journal article·2020-08-10Open access

Molecular engineering of dispersed nickel phthalocyanines on carbon nanotubes for selective CO2 reduction

Xiao Zhang, Yang Wang, Meng Gu, Maoyu Wang, Zisheng Zhang, Weiying Pan, Zhan Jiang, Hongzhi Zheng, Marcos Lucero, Hailiang Wang, George E. Sterbinsky, Qing Ma, Yang-Gang Wang, Zhenxing Feng, Jun Li, Hongjie Dai, Yongye Liang

Nature Energy· Volume 5· Issue 9

Abstract

Electrochemical reduction of CO2 is a promising route for sustainable production of fuels. A grand challenge is developing low-cost and efficient electrocatalysts that can enable rapid conversion with high product selectivity. Here we design a series of nickel phthalocyanine molecules supported on carbon nanotubes as molecularly dispersed electrocatalysts (MDEs), achieving CO2 reduction performances that are superior to aggregated molecular catalysts in terms of stability, activity and selectivity. The optimized MDE with methoxy group functionalization solves the stability issue of the original nickel phthalocyanine catalyst and catalyses the conversion of CO2 to CO with >99.5% selectivity at high current densities of up to −300 mA cm−2 in a gas diffusion electrode device with stable operation at −150 mA cm−2 for 40 h. The well-defined active sites of MDEs also facilitate the in-depth mechanistic understandings from in situ/operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy and theoretical calculations on structural factors that affect electrocatalytic performance. Widespread deployment of electrochemical CO2 reduction requires low-cost catalysts that perform well at high current densities. Zhang et al. show that methoxy-functionalized nickel phthalocyanine molecules on carbon nanotubes can operate as high-performing molecularly dispersed electrocatalysts at current densities of up to −300 mA cm–2.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Ionic liquids properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. Lewis, N. S. & Nocera, D. G. Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15729–15735 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0603395103 ↗
2. Davis, S. J., Caldeira, K. & Matthews, H. D. Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure. Science 329, 1330–1333 (2010).10.1126/science.1188566 ↗
3. Artero, V. & Fontecave, M. Solar fuels generation and molecular systems: is it homogeneous or heterogeneous catalysis? Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 2338–2356 (2013).10.1039/C2CS35334B ↗
4. Seh, Z. W. et al. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: insights into materials design. Science 355, eaad4998 (2017).10.1126/science.aad4998 ↗
5. Gao, S. et al. Partially oxidized atomic cobalt layers for carbon dioxide electroreduction to liquid fuel. Nature 529, 68–71 (2016).
6. Dinh, C.-T. et al. CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360, 783–787 (2018).10.1126/science.aas9100 ↗
7. Fei, H. et al. General synthesis and definitive structural identification of MN4C4 single-atom catalysts with tunable electrocatalytic activities. Nat. Catal. 1, 63–72 (2018).10.1038/s41929-017-0008-y ↗
8. Kortlever, R., Shen, J., Schouten, K. J. P., Calle-Vallejo, F. & Koper, M. T. M. Catalysts and reaction pathways for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4073–4082 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01559 ↗
9. Zheng, T., Jiang, K. & Wang, H. Recent advances in electrochemical CO2-to-CO conversion on heterogeneous catalysts. Adv. Mater. 30, 1802066 (2018).10.1002/adma.201802066 ↗
10. De Luna, P. et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364, eaav3506 (2019).10.1126/science.aav3506 ↗
11. Jiao, F. et al. Selective conversion of syngas to light olefins. Science 351, 1065–1068 (2016).10.1126/science.aaf1835 ↗
12. Chen, Y., Li, C. W. & Kanan, M. W. Aqueous CO2 reduction at very low overpotential on oxide-derived Au nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 19969–19972 (2012).10.1021/ja309317u ↗
13. Liu, M. et al. Enhanced electrocatalytic CO2 reduction via field-induced reagent concentration. Nature 537, 382–386 (2016).10.1038/nature19060 ↗
14. Dinh, C.-T., García de Arquer, F. P., Sinton, D. & Sargent, E. H. High rate, selective, and stable electroreduction of CO2 to CO in basic and neutral media. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 2835–2840 (2018).10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01734 ↗
15. Verma, S. et al. Insights into the low overpotential electroreduction of CO2 to CO on a supported gold catalyst in an alkaline flow electrolyzer. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 193–198 (2018).10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01096 ↗
16. Jhong, H.-R. M., Ma, S. & Kenis, P. J. A. Electrochemical conversion of CO2 to useful chemicals: current status, remaining challenges, and future opportunities. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2, 191–199 (2013).10.1016/j.coche.2013.03.005 ↗
17. Zhao, C. et al. Ionic exchange of metal–organic frameworks to access single nickel sites for efficient electroreduction of CO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8078–8081 (2017).10.1021/jacs.7b02736 ↗
