High-concentration silver alloying and steep back-contact gallium grading enabling copper indium gallium selenide solar cell with 23.6% efficiency
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Chalcopyrite-based solar cells have reached an efficiency of 23.35%, yet further improvements have been challenging. Here we present a 23.64% certified efficiency for a (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2solar cell, achieved through the implementation of a series of strategies. We introduce a relatively high amount of silver ([Ag]/([Ag] + [Cu]) = 0.19) into the absorber and implement a ‘hockey stick’-like gallium profile with a high concentration of Ga close to the molybdenum back contact and a lower, constant concentration in the region closer to the CdS buffer layer. This kind of elemental profile minimizes lateral and in-depth bandgap fluctuations, reducing losses in open-circuit voltage. In addition, the resulting bandgap energy is close to the local optimum of 1.15 eV. We apply a RbF post-deposition treatment that leads to the formation of a Rb–In–Se phase, probably RbInSe2, passivating the absorber surface. Finally, we discuss future research directions to reach 25% efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Chirila, A. et al. Potassium-induced surface modification of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films for high-efficiency solar cells. Nat. Mater. 12, 1107–1111 (2013).10.1038/nmat3789 ↗
2. Nakamura, M. et al. Cd-free Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2 thin-film solar cell with record efficiency of 23.35%. IEEE J. Photovolt. 9, 1863–1867 (2019).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2937218 ↗
3. Jackson, P. et al. Effects of heavy alkali elements in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 22.6%. Phys. Status Solidi RRL 586, 583–586 (2016).10.1002/pssr.201600199 ↗
4. Kato, T., Wu, J., Hirai, Y., Sugimoto, H. & Bermudez, V. Record efficiency for thin-film polycrystalline solar cells up to 22.9% achieved by Cs-treated Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2. IEEE J. Photovolt. 9, 325–330 (2019).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2882206 ↗
5. Hanket, G. M., Boyle, J. H. & Shafarman, W. N. Characterization and device performance of (AgCu)(InGa)Se2 absorber layers. In 34th IEEE Photovolt. Spec. Conf. 001240–001245 (IEEE, 2009).10.1109/PVSC.2009.5411241 ↗
6. Soltanmohammad, S., Tong, H. M., Anderson, T. J. & Shafarman, W. N. Reaction rate enhancement for Cu(In,Ga)Se2 absorber materials using Ag-alloying. IEEE J. Photovolt. 9, 898–905 (2019).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2897582 ↗
7. Chen, L., Lee, J. & Shafarman, W. N. The comparison of (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 and Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films deposited by three-stage coevaporation. IEEE J. Photovolt. 4, 447–451 (2014).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2280471 ↗
8. Kim, G. et al. Thin Ag precursor layer-assisted co-evaporation process for low-temperature growth of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 31923–31933 (2019).10.1021/acsami.9b09253 ↗
9. Erslev, P. T., Lee, J., Hanket, G. M., Shafarman, W. N. & Cohen, J. D. The electronic structure of Cu(In1-xGax)Se2 alloyed with silver. Thin Solid Films 519, 7296–7299 (2011).10.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.368 ↗
10. Keller, J. et al. Wide-gap (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with different buffer materials—a path to a better heterojunction. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 28, 237–250 (2020).10.1002/pip.3232 ↗
11. Chen, S., Gong, X. G. & Wei, S. H. Band-structure anomalies of the chalcopyrite semiconductors CuGaX2 versus AgGaX2 (X=S and Se) and their alloys. Phys. Rev. B 75, 205209 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.75.205209 ↗
12. Huang, D. et al. General rules of the sub-band gaps in group-IV (Si, Ge, and Sn)-doped I-III-VI2-type chalcopyrite compounds for intermediate band solar cell: a first-principles study. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 236–237, 147–152 (2018).10.1016/j.mseb.2018.11.006 ↗
13. Sugimoto, H., Tomita, H., Yamaguchi, K., Hirai, Y. & Kato, T. High-performance near-stoichiometric Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells by sub-percent Ag-doping. In 29th PVSEC Conference 723–726 (PVSEC, 2019).
