The SERENADE project – A step forward in the Safe by Design process of nanomaterials: Moving towards a product-oriented approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Recent research efforts have gone into formalizing and standardizing the Safe by Design process of nanomaterials. This usually results in a structured and (most often) sequential approach deliberately putting the focus on hazard and exposure issues regarding the nanomaterial itself in a bottom-up progression of material development. However, this general strategy lacks flexibility. Within the project SERENADE, a case study examining photocatalytic paint failed to validate the generally accepted Safe by Design scheme. This example examined the product (paint in this case) rather than the nanomaterials it contains. It was found that the essential parameters, namely product specification and functionality, failed to fit into a rigid bottom-up approach and indicated the need for alternative Safe by Design strategies.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Chemistry and Chemical Engineering · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Nanosafety-Cluster. https://www.nanosafetycluster.eu/ (Accessed April 2021).
2. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?10.1038/nrd1470 ↗
3. Testing paradigm for prediction of development-limiting barriers and human drug toxicity10.1016/j.cbi.2004.06.009 ↗
4. What can nanosafety learn from drug development? The feasibility of “safety by design”10.1080/17435390.2017.1299891 ↗
5. Managing technology development projects
6. Perspective: the Stage-Gate (R) idea-to-launch process-update, what’s new, and NexGen systems10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00296.x ↗
7. What’s next? After Stage-Gate
8. Implementation of Safe-by-Design for nanomaterial development and safe innovation: why we need a comprehensive approach10.3390/nano8040239 ↗
9. Safe innovation approach: towards an agile system for dealing with innovations
10. Evaluating environmental risk assessment models for nanomaterials according to requirements along the product innovation Stage-Gate process10.1039/C8EN00933C ↗
11. Risk analysis and technology assessment in support of technology development: Putting responsible innovation in practice in a case study for nanotechnology10.1002/ieam.1989 ↗
12. A. Sanchez, R. Puelles, M. Pérez, I. Rodriguez, M. Apostolova, B. Shivachev, Y. Youdar, H. Goede, N. Shandilya, R. Meier, C. Merino, E. Garcia, I. Tavernaro, A. Kraegeloh, Nanoreg2 Deliverable D4.6: Guidance on the practical implementation of SbD in the nano-technology community, 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5c3043cca&appId=PPGMS (Accessed May 2020).
13. The SERENADE project; a step forward in the Safe by Design process of nanomaterials: The benefits of a diverse and interdisciplinary approach10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101065 ↗
14. Commercial titanium dioxide nanoparticles in both natural and synthetic water: comprehensive multidimensional testing and prediction of aggregation behavior10.1021/es2023225 ↗
15. Nanomaterials in the environment: from materials to high-throughput screening to organisms10.1021/nn1034857 ↗
16. Assessment of the physico-chemical behavior of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in aquatic environments using multi-dimensional parameter testing10.1016/j.envpol.2010.05.007 ↗
17. SERENADE: safer and ecodesign research and education applied to nanomaterial development, the new generation of materials safer by design10.1039/C6EN00282J ↗
18. The impact of photocatalytic paint porosity on indoor NOx and HONO levels10.1039/C9CP05477D ↗
19. Application of a mineral binder to reduce VOC emissions from indoor photocatalytic paints10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.031 ↗
20. Characterization of photocatalytic paints: a relationship between the photocatalytic properties - release of nanoparticles and volatile organic compounds10.1039/C7EN00467B ↗
21. Nanoreg Deliverable D3.01, Gap analysis report, identifying the critical exposure scenarios within the key value chains, 2015. https://www.rivm.nl/en/documenten/nanoreg-d301-dr-gap-analysis-report-identifying-critical-exposure-scenarios-within-key (Accessed June 2021).
22. Release of silver nanoparticles from outdoor facades10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.009 ↗
23. Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment10.1016/j.envpol.2008.08.004 ↗
24. Unexpectedly high levels of organic compounds released by indoor photocatalytic paints10.1021/acs.est.8b03865 ↗
25. Non-linear release dynamics for a CeO2 nanomaterial embedded in a protective wood stain, due to matrix photo-degradation10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.045 ↗
26. Nanoreg Deliverable D3.03, Methods for the use of simulation approaches, 2015. https://www.rivm.nl/en/documenten/nanoreg-d3-03-dr-methods-for-use-of-simulation-approaches (Accessed June 2021).
27. Contribution of mesocosm testing to a single-step and exposure-driven environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials10.1016/j.impact.2018.12.005 ↗
28. An adaptable mesocosm platform for performing integrated assessments of nanomaterial risk in complex environmental systems10.1038/srep05608 ↗
29. Monitoring the environmental aging of nanomaterials: an opportunity for mesocosm testing?10.3390/ma12152447 ↗
30. Grouping and read-across approaches for risk assessment of nanomaterials10.3390/ijerph121013415 ↗
31. Risk assessment frameworks for nanomaterials: scope, link to regulations, applicability, and outline for future directions in view of needed increase in efficiency10.1016/j.impact.2017.09.001 ↗