18. Ju, W. et al. Understanding activity and selectivity of metal-nitrogen-doped carbon catalysts for electrochemical reduction of CO2. Nat. Commun. 8, 944 (2017).
19. Lieber, C. M. & Lewis, N. S. Catalytic reduction of carbon dioxide at carbon electrodes modified with cobalt phthalocyanine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 5033–5034 (1984).10.1021/ja00329a082 ↗
20. Costentin, C., Drouet, S., Robert, M. & Savéant, J.-M. A local proton source enhances CO2 electroreduction to CO by a molecular Fe catalyst. Science 338, 90–94 (2012).10.1126/science.1224581 ↗
21. Lin, S. et al. Covalent organic frameworks comprising cobalt porphyrins for catalytic CO2 reduction in water. Science 349, 1208–1213 (2015).10.1126/science.aac8343 ↗
22. Zhang, X. et al. Highly selective and active CO2 reduction electrocatalysts based on cobalt phthalocyanine/carbon nanotube hybrid structures. Nat. Commun. 8, 14675 (2017).
23. Ren, S. et al. Molecular electrocatalysts can mediate fast, selective CO2 reduction in a flow cell. Science 365, 367–369 (2019).10.1126/science.aax4608 ↗
24. Zhu, M., Ye, R., Jin, K., Lazouski, N. & Manthiram, K. Elucidating the reactivity and mechanism of CO2 electroreduction at highly dispersed cobalt phthalocyanine. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 1381–1386 (2018).10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00519 ↗
25. Jiang, Z. et al. Revealing the hidden performance of metal phthalocyanines for CO2 reduction electrocatalysis by hybridization with carbon nanotubes. Nano Res. 12, 2330–2334 (2019).10.1007/s12274-019-2455-z ↗
26. Hu, X.-M., Rønne, M. H., Pedersen, S. U., Skrydstrup, T. & Daasbjerg, K. Enhanced catalytic activity of cobalt porphyrin in CO2 electroreduction upon immobilization on carbon materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 6468–6472 (2017).10.1002/anie.201701104 ↗
27. Zhu, M. et al. Covalently grafting cobalt porphyrin onto carbon nanotubes for efficient CO2 electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 6595–6599 (2019).10.1002/anie.201900499 ↗
28. Choi, J. et al. Steric modification of a cobalt phthalocyanine/graphene catalyst to give enhanced and stable electrochemical CO2 reduction to CO. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 666–672 (2019).10.1021/acsenergylett.8b02355 ↗
29. Maurin, A. & Robert, M. Noncovalent immobilization of a molecular iron-based electrocatalyst on carbon electrodes for selective, efficient CO2-to-CO conversion in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 2492–2495 (2016).10.1021/jacs.5b12652 ↗
30. Wu, Y., Jiang, Z., Lu, X., Liang, Y. & Wang, H. Domino electroreduction of CO2 to methanol on a molecular catalyst. Nature 575, 639–642 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1760-8 ↗
31. Li, X. et al. Exclusive Ni–N4 sites realize near-unity CO selectivity for electrochemical CO2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 14889–14892 (2017).10.1021/jacs.7b09074 ↗
32. Yang, H. B. et al. Atomically dispersed Ni(i) as the active site for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Energy 3, 140–147 (2018).10.1038/s41560-017-0078-8 ↗
33. Yan, C. et al. Coordinatively unsaturated nickel–nitrogen sites towards selective and high-rate CO2 electroreduction. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1204–1210 (2018).10.1039/C8EE00133B ↗
34. Jiang, K. et al. Isolated Ni single atoms in graphene nanosheets for high-performance CO2 reduction. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 893–903 (2018).10.1039/C7EE03245E ↗
35. Sorokin, A. B. Phthalocyanine metal complexes in catalysis. Chem. Rev. 113, 8152–8191 (2013).10.1021/cr4000072 ↗
36. Zhang, Z. et al. Reaction mechanisms of well-defined metal–N4 sites in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 16339–16342 (2018).10.1002/anie.201808593 ↗
37. Clark, E. L. et al. Standards and protocols for data acquisition and reporting for studies of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. ACS Catal. 8, 6560–6570 (2018).10.1021/acscatal.8b01340 ↗
38. Weekes, D. M., Salvatore, D. A., Reyes, A., Huang, A. & Berlinguette, C. P. Electrolytic CO2 reduction in a flow cell. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 910–918 (2018).10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00010 ↗
39. Higgins, D., Hahn, C., Xiang, C., Jaramillo, T. F. & Weber, A. Z. Gas-diffusion electrodes for carbon dioxide reduction: a new paradigm. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 317–324 (2019).10.1021/acsenergylett.8b02035 ↗
40. Yin, Z. et al. An alkaline polymer electrolyte CO2 electrolyzer operated with pure water. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2455–2462 (2019).10.1039/C9EE01204D ↗
41. Möller, T. et al. Efficient CO2 to CO electrolysis on solid Ni–N–C catalysts at industrial current densities. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 640–647 (2019).10.1039/C8EE02662A ↗
42. Kutz, R. B. et al. Sustainion imidazolium-functionalized polymers for carbon dioxide electrolysis. Energy Technol. 5, 929–936 (2017).10.1002/ente.201600636 ↗
43. Wang, M. et al. CO2 electrochemical catalytic reduction with a highly active cobalt phthalocyanine. Nat. Commun. 10, 3602 (2019).