14. Green, M. A. Do built-in fields improve solar cell performance? Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 17, 57–66 (2009).10.1002/pip.851 ↗
15. Kobayashi, T. et al. Impacts of surface sulfurization on Cu(In1-x,Gax)Se2 thin-film solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 23, 1367–1374 (2015).10.1002/pip.2554 ↗
16. Avancini, E. et al. Impact of compositional grading and overall Cu deficiency on the near-infrared response in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 25, 233–241 (2017).10.1002/pip.2850 ↗
17. Reinhard, P. et al. Flexible Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with reduced absorber thickness. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 23, 281–289 (2015).10.1002/pip.2420 ↗
18. Gong, J. et al. Enhancing photocurrent of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with actively controlled Ga grading in the absorber layer. Nano Energy 62, 205–211 (2019).10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.05.052 ↗
19. Friedlmeier, T. M. et al. Improved photocurrent in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells: from 20.8% to 21.7% efficiency with CdS buffer and 21.0% Cd-free. IEEE J. Photovolt. 5, 1487–1491 (2015).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2458039 ↗
20. Chirilǎ, A. et al. Highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells grown on flexible polymer films. Nat. Mater. 10, 857–861 (2011).10.1038/nmat3122 ↗
21. Werner, J. H., Mattheis, J. & Rau, U. Efficiency limitations of polycrystalline thin film solar cells: case of Cu(In,Ga)Se2. Thin Solid Films 480–481, 399–409 (2005).10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.052 ↗
22. Krause, M. et al. Microscopic origins of performance losses in highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells. Nat. Commun. 11, 4189 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-17507-8 ↗
23. Carron, R. et al. Heat–light soaking treatments for high-performance CIGS solar cells on flexible substrates. Preprint at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2116168/v1 (2022).10.21203/rs.3.rs-2116168/v1 ↗
24. Khatri, I., Shudo, K., Matsuura, J., Sugiyama, M. & Nakada, T. Impact of heat–light soaking on potassium fluoride treated CIGS solar cells with CdS buffer layer. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 26, 171–178 (2018).10.1002/pip.2962 ↗
25. Scheer, R. Activation energy of heterojunction diode currents in the limit of interface recombination. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 104505 (2009).10.1063/1.3126523 ↗
26. Nadenau, V., Rau, U., Jasenek, A. & Schock, H. W. Electronic properties of CuGaSe2-based heterojunction solar cells. Part I. Transport. Anal. J. Appl. Phys. 87, 584–593 (2000).10.1063/1.371903 ↗
27. Keller, J., Lindahl, J., Edoff, M., Stolt, L. & Törndahl, T. Potential gain in photocurrent generation for Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells by using In2O3 as a transparent conductive oxide layer. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 24, 102–107 (2016).10.1002/pip.2655 ↗
28. Keller, J., Stolt, L., Edoff, M. & Törndahl, T. Atomic layer deposition of In2O3 transparent conductive oxide layers for application in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with different buffer layers. Phys. Status Solidi A 213, 1541–152 (2016).10.1002/pssa.201532883 ↗
29. Chantana, J., Kawano, Y., Nishimura, T., Mavlonov, A. & Minemoto, T. Impact of Urbach energy on open-circuit voltage deficit of thin-film solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 210, 110502 (2020).10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110502 ↗
30. Carron, R. et al. Advanced alkali treatments for high‐efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells on flexible substrates. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1900408 (2019).10.1002/aenm.201900408 ↗
31. Siebentritt, S. et al. Heavy alkali treatment of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells: surface versus bulk effects. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903752 (2020).10.1002/aenm.201903752 ↗
32. Ugur, E. et al. Life on the Urbach edge. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 7702–7711 (2022).10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01812 ↗
33. Shockley, W. & Queisser, H. J. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p–n junction solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 510–519 (1961).10.1063/1.1736034 ↗
34. Siebentritt, S. et al. How photoluminescence can predict the efficiency of solar cells. J. Phys. Mater. 4, 042010 (2021).10.1088/2515-7639/ac266e ↗
35. Siebentritt, S. et al. Photoluminescence assessment of materials for solar cell absorbers. Faraday Discuss. 239, 112–129 (2022).10.1039/D2FD00057A ↗
36. Green, M. A. & Ho-Baillie, A. W. Y. Pushing to the limit: radiative efficiencies of recent mainstream and emerging solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 1639–1644 (2019).10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01128 ↗
37. Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 61). Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 31, 3–16 (2023).10.1002/pip.3646 ↗
38. Schöppe, P. et al. Overall distribution of rubidium in highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 40592–40598 (2018).10.1021/acsami.8b16040 ↗
39. Schöppe, P. et al. Revealing the origin of the beneficial effect of cesium in highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Nano Energy 71, 104622 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104622 ↗
40. Schöppe, P. et al. Rubidium segregation at random grain boundaries in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 absorbers. Nano Energy 42, 307–313 (2017).10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.063 ↗
