. Local electronic structure variation resulting in Li ‘filament’ formation within solid electrolytes. Nat. Mater. 20, 1485–1490 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-01019-x ↗
14. Raj, V. et al. Direct correlation between void formation and lithium dendrite growth in solid-state electrolytes with interlayers. Nat. Mater. 21, 1050–1056 (2022).10.1038/s41563-022-01264-8 ↗
15. Han, F. D., Zhu, Y., He, X., Mo, Y. & Wang, C. Electrochemical stability of Li10GeP2S12 and Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501590 (2016).10.1002/aenm.201501590 ↗
16. Wang, S. et al. Lithium chlorides and bromides as promising solid-state chemistries for fast ion conductors with good electrochemical stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 8039–8043 (2019).10.1002/anie.201901938 ↗
17. Shen, F., Dixit, M. B., Xiao, X. & Hatzell, K. B. Effect of pore connectivity on Li dendrite propagation within LLZO electrolytes observed with synchrotron X-ray tomography. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 1056–1061 (2018).10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00249 ↗
18. Venturi, V. & Viswanathan, V. Thermodynamic analysis of initial steps for void formation at lithium/solid electrolyte interphase interfaces. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 1953–1959 (2022).10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00550 ↗
19. Tsai, C.-L. et al. Li7La3Zr2O12 interface modification for li dendrite prevention. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 10617–10626 (2016).10.1021/acsami.6b00831 ↗
20. Han, X. et al. Negating interfacial impedance in garnet-based solid-state Li metal batteries. Nat. Mater. 16, 572–579 (2017).10.1038/nmat4821 ↗
21. Wang, C. et al. Universal soldering of lithium and sodium alloys on various substrates for batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1701963 (2018).10.1002/aenm.201701963 ↗
22. Tian, Y. et al. Li6.75La3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12@amorphous Li3OCl composite electrolyte for solid state lithium-metal batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 14, 49–57 (2018).10.1016/j.ensm.2018.02.015 ↗
23. You, Y. et al. Effect of charge non-uniformity on the lithium dendrites and improvement by the LiF interfacial layer. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 5, 15078–15085 (2022).10.1021/acsaem.2c02756 ↗
24. Ji, X. et al. Solid-state electrolyte design for lithium dendrite suppression. Adv. Mater. 32, 2002741 (2020).10.1002/adma.202002741 ↗
25. Wang, T. et al. A self-regulated gradient interphase for dendrite-free solid-state Li batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 1325–1333 (2022).10.1039/D1EE03604A ↗
26. Lee, Y.-G. et al. High-energy long-cycling all-solid-state lithium metal batteries enabled by silver–carbon composite anodes. Nat. Energy 5, 299–308 (2020).10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z ↗
27. Biswal, P., Stalin, S., Kludze, A., Choudhury, S. & Archer, L. A. Nucleation and early stage growth of Li electrodeposits. Nano Lett. 19, 8191–8200 (2019).10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03548 ↗
28. Jo, S. et al. The roles of nucleation and growth kinetics in determining Li metal morphology for Li metal batteries: columnar versus spherical growth. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 5520–5529 (2022).10.1039/D1TA09481E ↗
29. Dickinson, E. J. F. & Wain, A. J. The Butler–Volmer equation in electrochemical theory: origins, value, and practical application. J. Electroanal. Chem. 872, 114145 (2020).10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114145 ↗
30. Pei, A., Zheng, G., Shi, F., Li, Y. & Cui, Y. Nanoscale nucleation and growth of electrodeposited lithium metal. Nano Lett. 17, 1132–1139 (2017).10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04755 ↗
31. Suzuki, N. et al. Highly cyclable all-solid-state battery with deposition-type lithium metal anode based on thin carbon black layer. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 11, 2100066 (2021).
32. Kim, S. et al. High-power hybrid solid-state lithium–metal batteries enabled by preferred directional lithium growth mechanism. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 9–20 (2023).10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02150 ↗
33. Wang, C. et al. Identifying soft breakdown in all-solid-state lithium battery. Joule 6, 1770–1781 (2022).10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.020 ↗
34. Rebelo, S. L. H. et al. Progress in the Raman spectra analysis of covalently functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes: unraveling disorder in graphitic materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 12784–12796 (2016).10.1039/C5CP06519D ↗
35. Guan, X. et al. Controlling nucleation in lithium metal anodes. Small 14, 1801423 (2018).10.1002/smll.201801423 ↗
36. Huang, C. J. et al. Decoupling the origins of irreversible coulombic efficiency in anode-free lithium metal batteries. Nat. Commun. 12, 1452 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-21683-6 ↗
37. Krauskopf, T., Mogwitz, B., Rosenbach, C., Zeier, W. G. & Janek, J. Diffusion limitation of lithium metal and Li–Mg alloy anodes on LLZO-type solid electrolytes as a function of temperature and pressure. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1902568 (2019).10.1002/aenm.201902568 ↗
38. Obayashi, H., Gotoh, A. & Nagai, R. Composition dependence of lithium ionic conductivity in lithium nitride-lithium iodide system. Mat. Res. Bull. 16, 581–585 (1981).10.1016/0025-5408(81)90124-0 ↗
39. Lu, X. et al. Liquid–metal electrode to enable ultra-low temperature sodium–beta alumina batteries for renewable energy storage. Nat. Commun. 5, 4578 (2014).10.1038/ncomms5578 ↗
40. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 54, 11169 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
41. Perdew, J. P., Ernzerhof, M. & Burke, K. Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9982–9985 (1996).10.1063/1.472933 ↗
42. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
43. Nose, S. Constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 103, 1–46 (1991).10.1143/PTPS.103.1 ↗
44. Blatov, V. A., Shevchenko, A. P. & Proserpio, D. M. Applied topological analysis of crystal structures with the program package ToposPro. Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 3576–3586 (2014).10.1021/cg500498k ↗
45. Meng, D., Zheng, B., Lin, G. & Sushko, M. L. Numerical solution of 3D Poisson–Nernst–Planck equations coupled with classical density functional theory for modeling ion and electron transport in a confined environment. Commun. Comput. Phys. 16, 1298–1322 (2014).10.4208/cicp.040913.120514a ↗
46. Wang, H., Thiele, A. & Pilon, L. Simulations of cyclic voltammetry for electric double layers in asymmetric electrolytes: a generalized modified Poisson–Nernst–Planck model. J. Phys. Chem. C. 117, 18286–18297 (2013).10.1021/jp402181e ↗
47. Sommer, J. L. & Mortensen, A. Forced unidirectional infiltration of deformable porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 31, 193–217 (1996).10.1017/S002211209600256X ↗
48. Brinkman, H. C. A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles. Flow Turbul. Combust. 1, 27–34 (1949).10.1007/BF02120313 ↗
49. Chen, L. et al. Modulation of dendritic patterns during electrodeposition: a nonlinear phase-field model. J. Power Sources 300, 376–385 (2015).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.055 ↗