Direct seawater electrolysis by adjusting the local reaction environment of a catalyst
Source abstract
Abstract
The use of vast amounts of high-purity water for hydrogen production may aggravate the shortage of freshwater resources. Seawater is abundant but must be desalinated before use in typical proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers. Here we report direct electrolysis of real seawater that has not been alkalised nor acidified, achieving long-term stability exceeding 100 h at 500 mA cm‾² and similar performance to a typical PEM electrolyser operating in high-purity water. This is achieved by introducing a Lewis acid layer (for example, Cr₂O₃) on transition metal oxide catalysts to dynamically split water molecules and capture hydroxyl anions. Such in situ generated local alkalinity facilitates the kinetics of both electrode reactions and avoids chloride attack and precipitate formation on the electrodes. A flow-type natural seawater electrolyser with Lewis acid-modified electrodes (Cr₂O₃–CoO₊) exhibits the industrially required current density of 1.0 A cm‾² at 1.87 V and 60 °C. ; Jiaxin Guo, Yao Zheng, Zhenpeng Hu, Caiyan Zheng, Jing Mao, Kun Du, Mietek Jaroniec, Shi-Zhang Qiao, Tao Ling
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Turner, J. Sustainable hydrogen production. Science 305, 972–974 (2004).10.1126/science.1103197 ↗
2. Rashid, M. R., Al Mesfer, M. K., Naseem, H. & Mohd, D. Hydrogen production by water electrolysis: a review of alkaline water electrolysis, PEM water electrolysis and high temperature water electrolysis. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 4, 2249–8958 (2015).
3. Stiber, S. et al. A high-performance, durable and low-cost proton exchange membrane electrolyser with stainless steel components. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 109–122 (2022).10.1039/D1EE02112E ↗
4. Kuang, Y. et al. Solar-driven, highly sustained splitting of seawater into hydrogen and oxygen fuels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6624–6629 (2019).10.1073/pnas.1900556116 ↗
5. Tong, W. et al. Electrolysis of low-grade and saline surface water. Nat. Energy 5, 367–377 (2020).10.1038/s41560-020-0550-8 ↗
6. Dionigi, F., Reier, T., Pawolek, Z., Gliech, M. & Strasser, P. Design criteria, operating conditions, and nickel–iron hydroxide catalyst materials for selective seawater electrolysis. ChemSusChem 9, 962–972 (2016).10.1002/cssc.201501581 ↗
7. Dresp, S. et al. Molecular understanding of the impact of saline contaminants and alkaline pH on NiFe layered double hydroxide oxygen evolution catalysts. ACS Catal. 11, 6800–6809 (2021).10.1021/acscatal.1c00773 ↗
8. Hausmann, J. N., Schlӧgl, R., Menezes, P. W. & Driess, M. Is direct seawater splitting economically meaningful? Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 3679–3685 (2021).10.1039/D0EE03659E ↗
9. Khan, M. A. et al. Seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production: a solution looking for a problem? Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 4831–4839 (2021).10.1039/D1EE00870F ↗
10. Dresp, S., Dionigi, F., Klingenhof, M. & Strasser, P. Direct electrolytic splitting of seawater: opportunities and challenges. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 933–942 (2019).10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00220 ↗
11. Kana, M. W. & Nocera, D. G. In situ formation of an oxygen-evolving catalyst in neutral water containing phosphate and Co2+. Science 321, 1072–1075 (2008).10.1126/science.1162018 ↗
12. Anantharaj, S. & Aravindan, V. Developments and perspectives in 3D transition‐metal‐based electrocatalysts for neutral and near‐neutral water electrolysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1902666 (2020).10.1002/aenm.201902666 ↗
13. Kapp, E. M. The precipitation of calcium and magnesium from seawater by sodium hydroxide. Biol. Bull. 55, 453–458 (1928).10.2307/1536800 ↗
14. Kirk, D. W. & Ledas, A. E. Precipitate formation during sea water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 7, 925–932 (1982).10.1016/0360-3199(82)90160-4 ↗