41. Siebentritt, S. & Weiss, T. P. Chalcopyrite solar cells—state-of-the-art and options for improvement. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 217301 (2023).10.1007/s11433-022-2001-4 ↗
42. Reinhard, P. et al. Alkali-templated surface nanopatterning of chalcogenide thin films: a novel approach toward solar cells with enhanced efficiency. Nano Lett. 15, 3334–3340 (2015).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00584 ↗
43. Keller, J. et al. Effect of KF absorber treatment on the functionality of different transparent conductive oxide layers in CIGSe solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 26, 13–23 (2018).10.1002/pip.2925 ↗
44. Larsson, F., Donzel-Gargand, O., Keller, J., Edoff, M. & Törndahl, T. Atomic layer deposition of Zn(O,S) buffer layers for Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with KF post-deposition treatment. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 183, 8–15 (2018).10.1016/j.solmat.2018.03.045 ↗
45. Sopiha, K. V. et al. Thermodynamic stability, phase separation and Ag grading in (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 solar absorbers. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 8740–8751 (2020).10.1039/D0TA00363H ↗
46. Pianezzi, F. et al. Unveiling the effects of post-deposition treatment with different alkaline elements on the electronic properties of CIGS thin film solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 8843–8851 (2014).10.1039/c4cp00614c ↗
47. Raghuwanshi, M. et al. Influence of RbF post deposition treatment on heterojunction and grain boundaries in high efficient (21.1%) Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Nano Energy 60, 103–110 (2019).10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.028 ↗
48. Vilalta-Clemente, A. et al. Rubidium distribution at atomic scale in high efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 103105 (2018).10.1063/1.5020805 ↗
49. Keller, J., Aboulfadl, H., Stolt, L., Donzel-Gargand, O. & Edoff, M. Rubidium fluoride absorber treatment for wide‐gap (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Sol. RRL 6, 2200044 (2022).10.1002/solr.202200044 ↗
50. Keller, J. et al. On the paramount role of absorber stoichiometry in (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 wide-gap solar cells. Sol. RRL 4, 2000508 (2020).10.1002/solr.202000508 ↗
51. Taguchi, N., Tanaka, S. & Ishizuka, S. Direct insights into RbInSe2 formation at Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film surface with RbF postdeposition treatment. Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 113903 (2018).10.1063/1.5044244 ↗
52. Huang, F. Q., Deng, B., Ellis, D. E. & Ibers, J. A. Preparation, structures, and band gaps of RbInS2 and RbInSe2. J. Solid State Chem. 178, 2128–2132 (2005).10.1016/j.jssc.2005.04.007 ↗
53. Weinberger, N. et al. Phase development in RbInSe2 thin films—a temperature series. Scr. Mater. 202, 113999 (2021).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.113999 ↗
54. Kodalle, T. et al. Properties of co-evaporated RbInSe2 thin films. Phys. Status Solidi RRL 13, 1800564 (2019).10.1002/pssr.201800564 ↗
55. Koprek, A. et al. Effect of Cd diffusion on the electrical properties of the Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cell. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 224, 110989 (2021).10.1016/j.solmat.2021.110989 ↗
56. Nakada, T. & Kunioka, A. Direct evidence of Cd diffusion into Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films during chemical-bath deposition process of CdS films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2444–2446 (1999).10.1063/1.123875 ↗
57. Migliorato, P., Shay, J. L., Kasper, H. M. & Wagner, S. Analysis of the electrical and luminescent properties of CuInSe2. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 1777–1782 (1975).10.1063/1.321782 ↗
58. Ramanathan, K. et al. Advances in the CIS research at NREL. In 26th IEEE Photovolt. Spec. Conf. 319–322 (IEEE, 1997).10.1109/PVSC.1997.654092 ↗
59. Keller, J. et al. Grain boundary investigations on sulfurized Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 solar cells using atom probe tomography. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 117, 592–598 (2013).10.1016/j.solmat.2013.07.034 ↗
60. Aboulfadl, H. et al. Alkali dispersion in (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 thin film solar cells—insight from theory and experiment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 7188–7199 (2021).10.1021/acsami.0c20539 ↗
61. Raghuwanshi, M., Wuerz, R. & Cojocaru-Mirédin, O. Interconnection between trait, structure, and composition of grain boundaries in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2001046 (2020).10.1002/adfm.202001046 ↗
62. Nicoara, N. et al. Direct evidence for grain boundary passivation in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells through alkali-fluoride post-deposition treatments. Nat. Commun. 10, 3980 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-11996-y ↗
63. Abou-Ras, D. et al. Formation and characterisation of MoSe2 for Cu(In,Ga)Se2 based solar cells. Thin Solid Films 480–481, 433–438 (2005).10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.098 ↗
64. Edoff, M. et al. High VOC in (Cu,Ag)(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. IEEE J. Photovolt. 7, 1789–1794 (2017).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2756058 ↗
65. Johansson, U. et al. NanoMAX: the hard X-ray nanoprobe beamline at the MAX IV Laboratory. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 28, 1935–1947 (2021).10.1107/S1600577521008213 ↗
66. Solé, V. A., Papillon, E., Cotte, M., Walter, P. & Susini, J. A multiplatform code for the analysis of energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectra. Spectrochim. Acta Part B 62, 63–68 (2007).10.1016/j.sab.2006.12.002 ↗