44. Wu, Y. et al. Electroreduction of CO2 catalyzed by a heterogenized Zn–porphyrin complex with a redox-innocent metal center. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 847–852 (2017).10.1021/acscentsci.7b00160 ↗
45. Weng, Z. et al. Active sites of copper-complex catalytic materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 9, 415 (2018).
46. Rollmann, L. D. & Iwamoto, R. T. Electrochemistry, electron paramagnetic resonance, and visible spectra of cobalt, nickel, copper, and metal-free phthalocyanines in dimethyl sulfoxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90, 1455–1463 (1968).10.1021/ja01008a013 ↗
47. Chen, L. X. et al. Capturing a photoexcited molecular structure through time-domain X-ray absorption fine structure. Science 292, 262–264 (2001).10.1126/science.1057063 ↗
48. Yamamoto, T. Assignment of pre-edge peaks in K-edge X-ray absorption spectra of 3d transition metal compounds: electric dipole or quadrupole? X-ray Spectrom. 37, 572–584 (2008).10.1002/xrs.1103 ↗
49. Froehlich, J. D. & Kubiak, C. P. The homogeneous reduction of CO2 by [Ni(cyclam)]+: increased catalytic rates with the addition of a CO scavenger. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3565–3573 (2015).10.1021/ja512575v ↗
50. Costentin, C. & Savéant, J.-M. Towards an intelligent design of molecular electrocatalysts. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 0087 (2017).10.1038/s41570-017-0087 ↗
51. Kim, S.-J., Matsumoto, M. & Shigehara, K. Synthesis and electrical properties of poly(μ-1,4-diisocyanobenzene) octacyanophthalocyaninatoiron(ii). Synth. Met. 107, 27–33 (1999).10.1016/S0379-6779(99)00127-7 ↗
52. Yslas, E. I., Rivarola, V. & Durantini, E. N. Synthesis and photodynamic activity of zinc(ii) phthalocyanine derivatives bearing methoxy and trifluoromethylbenzyloxy substituents in homogeneous and biological media. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13, 39–46 (2005).10.1016/j.bmc.2004.10.003 ↗
53. Kim, S.-J., Matsumoto, M. & Shigehara, K. Synthesis and electrical properties of one-dimensional octacyanometallophthalocyanine (M≡Fe, Co) polymers. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 04, 136–144 (2000).10.1002/(SICI)1099-1409(200001/02)4:1<136::AID-JPP213>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
54. Ma, M. et al. Insights into the carbon balance for CO2 electroreduction on Cu using gas diffusion electrode reactor designs. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 977–985 (2020).10.1039/D0EE00047G ↗
55. Wang, M., Árnadóttir, L., Xu, Z. J. & Feng, Z. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies of nanoscale electrocatalysts. Nano-Micro Lett. 11, 47 (2019).
56. Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537–541 (2005).10.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
57. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09 (Gaussian, 2009).
58. Adamo, C. & Barone, V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: the PBE0 model. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158–6170 (1999).10.1063/1.478522 ↗
59. Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S. & Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456–1465 (2011).10.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
60. Steinmetz, M. & Grimme, S. Benchmark study of the performance of density functional theory for bond activations with (Ni,Pd)-based transition-metal catalysts. ChemistryOpen 2, 115–124 (2013).10.1002/open.201300012 ↗
61. Andrae, D., Häußermann, U., Dolg, M., Stoll, H. & Preuß, H. Energy-adjusted ab initio pseudopotentials for the second and third row transition elements. Theor. Chim. Acta 77, 123–141 (1990).10.1007/BF01114537 ↗
62. Hariharan, P. C. & Pople, J. A. The influence of polarization functions on molecular orbital hydrogenation energies. Theor. Chim. Acta 28, 213–222 (1973).10.1007/BF00533485 ↗
63. Gordon, M. S. The isomers of silacyclopropane. Chem. Phys. Lett. 76, 163–168 (1980).10.1016/0009-2614(80)80628-2 ↗
64. Binning, R. & Curtiss, L. Compact contracted basis sets for third-row atoms: Ga–Kr. J. Comput. Chem. 11, 1206–1216 (1990).10.1002/jcc.540111013 ↗
65. Hirshfeld, F. L. Bonded-atom fragments for describing molecular charge densities. Theor. Chim. Acta 44, 129–138 (1977).10.1007/BF00549096 ↗
66. Lu, T. & Chen, F. Calculation of molecular orbital composition. Acta Chim. Sinica 69, 2393–2406 (2011).
67. Mayer, I. Charge, bond order and valence in the AB initio SCF theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 97, 270–274 (1983).10.1016/0009-2614(83)80005-0 ↗
68. Lu, T. & Chen, F. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580–592 (2012).10.1002/jcc.22885 ↗
69. Buck, D. & Collins, A. Persistence of Vision Raytracer 3.6 (Persistence of Vision, 2004).
70. Chan, K. & Nørskov, J. K. Electrochemical barriers made simple. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2663–2668 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01043 ↗
71. Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J. & Nørskov, J. K. How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1311–1315 (2010).10.1039/c0ee00071j ↗