15. Li, P., Jin, Z. & Xiao, D. A one-step synthesis of Co–P–B/rGO at room temperature with synergistically enhanced electrocatalytic activity in neutral solution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 18420–18427 (2014).10.1039/C4TA03962A ↗
16. Hsu, S. H. et al. An earth-abundant catalyst-based seawater photoelectrolysis system with 17.9% solar-to-hydrogen efficiency. Adv. Mater. 30, 1707261 (2018).10.1002/adma.201707261 ↗
17. Yu, L. et al. Hydrogen generation from seawater electrolysis over a sandwich-like NiCoN|NixP|NiCoN micro-sheet array catalyst. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 2681–2689 (2020).10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01244 ↗
18. Lu, X. et al. A sea-change: manganese doped nickel/nickel oxide electrocatalysts for hydrogen generation from seawater. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1898–1910 (2018).10.1039/C8EE00976G ↗
19. Yu, L. et al. Ultrafast room-temperature synthesis of porous S-doped Ni/Fe (oxy)hydroxide electrodes for oxygen evolution catalysis in seawater splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 3439–3446 (2020).10.1039/D0EE00921K ↗
20. Wu, L. et al. Heterogeneous bimetallic phosphide Ni2P–Fe2P as an efficient bifunctional catalyst for water/seawater splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2006484 (2021).10.1002/adfm.202006484 ↗
21. Gao, X. et al. Karst landform-featured monolithic electrode for water electrolysis in neutral media. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 174–182 (2020).10.1039/C9EE02380A ↗
22. Zhao, Y. et al. Charge state manipulation of cobalt selenide catalyst for overall seawater electrolysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1801926 (2018).10.1002/aenm.201801926 ↗
23. Park, J. E. et al. High-performance proton-exchange membrane water electrolysis using a sulfonated poly (arylene ether sulfone) membrane and ionomer. J. Membr. Sci. 620, 118871 (2021).10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118871 ↗
24. Lindquist, G. A., Xu, Q., Oener, S. Z. & Boettcher, S. W. Membrane electrolyzers for impure-water splitting. Joule 4, 2549–2561 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.020 ↗
25. Surendranath, Y., Matthew, W. & Daniel, G. Mechanistic studies of the oxygen evolution reaction by a cobalt–phosphate catalyst at neutral pH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 16501–16509 (2010).10.1021/ja106102b ↗
26. Pearson, R. G. Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB, part 1: fundamental principles. J. Chem. Educ. 45, 581–587 (1968).10.1021/ed045p581 ↗
27. Magaz, G. E., Rodenas, L. G., Morando, P. J. & Blesa, M. A. Electrokinetic behaviour and interaction with oxalic acid of different hydrous chromium(III) oxides. Croat. Chem. Acta 71, 917–927 (1998).
28. Yu, L. et al. Non-noble metal-nitride based electrocatalysts for high-performance alkaline seawater electrolysis. Nat. Commun. 10, 5106 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-13092-7 ↗
29. Li, Y. et al. Sandwich structured Ni3S2–MoS2–Ni3S2@Ni foam electrode as a stable bifunctional electrocatalyst for highly sustained overall seawater splitting. Electrochim. Acta 390, 138833 (2021).10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138833 ↗
30. Wang, C. et al. Heterogeneous bimetallic sulfides based seawater electrolysis towards stable industrial-level large current density. Appl. Catal. B 291, 120071–120079 (2021).10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120071 ↗
31. Rodríguez, R., Blesa, M. A. & Regazzonil, A. E. Surface complexation at the TiO2(anatase)/aqueous solution interface: chemisorption of catechol. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 177, 121–131 (1996).10.1006/jcis.1996.0012 ↗
32. Yokoyama, Y. et al. In situ local pH measurements with hydrated iridium oxide ring electrodes in neutral pH aqueous solutions. Chem. Lett. 49, 195–198 (2020).10.1246/cl.190856 ↗
33. Bard, A. J. & Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications (Wiley, 2001).
34. Kunimatsu, K., Yoda, T., Tryk, D. A., Uchida, H. & Watanabe, M. In situ ATR-FTIR study of oxygen reduction at the Pt/Nafion interface. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 621–629 (2010).10.1039/B917306D ↗
35. Zhu, S., Qin, X., Yao, Y. & Shao, M. pH-Dependent hydrogen and water binding energies on platinum surfaces as directly probed through surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 8748–8754 (2020).10.1021/jacs.0c01104 ↗
36. Deng, W. et al. Crucial role of surface hydroxyls on the activity and stability in electrochemical CO2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 2911–2915 (2019).10.1021/jacs.8b13786 ↗
37. Kitano, S. et al. Heterointerface created on Au cluster‐loaded unilamellar hydroxide electrocatalysts as a highly active site for the oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Mater. 37, 2110552 (2022).10.1002/adma.202110552 ↗
38. Yang, X. et al. Understanding the pH dependence of underpotential deposited hydrogen on platinum. Angew. Chem. 131, 17882–17887 (2019).10.1002/ange.201909697 ↗
39. Ackermann, T. Hydration of H+ and OH– ions in water from heat capacity measurements. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 24, 180–193 (1957).10.1039/df9572400180 ↗
40. Wang, X., Xu, C., Jaroniec, M., Zheng, Y. & Qiao, S. Z. Anomalous hydrogen evolution behavior in high-pH environment induced by locally generated hydronium ions. Nat. Commun. 10, 4876 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-12773-7 ↗
41. Yan, L. et al. Electronic modulation of cobalt phosphide nanosheet arrays via copper doping for highly efficient neutral-pH overall water splitting. Appl. Catal. B 265, 118555–118566 (2020).10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118555 ↗
42. Liu, L. et al. The rational design of Cu2−xSe@(Co, Cu)Se2 core–shell structures as bifunctional electrocatalysts for neutral-pH overall water splitting. Nanoscale 13, 1134–1143 (2021).10.1039/D0NR07897B ↗
43. Ling, T. et al. Activating cobalt(II) oxide nanorods for efficient electrocatalysis by strain engineering. Nat. Commun. 8, 1509 (2017).10.1038/s41467-017-01872-y ↗
44. Ling, T. et al. Atomic-level structure engineering of metal oxides for high-rate oxygen intercalation pseudocapacitance. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau6261 (2018).10.1126/sciadv.aau6261 ↗
45. Kim, B. et al. Vertical-crystalline Fe-doped β-Ni oxyhydroxides for highly active and stable oxygen evolution reaction. Matter 4, 3585–3604 (2021).10.1016/j.matt.2021.09.003 ↗
46. Kuai, C. et al. Phase segregation reversibility in mixed-metal hydroxide water oxidation catalysts. Nat. Catal. 4, 743–753 (2020).10.1038/s41929-020-0496-z ↗
47. Zheng, X. et al. Theory-driven design of high-valence metal sites for water oxidation confirmed using in situ soft X-ray absorption. Nat. Chem. 10, 149–154 (2017).10.1038/nchem.2886 ↗
48. Yamanaka, K. Anodically electrodeposited iridium oxide films from alkaline solutions for electrochromic display devices. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 632–637 (1989).10.1143/JJAP.28.632 ↗
49. Steegstra, P. & Ahlberg, E. In situ pH measurements with hydrous iridium oxide in a rotating ring disc configuration. J. Electroanal. Chem. 685, 1–7 (2012).10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.07.040 ↗
50. Albery, W. J. & Calvo, E. J. Ring–disc electrodes. Part 21.—pH measurement with the ring. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 79, 2583–2596 (1983).10.1039/f19837902583 ↗
51. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
52. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
53. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
54. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
55. Dudarev, S. L. et al. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505–1509 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505 ↗
56. Li, A. et al. Enhancing the stability of cobalt spinel oxide towards sustainable oxygen evolution in acid. Nat. Catal. 5, 109–118 (2022).10.1038/s41929-021-00732-9 ↗
57. Chan, K. & Nørskov, J. K. Electrochemical barriers made simple. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2663–2668 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01043 ↗
58. Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).10.1063/1.1329672 ↗